Fatima Azizkeya
A family day home in Arlington, Virginia 22204
1726 Columbia Pike, Arlington, Virginia 22204. (703) 624-0254.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 13 deficiencies in the last three years
- Jul 82026 the latest visit on record
- 9 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
11 inspections on record, the latest on Jul 8, 2026.
13 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
13 deficiencies in 4 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Jul 8, 2026: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation The license and any other documents required shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.
“The findings from the most recent inspection, dated 12/15/2025, were not posted in a conspicuous place on the premises.”
-
Information contained in a child’s record shall be privileged and confidential. The provider shall not distribute or release information in a child’s record to any unauthorized person without the written consent of the child’s parent.
“The Supplemental Information page is considered confidential. The supplemental information page for the 7/02/2025 inspection was posted on the provider’s bulletin board.”
-
Before the child’s first day of attendance, the provider shall obtain the parent’s written acknowledgement of the receipt of the information regarding the policies for the administration of medications and the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan.
“There were no parent acknowledgements available for Child #3 (enrolled 10 months)regarding the policies for the administration of medications and no parent acknowledgement available for Child#5 (enrolled 1 year 10 months) regarding the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan.”
-
Annually, the provider shall review with the parent the emergency contact information required in each child’s record to ensure the information is correct and shall obtain the parents signed acknowledgment of the review.
“Records for children #1, #2, and #5 did not have a parent’s signature for an annual review of the emergency contact information. Child #1’s file was last reviewed 1 year and 5 months ago. Children #2’s file was last reviewed 2 years and 2 months ago. Child #5’s file was last reviewed 1 year and 10 months ago.”
-
The provider shall review the emergency plan at least annually and update the plan as needed. The provider shall document in writing each review and update to the emergency plan.
“The provider’s emergency plan had not been updated since 7/22/2024.”
-
Documentation of additional immunizations is required once every six months for children under the age of two years. ’
“Child #1, 2 years and 9 months, last documented immunization was one year and 9 months ago.”
-
When meals or snacks are provided by the family day home, the menu for the current one-week period shall be dated, given to parents or posted or placed in a an area accessible to parents, list any substituted food and be kept on file one week at the family day home.
“The provider stated that meals or snacks are provided for the children and did not have a menu for the current one week period.”
Dec 15, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Children’s records were not complete. 1. Child #1’s record was missing the following information: parent’s name and contact information, 2 complete emergency contact information, medical insurance information, and a complete medication policy form. 2. Child #2’s record was missing the parent’s work information, 2 complete emergency contacts, medical insurance information and a complete medication policy form. 3. Child #3’s records was missing the complete medication policy form.”
Jan 13, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.011-F
“The license and any other documents required by the Superintendent shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises. The inspection report from 7/25/24 was not posted on site.”
-
8VAC20-800-320-B
“Child-resistant protective covers larger than 1-1/4 inches in diameter shall be installed on all unused electrical outlets and surge protectors accessible to children under five years of age. Two unused electrical outlets in the room where children were observed in activities, did not have protective outlet covers.”
Jul 22, 2024: inspection3 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on records review, the family day home did not obtain results of a repeat central registry search (CRS) for the applicant every five years. Evidence: Caregiver # 1’s most recent CRS was completed on 5/21/19. The search was not repeated in 5 years.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on records review, children’s records were not complete. Evidence: 1. Child # 1’s was missing the following: liability insurance form, information for an emergency contact, persons authorized to pick up. 2. Child # 2’s record was missing the following: liability insurance form and medical insurance policy number. 3. Child # 3’s record was missing the medical insurance policy number.”
-
8VAC20-800-960-E
“Based on observation, bottles were not labeled with the full name and date. Evidence: One infant milk bottle was found in the fridge with no name and date.”
Feb 21, 2023: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-320-A
“Based on observation, small electrical appliances left plugged while not in use. Evidence: The electric kettle, air fryer and coffee machine were plugged in. None of the appliances were in use.”
-
8VAC20-820-120-E-2
“Based on review of required posted documents, the family day home did not ensure that the findings of the most recent inspection were posted. Evidence: 1. On the date of inspection, the complete findings of the most recent inspection of the facility (9/19/2022) were not posted. 2. The inspection summary was posted but the violation notice was not posted.”
