Hearth Record

Davita Buena Ventura Lakes Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Kissimmee, Florida 34743

1998 E Osceola Pkwy, Kissimmee, Florida 34743. (407) 348-1271.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 17, 2025: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 25, 2025: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 859 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39943 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow orders for maintaining blood pressure during dialysis for 3 of 7 patients reviewed, (#1,#2, #5). Findings: 1. Patient #2 was admitted to the facility for dialysis on 8/12/24. The initial diagnosis for dialysis was hypertension. Physician order dated 8/13/25, read, clonidine HCI 0.1milligram-administer if systolic is greater than 190 or diastolic is greater than 110, may repeat x 4 if still hypertensive after 30-45 minutes. Review of the record revealed on 9/17/25 at 9:09 AM, revealed patient #2’s blood pressure was 152/133. No documentation that the doctor was notified or medication given/refused. On 9/19/25 at 6:51 AM patient #2’s blood pressure was documented to be 174/124 with a notation that blood pressure was taken manually due to machine false reading. There was no documentation that clonidine was given as ordered nor that the doctor was notified. Documentation revealed the blood pressure was taken manually throughout the rest of the dialysis treatment that day with the following readings: 7:24 AM- 154/116 7:54 AM- 152/111 9:02 AM- 151/116 9:47 AM- 150/113 10:05 AM -156/114 There was no documentation found to indicate that the physician was notified or that the clonidine was given or refused. 2. Patient #5 was admitted to the facility on 1/06/25. The initial diagnosis for dialysis was Type 2 diabetes. Review of the medical record Treatment Details Report revealed the following blood pressures for dates indicated. On 9/03/25 at 11:05 AM 116/37- Registered Nurse (RN) notified, no other intervention documented, 1:01 PM -140/41 2:05 PM -108/48. 9/08/25 at 12:02 PM -113/48 12:46 PM -105/49 12:59 PM -115/45 1:04 PM 95/21 1:08 PM -109/49 2:06 PM -116/37 2:17 PM -114/49. No documentation found to indicate the RN or physician were notified. 9/15/25 11:02 AM -112/46 1:02 PM -93/17 1:08 PM -72/28 1:17 PM -99/43 No documentation of notification to the RN or physician. No acknowledgement of low blood pressure. 9/17/25 at 10:25 AM -106.46 10:31 AM-97/44 11:02 AM-58/19 11:10 AM- 99/26 1:24 PM- 92/36. No documentation of notification to the RN or physician. No acknowledgement of low blood pressure. Review of the record revealed no documentation regarding the low blood pressures and no indication that the physician was ever notified. Patient Care Technician did not document acknowledgement of the low blood pressure. 52666 3. Patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 4/06/24, with a medical history of End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) and Diabetes Mellitus Type 2. Treatment orders revealed orders for dialysis 3 days per week, 4-hour each session. Review of treatment records dated 9/02/25 through 9/23/25, revealed 4 of 9 treatments had documented elevated blood pressures, systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 179 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 90 during treatments. On 9/5/25 at 8:56 AM, patient #1 arrived at the facility for his dialysis treatment. Patient #1’s blood pressure (BP) at that time was 205/108. Patient Care Technician (PCT) C notified Registered Nurse (RN) A of the elevated BP, and the dialysis treatment was initiated. At 10:16 AM, patient #1’s BP was 209/111 and RN-A administered Clonidine 0.1mg. At 11:02 AM, RN-B rechecked the BP and readjusted the cuff. Patient #1’s BP at 11:03 AM, was 202/114. The treatment was terminated at 12:50 PM by RN-B No documentation was found that indicated the physician was notified of the elevated BPs during entire treatment. On 9/6/25, patient #1’s BP ranged from 190/95 to 219/118. There was no documentation acknowledging the elevated blood pressure, or whether any medication was given or the physician notified. On 9/9/25 at 8:50 AM, the BP was 185/103. PCT D did not notify the nurse. No documentation found that BP medication was administered, or the physician notified. On 9/16/25, during the last hour and a half of the treatment. PTC C did not notify the nurse of the elevated BP ranging from 179/101 to 193/106. No documentation found that BP medication was administered, or the physician notified. On 9/25/25 at 4:00 PM, the Facility Administrator (FA) and Group-FA were interviewed regarding the policy/procedure for monitoring of vital signs, nursing assessments of patients and when to notify physicians. The FA and Group-FA both confirmed after reviewing the treatment records that the patients did not receive their medications as ordered and the physician should have been notified of the abnormal blood pressures. Review of the facility policy, “Pre-Intra-Post Treatment Data Collection, Monitoring and Nursing Assessment” dated September 2007, and revised April 2024, read: Abnormal Findings: Unless other abnormal parameters are established by the facility Governing Body and documented in the Governing Body Meeting minutes, the following are considered abnormal findings and should be reported to the licensed nurse and documented in the patient’s medical record ... Blood Pressure Pre Dialysis-Intradialytic-Post dialysis: Systolic greater than 180 mm/Hg pr less than 90 mm/Hg Diastolic greater than pr equal to 100 mm/Hg or less than 50 mm/Hg.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 17, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 25, 2025Standard inspection1 deficiency cited
Oct 25, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Nov 17, 2014.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 16 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, worse than expected; readmissions to hospital, worse than expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 8 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Osceola County, 8 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5, 2 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.