James Madison University
A child day center in Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807
821 South Main Street, Harrisonburg, Virginia 22807. (540) 568-6089.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 19 deficiencies in the last three years
- Oct 272026 the latest visit on record
- 75 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
13 inspections on record, the latest on Oct 27, 2026.
19 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
19 deficiencies in 5 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. The last 3 years, to Oct 30, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Sep 9, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-40-M
“The center shall maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions. The list did not contain the name of one child with a dietary restriction.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Staff records shall include documentation to demonstrate that the individual possesses the education, certification, and experience required by the job position. Staff #3 did not have documentation required for the job position.”
Jan 29, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-40-E
The inspectors’ words, 102 words
“The operational responsibilities of the licensee shall include ensuring that the center’s activities, services, and facilities are maintained in compliance with these standards, the center’s own policies and procedures that are required by these standards, and the terms of the current license issued by the department. The center did not maintain compliance with the center’s procedures for administering medication which requires following all MAT procedures. The five rights were not matched as a prescribed medication was not given to the right child. On (date) Staff #1 administered a medication to child #1 (two years of age) that was prescribed to Child #2.”
-
8VAC20-780-510-I
“The center may administer prescription medication that would normally be administered by a parent or guardian to a child provided the center administers drugs only to the child identified on the prescription label in accordance with the prescriber’s instructions pertaining to dosage, frequency, and manner of administration. On January 22, 2025 Staff #1 administered a prescription medication to a two-year-old that was not the child identified on the prescription label.”
Dec 4, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-280-B
“Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, insecticides, and pesticides shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children. The janitor’s closet with left propped open with two buckets of cleaning mixture on top of a cart on wheels and other hazardous substances inside.”
-
8VAC20-780-340-A
“When staff are supervising children, they shall always ensure their care, protection, and guidance. The emergency medication for Child #5 could not be found.”
-
8VAC20-780-510-E
“The center’s procedures for administering medication shall: For nonprescription medication, be consistent with the manufacturer’s instructions for age, duration, and dosage; Include duration of the parent’s authorization for medication, provided that it shall expire or be renewed after 10 work days. Long-term prescription drug use and over-the- counter medication may be allowed with written authorization from the child’s physician and parent; and Include methods to prevent use of outdated medication. The center’s procedures do not contain the required information.”
Feb 26, 2024: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure fingerprint results were submitted for a new staff member prior to employment.
“Evidence: The record for staff 5 documents employment date as 8/15/22. The center does not have the required fingerprint results per the administrator.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure a new staff member completed a sworn statement or affirmation before employment.
“Evidence: The record for staff 5 documents the employment date as 8/15/22. The sworn statement is dated 9/14/22.”
-
(REPEAT VIOLATION) Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure central registry findings were obtained within 30 days of employment.
“Evidence: Per the administrator the hire date for staff 6 was 12/14/2023. The record for staff 6 did not contain findings of a central registry background check.”
-
Based on record review, the center failed to ensure staff submitted documentation of a negative TB screening within the last 30 calendar days of the date of employment. and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: The record for staff 5 documents the date of employment as 8/15/22. The TB documentation is dated 9/26/22”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to maintain a medication authorization available to staff during the entire time it is effective.
“Evidence: The medication and documentation for child 8 was reviewed. The center does not have parent authorization to administer medication.”
-
(REPEAT VIOLATION)Based on record review and interview, the center does not have a written care plan for a child with a diagnosed food allergy.
“Evidence: The medication and supporting documentation for child 9 was reviewed. The center does not have a written care plan for child 9’s food allergy.”
Nov 16, 2023: inspection6 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-330-B
“Based on measurement, the center failed to ensure that when playground equipment is provided, resilient surfacing complies with the minimum safety standards. Evidence: 1. The mulch depth was measured in various places on the toddler and preschool playgrounds. The mulch did not meet the minimum safety requirement of six inches in depth. 2. Staff #7 confirmed the mulch was not six inches in depth.”
-
8VAC20-780-40-M
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“(REPEAT VIOLATION) Based on observation and interview, the center failed to maintain, in a way that is accessible to all staff who work with children, a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions which is dated and kept confidential in each room or area where children are present. Evidence: 1. In each classroom, staff were unable to locate a current written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions. 2. Staff #7 confirmed the classrooms did not contain a written list of all children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions.”
-
8VAC20-780-560-G
The inspectors’ words, 289 words
“Based on observation and interview, the center failed to ensure that when food is brought from home, food containers are clearly labeled in a way that identifies the owner. Evidence: 1. In the Purple Pups classroom, there was four cups without names, nine cups without date and eight lunchboxes without dates. Staff #3 confirmed that the contents of the cups and lunchboxes were brought from home and were missing the dates and names. 2. In the Gold classroom, there was eight cups without names, 14 cups without dates and four lunchboxes without dates and names. Staff #6 confirmed that the contents of the cups and lunchboxes were brought from home and were missing the dates and names. 3. In the Purple classroom, there was four cups without dates, two cups without names, four lunchboxes without dates and three lunchboxes without names. Staff #2 confirmed that the contents of the cups and lunchboxes were brought from home and were missing the dates and names. 4. In the Royal Dukes classroom, there was nine lunchboxes without dates and nine cups without dates. Staff #7 confirmed that the contents of the cups and lunchboxes were brought from home and were missing the dates and names. 5. In the Madison Mini’s classroom, there was 12 lunchboxes without dates and 15 cups without dates. Staff #4 confirmed that the contents of the cups and lunchboxes were brought from home and were missing the dates and names. 6. In the Duke Dogs classroom, there was 14 lunchboxes without dates, five lunchboxes without dates, four cups without a name and seven cups without dates. Staff #1 confirmed that the contents of the cups and lunchboxes were brought from home and were missing the dates and names.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
The inspectors’ words, 107 words
“Based on review of records, the center failed to ensure that each child’s record contained the required information. Evidence: 1. Child #1?s record was missing the phone number of the child’s physician. 2. Child #2?s record was missing the phone number for the place of employment for both parents. 3. Child #3?s record was missing the phone number of the child’s physician. 4. Child #6?s record was missing the phone number for the place of employment for both parents. 5. Child #7?s record was missing the name and phone number of the child’s physician. 5. Staff #7 confirmed that the items were missing from the children’s records.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A-8
“Based on interview, the center did not have a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy. Evidence: 1. Staff #3 confirmed that Child #8 had an epinephrine pen for a food allergy. There was not a written care plan available for Child #8.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“(REPEAT VIOLATION) Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure staff records contained documentation to demonstrate that the individual possessed the education, certification, and experience required by the job position. Evidence: 1. Staff #3?s record did not contain evidence of qualifications. Staff #7 confirmed that the record did not contain the required documentation.”