Sep 19, 2022: inspection7 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-4
The inspectors’ words, 167 words
“Based on records review and staff interview, the family day home did not obtain results of an out of state central registry search for an employee within 45 days of employment; and did not obtain results of an out of state criminal record check and sex offender search for an employee prior to the first day of employment. Evidence: 1. The provider stated that Caregiver #2 worked at the family day home effective 6/6/22, on an as needed basis. 2. Caregiver # 2?s records indicated that she resided in Arizona and Texas within the last 5 years. 3. The provider confirmed that to this date, she had not obtained results of the central registry findings for Texas and Arizona for Caregiver # 2. 4. The provider also confirmed that the results of the sex offender and the criminal record checks for the states of Arizona and Texas were not obtained for Caregiver # 2 prior to the first day of employment, and were unavailable to this date.”
-
8VAC20-800-1010
The inspectors’ words, 153 words
“Based on staff interviews, the provider did not ensure that during transportation, children were in an individual car seat with appropriate restraints, according to Virginia Law. Evidence: 1. Virginia law requires that all children under the age of eight be placed in a proper safety restraint system for their age. 2. On 9/13/22, Caregiver # 1 took Child # 1 (4 years) in her friend’s car to her home, a local grocery store and then back to the family day home. 3. The provider and Caregiver # 1 both stated that there was no car seat in the car. Child # 1 and Caregiver # 1 were seated in the back seat, while Caregiver # 1?s friend drove the car. 4. Caregiver # 1 stated that Child # 1 was restrained using the car’s safety belt and that she had her arms around Child # 1 the entire time during the car ride.”
-
8VAC20-800-150-D-1
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“Based on records review, an assistant who was alone with a child in care did not have certification in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Evidence: 1. On 9/13/22, Caregiver # 1 took Child # 1 from the family day home, in a car to her home and to a local grocery store, after which she returned to the family day home. They were gone for approximately 15-20 minutes. 2. Caregiver # 1?s record did not have documentation of CPR certification on file. 3. Caregiver #1 confirmed in an email 11/9/22 that she was not CPR certified.”
-
8VAC20-800-150-D-2
The inspectors’ words, 96 words
“Based on records review, an assistant who was alone with a child in care did not have certification in first aid. Evidence: 1. On 9/13/22, Caregiver # 1 took Child # 1 from the family day home, in a car to her home and to a local grocery store, after which she returned to the family day home. They were gone for approximately 15-20 minutes. 2. Caregiver # 1?s record did not have documentation of first aid certification on file. 3. Caregiver #1 confirmed in an email dated 11/9/22 that she was not First Aid certified.”
-
8VAC20-800-50-A
“Based on interview and records review, the family day home did not maintain written attendance each day for children in care. Evidence: 1. The provider confirmed that Child #2 does not live in the home and has been in care since 9/6/21. 2. Attendance records were reviewed for the months of July, August and September 2022. A written record of Child # 2?s attendance was not maintained for any of these months.”
-
8VAC20-800-650-E
The inspectors’ words, 237 words
“Based on staff interview, parent interview, and records review, the provider did not notify the parent immediately when a child was missing. Evidence: 1. The provider stated the following: a. On 9/13/22 at approximately 12:30pm, the provider went upstairs on the second level of the family day home to pray. b. At approximately 12:54pm, when the provider came back downstairs, she did not see Caregiver # 1 and Child # 1 anywhere in the main daycare room where the other 4 children were asleep. The provider then checked the living and dining room. Caregiver # 1 and Child # 1 were not found. c. The provider grabbed her cell phone from the kitchen counter and went outside to check if they were there. d. The provider started to call Caregiver # 1 at 1:04pm, during which time Caregiver # 1 pulled up to the family day home in her friend’s car. e. The provider did not call Child # 1?s parents immediately to inform them that Child # 1 was missing from the daycare, reportedly because she was trying to understand what had just happened and because of how upset she was. f. The provider told Child # 1?s parent about the incident at 5:00pm when the parent arrived to pick up. 2. Child # 1?s parent confirmed that the provider notified them of the incident when they arrived at approximately 5:00pm to pick up the child.”
-
8VAC20-800-980-A
The inspectors’ words, 101 words
“Based on records review and staff interview, the provider did not obtain written parental permission to take a child off the premises of the family day home. Evidence: 1. On 9/13/22, Caregiver # 1 took Child # 1 from the family day home, in a car to her home and to a local grocery store, after which she returned to the family day home. They were gone for approximately 15-20 minutes. 2. Child # 1?s record did not have any written parental permission that allowed Child # 1 to be transported anywhere outside of or away from the family day home.”
