Fmc Edison
A dialysis facility in Edison, New Jersey 08820
2 Olsen Ave, Edison, New Jersey 08820. (732) 549-3286.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- Not rated patient survey rating
- 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 19 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2025: a standard inspection.
5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Feb 11, 2025: standard inspection5 deficiencies
-
Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols
The inspectors’ words, 273 words
“IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51227 Based on one of one observation, staff interview, and a review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all surfaces of the plastic hemostat clamps are disinfected after use according to facility policy. Findings include: On 2/10/24 at 9:40 AM, during a tour of the Treatment Floor, a clear container that had a 1:100 bleach solution (one part bleach to 100 parts water) in it was observed on a countertop located across from Station 8. The container had six plastic hemostat clamps soaking in the bleach solution. Five of the six clamps were in the closed position. The soaking of the clamps in the closed position could potentially prevent the bleach solution from contacting and disinfecting all surfaces of the hemostat clamps. During an interview at 9:45 AM, Staff (S) 12, the Charge Nurse, stated that dirty clamps should be in an open position while soaking in the bleach. Facility policy titled, “Cleaning and Disinfecting the Dialysis Station,” published 9/5/23, stated, “... Cleaning Clamps Place used plastic pressure clamps and plastic hemostat clamps in a labeled opaque plastic container filled with a 1:100 bleach solution per the Mixing Bleach policy. Make sure the items are completely submerged, unclamped, and in open position when placed in the solution ...” N.J.A.C. 8:43A-24.8(b)”
-
Pe - Hemodialysis Patients In View During Treatments
The inspectors’ words, 272 words
“PE-HD PTS IN VIEW DURING TREATMENTS CFR(s): 494.60(c)(4) Patients must be in view of staff during hemodialysis treatment to ensure patient safety, (video surveillance will not meet this requirement). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51990 Based on one of one observation of patient monitoring during hemodialysis, staff interview and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure all patient’s remain in view of staff to ensure patient safety. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 9:57 AM, in Station 10, during an observation of Patient (P) 8’s hemodialysis through a right chest Central Venous Catheter (CVC, a type of access used for hemodialysis), the following was revealed: P8 had a blanket over top of them which covered from his/her neck down to his/her feet. The blanket did not allow for the CVC access to be visible to staff. At 10:28 AM, P8’s access continued to remain covered with the blanket. At 10:35 AM, Staff (S) 16, a Registered Nurse, entered Station 10, typed on the dialysis machine’s keyboard, did not uncover the access, then exited the station. P8’s access was not visible to staff from 9:57 AM to 10:35 AM, a length of 38 minutes. During an interview at 10:35 AM, S16 stated that a patient’s access should be checked and uncovered while on hemodialysis. S16 subsequently uncovered P8’s access to be visible by the staff. Facility policy titled, “Patient Assessments and Monitoring,” published 5/1/2023, stated, “... During Treatment ... Follow the steps below for monitoring patient and machine parameters during treatment: ... 6. Access .... Ensure access remains uncovered throughout the treatment ...” N.J.A.C. 8:43A-24.4(a)”
-
Privacy & Confidentiality In Treatment
The inspectors’ words, 238 words
“PR-PRIVACY & CONFIDENTIALITY-TREATMENT CFR(s): 494.70(a)(3) The patient has the right to- (3) Privacy and confidentiality in all aspects of treatment; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51990 Based on one of one observation of the termination of hemodialysis through a Central Venous Catheter (CVC, a type of access used for hemodialysis), staff interview and a review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure patient’s rights to privacy. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 10:00 AM in Station 10, Staff (S) 12, the Charge Nurse, terminated hemodialysis on Patient (P) 9 through a right chest CVC. During the procedure, the curtains were fully drawn on both sides of Station 10 ensuring privacy to the left and the right side of P9. The curtains were not fully closed in front of the station leaving an approximate two feet opening. The patient’s chest was visible from the nurse’s station and to the patient in Station 2, which was located across from Station 10. During an interview at 10:35 AM, S12 confirmed that the curtains should be fully closed around the patient’s station when discontinuing hemodialysis. Facility policy titled, “Patient Rights and Responsibilities,” published 4/4/2012, stated, “... Policy: Privacy Rights ... Patients have the right to privacy during activities that may require the exposure of private body parts while in the dialysis facility. Privacy screens or curtains may be used to provide privacy ...” N.J.A.C. 8:43A-16.2(a)10”
-
Manage Volume Status
The inspectors’ words, 440 words
“POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50912 Based on one of five medical records reviewed (Patient (P) 2), staff interview, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that post hemodialysis nursing assessments are completed according to facility policy. Findings include: A review of P2’s plan of care, dated 11/13/24, stated, “Area of Focus BP [blood pressure] and Fluid Management Open Goal Achieve BP Control as specified by the patient’s physician ... Intervention (s): ... Educate patient/family/caregiver on fluid control In Progress ... Continue to monitor patient ... In Progress ... Monitor fluid gains ... In Progress ...” A review of the “Treatment Sheets For Facility” from 1/13/25 through 2/10/25 in P2’s medical record revealed the following: On 1/13/25 at 3:08 PM, the pre-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” indicated bilateral ankle edema, plus one: two mm (millimeters) or less, disappears rapidly. The post-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” at 6:40 PM lacked documented evidence of a re-assessment of the bilateral ankle edema. On 1/17/25 at 3:25 PM, the pre-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” indicated bilateral ankle edema, one plus: two mm or less, disappears rapidly. The post-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” at 7:19 PM lacked documented evidence of a re-assessment of the bilateral ankle edema. On 1/24/25 at 3:14 PM, the pre-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” indicated bilateral ankle edema, one plus: two mm or less, disappears rapidly. The post-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” at 6:49 PM lacked documented evidence of a re-assessment of the bilateral ankle edema. On 2/10/25 at 3:23 PM, the pre-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” indicated bilateral ankle edema, one plus: two mm or less disappears rapidly. The post-treatment “Nursing Evaluation” at 7:05 PM lacked documented evidence of a re-assessment of the bilateral ankle edema. During an interview on 2/11/25 at 12:42 PM, Staff (S) 1, the Clinical Manager, reviewed the above findings and confirmed that the post hemodialysis re-assessment of edema was not documented on the above-mentioned hemodialysis flowsheets. S1 stated that staff nurses should reassess and document post-treatment edema if abnormal findings were found pre-treatment. Facility policy and procedure titled, “Patient Assessment and Monitoring,” published 05/01/23, stated, “... Purpose ... provide guidance to (facility name) direct patient care staff on assessment and monitoring patients before, during and after treatment ... Edema (As indicated by patient condition): Assess the patient for edema ... Location ... Severity ... Post Treatment ... Follow the steps below for obtaining post-treatment assessment data ... Edema ...” N.J.A.C. 8:43A-24.4(a)”
-
Fac Receive/Review Self Monitoring Data Every 2 Months
The inspectors’ words, 513 words
“H-FAC RECEIVE/REVIEW PT RECORDS Q 2 MONTHS CFR(s): 494.100(b)(2),(3) The dialysis facility must - (2) Retrieve and review complete self-monitoring data and other information from self-care patients or their designated caregiver(s) at least every 2 months; and (3) Maintain this information in the patient ’ s medical record. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51990 Based on one of five medical records reviewed (Patient (P) 4), staff interviews, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the Registered Nurse (RN) failed to ensure that a comprehensive review of all Home Therapy patients flowsheets are performed monthly. Findings include: On 2/11/25, a review of P4’s medical record revealed the following: The “CCPD [continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis] Daily Flowsheets,” a paper PD (peritoneal dialysis) flowsheet completed by the patient or the care partner, and the “PatientHub Flowsheets,” an electronic transmitted treatment report from the PD Cycler (a machine used to perform PD treatments) also completed by the patient or care partner, from 11/20/24 to 1/1/25, indicated that there were 19 PD treatments that lacked documentation of either the patient’s weight, blood pressure, pulse, temperature, and the dextrose solutions used. A review of the “ESRD [end-stage renal disease] Comprehensive RN Assessment” dated 1/9/25, did not contain documentation by a RN that addressed the missing treatment information in the patient’s flowsheets. A review of the “Plan of Care” dated 1/9/25, stated, “... Area of Focus Dialysis Access (PD) ... Intervention(s) ... Educate on using Patient Portal to check access concerns Completed ... Patient unable to use patient hub for treatment data. Alternatively, patient enters data using CCPD flowsheet into cycler. Patient and wife educated on signs and symptoms of exit site/ tunnel infection and prompt reporting of symptoms ... Area of Focus Dialysis Adequacy (PD) Issues Open ... Intervention(s) ... Educate patient on using Patient Portal for evaluation of treatment data In Progress ...” The RN progress notes in January 2025 and February 2025 were reviewed and lacked documented evidence that the missing treatment data was discussed with the patient and the care giver at P4’s monthly clinic visits. On 2/11/25 at 11:40 AM, the CCPD Daily Flowsheets and the PatientHub Flowsheets from 11/20/24 to 1/1/25 were reviewed with Staff (S) 5, the Home Therapy Program Manager. S5 explained that P4 completes both the CCPD Daily Flowsheets and also enters treatment details into the PD cycler PatientHub Flowsheet which is then printed by the Home Therapies staff. S5 confirmed the missing treatment documentation on the flowsheets. S5 stated that the flowsheets are reviewed at clinic visits by the RN and Home Therapies staff should review them routinely. Facility policy titled, “Review and Documentation of Home Therapies Patient Health Data,” published 5/11/2023, stated, “ ... Review and Documentation of Health Data ... At a minimum, the home therapies nurse will perform a comprehensive monthly review of all treatment data regardless of the method of data submission. Data review will be discussed with the patient and /or care partner during the patient’s regular clinic visit and concerns will be addressed and documented accordingly ...” N.J.A.C. 8:43A-24.20(a)”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 2025 | Standard inspection | 5 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 29, 2011.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
- Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 19 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- CMS gives no CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | Not rated |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 20 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Middlesex County, 19 have a star rating from CMS: 10 rated 5 of 5, 5 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.