Fmc - Mercy
A dialysis facility in Des Moines, Iowa 50314
95 University Ste. 11, Des Moines, Iowa 50314. (515) 244-0379.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026. We couldn’t read Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ list since Nov 2, 2026: qcor.cms.gov now refuses our reader. This record is as of then.
- 2of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 21 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Apr 17, 2024: a standard inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Apr 17, 2024: standard inspection2 deficiencies
-
Ic - Clean/Dirty Areas, Med Prep Area, No Common Med Carts
The inspectors’ words, 474 words
“IC-CLEAN/DIRTY;MED PREP AREA;NO COMMON CARTS CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Clean areas should be clearly designated for the preparation, handling and storage of medications and unused supplies and equipment. Clean areas should be clearly separated from contaminated areas where used supplies and equipment are handled. Do not handle and store medications or clean supplies in the same or an adjacent area to that where used equipment or blood samples are handled. When multiple dose medication vials are used (including vials containing diluents), prepare individual patient doses in a clean (centralized) area away from dialysis stations and deliver separately to each patient. Do not carry multiple dose medication vials from station to station. Do not use common medication carts to deliver medications to patients. If trays are used to deliver medications to individual patients, they must be cleaned between patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36083 Based on documents review, observations, and interviews, the facility did not ensure administration of the medication to the right patient for 1 of 3 patients observed for medication administration (Patient #2). At the time of the survey, the facility reported a census of 75 patients. Findings include: 1. The policy titled, Medication Preparation and Administration, dated 2/6/23, noted for its purpose, “To administer medications with the goals of staff and patient safety, optimal therapeutic response, and infection control.” The policy indicates that all medications in syringes not being administered immediately shall be labeled appropriately with the name of the medication, route, dose, name of patient, date, time and initials of the person who prepared the medication. The policy directs staff members to follow the principles for medication administration including the right drug and the right patient. 2. The document titled, Adverse Events Report, from 4/10/23 to 4/10/24, included 2 occurrences of medication errors, which indicated facility’s history of occurrences related to medication errors. 3. On 4/10/24, at 12:20 PM, observations of multiple labeled syringes of pre-drawn medications were stored in a locked drawer by the medication preparation area. 4. On 4/10/24, at 1:30 PM, Patient Care Technician (PCT) A, was in the process of administering Patient #2’s heparin through the venous (blue) catheter port. After giving the medication, PCT A showed the empty syringe labeled as 2.3 ml (milliliters) of heparin for Patient #8, and not for Patient #2. 5. On 4/10/24, at 1:31 PM, PCT A verified to have administered the medication to Patient #2, which was prepared for a different patient, saying, “I got the wrong one, it’s for [Patient #8]” while pointing to Patient #8, who had ongoing treatment at another dialysis station. 6. On 4/15/24, at 4:30 PM, the Interim Clinic Manager (ICM) acknowledged the the potential adverse effect of administering medications prepared for different patient. The ICM also acknowledged the importance of thorough verification of the right medication and the right patient before administration.”
-
Qapi Indicator - Medical Injuries/Errors
The inspectors’ words, 566 words
“QAPI-INDICATOR-MEDICAL INJURIES/ERRORS CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(vi) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (vi) Medical injuries and medical errors identification. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 36083 Based on documents review, observation, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure reporting of occurrences in order to investigate and address for 2 of 2 incidents in the sample observed and reviewed (total chlorine breakthrough and medication error). At the time of the survey, the facility reported a census of 75 patients. Findings include: 1. The policy titled, Patient Safety Event Reporting and Documentation, dated 2/6/23, provides the guidelines for staff on identifying, reporting, and documenting patient related near misses, safety events, and serious safety events. The policy indicates that promotion of a culture of safety will create best practice guidelines by identifying human, technical and environmental factors that impact patient safety. The policy also indicates staff are encouraged to report events with the understanding that event review is focused on opportunities for learning and improving the quality and safety of patient care. The policy directs staff to complete reporting in a timely manner and according to facility’s event reporting procedure. The policy lists examples of events to be reported including exposure to contaminants, and medication errors. 2. The document titled, Hourly TCL Logs, from 4/1/24 to 4/10/24, showed that on 4/2/24 at 6:00 AM, the total chlorine result from post worker carbon tank was 0.1 ppm (parts per million), which directed staff to activate the breakthrough policy. 3. On 4/10/24, at 1:30 PM, Patient Care Technician (PCT) A, was observed in the process of administering Patient #2’s heparin through the venous (blue) catheter port. After the medication administration, PCT A showed the empty syringe that indicated it was 2.3 ml (milliliters) of heparin for Patient #9, and not for Patient #2. PCT A verified to have administered the medication to Patient #2, which was prepared for a different patient, saying, “I got the wrong one, it’s for [Patient #9].” 4. However, the facility’s adverse events log from 4/1/24 to 4/10/24, lacked indication that occurrences were reported regarding the 0.1 ppm total chlorine results on 4/2/24 and the medication error on 4/10/24. 5. On 4/15/24, at 1:44 PM, PCT C indicated an incident of a “high” total chlorine result from the port post primary carbon during tests on 4/2/24. PCT C also indicated activation of the facility’s breakthrough policy. On 4/15/24, at 4:00 PM, the Biomedical Staff (BS) verified the incident regarding the total chlorine result of 0.1 ppm on 4/2/24 has not been reported according to facility policy. 6. On 4/15/24 at 4:45 PM, when asked about expectations regarding reporting of incidents regarding high total chlorine tests and medication/heparin administration errors, the Interim Clinic Manager (ICM) indicated these should be reported in a timely manner. On 4/16/24 at 1:15 PM, PCT A indicated reporting the medication error involving Patient #2 on 4/10/24, immediately prior to the interview saying, “I just reported it today.” PCT A acknowledged the incident report should have been made as soon as it happened on 4/10/24 (6 days ago). 7. On 4/17/24 at 1:13 PM, the Medical Director (MD) stated the purposes for reporting incidents is for facility to review root cause, development and implementation of action plan to address or prevent reoccurrence, and for tracking and trending. The MD also indicated incidents should be reported as soon after occurrence.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2024 | Standard inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 1, 2004.
- Run for profit.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 21 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (33 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 72% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Polk County, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 3 rated 4 of 5, 4 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.