Aug 5, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-B-4
The inspectors’ words, 133 words
“Based on staff interview and record review, the family day home did not obtain results of an out of state criminal record check and sex offender search for an employee prior to the first day of employment. Evidence: 1. The provider stated that caregiver # 1 at the family day home starting on 6/6/22. Caregiver # 1 worked for approximately 3 weeks. 2. Caregiver # 1’s record indicated that she resided in Arizona and Texas within the last 5 years. 3. Caregiver # 1’s sex offender searches for Arizona and Texas were not completed prior to the first day of employment. 4. The criminal record checks for Caregiver # 1 for the states of Arizona and Texas were not obtained prior to the first day of employment, and were unavailable to this date.”
-
8VAC20-800-200-C
“Based on record review, the provider did not maintain documentation of a signed and dated orientation fo9r each caregiver. Evidence: 1. The provider stated that Caregiver # 1’s first day of employment was 6/6/22. 2. The provider stated that she had completed orientation with Caregiver # 1 but written documentation was not maintained.”
Mar 15, 2022: inspection8 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-770-60-C-2
“Based on records review and staff interview, the family day home did not obtain results of a central registry child abuse and neglect search for employees within 30 days of employment. Evidence: 1. Caregiver # 1 and Caregiver # 2’s first day of employment was 1/18/22. 2. Central registry findings were not obtained for Caregiver # 1 and Caregiver # 2 within 30 days of employment. 3. The provider stated that she did not have the form to submit for both caregivers.”
-
8VAC20-800-210-A
“Based on staff interview, the provider did not complete 16 hours of annual training. Evidence: The provider stated that she did not complete any trainings other than the First Aid and CPR training in 2021.”
-
8VAC20-800-280
“Based on observation, potentially poisonous substances were not stored in areas inaccessible to children. Evidence: A bottle of hand sanitizer was found in the home living equipment. The bottle was accessible to children.”
-
8VAC20-800-530-B
“Based on observation, a crib did not have a tight fitting bottom cover. Evidence: One crib in the family day home had a crib sheet that was not tight fitted, and was creating folds when pulled.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-A
“Based on staff interview, the provider did not maintain an up to date record for each child. Evidence: 1. The provider stated that Child # 2 is her grand daughter. Child # 2’s is not a resident child. 2. Child # 2’s parent was not present during the inspection, and Child # 2 was under the direct care of the the provider, Caregiver # 1 and Caregiver # 2. 3. The provider did not have a complete record for Child # 2 on site.”
-
8VAC20-800-690-D
“Based on observation, the diaper changing surface was absorbent. Evidence: The diaper changing pad had a cloth cover that was not non absorbent. The”
-
8VAC20-800-690-E
“Based on observation, soiled disposable diapers and wipes were not disposed of in a plastic-lined storage system. Evidence: The diaper disposal pail contained dirty diapers and wipes. The diaper pail was not lined with a plastic bag.”
-
8VAC20-800-90-C
“Based on records review, the family day home did not obtain documentation of additional immunizations for a child under the age two, every six months. Evidence: 1. Child # 1’s date of birth was 1/20/20. 2. Child # 1’s record did not have documentation of additional immunizations from 2021.”
All 11 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2026 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Dec 15, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jul 2, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 13, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 22, 2024 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jan 9, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jul 25, 2023 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 21, 2023 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 19, 2022 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Aug 5, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 15, 2022 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: Two Year license, expires Aug 18, 2028.
- Ages: 2 months - 5 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 9 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 157 child care providers in Arlington County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 13.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Fatima Azizkeya This child care provider | 13 |
| ARLINGTON Parks and Recreation at Carlin Hall | 5 |
| Funshine Preschool | 16 |
| Dora Silva-Celi | 1 |
| Grace Paniagua | 9 |
| Isabel Torrico | 4 |
| Children’s International - FSI | 23 |
| Magaly Paz-Quiroga | 5 |
| Full Circle Montessori School | 3 |
| Carmen Crespo | 2 |
| Our Savior Lutheran Church | 4 |
| Congregation Etz Hayim | 4 |
| Janeth Torrico | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.