Elzena Ross
A family day home in Manassas, Virginia 20109
11902 Molly Pitcher Circle, Manassas, Virginia 20109. (703) 568-2319.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 23 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 102026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
22 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 10, 2026.
23 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
23 deficiencies in 5 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jul 6, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider must obtain documentation of a physical examination for each enrolled child either prior to the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Child #2 has been enrolled in the program for 17 months and did not have a physical examination on file. Child #3 has been enrolled in the program for seven months and did not have a physical examination on file.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall obtain for each caregiver an updated Tuberculosis (TB) screening or test every two years from the date of the first screening or more frequently as recommended by a physician. Staff #2’s updated TB screening is overdue by nine months.”
-
Repeat Violation
“Children’s records must contain documentation of the annual review of the child’s emergency contact information. Child #2’s annual review was overdue by five months. Child #5’s annual review was overdue by two years and three months and Child #6’s annual review was overdue by six months.”
Nov 3, 2025: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall obtain documentation of a physical examination for each child prior the child’s first day of attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Child #1, enrolled for nine months, and Child #2, enrolled for over two years, did not have physical examinations on file.”
-
The provider shall obtain for each caregiver an updated Tuberculosis (TB) screening or test every two years from the date of the first screening or more frequently as recommended by a physician.
“Staff #1’s updated TB screening is overdue by two months. Staff #2’s updated TB screening is overdue by over a month.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall ensure children’s records contain all required information. Child #1’s record did not contain the parent’s signed acknowledgement of the receipt of the family day home’s liability insurance status.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall obtain documentation that children have been adequately immunized before the child may attend the family day home. Child #1, enrolled for nine months, and Child #2, enrolled for over two years, did not have immunizations on file.”
Jul 7, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
Applicants for licensure shall submit to a fingerprint-based national criminal history background check prior to operation.
“The fingerprint-based national criminal history background check results for Staff #1 could not be located at the time of inspection.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall obtain documentation of a physical examination prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Child #2, enrolled for over four months, and Child #3, enrolled for over two years, did not have physical examinations on file and both children were present at the time of inspection.”
-
The provider shall ensure children’s records contain all required information.
“Child #2’s record was missing the parent’s signed acknowledgement of receiving the family day home’s liability insurance declaration. Child #3’s record was missing documentation of the annual review of the child’s emergency contact information. Child #3’s record was last reviewed by the parent on 4/26/2023.”
-
The provider is required to review the emergency preparedness and respond plan at least annually and update the plan as needed. The provider shall document in writing each review and update to the emergency plan.
“There was no documentation of an annual review of the emergency plan. The most recent documented review was completed 9/20/2023.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall obtain documentation that children have been adequately immunized according to the requirements of the Code of Virginia and applicable State Board of Health regulations before they may attend. Child #2 has attended the family day home for over four months and did not have the immunization record on file.”
Jan 22, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
The provider shall obtain the results of a fingerprint based criminal history background check for all adult household members.
“Adult Household Member #1 did not have fingerprint results on file.”
-
Repeat Violation
“The provider shall obtain documentation of a physical examination for each child prior to the child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance. Child #2 has been attending the family day home for over one year and eight months and did not have a physical examination on file.”
-
The provider shall obtain documentation of a negative tuberculosis (TB) screening for all adult household members.
“Adult Household Member #1 does not have a TB screening on file.”
-
The provider shall provide each child with an individual crib, cot, rest mat, or bed for resting or napping.
“7 children were observed napping on the floor during the inspection without a crib, cot, rest mat, or bed.”
-
The provider shall obtain documentation that children have been adequately immunized before attending the family day home.
“Child #1 has been attending the family day home for over two weeks and did not have an immunization record on file.”
Jul 2, 2024: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on review of 5 child records, the provider did not obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: The records for Child #3 (Start Date: 10/14/2022), Child #4 (Start Date: 10/14/2022) and Child #5 (Start Date: 3/27/2023) did not contain documentation of a physical examination.”
-
Based on observation, areas and furnishings inside the family day home were not maintained in a safe condition.
