Hearth Record

Davita Old Bridge Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Old Bridge, New Jersey 08857

Davita Kidney Care, 262 Texas Rd, Old Bridge, New Jersey 08857. (732) 591-4931.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 13, 2024: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 13, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Plan Of Care - Goals - Community-Based Standards

    The inspectors’ words, 576 words

    “POC-GOALS=COMMUNITY-BASED STANDARDS CFR(s): 494.90 The interdisciplinary team as defined at §494.80 must develop and implement a written, individualized comprehensive plan of care that specifies the services necessary to address the patient’s needs, as identified by the comprehensive assessment and changes in the patient’s condition, and must include measurable and expected outcomes and estimated timetables to achieve these outcomes. The outcomes specified in the patient plan of care must be consistent with current evidence-based professionally-accepted clinical practice standards. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37656 Based on medical record review (Patient 4), staff interview, and a review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that physician orders for a heart rate (HR) below 50 beats per minute (bpm) were implemented for two of five treatment flow sheets reviewed. Findings include: A review of Patient (P) 4’s medical record revealed the following: TREATMENT PARAMETER ORDERS, “... HEART RATE ... Pre-Tx [Pre-Treatment] may start with - Heart rate above 50 BPM ... Post-Tx [Post Treatment] may leave with - HR above 50 BPM ... Notify provider if intradialytic heart rate is below 50 BPM. ...” Order date 2/27/24. The Treatment Details Report, dated 2/29/24 revealed the following: 6:56 AM HR 64, treatment initiated 9:03 AM HR 48 9:04 AM HR 41 9:05 AM HR 50 recorded by a PCT (Patient Care Technician) 9:07 AM HR 79 (manual reading documented by the Registered Nurse (RN)) 9:33 AM HR 43 and was checked manually by the RN as 42. RN notes stated, “pt [patient] asymptomatic; alert reports feeling well ...” 10:03 AM HR 43 10:29 AM HR 48, RN note stated, “Treatment terminated.” The Treatment Details Report lacked documented evidence that the physician was notified of the five times the intradialytic HR readings were below 50 bpm, as specified in the above orders. The Treatment Details Report dated 3/2/24 revealed the following documented by the PCT: 6:53 AM HR 64, treatment initiated 8:02 AM HR 49 8:32 AM HR 49 9:02 AM HR 46 9:32 AM HR 49 10:24 AM HR 49 The flow sheet lacked documented evidence that the RN assessed P4 when the HR dropped below 50 bpm. The flow sheet lacked documented evidence that the RN and the physician were notified of the five times the intradialytic HR was below 50 bpm, as specified in the above orders. The above findings were reviewed with Staff (S) 3, a Registered Nurse on 3/13/24 at 1:26 PM. S3 stated that the physician should have been informed of the intradialytic HR below 50 bpm, as per the physician’s treatment parameter orders. At 1:28 PM, S3 confirmed that there was no communication made to the doctor or documentation that the physician was aware of the patient’s low heart rate less than 50 bpm on 2/29/24 and 3/02/24. A review of the facility policy titled, “Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment,” revised October 2023, stated, “... INTRADIALYTIC DATA COLLECTION/ASSESSMENT 11. Abnormal findings or findings outside of any patient specific ordered parameters will be reported to the licensed nurse immediately ... . The licensed nurse will use his/her clinical judgement based on individual patient needs to determine if any clinical interventions are necessary. ... ABNORMAL FINDINGS ... Within each category, definitions may be adjusted by a specific physician order. ... Heart or Pulse Rate Pre/Intra/Post : ... Less than 60 beats per minute or greater than 100 beats per minute and/or an irregular heartbeat. ...””

    Rule V0541. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 13, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 16, 1997.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • 13 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 5 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 55 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Middlesex County, 19 have a star rating from CMS: 10 rated 5 of 5, 5 rated 4 of 5, 3 rated 3 of 5, 1 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 5 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.