Hearth Record

Davita Tucson Central Dialysis

A dialysis facility in Tucson, Arizona 85716

2901 E Grant Rd, Tucson, Arizona 85716. (520) 325-3408.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 11, 2024: a standard inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 11, 2024: standard inspection4 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 292 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff changed gloves and performed hand hygiene between glove changes, between clean and dirty tasks, and when gathering dialysis supplies from clean supply carts. Failure to follow established standard and infection control precautions poses an increased risk of infections for immunocompromised patients through contact transmission and cross contamination. Findings include: The facility policy titled “INFECTION CONTROL FOR DIALYSIS FACILITIES” requires: “...Hand Hygiene...All teammates...will perform hand hygiene...prior to gloving and immediately after removal of gloves...after contamination with blood or other infectious material...after patient and dialysis delivery system contact...before touching clean areas such as supplies, supply cart and chairside keyboard/mouse...Use of an alcohol-based hand rub may be substituted for handwashing....” Observation on 03/06/2024 revealed PCT #10 providing patient care and preparing to cannulate Patient #9’s vascular access. PCT #10 stopped disinfecting the access halfway through the procedure, left the dialysis station, gathered sterile gauze and skin disinfectant from the clean supply area, and returned to the dialysis station and continued with the access disinfection and cannulation procedure. PCT #10 did not remove his/her gloves and perform hand hygiene upon stepping away from the dialysis station and upon gathering additional gauze and ExSept skin disinfectant, or change gloves and hand sanitize and reglove upon returning the dialysis station and continuing patient care. Employees #1 confirmed on 03/06/2024 that staff failed to follow the facility policy for hand hygiene and glove changes between clean and dirty tasks.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Items Taken To Station Disposed/Dedicated Or Disinfected

    The inspectors’ words, 455 words

    “IC-IF TO STATION=DISP/DEDICATE OR DISINFECT CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Items taken into the dialysis station should either be disposed of, dedicated for use only on a single patient, or cleaned and disinfected before being taken to a common clean area or used on another patient. -- Nondisposable items that cannot be cleaned and disinfected (e.g., adhesive tape, cloth covered blood pressure cuffs) should be dedicated for use only on a single patient. -- Unused medications (including multiple dose vials containing diluents) or supplies (syringes, alcohol swabs, etc.) taken to the patient’s station should be used only for that patient and should not be returned to a common clean area or used on other patients. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff thoroughly cleaned and disinfected their stethoscope after use which has the potential for cross contamination and increased infection. Findings include: The facility policy titled “Infection Control for Dialysis Facilities” requires: “...Notes: Refer to the Infection Control Quick Reference Guide for further detail on implementation steps...Non-disposable items are to be disinfected after each patient use, prior to removal from treatment area/station and if contaminated between uses...Stethoscopes will be disinfected with alcohol prep pad and/or 1:100 (one to one hundred) bleach solution....” Observation on 03/06/2024 revealed RN #6 use his/her stethoscope to assess the patient at station #11. RN #6 hung the stethoscope off of his/her left wrist while documenting the assessment in the chairside electronic medical record (EMR) then left the station to assess the patient at station #10 without cleaning and disinfecting the stethoscope. Employee #6 placed the dirty stethoscope on a countertop with clean dialysis supplies away from the dialysis station after leaving the station without cleaning or disinfecting the stethoscope. Additionally, RN #6 was observed picking up the dirty stethoscope to assess the patient at station #3, left the station, assessed the patient at the weight scale, then proceeded to assess patients at stations #5 and #9 without cleaning and disinfection of the stethoscope between patients and stations. Observation on 03/06/2024 revealed PCT #12 gather a stethoscope from a hanger on a wall to listen to a patient’s vascular access at station #8. PCT #12 returned the dirty stethoscope to the hanger without cleaning and disinfecting the stethoscope. Observation on 03/06/2024 revealed PCT #10 use a stethoscope to listen to a patient’s vascular access at station #2. PCT #10 used a small alcohol prep pad to clean only the ear pieces and diaphragm on the bell of the stethoscope. The stethoscope tubing and entire bell were not disinfected. Employee #1 confirmed 03/06/2024 that staff did not clean and disinfect stethoscopes as required by facility policy.”

