Hearth Record

032617 Tucson West Dialysis Center (Fmc)

A dialysis facility in Tucson, Arizona 85705

100 W Grant Rd, Tucson, Arizona 85705. (520) 624-0266.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 28, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 30, 2025: a standard inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 30, 2025: standard inspection5 deficiencies
  • Ic - Wear Gloves/Hand Hygiene

    The inspectors’ words, 404 words

    “IC-WEAR GLOVES/HAND HYGIENE CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1) Wear disposable gloves when caring for the patient or touching the patient’s equipment at the dialysis station. Staff must remove gloves and wash hands between each patient or station. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene between glove changes and donned clean gloves when providing patient care which has the potential risk of increased infection for patients through cross contamination and contact transmission. Findings include: The facility policy titled “Hand Hygiene” requires: “...Purpose...to prevent transmission of pathogenic microorganisms to patients and staff through cross contamination...Hands will be...Decontaminated using alcohol-based hand rub or by washing hands with antimicrobial soap and water...Before and after direct contact with patients...Entering and leaving the treatment area...Before performing any invasive procedure...Immediately after removing gloves...After contact with inanimate objects near the patient...When moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site of the same patient...After contact with the dialysis wall box, concentrate, drain, or water lines...After contact with other objects within the patient station or treatment space....” Observation on 12/29/2025, revealed Employee #12 providing patient care. Employee #12 donned a pair of gloves without performing hand hygiene, then retrieved a second pair of gloves which remained in his right hand while escorting a patient from the lobby to the treatment area. Employee #12 took the patient’s temperature with his gloved right hand and extra gloves, walked the patient to the scale and reset some buttons for the scale with his gloved hand, walked the patient to station #15, left the station, walked to station #22 to talk to another employee, then walked to station #24 and touched the machine. Glove changes and hand hygiene were not observed to take place between any of the patient care tasks. Employee #12 was observed re-gloving in the same manner two additional times during the observation. One set of gloves were donned with a second set of gloves retrieved and held in his right hand while providing care. One occurrence the employee did not hand sanitize prior to donning the first set of gloves, and on the second occurrence the employee donned the dirty second set of gloves without performing hand hygiene between glove changes. Employee #1 confirmed on 12/29/2025, that Employee #12 did not perform hand hygiene and glove changes as required by facility policy.”

    Rule V0113. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Wear Gowns, Shields/Masks; Staff Not Eat/Drink In Tx Area

    The inspectors’ words, 217 words

    “IC-GOWNS, SHIELDS/MASKS-NO STAFF EAT/DRINK CFR(s): 494.30(a)(1)(i) Staff members should wear gowns, face shields, eye wear, or masks to protect themselves and prevent soiling of clothing when performing procedures during which spurting or spattering of blood might occur (e.g., during initiation and termination of dialysis, cleaning of dialyzers, and centrifugation of blood). Staff members should not eat, drink, or smoke in the dialysis treatment area or in the laboratory. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff wore appropriately maintained fluid resistant gowns while providing patient care which has the potential for contamination of clothing and spread of infection throughout the facility. Findings include: The facility policy titled “Personal Protective Equipment” requires: “...Gowns ...Personal protective fluid resistant gowns must be changed whenever visibly soiled or in disrepair ....” Observation on 12/29/2025, revealed Employee #12 providing patient care in the treatment area. Employee #12 ’ s fluid resistant gown was torn in the front with a large hole approximately 4 inches in diameter with the ties torn off and the gown fluttering around the employee as he walked around the facility. Employee #1 confirmed on 12/29/2025, that Employee #12 ’ s gown was torn and worn inappropriately while providing patient care.”