“Evidence: In the basement, which is the main programming space for child care, there was an unlocked refrigerator accessible to children in care ranging in ages 11 months to 11 years old. On the bottom lower shelf of the refrigerator door there were two open bottles of wine.”
-
Based on observation, potentially poisonous substances, materials and supplies such as, but not limited to, cleaning agents, disinfectants, deodorizers, plant care chemicals, pesticides, and petroleum distillates were not stored in areas inaccessible to children.
The inspectors’ words, 95 words
“Evidence: 1. In the basement, in the bathroom that was designated for child use, there were disinfectant wipes, with the warning ?Keep out of reach of children?, stored on the shelf behind the toilet. On the shelf next to the toilet, within reach of children, there was one bag of bath salts and two bags of Epsom salts with the warning ?Keep out of reach of children?. In an unlocked cabinet underneath the bathroom sink there was a bottle of bleach and a bottle of all-purpose cleaner both labeled ?Keep out of reach of children?.”
-
Based on review of 5 child records, the provider did not ensure that the record for each child had includes all required information.
The inspectors’ words, 121 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child #1 did not include father’s place of employment and telephone number. 2. The record for Child #2 did not include father’s place of employment and telephone number. 3. The record for Child #3 did not include the address for one of the emergency contact persons and father’s place of employment and telephone number. 4. The record for Child #4 did not include the address for one of the emergency contact persons and father’s place of employment and telephone number. 5. The record for Child #5 did not include the name and policy number of the child’s medical insurance and names of persons other than the custodial parents who are authorized to pick up the child.”
-
Based on observation and staff interviews, the provider did not ensure medication, including refrigerated medication and medications for household members, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
The inspectors’ words, 95 words
“Evidence: 1. In the basement, which is the main programming space for child care, there was an unlocked refrigerator accessible to the children in care. On the second shelf from the bottom on the door of the refrigerator, there was a bottle of Amoxicillin and Children’s Tylenol. On the third shelf of the door of the refrigerator, there was a bottle of Cetirizine and cough syrup. 2. In the basement, in the bathroom that was designated for child use, on the top shelf of the bathroom cabinet, there was a box of unlocked heartburn medication.”
-
Based on documentation review and staff interview, the family day home did not receive general written permission from the parent of each child for the provider to take the child off the premises of the family day home.
“Evidence: Staff #1 and Staff #2 stated that children have been taken off the premises to several locations to include the neighborhood park, movies (2 times a week) and Chuck-E Cheese. Child #1, Child #2, Child #3, Child #4, and Child #5 did not have signed field trip permission forms on file. Staff #1 and Staff #2 stated that they were not aware that they needed written documentation for general ongoing field trips.”
Sep 5, 2023: inspection12 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain documentation of a physical examination prior to each child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: Child #3 (Start Date: 4/17/2023) did not have a physical examination on file.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the provider did not obtain for each caregiver an updated tuberculosis screening or test that was completed within the last two years.
“Evidence: Staff #2’s most recently tuberculosis test on file was completed 8/26/2020.”
-
Based on observation, potentially poisonous supplies, such as disinfectants, were not stored in an area inaccessible to children.
“Evidence: A disinfectant spray with the words “Caution: Keep out of reach of children” was sitting on top of a storage bin approximately 3 feet in height within the programming space and was accessible to the children in care.”
-
Based on observation, children under two years of age and children over two years of age who are not developmentally ready to climb or descend stairs without supervision had access to stairs.
“Evidence: There was no gate at the bottom of the stairs leading from the main level of the home to the child care space in the basement. Children in care at the time of inspection ranged from 8 weeks to 4 years old.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not maintain an up-to-date record at the family day home for each enrolled child.
“Evidence: Child #1 (Start Date: 9/5/2023) was present on site and did not have a file.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not ensure that all children’s records contained all required information.
