Hearth Record

Davita Newton County Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Covington, Georgia 30014

10132 Carlin Dr, Covington, Georgia 30014. (770) 385-8008.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 28, 2025: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 4, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Initial Poc Implemented - 30 Days/13 Tx

    The inspectors’ words, 311 words

    “POC-INITIAL IMPLEMENTED-30 DAYS/13 TX CFR(s): 494.90(b)(2) Implementation of the initial plan of care must begin within the latter of 30 calendar days after admission to the dialysis facility or 13 outpatient hemodialysis sessions beginning with the first outpatient dialysis session. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50523 Based on a review of medical records, staff interview and a review of facility Policy and Procedures (P&P) it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an individualized plan of care was developed and implemented within 30 days of admission, for one of one patient (P) (P#1) sampled for new admission. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of P#1. The facility incenter census was 73. Findings include: - During a review of medical records, the following was revealed: - P#1 was admitted to this facility on 10/15/24, who was new to dialysis. There was no documentary evidence that an initial plan of care was completed for this patient. The Facility Administrator (FA) was notified of this finding on 12/3/24 at 12:35 p.m. and he confirmed that it was greater than 30 days since P#1 admission and the patient had 13 hemodialysis treatments, yet there was no care plan developed and implemented for the patient sampled. A review of facility Policy: 1-14-01 titled, “Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) Patient Assessment and Plan of Care” with latest revision date of October 2024 showed: 4. A comprehensive assessment will be conducted on all new patients within 30 calendar days (or 13 outpatient dialysis sessions for hemodialysis) beginning with the first outpatient dialysis treatment or per state guidelines. - An initial Plan of Care, based on the findings from the comprehensive assessment, will be completed on all patients new to dialysis within 30 calendar days or 13 outpatient dialysis sessions for hemodialysis beginning with the first outpatient dialysis treatment...”

    Rule V0557. Standard-level.

  • Qapi Indicator - Nutritional Status

    The inspectors’ words, 561 words

    “QAPI-INDICATOR-NUTRITIONAL STATUS CFR(s): 494.110(a)(2)(ii) The program must include, but not be limited to, the following: (ii) Nutritional status. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50523 Based on a review of facility records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to effectively manage albumin (protein found in blood) levels, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the facility’s albumin plan of intervention in six of six months of Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meeting minutes reviewed (May 2024 - October 2024). This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of 73 in-center hemodialysis (ICHD) patients, and six Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) patients who were under the care of this facility. Findings include: A review of Fiscal Year 2024 Quarterly Dialysis Facility Report (QDFR: A report prepared by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to provide a comparative summary of treatment patterns and patient outcomes for dialysis patients of this facility, as compared to other facilities in the U.S.), revealed that 64.3 % of ICHD patients and 81.3% of PD patients at this facility had albumin levels of less than (<) 4 g/dL (grams per deciliter). The U.S. average was 51.8.0%. The average albumin less than 4 g/dL for the past six months reviewed (May 2024 - October 2024), was 70% for ICHD and was 100% for PD. A review of this facility’s ICHD Albumin report for the last six months, revealed the following: - In May 2024, 59% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In June 2024, 66% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In July 2024, 75% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In August 2024, 63% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In September 2024, 58% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL; and - In October 2024, 70% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. Although the facility data was collected monthly, there was no documented evidence that the data was analyzed. The QAPI meeting minutes showed that plans and root cause analysis were developed. However, the improvement plan was replicated without a reassessment of its effectiveness to mprove and sustain the facility’s outcomes. A review of this facility’s PD Albumin report for the last six months, revealed the following: - In May 2024, 75% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In June 2024, 75% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In July 2024, 100% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In August 2024, 100% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. - In September 2024, 80% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL; and - In October 2024, 100% of patients had Albumin levels of <4.0 g/dL. Again, the monthly QAPI meeting minutes showed that plans for adjustments and a root cause analysis were developed. However, the written plan was replicated without a reassessment of its effectiveness. Again, the facility’s QAPI meeting minutes showed that the interdisciplinary team IDT conducted a review of albumin levels with no changes made to the action plans to attain and sustain improvement. The Facility Administrator acknowledged the findings on 12/4/24 at 12:50 p.m. At 1:24 p.m. on 12/4/24, the Medical Director stated that a deeper dive needed to be implemented to discover the root causes for both modalities..”

    Rule V0630. Standard-level.

  • Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P

    The inspectors’ words, 370 words

    “MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50523 Based on observation, staff interview, a review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations and a review of facility Policy and Procedures (P&P) it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that expired medication in one of one Medication Cabinet were removed and not made available for use; and expired laboratory (lab) supplies found in one of one Supply Cabinet were not made available for use per facility P&P. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the health and safety of six Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) patients who were under the care of this facility. Findings include: During a tour of the facility on 12/2/24 from 10:30 a.m. though 11:37 a.m., the following medication and supplies had expired, being unfit for use. In the PD Exam Room Medication Cabinet: - There were three bottles of Jardiance (used to help lower blood sugar levels in people with type 2 diabetes)10 milligrams (mg) that expired 6/2024. In the PD Exam Room supply cabinet: - There were 100 gold top lab tubes that expired 10/31/24. On 12/2/24, Registered Nurse/ Clinical Coordinator (RN/CC) acknowledged these findings at 11:18 a.m. According to FDA recommendations dated 2/8/21, drug and supplies’ expiration dates reflect the time period during which the product is known to remain stable, which means it retains its strength, quality, and purity when it is stored according to its labeled storage conditions. Several potential harms may occur from taking an expired medication or using expired supplies. Once the expiration date has passed there is no guarantee that the medicine or supplies will be safe and effective. A review of facility Policy: 1-06-01, titled, “Medication Policy” with latest revision date of November 2023, stated: 13. All open or unopened medication packages (i.e. vials, ampules, etc.) are stored according to the manufacturer’s directions. Do not use any medication that has been stored improperly or has expired.”

    Rule V0715. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 28, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 4, 2024Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jul 15, 2014.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 12 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Newton County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.