Miryam Galarza
A family day home in Alexandria, Virginia 22304
4507 Venable Avenue, Alexandria, Virginia 22304. (703) 982-2900.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 36 deficiencies in the last three years
- Sep 22026 the latest visit on record
- 9 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
16 inspections on record, the latest on Sep 2, 2026.
36 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
36 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Sep 2, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
The provider shall obtain documentation of a physical examination prior to a child’s attendance or within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“There was no physical exam record available for Child #1 who has been in care for over four months.”
-
Infant carrier seats, swings, strollers, feeding or activity tables, and high chairs shall be used according to the manufacturer’s instructions and when occupied by a child, a safety strap shall be used and securely fastened.
“Four children were observed sitting in a high chair without the safety strap securely fastened.”
-
A The provider shall ensure that a caregiver does not exceed 16 points by using the following point system to determine if an additional caregiver is needed: 1. Children from birth through 15 months of age count as four points each. 2. Children from 16 months through 23 months of age count as three points each. 3. Children from two through four years of age count as two points each.
“Caregiver #1 was observed supervising 6 children (18 points) without a second caregiver. The caregiver was over the supervision requirements by 2 points for approximately 45 minutes.”
-
Repeat violation
“A child’s record shall contain the required information. The record for Child #3 was missing the name and policy number of the medical insurance and has been in care for over one year. The record for Child #5 was missing the first date of attendance.”
-
Caregivers shall ensure that children’s hands are washed with liquid soap and warm running water before eating.
“4 out of 6 children’s hands were not washed with liquid soap and warm running water before eating.”
Feb 13, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
The license and any other documents required shall be posted in a conspicuous place on the licensed premises.
“The findings from the most recent inspection, dated 9/11/2025, were not posted in a conspicuous place on the premises.”
-
Assistants’ and substitute providers’ records shall contain a name, address, and telephone number of a person to be notified in an emergency and documentation of education.
“The record for Assistant Caregiver #2 was missing an emergency contact and documentation of education and has been employed for over two months.”
-
The provider must orient assistants by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.
“Assistant Caregiver #2 provided care for children for over two months without receiving orientation.”
-
Children’s records are required to contain name, address, and telephone number of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached and the policy number of the child’s medical insurance.
“The record for Child #3 was missing a second emergency contact and the policy number of the medical insurance. The child was present during the inspection and had been in care for 24 days.”
-
Before attendance, documentation of immunizations is to be obtained for each child.
“There was no documentation of immunizations for Child #3, who was in care during the inspection and had been in care 23 days.”
Sep 11, 2025: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
The vendor shall maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Attendance for children 1-3 did not have attendance documented as it occurred.”
-
8VAC20-790-250-F
“Caregivers who work directly with children shall complete the department’s health and safety update course annually. The record for Caregiver #1 did not contain documentation of the health and safety update course.”
Sep 11, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
A child’s record shall contain the first date of attendance.
“Child #3 did not have the first date of attendance.”
-
8VAC20-800-80-C
“The provider shall document in the child’s record the method of verification of the child’s age and identity. The records for Child #1 and Child #3 did not contain documentation verifying the date of when the original birth certificate was seen by the provider.”
Mar 5, 2025: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-790-180-B
“The provider is required to maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs. At the time of inspection, 5 children were present and the attendance had not been completed.”
-
8VAC20-790-430-A-3
“Lockdown procedures are required to be practiced at least annually. The provider did not complete a lockdown drill during the year 2024.”
Mar 5, 2025: inspection3 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.035-A
“Caregivers and household members are required to complete a sworn statement every five years. The most recent sworn statement in the records for Caregiver #1 and Household Member #1 were overdue by two months.”
-
8VAC20-800-240-B
“The provider is not permitted to use equipment that has been recalled or identified by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission as being hazardous. During the inspection, three recalled bumbo seats were identified in the family day home. The provider was informed that the bumbo seats were recalled and not permitted for use in the Family Day Home. After being informed of the recall, the provider placed three children in the recalled bumbo seats for storytime.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-A
“An up to date record for each child enrolled shall be maintained by the provider and contain all required information. The record for Child #5 was missing the following: phone number of the parent’s place of employment for both parents, the policy number of the child’s medical insurance, and the name, address and telephone number of one of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached. The child was present during the inspection and had been in care for a month.”
Aug 19, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, the provider did not maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Evidence: 1. 4 children were present in the family day home. 2. The arrival of each child present was not documented.”
Aug 19, 2024: inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and interview, the provider did not maintain a record for each caregiver.
“Evidence: 1. The provider stated Caregiver #2 was not present but is currently employed by the provider. 2. The provider did not have a record available for review for Caregiver #2. 3. The provider stated she gave the record to the provider to complete missing information.”
-
Based on record review and observation, the provider did not ensure compliance with the home’s policies regarding medication.
“Evidence: 1. The provider did not obtain written authorization to administer prescription and non prescription medication for one child. 2. The provider did not ensure medication is in it’s original container.”
-
Based on record review, the family day home did not keep a written record of children in attendance each day.
“Evidence: 1. Attendance was not documented on the date of the inspection. 2. The last documented record of children in attendance was dated 8/14/2024.”
-
Based on observation, medication was not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1. The provider was in possession of medication for Child #3. The medication was located in the child’s belongings, not in a locked place.”
-
Based on observation, requirements for topical skin products were not met.
