Countryside Montessori School Inc.
A child day center in Lynchburg, Virginia 24502
21724 Timberlake Road, Lynchburg, Virginia 24502. (540) 520-8006.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 9 deficiencies in the last three years
- May 262026 the latest visit on record
- 42 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
14 inspections on record, the latest on May 26, 2026.
9 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 5 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
May 26, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
There shall always be at least one staff member on duty who has obtained within the last three years instruction in performing the daily heath observation of children.
“There was no staff member on duty who has obtained instruction in performing the daily health observation.”
Nov 20, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
The center shall obtain documentation that each child has received the immunizations required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“There was no immunization in the record of Child 4, who had been enrolled for approximately one month.”
Dec 10, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
The center is required to request a search of the child abuse and neglect registry prior to hire, from any state in which the individual has resided in the preceding five years.
“The center did not request a search of the child abuse and neglect registry from two states for Staff 1, who has been employed for more than a month and was working with children at the time of the inspection.”
-
Th center shall provide the licensing representative an annual fire inspection report from the appropriate fire official having jurisdiction.
“The most recent fire inspection available during the inspection was dated 09/07/2023.”
-
At least one staff in each classroom or area where children are present shall have current certification in both CPR and first aid.
“Staff 3 was the only staff member providing care to a group of children. Staff 3?s certification in first aid and CPR was expired by 3 months.”
-
Bottle fed infants who cannot hold their own bottle shall be held when fed.
“Child 5 was observed laying on their back with a bottle propped.”
Jun 5, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, the center failed to obtain documentation that each child has received the immunization required by the State Board of Health before the child can attend the center.
“Evidence: The record for Child 5 documented the first date of attendance as 04/26/2021. The immunization record was obtained 04/28/2021.”
Dec 7, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on review of five staff’s records, the center failed to ensure that no person shall be hired for compensated employment prior to the enter obtaining an employment eligibility letter upon completion of a fingerprint background check as required by the Code of Virginia.
“Evidence: Staff # 4 had a documented employment date of 06/12/2023. A returned letter of eligibility was dated 07/13/2023. Staff # 6 did not provide documentation when requested.”
-
Based on record review and interviews, the center failed to ensure that all emergency drills were documented.
“Evidence: The center did not have documentation of a fire evacuation drill for November of 2023.”
Mar 6, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on review of five children’s records, the center failed to that immunizations for children 2 and under were updated every 6 months.
“Evidence: Child # 5 (DOB 5/22/2020) and documented enrollment date of 10/26/2020 did not have updated immunizations ever six months. The most recent immunization record is 8/25/2020.”
Dec 9, 2022: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on review of five staff records, the center failed to obtain the finding from a search of the central registry within 30 days of hire.
“Evidence: 1.Staff # 4 had a hire date of 9/1/2022. A return search of the central registry was not in the record. Staff # 3 did not provide documentation when requested. 2. Staff # 5 had a hire date of 6/22/22. A return search of the central registry was not in the record. Staff # 3 did not provide documentation when requested.”
-
Based on interview and review of six staff records, the center failed to ensure that all staff had a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening at least every two years from the day of the initial screening or testing. Evidence:
“1.Staff # 1 started employment on 10/09/2020 and the most recent TB screening was dated 7/10/2020. The Staff person was working with children on the day of the inspection without a current TB screening.”
-
Based on observation of the infant room, the center failed to ensure that all areas required for diapering were met.
“Evidence: 1.Observed the diaper changing pad in the nido room had several tears which makes the pad absorbent.”
Aug 29, 2022: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that all areas and equipment was maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
The inspectors’ words, 127 words
“Evidence: 1.Observed a structure of tree logs in the outdoor play area. The logs were different sizes and were stacked haphazardly with no ground support to keep them from moving. Some were approximately 6 ft. long with approximately 2 ft. diameter. The entire structure stood approximately 5 ft. tall. There were several large openings in the structure that posed an entrapment hazard and pinch point for children’s limbs. The tree structure had several protruding limbs and had splintering pieces that posed a hazard to children. 2.Observed on the outside play area a stacked pile of wooden logs that had rebar protruding out of the top of the logs. Tennis balls were placed on the top of the rebar. The rebar poses a protrusion and an entanglement hazard.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that all play structures that required resilient surfacing had the required amount.
