Kiddie Academy of West Creek
A child day center in Richmond, Virginia 23238
840 Broad Branch Way, Richmond, Virginia 23238. (804) 362-2362.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 9 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 62026 the latest visit on record
- 158 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
14 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 6, 2026.
9 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
9 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 6, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance.
“On July 30, 2026, Staff #1 fed a bottle to child #1 (age 7 months) that belonged to another child.”
Jun 9, 2026: inspection1 deficiency
-
The center shall obtain documentation of additional immunizations once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Child #6, 23 months old, last documented immunization was over 1 year and 6 months ago.”
Jun 21, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on review of ten children’s records, the center did not obtain documentation of immunizations for one child before the child’s attendance.
“Evidence: 1. The record of child #1, enrolled 04/15/2024, contained documentation of immunizations dated 04/16/2024 exceeding the first day of attendance. 2. The administrator confirmed child #1 was in attendance on 04/15/2024.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the center did not ensure infant walker were not used.
“Evidence: An infant walker was observed in classroom ?Infant 2?. The administrator stated the walker had not been used for a while but had been used for a child to assist in learning to walk.”
-
Based on review of ten staff records, the center did not obtain all required documentation for one staff record.
“Evidence: 1.The record of staff #5, identified as a program lead, did not contain documentation to demonstrate that the individual possesses the education required by the job position. 2. The administrator stated staff #5 had the equivalent to a high school diploma however she did not have written documentation.”
Mar 28, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Repeat Based on review of 12 staff records, the center did not ensure that each staff member submitted documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children. The documentation shall have been completed within 30 days prior to employment.
“Evidence: The record of staff #8, employed 08/21/2023, contained documentation of a negative tuberculosis screening dated 03/11/2023. The tuberculosis screening exceeded 30 days prior to employment.”
-
Based on a review of staff records, observations, and interviews, the center did not ensure at least one staff member who meets the qualifications of a program leader or program director shall be regularly present in each grouping of children.
The inspectors’ words, 329 words
“Evidence: 1. The record of staff #18, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 12 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. 2. The record of staff #14, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 12 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. 3. The record of staff #17, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 12 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. 4. The record of staff #16, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 16 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. 5. The record of staff #22, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 16 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. The record also did not contain documentation of education as required by the job position. 6. The record of staff #7, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 12 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. The record also did not contain documentation of education as required by the job position. 7. The record of staff #15, identified as a program lead, and observed supervising a group of children during the inspection on 03/28/2023, contained documentation of 16 hours of training when 24 hours was required to meet lead qualifications. 8. A member of administration stated they had read the standards wrong and believed only 12 hours of training was required to meet lead qualifications.”
-
Based on review of medications, the center did not ensure when an authorization for medications expires, the parent shall be notified that the medication needs to be picked up within 14 days or the parent must renew the authorization. Medications that are not picked up by the parent within 14 days will be disposed of by the center.
“Evidence: 1. The medication authorizations for child #11 expired on 12/22/2023. The medications were on site exceeding 14 days from the date the authorization expired. The medication had not been administered. 2. The medication authorization for child #9, expired on 02/29/2024. The authorization was only signed by the parent, which gave authorization for ten days. The medication was on site exceeding 14 days from the date the authorization expired. The medication had not been administered.”
-
Based on review of staff records, observations and interview, the center did not ensure at least one staff in each classroom or area, where children are present shall have current certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) as appropriate to the age of the children in care. The training shall include an in-person competency demonstration.
The inspectors’ words, 173 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for staff #4, staff #7 and staff #21 did not contain documentation of current CPR certification. The three staff were observed in charge of a group of children in the infant classroom during the inspection on 03/28/2024. 2. The record of staff #18 did not contain documentation of current CPR certification. Staff #18 was observed in charge of a group of children in the pre-k classroom during the inspection on 03/28/2024. 3. The record for staff #8, staff #9 and staff #16 did not contain documentation of current CPR certification. The three staff were observed in charge of a group of children in the early pre-school classroom during the inspection on 03/28/2024. 4.. The record for staff #17, staff #19 and staff #20 did not contain documentation of current CPR certification. The three staff were observed in charge of group of children in the young infant classroom during the inspection on 03/28/2024. 5. The owner stated the staff members had not completed the hands-on portion for certification in CPR.”
Jun 26, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the center did not ensure children under 10 years of age were always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff.
“Evidence: On 06/26/2023, Ten children from Classroom #7 (Three through Five Years) were observed participating in a tennis clinic located outside on the center’s tennis courts. Center staff were not present for approximately 10 minutes while the 10 children were being instructed by two independent contractors.”
-
Based on review of nine children’s records, the center did not have a written allergy action care plan for one child diagnosed with a food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the steps to take in the event of an allergic reaction.
“Evidence: The record for Child #3 (start date 12/28/2020) indicated the child has a diagnosed food allergy. A written food allergy action plan had not been obtained as of 06/26/2023.”
Dec 14, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on review of eight staff records, the center did not obtain documentation of a tuberculosis screening for two staff that had been completed within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The record of staff #4, employed 9/1/2022, contained documentation of a tuberculosis screening dated 11/28/2021 exceeding 30 calendar days prior to hire. 2. The record of staff #5, employed 10/25/2022, contained documentation of a tuberculosis screening dated 6/05/2022 exceeding 30 calendar days prior to hire.”
Jun 10, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation, the center did not ensure hazardous substances such as cleaning materials were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: A canister of stainless steel cleaner was observed unlocked, on top of the refrigerator in the infant classroom.”
All 14 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jun 9, 2026 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 20, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 4, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 13, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 18, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 21, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Mar 28, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Mar 28, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 26, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Jun 26, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Dec 14, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jun 10, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jan 10, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Jun 23, 2028.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 158 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 3 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 8 child care providers in Goochland County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 10.5; this one had 9.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Kiddie Academy of West Creek This child care provider | 9 |
| Hebron Presbyterian Church | 6 |
| Mount Gilead Baptist Church | 1 |
| Adams International School | 17 |
| Bundle of Joy - Goochland | 20 |
| Mariah Ulmet | Not given |
| Kaiolani Schreiber | Not given |
| GEF EdVentures - Randolph Elementary | 12 |
| GEF EdVentures - Byrd Elementary | 12 |
| GEF EdVentures - Goochland Elementary | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.