The inspectors’ words, 120 words
“Evidence: 1. Child #2 (Start Date: 9/5/2023) was present at the time of inspection and did not have the following information: physician name and phone number, two emergency contacts with name, address, and phone number, medical insurance and policy number, and authorization for emergency medical care. 2. Child #3 (Start Date: 4/17/2023) was present at the time of inspection and did not have the medical insurance policy number on file. 3. Child #4 (Start Date: 5/2/2023) was present at the time of inspection and was missing one emergency contact in the file. 4. Child #5 (Start Date: 9/30/2021) was present at the time of inspection and was missing the medical insurance policy number and one emergency contact in the file.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not ensure that the diapering area had a diapering surface that was nonabsorbent.
“Evidence: The changing pad had a cloth cover on it making it absorbent.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not ensure that all parents were provided required written information prior to the child’s first day of attendance.
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“Evidence: 1. Child #2 (Start Date: 9/5/2023), Child #3 (Start Date: 4/17/2023), Child #4 (Start Date: 5/2/2023), Child #5 (Start Date: 9/30/2021), and Child #6 (Start Date: 2/10/2020) did not have documentation on file that parents were provided the provider’s medication administration policy. 2. Child #2 was missing documentation on file that parents were provided the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan. 3. Child #2 and Child #6 did not have documentation on file that parents were informed whether or not there is liability insurance in force on the family day home operation.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the family day home did not have a written emergency preparedness and response plan.
“Evidence: There was no emergency preparedness and response plan available at the time of inspection.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain documentation that all children have been adequately immunized according to the requirements of ? 32.1-46 A of the Code of Virginia and applicable State Board of Health regulations.
“Evidence: Child #2 (Start Date: 9/5/2023) and Child #3 (Start Date: 4/17/2023) did not have immunizations on file.”
-
Based on record review and staff interview, the provider did not ensure the menu for the current one-week period was given to parents or kept on file.
“Evidence: The menu for the week of 9/5/2023 hadn’t been developed at the time of inspection.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not have an operable thermometer available to monitor refrigerator and freezer compartment temperatures.
“Evidence: There was no thermometer in the refrigerator or freezer compartments that was located in the programming space and utilized for the family day home.”
Jun 28, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-30-A
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the provider did not ensure compliance with these standards and the terms of the current license issued by the department . Evidence: Upon arrival, the Licensing Inspector observed 17 children with one caregiver. Interview revealed that 3 of the 17 children resides in the home, therefore the remaining 14 children were enrolled in the family day home. The family day home has a licensed capacity of 12 children.”
-
8VAC20-800-570-A
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that a caregiver exceeded 16 points. Evidence: The Licensing Inspector observed staff A alone with 17 children ( 3 of the children are residential children) between the ages of 2 years to 9 years for a total of 28 points. Each caregiver shall not exceed 16 points.”
Sep 26, 2022: inspection6 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on interview and a review of record keeping, it was determined that two caregivers/household members did not have the repeat central registry finding background checks every five years as required. Evidence: Person A’s central registry finding is dated 11/15/16 and Person B’s central registry finding is dated 11/19/16, neither have obtain repeat background checks every five years thereafter.”
-
8VAC20-770-40-D-5-a
“Based on interview it was determined that a household member between 14 to 18 years of age did not have a central registry finding on file within 30 days of becoming a household member. Evidence: Person C is 16 years of age and became a household member in 7/22 and the provider has not obtained a central registry background check as required.”
-
8VAC20-800-50-A
“Based on interview and a review of the attendance log, it was determined that the provider is not maintaining a written record of children in attendance each day. Evidence: There was no written record showing that 8 day care children were in attendance.”
-
8VAC20-800-510-A
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that children were not provided a cot, mat or bed for resting. Evidence: The Licensing Inspector observed 4 of the 7 preschoolers sleeping on a sleep sack napper and not a cot, mat or bed as required.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on a review of four children’s files and an interview with the provider, it was determined that 3 children’s files did not contain all of the required components. Evidence: Child A, B and C’s files did not contain their insurance policy numbers nor their date of enrollment.”
-
8VAC20-800-70-A
“Based on interview and a review of 4 children’s files, it was determined that parents were not provided in writing information on the homes check in and out procedures and/or termination procedures. Evidence: The family day home’s check in and out procedures were not provided in writing to the parents of child B and C. Termination procedures were not provided in writing to the parents of child C. Child C enrolled on 7/10/20.”