“Evidence: 1.The tire swing had resilient surfacing directly under the swing. The requirement is for the resilient surfacing to extend all directions that the tire swing goes and double the area. 2.The composite play structure that has four slides, climbing wall and a swinging bridge had resilient surfacing mats that only extended approximately 2 feet in the direct fall zones. The requirement is for the resilient surfacing to extend six feet on all sides of the equipment.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that when staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection and guidance. Evidence: 1.Nine chicken hens, one rooster and one turkey were observed roaming around the outdoor play area with the children. There were several child sized picnic tables in the area. The inspectors observed pieces of food, such as chicken nuggets and sweet potato fries, on the ground around the picnic tables. The poultry were observed eating the pieces of food.
The inspectors’ words, 179 words
“There were 6 children, approximately ages 3 ? 5 years old, playing in the same area around the poultry. Two children were observed walking around barefoot in same area. Poultry feces was observed on the ground around the child sized picnic tables. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Poultry should not be kept in schools, childcare centers, and other facilities with children younger than 5 years old. If this is not possible, the area where the chickens roam should be considered contaminated, and the children should not be allowed to play, eat, or drink in these areas. Young children are more likely to get sick from germs as their immune systems are still developing and they are more likely to put unwashed hands into their mouth.” 2.Observed four goats in a corral inside the outdoor play area. The goats were able to place their snout through the gate and have access to the children. Observed in the corral was feces from the goats. The feces was accessible to the children through the openings in the gate.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that when children are in ongoing mixed age groups, the staff-to children ratio is applicable to the youngest child in the group.
“Evidence: Observed in the infant room 10 children with two staff members. The youngest child present was 11 months old. The room required three staff members. The ratio is one staff person for four infants.”
-
Based on observation and interview with staff, the center failed to ensure that all children 12 months and younger were using a crib.
“Evidence: On the day of the inspection, there was one child 12 months and younger that was sleeping on an infant bed and not the required crib per the standard.”
-
Based on observation of the infant room, the center failed to ensure that when cloth diapers are used a separate leak proof storage system that is either foot-operated or used in such a way that neither the staff member’s hand nor the soiled diaper touches an exterior surface of the storage system.
“Evidence: Observed three zipped cloth bags hanging from the diaper changing table. Each bag had soiled cloth diapers in them. The method of disposal did not ensure that a staff’s member’s hands nor the soiled diaper touched the exterior surface of the storage system.”
May 23, 2022: inspection9 deficiencies
-
Based on review of the most recent fire inspection the, center failed to ensure that an annual fire inspection was conducted.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent fire inspection was 1/28/2021”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that all areas and equipment was maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
The inspectors’ words, 209 words
“Evidence: 1. Observed in the playground area a thorny bush that was approximately 8 inches in diameter. Several children were outside with no shoes on. One child pointed the thorny bush out to the inspector and told her ?that it pokes them and they are not allowed to touch it.? 2. Observed children playing on a large makeshift play structure. This play structure was made of tree logs. The logs were different sizes, some were approximately 6 ft. long with approximately 2 ft. diameter. The logs were placed haphazardly with no ground support to keep them from moving. The entire play structure stood approximately 5 f tall. The staff # 4 stated that the logs are supported by the weight and pressures of the logs. There were several areas that had openings that could allow for children to fall down into the middle of the structure and cause an entrapment hazard or allow for a pinch point for children’s limbs. The play structure had several protruding limbs and had splintering pieces that posed a hazard. 3. Observed around the middle of the outside play area were small logs used as stepping stones. Some of the logs had limbs protruding out that posed a hazard to the children in care.”
-
Based on observation, the center failed to ensure that all play structures that required resilient surfacing had the required amount.
“Evidence: 1. The tire swing had resilient surfacing directly under the swing. The requirement is for the resilient surfacing to extend all directions that the tire swing goes and double the area. 2. The makeshift log play structure did not have the required resilient surfacing around the perimeter. There was not enough mulch around it to measure.”
-
Based on observation and interviews, the center failed to ensure that when staff are supervising children they always ensure their care, protection and guidance.
