The Butterfly House
A child day center in Alexandria, Virginia 22304
3800 & 3810 Butterfly Lane, Alexandria, Virginia 22304. (703) 461-1786.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 29 deficiencies in the last three years
- Sep 282026 the latest visit on record
- 80 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 inspections on record, the latest on Sep 28, 2026.
29 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
29 deficiencies in 7 months of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Mar 9, 2026: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Areas and equipment of the center, inside and outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe and operable condition.
“1. Room 4 and 5 both had areas of peeling paint along the walls in their classrooms. 2. Preschool playground had a wooden activity table with mesh corners that were torn, exposing sharp edges. 3. Peeling/chipping wood causing sharp edges along the legs and lower roofing of the “gazebo” structure.”
-
Hazardous substances such as cleaning materials, shall be kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Room 5 had an unlocked cabinet with bleach water and hand sanitizer accessible to children.”
-
Prepared infant formula shall be refrigerated, dated and labeled with the child’s name.
“Infant B had prepared bottles in the fridge, and one child’s bottles did not have a date.”
Jan 28, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
REPEAT VIOLATION A nonabsorbent surface for diapering or changing shall be used. For children younger than three years, this surface shall be a changing table or countertop designated for changing.
“Room 4 had a diaper changing pad with a large cut exposing the soft, absorbent cushion inside.”
-
REPEAT VIOLATION. Documentation shall be maintained of emergency evacuation, shelter-in-place, and lockdown drills that includes: Identity of the person conducting the drill; The date and time of the drill; The method used for notification of the drill; The number of staff participating; The number of children participating; Any special conditions simulated; The time it took to complete the drill; Problems encountered, if any; and For emergency evacuation drills only, weather conditions.
“The facility did not have complete documentation of the emergency drill log.”
Aug 20, 2024: inspection8 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.023-A
“Based on observation, the facility did not ensure that the Notice of the Superintendent’s intent was posted in a prominent place at each public entrance of the licensed premises to advise consumers or serious or persistent violations. Evidence: observed and identified through staff interviews that the notice of intent was not posted in a prominent place at each public entrance.”
-
22.1-289.035-B-1
“Based on review, the facility did not ensure that staff provided a sworn statement of disclosure prior to employment. Evidence: reviewed 2 staff records and found that Staff 1 did not have documentation of a sworn statement of disclosure and their first day was on 8/19/2024.”
-
8VAC20-780-130-E
“Based on review, the facility did not ensure that they obtained documentation of additional immunizations every six months for children under the age of two years. Evidence: reviewed 5 children’s records and found that Child 5 did not have documentation of updated immunizations. Child 5’s last immunization was dated 11/28/2023.”
-
8VAC20-780-500-B
“Based on observation, the facility did not ensure that the diapering surface was nonabsorbent. Evidence: observed that there was a long tear on the side of the diaper changing mat that was uncovered when the nonabsorbent liner was used.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-F
“Based on review, the facility did not ensure that the lockdown procedures are practiced at least annually. Evidence: reviewed the emergency drill log and found that there were no lockdown drills practiced within the last 12 months.”
-
8VAC20-780-550-G
“Based on review, the facility did not ensure that all required information was documented on emergency drill logs. Evidence: reviewed the emergency drill log and found that it was missing documentation of time of drill, notification of drill, problems encountered, and events simulated.”
-
8VAC20-780-60-A
“Based on review, the facility did not ensure that children’s records were maintained with the required information. Evidence: reviewed 5 children’s records and found that Child 1 and 2 did not have documentation of the parents annual review of the emergency contact information. Child 1’s last review was dated 1/9/2023 and Child 2’s last review was dated 7/20/2023.”
-
8VAC20-780-70
“Based on review, the facility did not ensure that staff records were maintained with required documentation. Evidence: reviewed 2 staff records and found that Staff 1 did not have documentation of a second reference check.”
May 9, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Repeat violation systemic violation
“Based on video footage, the required staff-to-child ratio of 1:4 for infants was not followed. Evidence: On April 30, 2024 at approximately 8:25am, there were 5 infants with 1 staff member. At 8:45am, another child came into care. There were 6 children in care with 1 staff member until approximately 9:00am when another staff member came into the classroom. The infant classroom was out of ratio for 40 minutes.”
Apr 25, 2024: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, program leaders did not meet all required qualifications.
“Evidence: Staff 1 and Staff 2 do not meet lead teacher qualifications.”
-
Based on observation, hazardous substances were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: In the Purple Butterfly classroom, a hand sanitizer was on a shelf accessible to children.”
-
Based on observation, cleaning and sanitizing materials were located in an area close to food.
