Hearth Record

Fresenius Kidney Care Southport

A dialysis facility in Indianapolis, Indiana 46227

6826 Madison Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46227. (317) 791-8362.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jul 10, 2025: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 20, 2023: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Procedures For Tracking Of Staff And Patients

    The inspectors’ words, 653 words

    “Procedures for Tracking of Staff and Patients CFR(s): §403.748(b)(2), §416.54(b)(1), §418.113(b)(6)(ii) and (v), §441.184(b)(2), §460.84(b)(2), §482.15(b)(2), §483.73(b)(2), §483.475(b)(2), §485.542(b)(2), §485.625(b)(2), §485.920(b)(1), §486.360(b)(1), §494.62(b)(1). [(b) Policies and procedures. The [facilities] must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years [annually for LTC facilities]. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] [(2) or (1)] A system to track the location of on-duty staff and sheltered patients in the [facility’s] care during an emergency. If on-duty staff and sheltered patients are relocated during the emergency, the [facility] must document the specific name and location of the receiving facility or other location. *[For PRTFs at §441.184(b), LTC at §483.73(b), ICF/IIDs at §483.475(b), PACE at §460.84(b):] Policies and procedures. (2) A system to track the location of on-duty staff and sheltered residents in the [PRTF’s, LTC, ICF/IID or PACE] care during and after an emergency. If on-duty staff and sheltered residents are relocated during the emergency, the [PRTF’s, LTC, ICF/IID or PACE] must document the specific name and location of the receiving facility or other location. *[For Inpatient Hospice at §418.113(b)(6):] Policies and procedures. (ii) Safe evacuation from the hospice, which includes consideration of care and treatment needs of evacuees; staff responsibilities; transportation; identification of evacuation location(s) and primary and alternate means of communication with external sources of assistance. (v) A system to track the location of hospice employees’ on-duty and sheltered patients in the hospice’s care during an emergency. If the on-duty employees or sheltered patients are relocated during the emergency, the hospice must document the specific name and location of the receiving facility or other location. *[For CMHCs at §485.920(b):] Policies and procedures. (2) Safe evacuation from the CMHC, which includes consideration of care and treatment needs of evacuees; staff responsibilities; transportation; identification of evacuation location(s); and primary and alternate means of communication with external sources of assistance. *[For OPOs at § 486.360(b):] Policies and procedures. (2) A system of medical documentation that preserves potential and actual donor information, protects confidentiality of potential and actual donor information, and secures and maintains the availability of records. *[For ESRD at § 494.62(b):] Policies and procedures. (2) Safe evacuation from the dialysis facility, which includes staff responsibilities, and needs of the patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44232 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure patient and staff information was current in the Emergency Preparedness tote for 1 of 1 stand alone in-center dialysis facilities. Findings Include: 1. A review of a dated 07-03-2023, Fresenius Kidney Care policy titled, “Guidelines for Emergency Preparedness,” indicated but was not limited to “ ... Create and maintain staff, patient, and facility emergency information contact list ... “ 2. On 12-18-2023 at 9:45 AM, during a flash tour, the Emergency Evacuation box was reviewed. The Emergency Evacuation box failed to contain an updated list of the patient’s and staff’s emergency contact information. During an interview on 12-18-2023 at 9:45 AM, the Interim Clinical Manager, Admin 3, indicated the documents had fallen off the box and handed me the documents dated 09-23-2023. Admin 3 further confirmed the Emergency Evacuation box is audited monthly. 3. During an interview on 12-18-2023 at 9:55 AM, the Director of Operations, Admin 1, confirmed the Emergency Evacuation box should have contained the updated list of the patient’s and staff’s emergency contact information. 4. On 12-19-2023 at 11:11 AM, facility documents dated 05-14-203 to 12-19-2023, titled, “Fresenius Kidney Care Clinical Log Readings Report” was provided by Admin 1. The documents indicated a review of the contents of the Emergency Evacuation box contents. The log was completed on 12-19-2023, and signed by Admin 3.”

    Rule E0018. Standard-level.