“Evidence: 1. Two topical skin products were not labeled with the child’s name. 2. The provider stated the parents had provided a new container and they had not yet been labeled. 3. Written authorization for one topical skin product was not obtained annually from the parent of Child #3. The authorization expired on 8/08/2023.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review the emergency plan at least annually and document in writing each review to the plan.
“Evidence: 1. The last documented review of the emergency plan was dated 5/10/2023.”
Apr 25, 2024: inspection10 deficiencies
-
Based on record review and provider interview, a fingerprint-based criminal history record check was not obtained for 1 caregiver prior to first day of employment.
“Evidence: 1. 1. There was no documentation of a fingerprint-based criminal history record check for Caregiver #1. 2. Provider stated Caregiver #1 did not complete a a fingerprint-based criminal history record check.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain a completed sworn statement for 2 caregivers.
“Evidence: 1. Caregiver #1 has not completed a sworn statement. 2. The sworn statement in the record for Caregiver #2 did not contain a date of completion.”
-
Based on record review and provider interview, the provider did not maintain a record for 1 of 2 caregivers present.
“Evidence: 1. The provider stated Caregiver #1’s first day at the family day home was “last week”. 2. The provider stated she did not have a record for Caregiver #1.”
-
Based on record review, 2 of 3 caregiver records did not contain all required information.
“Evidence: 1. The provider did not document the 1st date of employment for Caregiver #1 and Caregiver #2. 2. The provider did not have documentation of the name address and telephone number of a person to be notified in an emergency for Caregiver #1 and Caregiver #2.”
-
Based on observation and caregiver interviews, 1 of 3 caregivers was not able to speak English as necessary to carry out assigned job responsibilities and communicate with emergency responders.
“Evidence: 1. Caregiver #1 was unable to communicate with licensing inspector during inspection. 2. Caregiver #3 stated Caregiver #1 was not able to speak English.”
-
Based on record review and provider interview, the provider did not orient 2 caregivers by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.
“Evidence: 1. Provider stated Caregiver #1 began employment “last week”. 2. Provider stated Caregiver #2 began employment “at the end of March or first of April”. 3. There was no documentation of orientation training for Caregiver 1 and Caregiver #2. 4. Provider stated orientation training was not completed for Caregiver #1 and Caregiver #2.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not ensure the total number of children receiving care at any one time does not exceed the maximum licensed capacity of the home.
“Evidence: 1. The provider is currently licensed to provide care for 5 children at one time. 2. Upon arrival, there were 6 children in care in the family day home.”
-
Based on record review and provider interview, the family day home did not keep a written record of children in attendance.
“Evidence: 1. Provider stated a record of attendance had not been completed for the current week.”
-
Based on record review, 2 of 4 children’s records did not contain all required information.
“Evidence: 1. The records for Child #1 and Child #2 did not contain the name and policy number of the child’s medical insurance,”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review annually with the parent the emergency contact information required to ensure the information is correct, and obtain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the review for 1 of 4 children.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent review of emergency contact information in the record for Child #4 was dated 8/8/2022”
Aug 24, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, Caregiver #1 did not complete the department’s health and safety update course annually.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Caregiver #1 did not contain documentation of the health and safety update course.”
Apr 27, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review the emergency plan at least annually and document each review of the emergency plan.
“Evidence: The most recent documented review of the emergency plan for the family day home was dated February 2022.”
Apr 27, 2023: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and provider interview, the provider did not ensure that services were conducive to the welfare of one child in care.
The inspectors’ words, 143 words
“Evidence: 1. Upon arrival at the Family Day Home on 4/27/2023, Child #1, age 2 months, was observed sleeping in a crib with an item of clothing, an adult sized shirt, completely covering the child’s face, to include his nose and mouth. 2. Child #1 was observed in a bouncer during which the provider was observed to place the shirt over the child’s face, then holding in place the child’s pacifier which was located under the shirt, and bouncing the child in the chair, as it is designed to do, in an effort to provide comfort to the child. 3. Provider stated the shirt was provided by the parent to provide comfort to the child as the child was comforted by the parent’s scent and the provider had been placing the shirt on the child’s face in an effort to help him sleep.”
-
Based on observation, two cribs used by infants did not have a tight fitting bottom cover.
“Evidence: 1. Child #1 and Child #2 were both observed sleeping in their assigned cribs. 2. The bottom cover in the cribs occupied by Child #1 and Child #2 were not tight fitting. The bottom covers in both of the cribs were observed to be loose, allowing material to gather on the surface of the mattress.”
All 16 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Feb 13, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Sep 11, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Sep 11, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 5, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 5, 2025 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 19, 2024 | Inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Apr 25, 2024 | Inspection | 10 violations cited |
| Aug 24, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 24, 2023 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 27, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 27, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 27, 2023 | Complaint inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Feb 13, 2023 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: Two Year license, expires Oct 6, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: Birth - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 9 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 1 complaint inspection on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 171 child care providers in the City of Alexandria, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 36.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| The Butterfly House | 29 |
| The Campagna Center-Samuel Tucker | 1 |
| Creative World Learning Center - Landmark | 23 |
| Bright Start Learning Center | 15 |
| Valley Drive Preschool | 2 |
| Bright Start Preschool II | 13 |
| Miriam Ayala | 28 |
| Bright Start Preschool I | 3 |
| The Child and Family Network Centers - Wheeler Site | 22 |
| Vanessa Gutierrez | 2 |
| Miryam Galarza This child care provider | 36 |
| Kalsoom Akhtar | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.