“Evidence: In the toddler classroom, cleaning and sanitizing products were on the same counter as food.”
-
Based on observation, electrical outlets did not have protective covers in place.
“Evidence: In the hallway entrance, an unused electrical outlet did not have protective cover in place.”
-
Based on observation, a child did not wash hands after bathrooming.
“Evidence: A child from the Green Butterfly class did not wash their hands after using the bathroom.”
-
Based on observation, medication was not labeled with the child’s name.
“Evidence: There was an allergy medication with no name on it.”
-
Based on observation, staff’s personal medication was kept in an unlocked place.
“Evidence: In the toddler class, an adult medication was kept in an unlocked upper cabinet.”
Feb 8, 2024: complaint inspection7 deficiencies
-
Repeat violation systemic deficiency
“Based on interviews and video footage, staff supervising children did not always ensure their care, protection and guidance. 1) On 2/5/2024 from approximately 5:24pm until 5:33pm, video footage and staff interviews confirmed Child #1 (3 years) was left alone outside on the playground. 2) The child was on the playground alone for approximately 9 minutes and staff were not aware that the child was missing until a parent notified them. 3) The playground is located adjacent to a parking lot.”
-
Systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 97 words
“Based on interviews and video footage, staff supervising children did not always ensure their care, protection and guidance. Evidence: 1)Video footage and interviews confirmed that on 1/23/2024 at approximately 3:38pm, Child 1 (3 years old) left the classroom unnoticed and was outside of the building for approximately 6 minutes. 2) Staff were unaware the child was missing until a parent arriving at the center at approximately 3:46pm notified them that the child was outside. 3) The front of the building is adjacent to the parking lot of the school and a through street utilized by campus staff.”
-
Repeat violation systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 131 words
“Based on interviews and video footage , children under 10 years of age were not always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence: 1) Video footage shows, at approximately 5:24pm on 2/5/2024, Staff 1 and 2 left the playground area and entered the building with 7 children. Child 1 (3 years old) was left outside on the far side of the playground. 2) Staff stated and video footage confirmed at about 5:32pm a parent notified them that they observed Child 1 outside on the playground alone. 3) Staff 1 stated and video footage confirmed that Staff 1 went outside at about 5:33pm and found Child 1 on the far corner of the playground. 4) Child 1 was outside alone on the playground for approximately 9 minutes without staff supervision.”
-
Systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 173 words
“Based on interviews and video footage, children under 10 years of age were not always within actual sight and sound supervision of staff. Evidence 1) Video footage shows, on 1/23/2024 at approximately 3:30pm, Staff 1 and 2 were supervising 11 children in the classroom. Staff 1 was changing diapers and helping children use the restroom. Staff 2 was supervising the remainder of the children in the classroom. 2) Video footage shows that at approximately 3:38pm, Child 1 (3 years old) walked out of the classroom through an open gate of the classroom, down the hallway and out the front door of the school. 3) A parent stated that while approaching the facility, they found Child 1 outside of the facility’s front door. The parent stated Child 1 would not go with them. They went inside and informed the staff inside the building that Child 1 was outside. 4) After being informed by the parent, Staff 3 went outside to get the child, by which time, the child’s mother had already found the child.”
-
Systemic deficiency
“Based on observation and documentation, the required staff-to-child ratio of 1:4 for infants was not followed. Evidence: On 2/28/2024, from approximately 8:05am until 8:30am there were 5 infants (ages 3 months to 14 months) with Staff 4 in the infant classroom. At 8:31am, Staff 5 went into the classroom.”
-
Systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 225 words
“Based on observations and video footage, staff included in the required staff-to-child ratios were not always directly supervising children. Evidence: 1) Video footage from 1/23/2024 shows Staff 1 and 2 in a classroom of 11 children ages 2 ? years to 3 years old. Between 3:27pm and 3:46pm, the video shows both staff members exiting the classroom about 5 times briefly, leaving the other teacher alone with 11 children. Staff 2 left the classroom about 3 times and, while in the hallway, was seen turning their back to their classroom and interacting with teachers and students in the classroom across the hall. At 3:30pm , both teachers stepped out of the classroom, leaving the children unsupervised for about 1 minute. 2) On 2/28/2024 during breakfast from approximately 9:00am until 9:15am, the Blue Butterfly classroom had 9 children (2 years old) and 2 staff supervising. Teachers in that classroom stepped out for a minute or two to obtain breakfast items for their classroom leaving their classroom out of ratio whenever one teacher stepped out. 3) On 2/28/2024 during breakfast from approximately 9:00am until 9:15am, the Orange Butterfly classroom had 12 children (3 years old) and 2 staff supervising. Teachers in that classroom stepped out for approximately 1-2 minutes to obtain breakfast items for their classroom leaving their classroom out of ratio whenever one teacher stepped out.”