  • Dialysis Emergency Equipment

    The inspectors’ words, 369 words

    “Dialysis Emergency Equipment CFR(s): §494.62(b)(9) Condition for Coverage: [(b) Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (9) A process by which the staff can confirm that emergency equipment, including, but not limited to, oxygen, airways, suction, defibrillator or automated external defibrillator, artificial resuscitator, and emergency drugs, are on the premises at all times and immediately available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44232 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Emergency Cart medications were checked for expiration dates for 1 of 2 Emergency Carts observed. Findings include: 1. A review of a dated 05-01-2023, Fresenius Kidney Care policy titled, “Emergency Medications, Equipment, and Supplies” indicated but was not limited to, “ ... The medications ... must be checked monthly or after use for contents, and expiration dates ... An itemized log must be kept indicating the contents and expiration dates of contents. Items approaching expiration must be reordered and replaced prior to the actual expiration date ....” 2. During the flash tour observation on 12-18-2023 at 9:35 AM, 19 vials of Adrenaline (a medication used for emergency treatment of severe allergic reactions) 1milligram (mg)/milliliter (ml), and 2 vials of Calcium Chloride ( a medication used for treatment of low calcium levels) 1 gram/10 ml were found in the Emergency Cart by the nurse’s station of the in-center treatment floor. During an interview on 12-18-2023 at 9:45 AM, The Interim Clinical Manager, Admin 3, confirmed the medications had expired. Admin 3 further indicated the Emergency Cart is audited monthly. 3. On 12-19-2023 at 11:11 AM, facility documents dated 05-14-203 to 12-19-2023, titled, “Fresenius Kidney Care Clinical Log Readings Report” was provided by Admin 1. The documents indicated a review of the contents of the Emergency Cart contents. The log was completed on 12-19-2023 and signed by Admin 3.”

    Rule E0028. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Safe, Functional, Comfortable Environment

    The inspectors’ words, 701 words

    “PE-SAFE/FUNCTIONAL/COMFORTABLE ENVIRONMENT CFR(s): 494.60 The dialysis facility must be designed, constructed, equipped, and maintained to provide dialysis patients, staff, and the public a safe, functional, and comfortable treatment environment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 44232 Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the patients with a safe, aesthetically pleasant environment with treatment chairs free of torn and unstained upholstery to allow proper effective cleaning and disinfection for 1 of 1 stand alone dialysis in-center facilities. Findings include: 1. A review of a dated 02-07-2022, Fresenius Kidney Care policy titled, “General Cleanliness and Infection Control Guidelines” indicated but was not limited to, “ ... The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for FKC staff ... maintaining a clean, safe, aesthetically pleasant environment for patients, staff, and visitors .... “ 2. During treatment room observations on 12-19-2023 from 8:30 AM to 1055 AM, observed the following on the treatment floor: A. Observed the isolation room patient’s treatment chair with brown spots and splatters on the right arm tray and the base of the dialysate machine #4. B. Observed at Station #12 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right arm tray and armrest. C. Observed at Station #13 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right arm tray and armrest. D. Observed at Station #11 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #16. E. Observed at Station #10 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #10. F. Observed at Station #9 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #14. G. Observed at Station #8 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right and left arm trays and the base of dialysis machine #18. H. Observed at Station #7 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right and left arm trays and the base of dialysis machine #2. I. Observed at Station #6 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #5. J. Observed at Station #5 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right and left arm trays and yellow stains at the base of dialysis machine #27. K. Observed at Station #3 the patient’s treatment chair with brown and yellow splatters on the right arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #11. L. Observed at Station #2 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right arm tray and yellow and brown stains at the base of dialysis machine #21. M. Observed at Station #1 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #17. N. Observed at Station #23 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right and left arm trays and the base of dialysis machine #6. O. Observed at Station #22 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the left and right arm trays and yellow and brown splatters on the base of dialysis machine #26. P. Observed at Station #19 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the right armrest and arm tray and the base of dialysis machine #20. Q. Observed at Station #17 the patient’s treatment chair with brown splatters on the left and right arm trays. During an interview on 12-18-2023 at 9:30 AM, the Patient Care Technicians, PCT 5 and PCT 7, when queried regarding the brown splatters and droplets on the patient’s treatment chairs and machines, indicated the stains were betadine and would not come off. 3. During an interview on 12-19-2023 at 3:20 PM, Patient #25 was receiving their dialysis at Station #18. Patient #25 confirmed the chairs looked worn and stained. 4. During an interview on 12-19-2023 at 4:00 PM, the Director of Operations, Admin 1, when queried regarding the patient’s treatment chairs and machines, indicated they would think they were dirty. Admin 1 confirmed the chairs were old and stained.”

    Rule V0401. Standard-level.