    Rule V0115. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Clean, Disinfect Surfaces & Equipment/Written Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 296 words

    “IC-DISINFECT SURFACES/EQUIP/WRITTEN PROTOCOL CFR(s): 494.30(a)(4)(ii) [The facility must demonstrate that it follows standard infection control precautions by implementing- (4) And maintaining procedures, in accordance with applicable State and local laws and accepted public health procedures, for the-] (ii) Cleaning and disinfection of contaminated surfaces, medical devices, and equipment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure staff thoroughly cleaned and disinfected the dialysis station after use which has the potential risk of spread of infection between patients. Findings include: The facility policy titled “Cleaning and Disinfecting the Dialysis Station” requires: “...General Cleaning...The dialysis station could become contaminated with blood and other body fluids during treatment...Externally disinfect the dialysis machine with 1:100 bleach solutions after each dialysis treatment....” Observation on 12/29/2025, revealed Employee #9 cleaning and disinfecting the vacated dialysis station #21. Employee #9 failed to disinfect all surfaces of the machine with bleach solution, missing the hangers on the IV pole, the TV arm, and missed sections of upholstery on the dialysis chair. Observation on 12/29/2025, revealed Employee #3 cleaning and disinfecting the vacated dialysis station #15. Employee #3 failed to disinfect all surfaces of the machine with bleach solution, missing the upper portion of the IV pole above the machine bracket, the IV pole hangers, and missed sections of upholstery on the dialysis chair. Observation on 12/29/2025, revealed 3M Transpore plastic medical tape used to tape machine components (YubiKey scanner device) onto the dialysis machine. The tape and tape residue was not removed to clean and disinfect the dialysis machines between patients at stations #11 and 14. Employee #1 confirmed on 12/29/2025, that dialysis machines and equipment at the patient stations were not cleaned and disinfected as required.”

    Rule V0122. Standard-level.

  • Ic - Aseptic Techniques For Iv Meds

    The inspectors’ words, 427 words

    “IC-ASEPTIC TECHNIQUES FOR IV MEDS CFR(s): 494.30(b)(2) [The facility must-] (2) Ensure that clinical staff demonstrate compliance with current aseptic techniques when dispensing and administering intravenous medications from vials and ampules; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure: 1. staff appropriately labeled multi-dose Heparin and Lidocaine medication vials when opened. Failure to label medication vials when opened with an appropriate expiration date prevents staff from knowing when to discard the vial which increases the risk a patient will receive a medication that is no longer stable, and that may be contaminated due to reduction of preservative efficacy as well as an increased exposure to pathogens from accessing a vial multiple times; and 2. predrawn medications were labeled appropriately which has the potential risk for patients to receive incorrect, or expired medications which can have adverse effects on the patient ’ s health. Findings include: 1. and 2. The facility policy titled “Medication Preparation and Administration” requires “...When preparing medications if the vial is not used immediately in its entirety, the nurse or PCT (if allowed by state regulations), must place the date and time the vial was opened on the medication label along with their initials ...Any open multidose vials must be discarded 28 days after opening or per manufacturer ’ s expiration date ...Medications may be pre-drawn up to 4 hours prior to administration. These pre-drawn medications shall be labeled ....” 1. Observation on 12/29/2025, revealed an opened 30 ml vial of Heparin Sodium labeled with an open date of 12/25/29, and an open and in-use, unlabeled 20 ml vial of Lidocaine Hcl. Both medications were found in the medication cabinet at the nurses station. Employee #1 confirmed on 12/29/2025, that the open, in-use vials of Heparin and Lidocaine were not labeled as required by facility policy. 2.Observation on 12/29/2025 revealed pre-drawn medication syringes in the medication cabinet at the nurses station. Three (3) 10 ml syringes of Heparin Sodium were labeled for Patients #9 and 11; however, there was no time that the medication was prepared or initials of the preparer written on the label. Additionally, two (2) 3 ml syringes contained an unknown, clear fluid that was not labeled with the contents of the syringes. Employee #1 confirmed on 12/29/2025, that the pre-drawn Heparin was not labeled with the time the medication was prepared and that two additional syringes in the medication cabinet contained unknown solutions and were not labeled as required by facility policy.”

