Usrc Covington Dialysis
A dialysis facility in Covington, Georgia 30014
4179 Baker St, Covington, Georgia 30014. (770) 385-4015.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s star rating
- 2of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 16 dialysis stations
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 13, 2024: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 2 of them at condition level, the most serious.
2 deficiencies at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Mar 13, 2024: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Cfc - Responsibilities Of The Medical Director
The inspectors’ words, 244 words
“CFC-RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE MEDICAL DIRECTOR CFR(s): 494.150 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 25727 Based on a review of medical records, staff interviews, and review of the facility’s Policies and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the Medical Director failed to ensure that one of one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN AA), a Float Staff who worked at this facility, adhered to facility’s P & P pertaining to patient safety relative to bathroom usage during treatment. On 3/12/24 at 4:00 p.m., a determination was made that a situation in which the facility’s noncompliance with 42 CFR Part 494.150 - Responsibilities of the Medical Director, resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that caused harm to the health and safety of one of one patient (P#1), who experienced severe blood loss while at this facility. The Facility Administrator was informed of the IJ finding on 3/12//24 at 4:00 p.m. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 3/7/24 at 1:55 p.m. The IJ situation was abated during the survey on 3/13/24 at 3:00 p.m. Findings were: Cross References: V 541 - Failure of the interdisciplinary team to develop and implement an individualized plan of care that met the specific safety needs of one of one patient (P#1) who demonstrated signs and symptoms of dementia. V 715 - Failure of the medical director to ensure that all P & P relative to patient safety were adhered to by all staff.”
-
Cfc - Governance
The inspectors’ words, 208 words
“CFC-GOVERNANCE CFR(s): 494.180 This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 25727 Based on a review of medical records, staff interviews, and review of the facility’s Policies and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the Governing Body failed to demonstrate responsibility and accountability for the operations of the facility. On 3/12/24 at 4:00 p.m., a determination was made that a situation in which the facility’s noncompliance with 42 CFR Part 494.180 - Governance, resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that caused harm to the health and safety of one of one patient (P#1), who experienced severe blood loss while at this facility. The Facility Administrator was informed of the IJ finding on 3/12//24 at 4:00 p.m. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 3/7/24 at 1:55 p.m. The IJ situation was abated during the survey on 3/13/24 at 3:00 p.m. Findings were: Cross References: V 541 - Failure of the interdisciplinary team to develop and implement an individualized plan of care that met the specific safety needs of P#1 who demonstrated signs and symptoms of dementia. V 715 - Failure of the medical director to ensure that all P & P relative to patient safety were adhered to by all staff.”
-
Patient Plan Of Care - Goals - Community-Based Standards
The inspectors’ words, 333 words
“POC-GOALS=COMMUNITY-BASED STANDARDS CFR(s): 494.90 The interdisciplinary team as defined at §494.80 must develop and implement a written, individualized comprehensive plan of care that specifies the services necessary to address the patient’s needs, as identified by the comprehensive assessment and changes in the patient’s condition, and must include measurable and expected outcomes and estimated timetables to achieve these outcomes. The outcomes specified in the patient plan of care must be consistent with current evidence-based professionally-accepted clinical practice standards. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 25727 Based on a review of records and staff interview, it was determined that the interdisciplinary team (IDT) failed to develop and implement an individualized plan of care that met the specific safety needs of one of one patient (P#1) who had been known to have dementia (loss of thinking, remembering, and reasoning skills). This failure had caused severe harm to the health and safety of P#1. Findings were: A review of P#1’s Initial Comprehensive Assessment/Plan of Care dated 4/12/23 and 90-day Reassessment/Plan of Care dated 6/29/23 revealed that P#1 was deemed stable by the IDT. A review of Psychosocial Progress Notes entered and electronically signed by the Social Worker dated 7/31/23 showed “P#1 has dementia and confusion”. This was the first time “dementia” was mentioned in P#1’s medical records. The Psychosocial Progress Notes dated 10/31/23 and 1/18/24 also showed P#1 has dementia... However, P#1’s plan of care was not updated accordingly, based on the above mentioned psychosocial assessments. There was a lack of documented evidence that an individualized plan of care specific to patient safety during dialysis, was developed and implemented by the IDT to ensure patient safety during dialysis treatment since P#1 developed signs and symptoms of dementia. The above findings were confirmed by the Clinical Specialist on 3/26/24 at 2:10 p.m. For detailed findings, cross reference V 715: Failure of the medical director to ensure that Policies and Procedures pertaining to patient safety relative to bathroom usage during treatment, were adhered to by all staff.”