  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 972 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47343 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure direct patient care staff monitored the patients according to the facility policy in 5 of 10 records reviewed. (Patients #1, 4, 5, 6, and 9) Findings Include: 1. A review of a Fresenius Kidney Care policy dated 09-05-2023 titled “Patient Monitoring and Safety Checks During Hemodialysis Treatment” indicated but was not limited to, “ ... Patient Monitoring: Monitor and document every 30 minutes or more frequently as needed but not to exceed 45 minutes ... Safety Check-Machine Checks ... DFR (sic Dialysis Flow Rate), BFR (Blood Flow Rate), and UFR (Ultrafiltration rate) is set and functioning per treating physician order ...” 2. The clinical record of Patient #4 was reviewed with a total of 6 treatment records reviewed from 09-20-2023 to 10-02-2023. The treatment records failed to evidence safety checks were performed every 30-45 minutes for the treatment records dated 09-20-2023 and 09-27-2023. The treatment document dated 09-20-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 13:43 and at 15:03 and the safety checks at 15:03 and 16:32. The treatment document dated 09-27-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 13:05 and 14:04 and the safety checks at 14:04 and 15:08. 3. The clinical record of Patient #5 was reviewed with a total of 10 treatment records reviewed from 11-27-2023 to 12-18-2023. The treatment records failed to evidence safety checks were performed every 30-45 minutes for the treatment records dated 11-27-2023, 11-29-2023, 12-01-2023, 12-04-2023, and 12-06-2023. The treatment document dated 11-27-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 15:10 and 16:15. The treatment document dated 11-29-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 15:01 and 16:05. The treatment document dated 12-01-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 14:05 and 15:02. The treatment document dated 12-04-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 15:12 and 16:19. The treatment document dated 12-06-2023 failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 14:36 and 16:53. The clinical record of Patient #5 evidenced treatment records from 11-27-2023 to 12-18-2023. The treatment records indicated the patient’s BFR was ordered at 350. The treatment documents dated 12-01-2023, 12-04-203, and 12-06-2023 evidenced the BFR was set at 400. The agency failed to ensure the BFR was set according to the physician’s orders for the 3 treatments. During an interview with the Director of Operations (DO) on 12-20-2023 at 2:00 PM, they indicated the staff had not looked at the orders to ensure the BFR was running at the physician-prescribed rate. 4. The clinical record of Patient #6 was reviewed with a total of 12 treatment records reviewed from 11-22-2023 to 12-18-2023. The treatment records failed to evidence safety checks were performed every 30-45 minutes for the treatment record dated 12-15-2023. The treatment document failed to evidence a safety check was performed in between the safety checks at 07:30 and 09:04. During an interview with the DO on 12-20-2023 at 4:15 PM, they indicated the staff were to include why the BFR was changed in the treatment notes. The DO indicated they were unable to find any notes indicating why the BFR was not running at the prescribed rate. 44232 5. The medical record/treatment sheets for Patient #1 were reviewed on 12-19-2023. The treatment sheets from 11-27-2023 through 12-18-2023 evidenced the following: A. Treatment sheet dated 12-18-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 10:00 AM by the Patient Care Technician (PCT). The following patient assessment was completed by the Registered Nurse (RN) at 11:43 AM. 6. The medical record/treatment sheets for Patient #9 were reviewed on 12-19-2023. The treatment sheets from 11-27-2023 through 12-18-2023 evidenced the following: A. Treatment sheet dated 11-27-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 3:08 PM by the PCT. The PCT completed the following blood pressure, and pulse check at 4:15 PM. B. Treatment sheet dated 11-29-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 3:00 PM by the PCT. The following patient assessment was completed by the RN at 4:03 PM. C. Treatment sheet dated 12-01-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 2:03 PM by the PCT. The following blood pressure and pulse check was completed by the PCT at 3:00 PM. D. Treatment sheet dated 12-06-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 12:42 PM by the PCT. The following patient assessment was completed by the PCT at 1:33 PM. The PCT completed a blood pressure, and pulse check at 3:02 PM, and then at 4:27 PM. E. Treatment sheet dated 12-08-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 2:01 PM by the RN. The following blood pressure and pulse check was completed by the PCT at 3:03 PM, and then at 4:01 PM, by the PCT. F. Treatment sheet dated 12-11-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 12:46 PM by the PCT. The following patient assessment was completed by the RN at 1:14 PM. G. Treatment sheet dated 12-13-2023, a blood pressure, and pulse check at 2:09 PM by the RN. The following blood pressure and pulse check was completed by the PCT at 3:05 PM. During an interview on 12-19-2023 at 1:00 PM, the Director of Operations, Admin 1, confirmed the patients are to be monitored every 30 minutes with a maximum of 45 minutes during their dialysis treatment by the direct care staff.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jul 10, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 20, 2023Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jan 18, 2018.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 24 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (39 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 63% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 25 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Marion County, 22 have a star rating from CMS: 8 rated 3 of 5, 7 rated 2 of 5, 7 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.