    Rule V0143. Standard-level.

  • Pe - Equipment Maintenance - Manufacturer’S Dfu

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “PE-EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE-MANUFACTURER’S DFU CFR(s): 494.60(b) The dialysis facility must implement and maintain a program to ensure that all equipment (including emergency equipment, dialysis machines and equipment, and the water treatment system) are maintained and operated in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 37489 Based on document review, observation, and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure (9) of (24) dialysis station chairs did not have torn and cracked vinyl that exposed underlying padding. Failure to maintain intact vinyl on dialysis chairs poses a risk of infection though cross contamination as exposed foam and fabric on the chair may harbor potentially infectious material that cannot be cleaned and disinfected. Findings include: The facility policy titled “Equipment Installation-Operation-Maintenance-Repair-and Disposal” requires: “...Dialysis Chairs ...Any equipment or device that is not fully functioning in accordance with IFU or company policy, must be repaired or replaced as soon as reasonably possible ...If the faulty equipment poses a risk to the patient or staff, the device will be immediately removed from service ....” Observation on 12/29/2025 revealed (9) of (24) dialysis chairs in use on the treatment floor had torn and cracked upholstery in various locations on the chairs including arm rests, foot rests, and head rests. The tears in the chairs ranged from 1/4 inch to 6 inches long and 12 inches wide with exposed underlying fabric backing and foam. Areas with multiple large sections of cracks were in areas patient ’ s heads routinely rested and were unable to be cleaned. Employee #1 confirmed on 12/29/2025 that the observed chairs were in disrepair with torn and cracked vinyl that prevented appropriate disinfection between patients. Additionally, the facility leadership was aware of the deficient practice and had not replaced or repaired the chairs to date.”

    Rule V0403. Standard-level.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 30, 2025Standard inspection5 deficiencies cited

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified dialysis facility, certified or last recertified on May 7, 2008.
  • Run for profit.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Chain: Fresenius Medical Care.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities.
  • None of the deficiencies cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, QCOR Dialysis Facility (ESRD) 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

What does it offer?

  • Offers in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis training.
  • Doesn’t offer a shift starting at 5 p.m. or later.
  • 24 dialysis stations.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • In CMS’s survey, patients rate its staff 1 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Part of the Fresenius Medical Care chain, as CMS lists it.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities, so no other owner is named.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How do patients fare?

  • CMS rates it 4 of 5 stars (Jan 1, 2021 to Dec 31, 2024).
  • Compared by CMS with what it expects for the facility’s patients: patient survival, as expected; hospital admissions, as expected; readmissions to hospital, as expected; blood transfusions, as expected; emergency department visits, as expected; emergency department visits within 30 days of a hospital stay, as expected; bloodstream infections, better than expected; patients dialysing through a fistula, better than expected; patients put on a kidney transplant waitlist in their first year of dialysis, as expected; patients on a kidney transplant waitlist, as expected.
  • Patients rate it 2 of 5 in CMS’s survey of in-center hemodialysis patients (38 interviews, Oct 18, 2024 to Jul 11, 2025): 62% rated the facility 9 or 10 out of 10.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility and Patient survey (ICH CAHPS) - Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Star ratingCMS’s star rating for dialysis facilities, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the facility’s in-center hemodialysis patients (ICH CAHPS), 1 to 52 of 5

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 20 dialysis facilities CMS lists in Pima County, 19 have a star rating from CMS: 7 rated 4 of 5, 8 rated 3 of 5, 4 rated 2 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 4 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Dialysis Facility - Listing by Facility. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for dialysis facilities, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • QCOR says it has no dialysis inspection reports after February 19, 2026, while it moves to a new system: a later inspection is not shown yet.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for dialysis facilities.
  • CMS publishes no owners file for dialysis facilities: the chain it lists is the only owner named.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.