The inspectors’ words, 200 words
“Evidence: 1. There were several child sized picnic tables in the outside play area. Approximately six chickens were observed roaming around the play area with the children and were observed walking on the picnic tables. The children were asked to remove the chickens off the picnic tables. Also while the chickens were roaming around there were children approximately ages 14 months ? 5 years were playing in the same area. The 14 month old child was observed crawling on the ground and two children were walking around the play area barefoot. 2. Observed three goats in a corral inside the play area. The goats were able to place their heads through the gate and have access to the children. Inspectors observed children feeding the goat weeds from the play area. One child stated to the inspector that ?the goats bite our fingers?. Staff # 4 was asked about the goats and she stated that ?the goats nibble on the children’s? clothes. 3. When Licensing staff entered the infant room, a small dog started barking and growling and ran across the infant floor beds towards the inspectors. Staff # 3 stated “you startled the dog”. The infant beds were not occupied”
-
Based on observation of the outside play area, the center failed to ensure that when children are in ongoing mixed age groups, the staff-to-children ratio is applicable to the youngest child in the group.
“Evidence: 1. Upon arrival at 8:45 A.M. there were 16 children outside ages 14 months to 5 years old with two staff. The required ratio is one staff to four children when the group is combined. The required number of staff is four staff. At 9:08 A.M. there were 22 children with four staff. The required number of staff would be seven for this grouping of children.”
-
Based on observation and discussion with the director, the center failed to ensure that all children 12 months and younger were using a crib.
“Evidence: 1. On the day of the inspection there were three children 12 months and younger that were sleeping on an infant bed and not the required crib per the standard.”
-
Based on observation of the infant room, the center failed to ensure that when cloth diapers are used a separate leak proof storage system that is either foot-operated or used in such a way that neither the staff member’s hand nor the soiled diaper touches an exterior surface of the storage system.
“Evidence: 1. Observed two zipped cloth bags hanging from the diaper changing table. Each bag had soiled cloth diapers in them. The method of disposal did not ensure that a staff’s member’s hands nor the soiled diaper touched the exterior surface of the storage system.”
-
Based on review of six staff’s records, the center failed to ensure that at least two staff members who meet the requirement for First Aid and CPR present on the premises during the center’s hours of operation.
“Evidence: Staff # 6 was the only staff present during the inspection that had First Aid and CPR.”
-
Based on interviews and observation, the center failed to ensure that all manure was removed from barns, stables, and corrals at least once a day and stored and disposed of in a manner to prevent the breeding of flies.
“Evidence 1. Observed chickens roaming around freely in the outside play area. Verified through interviews the chicken coop is cleaned weekly. 2. There were three goats in a corral that has a fence around it. Verified through interviews the corral is cleaned weekly.”
Feb 4, 2022: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on discussion with the staff and review of children’s ages, the center failed to ensure that cribs shall be used for children under 12 months of age.
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Evidence: 1. Staff 1 stated that the center does not have cribs for children under 12 months of age to sleep in. 2. Staff 1 stated that children under 12 months of age sleep on ?floor beds?. The floor beds align with the Montessori philosophy. 3. There are four children under the age of 12 months in care: Child 1 was determined to be 7 months of age; Child 2 was determined to be 4 months of age; Child 3 was determined to be 10 months of age; and Child 4 was determined to be 3 months of age.”
Jan 12, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on review of two staff’s records, the center failed to ensure that all out of state required backgrounds were obtained.
“Evidence: 1. Staff # 2 lived out side of Virginia in the past five years and did not have documentation of the out of state sex offender required.”
-
Based on observation and discussion with the director, the center failed to ensure that all children 12 months and younger were using a crib.
“Evidence: 1. On the day of the inspection there were four children 12 month and younger that were sleeping on a infant bed. This is a Montessori approach for the infants to sleep on this type of bed.”
All 14 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 20, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| May 27, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 3, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 10, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 7, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 6, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 6, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 9, 2022 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Aug 29, 2022 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| May 23, 2022 | Inspection | 9 violations cited |
| Feb 4, 2022 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jan 12, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Apr 19, 2027.
- Ages: 1 month - 7 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 42 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 3 complaint inspections on record.
- 1 complaint allegation published with Virginia’s findings, 1 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 2022 | Complaint | Allegation: Equipment. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 44 child care providers in the City of Lynchburg, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 6; this one had 9.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Heritage United Methodist Church | 0 |
| Tree of Life Ministries | 8 |
| Five Star Academy | 12 |
| Ms. Gloria Almond | 0 |
| Caterpillar Clubhouse #2 | 25 |
| Ms. Quiana Jones | 0 |
| New Beginnings Learning Center | 18 |
| Countryside Montessori School Inc. This child care provider | 9 |
| HumanKind - Lynchburg | 16 |
| Ted & Ted’s Tiny Tots LLC | 16 |
| Learning Tree of Lynchburg | 39 |
| Timberlake Church, Inc. | 3 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.