-
Systemic deficiency
The inspectors’ words, 106 words
“Based on documentation review and interviews, the center did not follow their own policies and procedures. Evidence: 1) The center’s staff handbook states (page 43), ?When children are taken out to the playground or to any other outing, teachers will use their in-app Tracking Sheet to indicate having been seen with the group at departure? and ?The teachers also use the in-app Name-to-Face Tracking Sheet to indicate contact with the students.? 2) Staff 1 and 2 stated that on 2/5/2024, when entering the building from the playground, they did not conduct a name-to-face check to indicate contact with the students as required in the policy handbook.”
Jan 5, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation, hazardous substances such as cleaning materials were not kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: Cleaning supplies were located in an unlocked cabinet in the bathroom of the “Toddlers” room.”
Apr 26, 2023: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, an out of state central registry search was not conducted for each staff who lived outside of Virginia within the last 5 years.
“Evidence: Staff A did not have a complete out of state central registry search on file. Staff A has lived in MD within the last 5 years.”
-
Based on interview, a child was moved from their grouping to maintain ratio.
“Evidence: A staff member confirmed that a child was moved from the “Purple Butterflies” room to the “Orange Butterflies” room to maintain ration in the “Purple Butterflies” room.”
-
Based on record review, minor injury reports were missing required information.
“Evidence: 2 of 5 minor injury records reviewed were missing the time in which the parent was notified of the injury.”
-
Based on observation, the findings of the most recent inspection were not posted.
“Evidence: The findings of the inspection that occurred 09/222 were not posted.”
Oct 6, 2022: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Based on observation, cleaning agents were not kept in a locked place.
“Evidence: Cleaning supplies were located on a sink in the “Infants” room.”
-
Based on record review, the center did not implement monthly evacuation drills.
“Evidence: The evacuation drill for September was not conducted.”
-
Based on observation, refrigerated bottles were not dated.
“Evidence: Refrigerated bottles located in the infant room of Child A and Child B were not dated.”
-
Based on record review, the center did not keep a complete record for each child in care.
“Evidence: 1) The record of Child C was missing the employer phone numbers of both parents. 2) The record of Child D was missing the employer phone number of the father and the employer and employer phone number of the mother.”
Apr 25, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-780-240-C
“Based on record review, staff orientation did not include all facility specific topics. Evidence: 1. Staff # 1’s first day of employment was 3/14/22. 2. Staff # 1’s orientation did not include the following topics: a. prevention of sudden infant death syndrome; b. prevention of shaken baby syndrome and abusive head trauma; c. prevention and response to food and allergic reactions; and d. prevention and control of disease.”
-
8VAC20-780-240-E
“Based on record review, within 30 days of the first day of employment, staff did not complete orientation training in first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as appropriate to the age of the children in care. Evidence: 1. Staff # 1’s first day of employment was 3/14/22. 2. Staff # 1’s record did not complete orientation training in first aid and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), within 30 days of employment.”
All 18 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2026 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 9, 2026 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Sep 24, 2025 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Nov 25, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 4, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 20, 2024 | Inspection | 8 violations cited |
| May 9, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 25, 2024 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Feb 8, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Feb 8, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Jan 5, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Apr 26, 2023 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Jan 12, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Oct 6, 2022 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Apr 25, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Nov 30, 2021 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 30, 2021 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Day Center: Two Year license, expires Oct 22, 2028.
- Ages: 1 month - 6 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 80 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 5 complaint inspections on record.
- 3 complaint allegations published with Virginia’s findings, 3 of them found valid.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Date | What | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Physical Abuse/Neglect. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Mar 14, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Supervision. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
| Feb 8, 2024 | Complaint | Allegation: Physical Abuse/Neglect. Virginia’s finding: Reported/Valid. |
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 171 child care providers in the City of Alexandria, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 29.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| The Butterfly House This child care provider | 29 |
| The Campagna Center-Samuel Tucker | 1 |
| Creative World Learning Center - Landmark | 23 |
| Bright Start Learning Center | 15 |
| Valley Drive Preschool | 2 |
| Bright Start Preschool II | 13 |
| Miriam Ayala | 28 |
| Bright Start Preschool I | 3 |
| The Child and Family Network Centers - Wheeler Site | 22 |
| Vanessa Gutierrez | 2 |
| Miryam Galarza | 36 |
| Kalsoom Akhtar | 5 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.