-
Md Resp - Ensure All Adhere To P&P
The inspectors’ words, 1,037 words
“MD RESP-ENSURE ALL ADHERE TO P&P CFR(s): 494.150(c)(2)(i) The medical director must- (2) Ensure that- (i) All policies and procedures relative to patient admissions, patient care, infection control, and safety are adhered to by all individuals who treat patients in the facility, including attending physicians and nonphysician providers; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 25727 Based on a review of medical records, staff interviews, and review of the facility’s Policies and Procedures (P & P), it was determined that the Medical Director failed to ensure that one of one Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN AA), a Float Staff who worked at this facility, adhered to P & P pertaining to patient safety relative to bathroom usage during treatment. On 3/12/24 at 4:00 p.m., a determination was made that a situation in which the facility’s noncompliance with 42 CFR Part 494.150 - Responsibilities of the Medical Director, resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) that caused harm to the health and safety of one of one patient (P#1), who experienced severe blood loss while at this facility. The Facility Administrator was informed of the IJ finding on 3/12//24 at 4:00 p.m. The IJ situation was abated during the survey on 3/13/24 at 3:00 p.m. Findings were: A review of P#1’s medical records showed the following: The Hemodialysis Flowsheet dated 3/7/24 that was documented and electronically signed by LPN AA showed the following: - At 14:57, “Pt (Patient) escorted to the rest room with needles securly (sic) taped to access site, moments after charge nurse went to check on patient, and found patient bleeding in restroom from self removed needle site with one needle removed by patient and the other needle still in place. Patient was found unresponsive but breathing, all medical staff was alert (sic) and given instruction to maintain the safety of Patient and request Emergency responce (sic) team”. A review of record created by the Facility Administrator (FA) dated 3/8/24 showed the following: “Per clinical staff the patient arrived from home alert and able to identify were (sic) she was. Patient was cannulated (inserted fistula needles for dialysis) and treatment ran for 2 hour (sic) and 50 min (minutes), when requested to use the restroom. assigned (sic) LPN then returned patients (sic) blood and Needles (sic) were secured with tape, patient was escorted to the restroom. RN (Registered Nurse) noticed that the patient was in the restroom for awhile and went to check on her when she discovered the patient lying on the floor unresponsive in a pool of blood with both needles pulled, estimated blood lost (sic) greater than 200mls. (sic) Patient threw the arterial needle in the toilet and the venous needle also pulled but still taped to her arm. RN then called for a code and the charging RN ran to assist and was suck (sic) by the venous needle, clinical staff attempted to revive the patient. AED (Automated External Defibrillator - a medical device designed to analyze the heart rhythm and deliver an electric shock to victims of ventricular fibrillation to restore the heart rhythm to normal) applied and suggested to start compressions, staff continued code until EMS (Emergency Medical System) 911 arrived. EMS was able to revive the patient, she was alert and screaming to let her go when they strapped her to the sretcher, patient was then transported to the ER (Emergency Room) for further evaluation. Patient’s daughter was notified by staff and MD (Medical Director) and supervisor was (sic) notified by the FA. FA contacted the ER a (sic) hour later for a follow up, RN (named) stated, the patient on arrival had a Hemoglobin of 6.9 and hematocrit of 20.1, rapid infusion of two units of blood was given and the patient was alert and stable...” NOTE: The acceptable Hemoglobin for dialysis patients ranged between 10 g/dL - 11 g/dL [(g) grams per dL (deciliter)]. During an interview with the Nephrologist/MD on 3/12/24 at 1:30 p.m., it was revealed that P#1 has cognitive impairment. MD stated “Patient is not with it; it comes and goes”. During an interview with the FA on 3/12/24 at 1:45 p.m., she stated that P#1 has shown symptoms of mild dementia and has been progressing, but P#1’s family was in denial. During an interview with RN AA, RN BB, PCT (Patient Care Technician) AA, and LPN BB on 3/12/24 between 2:05 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., it was revealed that P#1 has demonstrated signs and symptoms of dementia but was left alone in the Bathroom for approximately five to ten minutes without supervision. PCT AA stated that “everybody has been concerned about P#1 because she is not mentally stable and has progressively gotten worse during the last several months”. RN AA, RN BB, PCT AA, and LPN BB stated that the incident could have been prevented. LPN AA was not available for an interview during the survey. A review of Policy # C-ID-0130 titled, “Bathroom Usage During Treatment” dated 8/2020 showed the following: PURPOSE: To provide assistance for patients using the bathroom facilities during the dialysis treatment. POLICY: 1. Encourage patients to use the bathroom prior to treatment... If the patient’s vital signs are stable, the patient may use the bathroom with assistance from a staff member following the safety procedures below. 2. Staff will offer to stay with the patient inside the bathroom and document patient response on the flowsheet. PROCEDURE: 7. Staff will accompany the patient to the bathroom and will stay with the patient inside the bathroom unless the patient specifically requests privacy... then the staff will make a reasonable effort to stand outside the bathroom door... The Immediate Jeopardy was abated on 3/13/24 at 3:00 p.m. upon completion of the following: - An in-service was conducted on 3/13/24 by the Facility Administrator and Clinical Specialist on Policy and Procedure: C-ID0130 titled, “Bathroom Usage During Treatment” with emphasis on following the safety procedures. - An in-service was also conducted on 3/13/24 by the Regional Director on Float Staff about reviewing “Special Instructions” on the patient’s flowsheet to help identify patients who may be deemed high risk. Only Float Staff who have attended the in-service will be scheduled to work at this facility. - A Governing Body Meeting was held on 3/13/24.”
The one inspection in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 21, 2001.
- Run for profit.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for dialysis facilities.
- Chain: US Renal Care, Inc.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.
What does it offer?
- Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
- Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
- 16 dialysis stations.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Part of the US Renal Care, Inc. chain, as CMS lists it.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
How do patients fare?
- CMS rates it 3 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
- Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
- Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (45 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 44% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5 | 2 of 5 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Newton County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 5 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5, 2 rated 2 of 5.
- CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Star rating |
|---|---|
| Davita Newton County Dialysis | 2 |
| Fmc Dialysis Services Newton | 5 |
| Ara Ncg Piedmont Dialysis | 2 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
- CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility (23ew-n7w9).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility (59mq-zhts).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies (ESRD_2567s_2018_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 28, 2026 and checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.