Aug 3, 2022: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.058
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that there was no carbon monoxide detectors in the family day home.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on a review of seven children’s records and an interview with the provider, it was determined that there were missing components in children’s files. Evidence: 1. There was no insurance policy numbers on file for child A, B, C, and E. 2. There was no enrollment date on file for child B, C and D 3. Child A enrolled on 6/21/22, child E enrolled on 2/10/20.”
-
8VAC20-800-70-A
“Based on a review of seven children’s files and an interview with the provider, it was determined that before the children’s first day of attendance, parents were no provided in writing policies and procedures outlined under this standard. Evidence: 1. There was no check in an out procedures in the file for child A, B, C and D. 2. There was no discipline policy to include if the provider uses time out or not for child A and B.”
-
8VAC20-800-830-D
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the provider was unable to locate their record of emergency evacuation and shelter in place drills for one year.”
-
8VAC20-820-120-E-2
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the findings of the most recent inspection of the family day home was not posted,”
May 12, 2022: inspection5 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-100-A
“Based on a review of children’s records, it was determined that one child did not have a physical on file within 30 days of enrollment. Evidence: Child A enrolled in January 2022 and as of May 12, 2022 there was no physical on file.”
-
8VAC20-800-50-A
“Based on observation and a review of the attendance log, it was determined that a written record of children in attendance each day was not maintained. Evidence: There were 5 daycare children present however only three were listed on the attendance log.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on a review of two children’s files, it was determined that for one child’s record did not contain all of the required information upon enrollment. Evidence: Child A started in January 2022 and the file does not contain the medical insurance policy or written authorization for emergency medical care”
-
8VAC20-800-70-A
“Based on a review of two children’s files, it was determined that parents were not provided in writing the information required under this standard. Evidence: Child A’s file did not contain information on the policies for administration of medications, or notification of liability insurance.”
-
8VAC20-800-90-A
“Based on a review of children’s files, it was determined that a child was allowed to attend the family day home before obtaining their immunization record. Evidence: There was no immunization record on file for child A who enrolled in January 2022.”
Mar 16, 2022: inspection16 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on interview, it was determined that one caregiver/household member did not have a repeat background check every five years. Evidence: Caregiver B’s central registry finding is dated 11/15/16.”
-
8VAC20-800-100-A
“Based on a review of children’s files and interviews with the caregivers, it was determined that there were no physicals on file within 30 days of attendance for child B and C.”
-
8VAC20-800-240-A
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Based on observation, it was determined that the area inside and outside was not maintianed in a safe and operable condtion. Evidence: 1. The banister on the stairs leading to the basement was detaching from the wall and provided very little hand support. 2. In the backyard play area, the children were running around, playing and using tricycles/scooters near the the top of the stairs that lead to the basement. There was no protective barrier to prevent access to the stairs and the fall from the top to the bottom would have been approximately 7 feet.”
-
8VAC20-800-50-A
“Based on observation and interview, there was no written record of children in attendance.”
-
Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the one of the two caregivers were not providing direct care and supervision to the children while outside. The caregiver that was present with the children in the backyard thought she was caring for 9 children, when in fact she had 10 children in care. Evidence: The Licensing Inspector (LI) observed 10 preschoolers ( ages 22 months to 5 years of age) outside in the backyard playing and eating with caregiver A supervising. The LI asked caregiver A how many children were in care and was told 9 children were in care today. The LI repeated the question 20 minutes later and again was told 9 children were present. The LI pointed out there were in fact 10 children present, then caregiver A acknowledged that there were 10 children present and not the 9.
The inspectors’ words, 113 words
“The LI asked caregiver A if there was any other caregivers as she was alone with the 10 preschoolers, which totaled 21 points. Caregiver A reported that caregiver B was inside the house. Caregiver A asked caregiver B to join her outside with the children, caregiver B came outside for a few minutes and then returned inside, leaving caregiver A alone again with 10 preschoolers. Several minutes later, caregiver A decided to send 3 to 4 children inside with caregiver B. Caregiver B, while inside, was not providing direct care supervision of the children consequently leaving caregiver A alone with 10 children, which totaled 21 points. One caregiver should not exceed 16 points.”