Jun 22, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, the center failed to post the most current inspection.
“Evidence: 1. At the entrance to the center the inspection posted was dated 3/22/22. The last inspection conducted was dated 12/1/22. 2. The director verified that is the location they posted inspections.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain an immunization record for one out of five children’s records reviewed.
“Evidence: 1. The record for child 1, start date 8/23/22, did not contain an immunization record. 2. The administrator verified they did not have an immunization record for child 1.”
-
Based on interview, the center failed to maintain a written list of children’s allergies, sensitivities, and dietary restrictions in a confidential manner in each classroom where the children are present.
“Evidence: 1. In the Gold classroom the teacher stated a child had a food allergy. She was unable to provide a written list of the child’s allergies in the classroom. 2. The director stated the child was moved to the classroom recently and the list was not moved.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to ensure five out of five staff records contained documentation to demonstrate that the individual possessed the education, certification, and experience required by the job position.
“Evidence: 1. A review of all staff records that were present in the three classrooms did not contain documentation and certification of how any of the teachers met lead teacher qualifications. 2. The director was able to verbally advise the educational background for the staff which showed how they met lead teacher qualifications but did not have documentation to demonstrate.”
Dec 1, 2022: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on record review an interview, the center failed to request an out of state central registry background check within 30 days of beginning employment for a staff member that has lived outside the state of Virginia within the last five years.
“Evidence: 1. The record for staff 4 was reviewed. The sworn statement documented staff 4 lived in NY within the last five years. The record did not contain documentation of completing a request for a central registry check for NY. 2. The record for staff 4 documented the start date of employment as 10/5/22. 3. The administrator verified the center had not completed a request for an out of state central registry background check for staff 4.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain central registry background checks within 30 days from date of hire.
The inspectors’ words, 149 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for staff 1 documents the start date as 8/15/22. The staff record does not contain the results of a central registry. The paperwork for the central registry was notarized on 7/28/22. There is no documentation in the file that the administration followed up with the status of the central registry search. 2. The administrator stated she has not followed up to see the status of the central registry for staff 1. 3. The record for staff 2 documents the start date as 10/11/22. The staff record does not contain the results of a central registry. The paperwork for the central registry was notarized on 9/30/22. There is no documentation in the file that the administration followed up with the status of the central registry search. 4. The administrator stated she has not followed up to see the status of the central registry for staff 2.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to provide staff with all the required topics during orientation prior to working alone with children.
“Evidence: 1. The records for staff 1, staff 2, staff 3 and staff 4 were reviewed. There was no documentation of the four staff completing orientation in preventing abusive head trauma. 2. The administrator stated the staff were not oriented in preventing abusive head trauma.”
-
Based on interview, the center failed to develop a written procedure for preventing abusive head trauma.
“Evidence: The administrator stated they do not have a procedure for preventing abusive head trauma.”
-
Based on interview, the center failed to post in a visible place at each telephone a 911 or local dial number of police, fire and emergency medical services and the number of the regional poison control center.
“Evidence: The administrator stated the numbers are not posted with the phones at the center.”
-
Based on record review and interview, the center failed to obtain a written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“Evidence: 1. The administrator stated child 6 has a dairy food allergy. 2. The child’s record documents a food allergy for dairy. There was no allergy care plan in the child’s record. 3. The administrator stated they did not obtain an allergy care plan for child 6.”
Mar 22, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on review of ten staff files, program did not ensure that a fingerprint based criminal background check was completed prior to first day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The first date of employment for Staff #10 was 11/29/21. 2. The results in the file for Staff #10 was dated 12/7/21.”
All 13 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 19, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 9, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| May 14, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| May 14, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 29, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jan 17, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 4, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Feb 26, 2024 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Nov 16, 2023 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Jun 22, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Dec 1, 2022 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Mar 22, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Mar 27, 2028.
- Ages: 1 year 8 months - 6 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 75 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 1 complaint inspection on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 29 child care providers in the City of Harrisonburg, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 5; this one had 19.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| James Madison University This child care provider | 19 |
| James Madison University-Memorial Hall | 0 |
| Learning Paths Academy | 37 |
| City of Harrisonburg | 8 |
| Dominion Educational Ministries, Inc. | 1 |
| Harrisonburg Baptist Church | 0 |
| Community Preschool, Inc. | 1 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Harrisonburg/Rockingham County-Simms | 4 |
| Woodland Montessori School | 2 |
| Vicki Lucas | 0 |
| Tara Koontz | 3 |
| Shiningstar Daycare Center LLC | 12 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Oct 30, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 30, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.