Hearth Record

Davita West Beach Dialysis Center

A dialysis facility in Panama City, Florida 32413

16201 Panama City Beach Pkwy, Ste 102, Panama City, Florida 32413. (850) 233-0837.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 6, 2024: a standard inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 6, 2024: standard inspection3 deficiencies
  • Dialysis Emergency Equipment

    The inspectors’ words, 405 words

    “Dialysis Emergency Equipment CFR(s): §494.62(b)(9) Condition for Coverage: [(b) Policies and procedures. The dialysis facility must develop and implement emergency preparedness policies and procedures, based on the emergency plan set forth in paragraph (a) of this section, risk assessment at paragraph (a)(1) of this section, and the communication plan at paragraph (c) of this section. The policies and procedures must be reviewed and updated at least every 2 years. At a minimum, the policies and procedures must address the following:] (9) A process by which the staff can confirm that emergency equipment, including, but not limited to, oxygen, airways, suction, defibrillator or automated external defibrillator, artificial resuscitator, and emergency drugs, are on the premises at all times and immediately available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45827 Based on observation, facility record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure all supplies and equipment were readily avalable and present in the facility’s emergency evacuation kit. The findings include: On 11/05/2024 at approximately 3:30 PM, the facility’s emergency evacuation kit was inspected with assistance of the Facility Administrator (FA). The emergency evacuation kit whenc opared to the enclosed emergency evacuation kit checklist, did not contain a blood pressure (BP) cuff, a flashlight and only contained two of the three required face shields. On 11/05/2024 a review of the Health & Safety Policy & Procedures, Policy: 4-07-02, Emergency Evacuation Kit Checklist was completed. The policy state, “Note: Supplies for one full shift of patients; all modalities of patients. Complete the desired quantity to meet the needs of your facility. For “complete” and “not expired” indicate (Y) for criteria met and (N) for criteria not met. If not met, note corrective action.” Under the section Supply (at least one full shift): BP cuff, the desired quantity is listed at one with a yes to indicate complete; flashlight, the desired quantity is listed at one with a yes to indicate complete; PPE - face shields, the desired quantity is listed at three with a yes to indicate complete. The Emergency Evacuation Kit Checklist was dated as completed on 11/04/2024. On 11/05/2024 at approximately 3:30 PM an interview was conducted with the FA who confirmed the emergency evacuation kit did not contain a BP cuff, a flashlight and only contained two face shields. The FA further confirmed the Emergency Evacuation Kit Checklist was marked to indicate the kit should contain the BP cuff, flashlight and three face shields.”

    Rule E0028. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 247 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 51235 Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility’s policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure that staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene after removing an old dressing for 1 of 2 observations of central venous catheter (CVC) care. (#5) The findings include: During an observation of central venous catheter (CVC) care for patient #5, on 11/4/2024 at approximately 11:40 AM, RN (Registered Nurse) A did not remove their gloves and perform hand hygiene after removing patient #5 old CVC dressing. After removing the old CVC dressing, RN A proceeded to clean the CVC exit site with an antiseptic and applied a new dressing without performing hand hygiene or changing gloves. On 11/4/2024 at approximately 2:00 PM, RN A was interviewed. RN A confirmed he should have removed his gloves; performed hand hygiene and then donned a new pair of gloves after removing the old CVC dressing. A review of the facility’s Policy and Procedure, 1-04-02A, titled “Central Venous Catheter (CVC) with Tego Connectors or CVC end caps procedure,” under the heading “Procedure “4. Remove old dressing and discard; 5. Observe site for signs and symptoms of infection; 6. Remove gloves and discard; 7. Perform hand hygiene per procedure and re-glove”.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Softeners - Testing Hardness/Log

    The inspectors’ words, 270 words

    “SOFTENERS: TESTING HARDNESS/LOG CFR(s): 494.40(a) 6.2.4 Softeners: Testing hardness/log Users should ensure that test accuracy and sensitivity are sufficient to satisfy the total hardness monitoring requirements of the reverse osmosis machine manufacturer. Total hardness of the water exiting the water softener should be measured at the end of each treatment day. Water hardness test results should be recorded in a water softener log. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45827 Based on observation, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy and sensitivity while testing water for hardness due to using expired test strips. The findings include: On 11/04/2024 at approximately 9:35 AM a tour of the facility’s water room was conducted. A bottle of low-range water hardness reagent strips (used to test for total hardness in water) was observed with an expiration date of 2024/06. On 11/05/2024 a review of the facility’s Incenter Hemodialysis Policies & Procedures, Procedure: 1-18-01, Hardness Test Using RPC Water Hardness Test Strips was completed. On page one under the section titled Notes it lists, “Do not use test strips after the manufacturer expiration date which is printed on bottle.” On page one under the section Rationale, 1, it states, “Test strips must be stored and handled according to manufacturer’s instruction for proper function of the test strips.” On 11/06/2024 at approximately 11:30 AM an interview was conducted with the Facility Administrator (FA) who confirmed the expired strips were being used. The FA stated the water hardness test is completed at the end of each day and the expired test strips should not have been used to test water hardness.”

    Rule V0191. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 6, 2024Standard inspection3 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Feb 20, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 8 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Bay County, 4 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 3 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.