-
Based on observation, it was determined that caregiver B did not promote the children’s emotional and social well being and growth by providing needed help, comfort, and support. Evidence: Five preschoolers were not napping and were told to watch tv by caregiver B. The Licensing Inspector observed/overheard caregiver B repeatedly tell the 5 children to sit and watch tv. Caregiver B repeatedly told the children to “be quiet”, “sit down” “get back over there” “great, now turn around” all was done with a harsh and demeaning voice tone.
“One child said they couldn’t hear the tv, caregiver B said to the child, “say it again and you wont hear nothing””
-
8VAC20-800-60-A
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that there was no file available for review for child A. Interviews revealed that child A enrolled approximately 2 week prior.”
-
Based on a review of 7 children’s records and interviews with three caregivers, it was determined that children’s records did not contain all of the required information outlined under this standard. Evidence: 1. There were no dates of enrollment listed for children A through G. 2. There were no insurance information on file for child F, G and B. 3. There were no physician information on file for child C and D.
“All information above is required at the time of enrollment.”
-
8VAC20-800-630-A
“Based on observation, it was determined that a caregiver failed to use methods of discipline that was constructive , nor did she model and redirect the children to acceptable behavior Evidence: On one occasion the LI observed caregiver B leaning over the chair and the child with her body as the child sat in the chair trying to get the child to comply, caregiver B’s behavior was determined to be intimidating.”
-
8VAC20-800-680-B
“Based on observation, it was determined that the caregivers did not ensure that the 10 children’s hands were washed after coming in from playing outside as their hands were dirty nor after eating their lunch.”
-
8VAC20-800-70-A
“Based on a review of seven children’s files and interview with the caregivers, it was determined that there were no information provided in writing to parents to include check in and out procedures identified, operational information, schedule and fee information on file for child C, D. E, F and G.”
-
8VAC20-800-730-D
“Based on observation, it was determined that medication was not kept locked and was accessible to the children. Evidence: The Licensing Inspector observed a full bottle of Ibuprofen sitting on the kitchen counter. The medication was accessible to all of the children in care as the children were in and out of the kitchen area throughout the inspection.”
-
8VAC20-800-880
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the provider was not following the most recent nutritional requirements of a recognized authority such as the child and adult care program by the USDA. Evidence; The LI observed the children being served only peanut butter and jelly sandwiches for lunch.”
-
8VAC20-800-90-A
“Based on a review of children’s files and interviews with the caregivers, it was determined that there were no immunization records on file before attendance for child B and C.”
-
8VAC20-800-900-B
“Based on observation, it was determined that at least three children were observed walking and playing outside while eating their peanut butter and jelly sandwiches.”
-
8VAC20-800-920
“Based on observation and interview, it was determined that there was no menu given to parents or posted/placed in a area accessible to parents for the current one-week period.”
All 22 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 6, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 3, 2025 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jul 7, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 7, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jan 22, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 22, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jul 2, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 2, 2024 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Jan 11, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 11, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 5, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 5, 2023 | Inspection | 12 violations cited |
| Jun 28, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 26, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 26, 2022 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Aug 3, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 3, 2022 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| May 12, 2022 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Mar 16, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 16, 2022 | Inspection | 16 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: One Year license, expires Jul 10, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 299 child care providers in Prince William County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 8; this one had 23.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Children of America- Manassas Bull Run | 48 |
| Bethlehem Evangelical Lutheran Church | 1 |
| The Learning Experience | 61 |
| AlphaBest at Mullen Elementary | 11 |
| AlphaBEST at Ellis Elementary | 4 |
| AlphaBEST at Sinclair Elementary | 3 |
| AlphaBest at Sudley Elementary | 1 |
| Yahaira Stewart | 1 |
| Elzena Ross This child care provider | 23 |
| Diana Schockley | 15 |
| Building Blocks III Day School | 32 |
| Manassas Presbyterian Church | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.