    Rule V0116. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 363 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1. staff appropriately labeled multi-dose Tubersol medication vial when opened. Failure to label medication vials when opened with an appropriate expiration date prevents staff from knowing when to discard the vial which increases the risk a patient will receive a medication that is no longer stable, and that may be contaminated due to reduction of preservative efficacy as well as an increased exposure to pathogens from accessing a vial multiple times; and 2. staff discarded expired vaccines which has the potential risk that patients may receive an expired, ineffective, and/or contaminated vaccine. Findings include: 1. and 2. The facility policy titled “Medication Policy” requires: “...Medications containing a preservative must be discarded 28 days after opening or accessed (e.g., needle punctured), unless the manufacturer specifies a different (shorter or longer) date or as directed by the manufacturer...Each vial is labeled with the initials of the person opening the vial and the expiration date...Disposal of expired medications....are removed from the treatment and inventory areas and disposed of per state/local regulations....” 1. Observation on 03/06/2024 revealed an open, in use multidose vial of Tubersol purified protein derivative. The vial was not labeled with an open or discard date. Employee #1 confirmed on 03/06/2024 that the open vial of Tubersol was not labeled with an expiration date as required by facility policy. 2. Observation on 03/06/2024 revealed the following expired vaccines in the home therapies medication refrigerator. 1 box - 10 count single dose 0.5 ml vials Pneumovax 23 Pneumococcal Vaccine Polyvalent expired on January 31, 2024 1 - single dose prefilled syringe Prevnar 13 Pneumococcal 13-Valent Conjugate Vaccine expired on October 31, 2023 1 box - 10 count prefilled syringes Prevnar 20, Pneumococcal 20-Valent Conjugate Vaccine expired on February 29, 2024 Employee #1 confirmed on 03/06/2024 that staff did not remove and discard expired vaccines as required by policy.”

    Rule V0143. Standard-level.

  • Medical Records - Complete, Accurate, Accessible

    The inspectors’ words, 468 words

    “MR-COMPLETE, ACCURATE, ACCESSIBLE CFR(s): 494.170 The dialysis facility must maintain complete, accurate, and accessible records on all patients, including home patients who elect to receive dialysis supplies and equipment from a supplier that is not a provider of ESRD services and all other home dialysis patients whose care is under the supervision of the facility. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on review of facility policy, medical records and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1. AMAs (against medical advice) forms were completed for treatment times not met for (3) of (3) incenter hemodialysis patients (Patients #1, 2, and 4) with early termination of treatment which has the potential risk of adverse events related to inadequate dialysis; and 2. there was a documented discharge summary within 30 days of the patient’s discharge for (2) of (3) patients (Patient #7 and 8), which poses the potential risk of lack of coordination and continuity of care. Findings include: The facility policy titled “Prescribed Treatment Time Not Met” requires: “...1. The Registered Nurse (RN) will verify that a patient signs the Early termination of Treatment Against Medical Advice form any time the patient requests to terminate their treatment earlier than the prescribed run time....4. A copy of the Early termination of Treatment Against Medical Advice form signed by the patient, if shortened voluntarily by the patient, will be kept in the patient’s health record....” Patient #1 Treatment records dated 02/06/2024 through 03/05/2024 revealed (3) of (10) treatments were terminated early. The medical record did not contain AMA documentation for (3) of the (3) early terminated treatments. Patient #2 Treatment records dated 02/05/2024 through 03/04/2024 revealed (7) of (11) treatments were terminated early. The medical record did not contain AMA documentation for (6) of the (7) early terminated treatments. Patient #4 Treatment records dated 01/23/2024 through 03/05/2024 revealed (4) of (13) treatments were terminated early. The medical record did not contain AMA documentation for (4) of the (4) early terminated treatments. Employees #1 and 2 confirmed on 12/18/2023 that AMA forms were not completed for the aforementioned patients as required by facility policy. 2. Medical records review conducted on 03/11/2024 revealed missing discharge summaries from the following charts. Patient #7 The patient was discharged from the facility on 01/29/2024. The medical record did not contain a signed discharge summary completed by the patient’s nephrologist signed within 30 days of the patient’s discharge. Patient #8 The patient was discharged from the facility on 10/16/2023. The medical record did not contain a signed discharge summary completed by the patient’s nephrologist signed within 30 days of the patient’s discharge. Employee #1 confirmed on 03/11/2024 that Patients #7 and 8’s medical records did not contain discharge summaries completed within 30 days of the patients’ discharge from the facility.”

    Rule V0726. Standard-level.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 11, 2024Standard inspection4 deficiencies cited
Mar 11, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on Jun 10, 2009.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: DaVita.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis.
  • Doesn’t offer home hemodialysis training and a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 12 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the DaVita chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, as expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, better than expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • CMS gives no : “Too few completed survey responses to report.”
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 5Not rated

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Pima County, 19 have a star rating from CMS: 7 rated 4 of 5, 8 rated 3 of 5, 4 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.