Hearth Record

Fmc - Sanford

A dialysis facility in Sanford, Florida 32771

419 E First St, Sanford, Florida 32771. (407) 688-6765.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 11, 2025: a standard inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 11, 2025: standard inspection2 deficiencies
  • Manage Volume Status

    The inspectors’ words, 395 words

    “POC-MANAGE VOLUME STATUS CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) The plan of care must address, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Dose of dialysis. The interdisciplinary team must provide the necessary care and services to manage the patient’s volume status; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 13252 Based on record review that facility failed to ensure fluid removal did not exceed 13 milliters (ml) per kilograms (kg) of body weight per hour (h) for treatments less than or equal to four hours for 1 of 5 patients (#4). Finding: Patient #4 admitted to the facility on 8/14/24 and the patient’s diagnoses included End Stage Renal Disease and Endocarditis. The physician orders dated 9/8/25 noted a treatment time of 3 hours and 45 minutes. Review of the patient’s treatments from 8/8/25 to 9/8/25 revealed that the staff removed more than 13 ml of fluid, from the patient on 4 of 9 treatments. On 8/8/25 Patient #4’s pre dialysis weight was 84.4 kg. The post treatment weight was 79.3 kg and the patient was treated fro 3 hours and 47 minutes. This means 5.5 kg of fluid was removed from the patient. The Ultrafiltratin reate is caculated using the total fluid removed in ml divided by (post dialysis weight multiplied by the time (hours). Therefore 5.5 kg is approximatley 5,500 ml divided by (80.4 kg x 3.77 h) is 18.14 ml/kg-h removed in a treatment time of less than 4 hours. On 8/27/25 Patinet #4 came the facility weighting 84.8 kg. The post treatment weight was 80.4 kg and the patient treated for 3 hiours & 17 minutes. This means removed fluid at rate of 15.21 ml/kg-h. On 8/28/25 Patinet #4’s pre-treament weight was 83.7 Kg. The patient was treated for 3 hours and 4 minutes and weighed 79.7, which meass 4 kg of fluid weight was rmoved. Therefore fluid was removed at rate of 16.5 ml/kg-h. On 9/8/25 the patient pre-treatment weight was 84.3 kg. The post treatment weight was 80.9 kg and the total treatment time was 2 hours and 57 minutes. Staff removed 3.4 kg of fluid at a rate of 14 ml/kg-h. The facilty staff needed to remove fluid at a rate of 13 ml/kg-h or less. Rapid or excessive fluid removeal during dialysis can cause mycardial stunning, an acute cardiac event, which may increase the risk of progressive heart damage over time.”

    Rule V0543. Standard-level.

  • Achieve Adequate Clearance

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “POC-ACHIEVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE CFR(s): 494.90(a)(1) Achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis to meet a hemodialysis Kt/V of at least 1.2 and a peritoneal dialysis weekly Kt/V of at least 1.7 or meet an alternative equivalent professionally-accepted clinical practice standard for adequacy of dialysis. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 13252 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow the physician treatment orders for Blood Flow Rate (BFR) to achieve and sustain the prescribed dose of dialysis for 1 of 5 sampled patients (#2). Finding: Patient #2 admitted to the facilty on 6/11/25 and the patient’s diagnosis included Diabetes and Chronic Kidney disease. Review of the physician’s orders dated 8/25/25 note the patient was to be treated with a BFR of 400 milliliters per minute (ml/min). Review of 9 treatment records from 8/20/25 to 9/8/25 revealed staff did not follow the physician’s orders on 9/5/25. On 9/5/25 the patient had the pre-treatment evaluation at approximately 12:51 PM and started dialysis treatment shortly thereafter. The treatment run sheets noted the BFR was at 350 ml/min at approximately 1:19 PM. The 350 ml/min BFR was noted again at 1:31 PM, 2:01 PM, 2:38 PM, 2:57 PM, 3:06 PM and 3:33 PM. The staff failed to document the reason why a lower BFR was used to treat resident #2. On 9/11/25 at 2:15 PM the Clinical Manger reviewed the patient’s treatment on 9/5/25. She could not provide a reason as to why the physician prescribed BFR was not implemented.”

    Rule V0544. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 11, 2025Standard inspection2 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Dec 15, 1980.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 21 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 1 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, as expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 9 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Seminole County, 9 have a star rating from CMS: 1 rated 3 of 5, 5 rated 2 of 5, 3 rated 1 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.