Davita Commerce Township Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Commerce Township, Michigan 48382
120 W Commerce Rd, Commerce Township, Michigan 48382. (248) 363-4862.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 12 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on May 10, 2024: a standard inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
May 10, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
-
Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene
The inspectors’ words, 327 words
“IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 15195 Based on observation, interview, and record review, staff failed to perform hand hygiene after removing gloves in 1 (station #7) of 2 instances of performing catheter care and 2 (station #4, #5) of 2 instances of administering intravenous medications, resulting in the potential for cross contamination and infection for the eight patients receiving catheter care and the 55 patients receiving intravenous medications. Findings include: On 5/8/24 at 1050, Staff D was observed performing central venous catheter (CVC) care at station #7. Staff D wore double gloves (clear and blue) and after removing blue top gloves, she did not remove bottom clear gloves or perform hand hygiene during CVC care. Interview with Staff D on 5/8/24 at approximately 1100, revealed that she had an allergy to the blue gloves and did not know she was to remove both gloves and perform hand hygiene. On 5/8/24 at approximately 1105, interview with the Clinical Coordinator B, revealed that both gloves should be removed and hand hygiene should be performed to prevent cross contamination. On 5/9/24 at 1130, Staff J was observed giving Venofer 100 milligrams (mg) to the patient at station #4 without performing hand hygiene after completion of administration. Also on 5/9/24 at 1135, Staff J was observed giving Venofer 100 mg to the patient at station #5 without performing hand hygiene after completion of medication administration. Interview with Staff J, on 5/9/24 at approximately 1145, revealed that she was unaware that she had not performed hand hygiene after completion of medication administration. Review of the facility policy titled “Infection Control For Dialysis Facilities, #1-05-01, revised April 2023” documented, “All teammates, Physicians and Non-Physician (NPP) will perform hand...”prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves...””
-
Ic - Clean/Dirty Areas, Med Prep Area, No Common Med Carts
The inspectors’ words, 322 words
“IC-CLEAN/DIRTY;MED PREP AREA;NO COMMON CARTS CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Clean areas should be clearly designated for the preparation, handling and storage of medications and unused supplies and equipment. Clean areas should be clearly separated from contaminated areas where used supplies and equipment are handled. Do not handle and store medications or clean supplies in the same or an adjacent area to that where used equipment or blood samples are handled. When multiple dose medication vials are used (including vials containing diluents), prepare individual patient doses in a clean (centralized) area away from dialysis stations and deliver separately to each patient. Do not carry multiple dose medication vials from station to station. Do not use common medication carts to deliver medications to patients. If trays are used to deliver medications to individual patients, they must be cleaned between patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 15195 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a clean area remained clean and dirty areas remained separate from the clean area, resulting in the potential for cross contamination and infections for all 55 patients served. Findings include: On 5/9/24 at 0915, Staff P was observed taking a machine fluid sample to the nurse station counter for pH (acid/base) testing without wiping the pH bottle or counter after use. A small spill was observed on the nurse counter next to clean intravenous fluids and clean dialyzers. On 5/9/24 at approximately 0910, interview with Staff P verified that she did not wipe the pH container or counter after spill. On 5/10/24 at approximately 1030, interview with the Facility Administrator and Manager Clinical Services R, revealed that there should be a separation of the pH testing area and the clean supplies. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control For Dialysis Facilities, #1-05-01, revised April 2023” documented, “16. ... Clean areas should be clearly separated from contaminated areas where used supplies and equipment are handled.””
-
Ic - Hbv - Vaccinate Patients & Staff
The inspectors’ words, 203 words
“IC-HBV-VACCINATE PTS/STAFF CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Hepatitis B Vaccination Vaccinate all susceptible patients and staff members against hepatitis B. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 15195 Based on document review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that 2 (J, Q) of 5 staff members reviewed had hepatitis B immunization or vaccination, resulting in the potential for spread of infection. Findings include: On 5/10/24 at approximately 0830, review of personnel files for Registered Nurse J and Biomed Staff Q revealed that there was no documentation of hepatitis B status or vaccination. Staff member J was hired on 6/6/22 and Staff Q was hired on 1/24/22. This was verified by the Facility Administrator on 5/10/24 at 0930. Review of the facility policy titled “Teammate Hepatitis B Monitoring and Follow Up Guidance, #4-06-03, revised April 2024” documented, “New teammates who are not able to provide documentation of hepatitis B surface antibodies of 10 mlU/ml or greater from any time in the past, regardless of documentation indicating completion of the hepatitis B vaccine series, will be screened for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) within 10 days and offered the vaccination as indicated by their results...” This had not been done.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 386 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 15195 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the medical director failed to ensure that staff followed policies/procedures in 1 (#1) of 5 patients reviewed for blood pressures and medication manufacturer’s direction for use in 2 (station 4, 5) of 2 patients given Venofer intravenous medication, resulting in the potential for unsatisfactory patient outcomes. Findings include: On 5/8/24 at approximately 1500, record review of patient #1’s six flow sheets (dated 4/26/24 - 5/7/24) revealed that on 5/2/24 the patient had elevated diastolic blood pressures of 161/133 at 1449 and 155/121 at 1450 . There was no documentation that the registered nurse or physician were notified. On 5/8/24 at approximately 1530, interview with Manager Clinical Services and the Facility Administrator revealed that this should have been reported and there was no documentation of staff reporting it to nurse or physician. On 5/9/24 at approximately 1030, interview with the Medical Director revealed that this was his patient and no one had notified him of the elevated blood pressure and there were no PRN (if needed) blood pressure medications ordered. Review of the facility policy titled “Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment, #1-03-08, revised April 2024” documented, “Members of the patient care team should report ANY changes in patient conditions or concerns of patient well-being immediately to the licensed nurse at any time... Blood Pressure...Diastolic greater than or equal to 100 mm/Hg or less than 50 mm/Hg...” On 5/9/24 at 1130, Registered Nurse J was observed giving Venofer 100 mg (milligrams) IV push (intravenous) to the patient in station #4 in one minutes time. Also on 5/9/24 at 1130 Registered Nurse gave the patient in station #5 Venofer 100 mg in one minute’s time. Review of the Manufacturer’s Direction for Use dated 9/2020 documented to give “Venofer IV push 100 mg over 2 to 5 minutes.” Interview with Nurse J on 5/9/25 at approximately 1145 revealed that she had forgotten that Venofer needed to given over two to five minutes time.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2024 | Standard inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 21, 2007.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: DaVita.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis.
- Doesn’t offer peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 12 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, better than expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (33 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 65% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 32 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Oakland County, 30 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 4 of 5, 13 rated 3 of 5, 9 rated 2 of 5, 3 rated 1 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.