Hearth Record

Fmc - West Pensacola

A dialysis facility in Pensacola, Florida 32506

2940 N. Blue Angel Parkway, Pensacola, Florida 32506. (850) 453-3658.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 14, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on May 30, 2024: a standard inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited May 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 19, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

May 30, 2024: standard inspection1 deficiency
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 820 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 42926 Based on patient treatment record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility’s policies and procedures, the facility failed to identify and report abnormal blood pressure occurrences for 3 of 10 patients sampled (Patient #4, #5, #6) and failed to document nursing assessments within one hour of initiation of treatment for 2 of 10 patients sampled (Patient #2,#3) The findings include: Patient #2: In 2 of 9 treatment records reviewed (dated 5/11/2024 and 5/25/2024), nursing staff failed to document an initial assessment within 1 hour of initiation of dialysis treatment Patient #3: In 2 of 4 treatment records reviewed (dated 5/24/2024 and 05/27/2024), nursing staff failed to document an initial assessment within 1 hour of initiation of dialysis treatment. Patient #6: In 8 of 10 treatment record reviewed, Patient #5 had elevated blood pressures. In 8 of 10 of the treatment records (dated 05/06/2024 through 05/27/2024) staff failed to notify a provider per policy for blood pressure out of parameters. The treatment record review did not indicate that Patient #6 was treated per standing order for elevated blood pressure in 7 of 10 treatment records. 39374 Patient #5: In 9 of 9 treatment records reviewed, Patient #5 had elevated blood pressures (greater than 180 millimeters/Mercury (mm/Hg) systolic). In 7 of 9 treatment records (dated 05/08/2024 through 05/27/2024) staff failed to notify a provider per policy for blood pressure out of parameters. The record review did not indicate Patient #5 was treated per standing order for elevated blood pressure in 9 of 9 treatment records reviewed. A review of a policy titled, Patient Assessment and Monitoring, published 05/01/2023 with reference number 45284, version 4, included the statement, “The RN (Registered Nurse) will notify the patient’s physician/physician extender of any abnormal findings, if necessary, based on clinical judgement for additional instruction.” The policy also contained language for actions to take during treatment, including reporting to the nurse systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg, diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg, and blood pressure less than or equal to 100mmHg systolic. A review of “Standing Hemodialysis Orders v5.01” contained standing orders for PRN (as needed) medications including Clonidine (a medication used to lower blood pressure) 0.1mg for BP>180 systolic repeat x1 after 30 minutes. Notify physician for >180 after repeat administration. In an interview on 05/29/2024 at 4:00PM, the Medical Director said, “above 180 they need to call us, if its out of the normal range for the individual patient then we need to know about it. If they are always noncompliant and always high when they come, they call me and I give a protocol for that patient.” 47306 Patient #4: In 3 of 9 treatment records reviewed (dated 3/30/2024, 4/13/2024, and 5/21/2024) had elevated blood pressures (greater than 180 millimeters/Mercury (mm/Hg) systolic before, during, and after the treatments. The treatment records reviewed revealed the staff failed to notify a provider prior to beginning treatment per policy for blood pressures out of parameters. The record review did not indicate patient #4 was treated per standing order for elevated blood pressure in 3 of 9 treatment records reviewed. On 5/29/2024 at 3:28PM an interview was conducted with the Director of Operations (DO) regarding policy for reporting abnormal blood pressures to a provider. The DO indicated it is facility policy for the Nurse to notify the Provider of any abnormal vital signs prior to beginning treatment, during treatment, and at the end of treatment. On 5/29/2024 at 3:57PM an interview was conducted with Staff A (Licensed Practical Nurse) regarding the treatment record for patient #4 dated 3/30/2024. Staff A was asked to review patient #4’s pre-treatment and during treatment blood pressures. Staff A was asked if he recalled reporting the abnormal blood pressures to a Registered Nurse or calling a Provider. Staff A indicated he did not notify a Registered Nurse or a Provider. Staff A indicated he should have reported the high blood pressures to a Registered Nurse and let her handle any interventions. A review of a policy titled, Patient Assessment and Monitoring, published 05/01/2023 with reference number 45284, version 4, included the statement, “The RN will notify the patient’s physician/physician extender of any abnormal findings, if necessary, based on clinical judgement for additional instruction.” The policy also contained language for actions to take during treatment, including reporting to the nurse systolic blood pressures greater than 180mm/Hg, diastolic blood pressure greater than 100mm/Hg, and blood pressure less than or equal to 100mmHg systolic. A review of “Standing Hemodialysis Orders v5.01” contained standing orders for PRN (as needed) medications including Clonidine 0.1mg for BP>180 systolic repeat x1 after 30 minutes. Notify physician for >180 after repeat administration.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
May 30, 2024Standard inspection1 deficiency cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Sep 30, 2004.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 25 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 2 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (58 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 78% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 52 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 10 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Escambia County, 10 have a star rating from CMS: 5 rated 3 of 5, 4 rated 2 of 5, 1 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 2 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 19, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.