Lucia Martinez
A family day home in Alexandria, Virginia 22303
5646 Kathryn Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22303. (703) 960-6438.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 35 deficiencies in the last three years
- Oct 212026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 inspections on record, the latest on Oct 21, 2026.
35 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
30 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Oct 21, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection5 deficiencies
-
A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening.
“An updated TB screening for Household member #1 was not completed and was overdue by five months.”
-
A child’s record shall contain the required information.
“The record for Child #1, in care for two months, was missing the address for two emergency contacts, the policy number of the child’s medical insurance, and the employment phone number for both parents. The record for Child #3, in care for two weeks, was missing the employment information for both parents and first day of attendance.”
-
Before the child’s first day of attendance, the provider shall obtain the parent’s written acknowledgement of the receipt of the information regarding provisions of the family day homes emergency preparedness and response plan.
“There was no parent acknowledgement available for Child #1, who has been in care for two months.”
-
Documentation shall be maintained of emergency evacuation.
“The emergency evacuation drills for June, July, August, and September were not documented.”
-
Repeat violation
“When meals or snacks are provided by the family day home, the menu for the current one week period shall be given or posted in an area accessible to parents. At the time of the inspection, there was no menu available for review.”
May 8, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection4 deficiencies
-
Daily age-appropriate activities shall include opportunities for vigorous outdoor play.
“Children are not provided opportunities for vigorous outdoor play because the outdoor play space is used for storage.”
-
Before attendance, documentation of immunizations is to be obtained for each child.
“The documentation of immunizations for Child #3 was obtained 15 days after first day of attendance.”
-
Documentation of additional immunizations is required once every six months for children under the age of two years.
“Child #3, 17 months old, last documented immunization was over seven months ago.”
-
When meals or snacks are provided by the family day home, the menu for the current one-week period shall be given or posted in an area accessible to parents.
“At the time of the inspection, there was no menu available for review.”
Dec 3, 2025: inspection4 deficiencies
-
A landline telephone shall be available, operable, and accessible during the family day home’s hours of operation.
“There was no working landline telephone in the household.”
-
A child’s record shall contain the child’s first day of attendance, telephone number of each parent who has custody, and address and telephone of each custodial parents place of employment.
“The record for Child # 1 (in care for four years) was missing both parents full address for place of employment and one parent’s phone number. The record for Child #2 ( in care for over three years) was missing the employment phone number for one parent. The record for Child #5 (in care for at least seven months) was missing documentation of the first day of attendance.”
-
Before the child’s first day of attendance, parents shall be provided required information in writing.
“The parents of children #4 (in care for four months), and #5 (in care for at least seven months) were not provided in writing the following required information: Operating information including the hours and days of operation, holidays or other times closed, and the telephone number where a message can be left for a caregiver; schedule of fees and payment plans; check in and check out procedures, and provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan.”
-
Annually, the provider shall review with the parent the emergency contact information required in each child’s record to ensure the information is correct and shall obtain the parents signed acknowledgment of the review.
“The annual review for Child #1( in care for four years) was overdue by nine months. The annual review for Child #2 (in care for over three years) was overdue by over one year.”
Apr 22, 2025: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.036-A
“The family day home is required to have employees undergo a background check every five years. The most recent central registry check for Caregiver #1 was completed three months past due. The sworn statement in the record for Household member #1 was completed more than five years ago. The sworn statement is overdue by 5 months.”
-
22.1-289.057-A
“Licensed family day homes are required to develop and implement a plan to test potable water from sources identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency as high priority, including kitchen taps and sinks known to be or visibly used for consumption. The provider has not developed a plan to test potable water.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Children’s records are required to contain the child’s first date of attendance, name and policy number of the child’s medical insurance, and documentation of proof of the child’s age and identity. The record for Child #5 was missing the above information. The child was present during the inspection and had been in care for over a month.”
-
8VAC20-800-70-A
“Before the child’s first day of attendance, parents shall be provided required information in writing. The parents of Child #1 were not provided in writing the following required information: Operating information including the hours and days of operation, holidays or other times closed, and the telephone number where a message can be left for a caregiver; schedule of fees and payment plans; check in and check out procedures, and provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan. Child #5 had been in care for over a month.”
-
8VAC20-800-780-B
“Annually, the provider shall review with the parent the emergency contact information required in each child’s record to ensure the information is correct and shall obtain the parents signed acknowledgment of the review. The annual review for Child #1 was overdue by two months. The annual review for Child #2 and Child #4 was overdue by 5 months. The annual review for Child #3 was overdue by 2 weeks.”
Oct 9, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-240-A
“Areas and furnishings of the family day home, outside, shall be maintained in a clean, safe, and operable condition. The children’s outdoor play area was not in a safe condition. There were stacks of cinderblocks and bricks along the perimeter of the play area. A building containing lawn equipment was not locked and accessible to children. The steps children use to enter the play area contained chipped wood.”
-
8VAC20-800-280
“Poisonous materials shall be stored in an area inaccessible to children. Poisonous materials were inside an unlocked building and on the staircase that children use to enter the outdoor play area from the home.”
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Providers are required to maintain an up-to-date record at the family day home for each enrolled child that contains all of the required information. The record for Child #5 was missing the employment phone number for both parents, the policy number of the child’s medical insurance, and the address and phone number for 1 of 2 required emergency contacts. The record for Child #5 was also missing written authorization for emergency medical care should an emergency occur and the parent cannot be located immediately. The child was present during the inspection and had been in care for 3 years.”
-
8VAC20-800-800-B
“The provider is required to review the emergency plan at least annually and update the plan as needed. The review of the emergency plan was 5 months overdue.”
May 13, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on observation and record review, the arrival of one child was not documented as it occurred on the written record of daily attendance.
“Evidence: 1. 4 children were in care at 8:40am. Only 3 children were marked present on the written record of daily attendance.”
May 13, 2024: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain a current report of tuberculosis screening every two years for 1 household member.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent tuberculosis screening in the record for Household Member #1 was dated 4/28/2022.”
-
Repeat Violation
“Based on observation and provider interview, the provider did not provide all required daily age-appropriate activities. Evidence: The provider is not providing the children with opportunities for vigorous outdoor play daily. The provider stated she has not been taking the children outside during the day, as the area she typically uses, the backyard of the home, is not available due to the space being utilized for storage.”
-
Based on record review, 1 of 3 children’s records reviewed did not contain all required information.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child #1 did not contain written authorization for emergency medical care should an emergency occur and the parent cannot be located immediately.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain the parent’s written acknowledgement of the receipt of information for 1 child.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child #2 did not contain written acknowledgement of the receipt of the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review the emergency plan at least annually.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent review of the emergency plan was dated 5/3/2023.”
-
Repeat violation
“Based on record review, emergency evacuation procedures were not practiced monthly. Evidence: 1. An evacuation drill was not completed in April 2024.”
-
Based on observation, the menu for the current one-week period was not posted.
“Evidence: 1. Meals and snacks are provided by the family day home. 2. The posted menu was dated for the previous week (5/5-5/10)”
Nov 28, 2023: inspection5 deficiencies
-
22.1-289.036-A
“Based on record review, the provider did not obtain the results of a search of the Central Registry for 1 of 2 caregiver/household member records every 5 years as required. Evidence: The results of the search of the Central Registry for Household Member #1 were dated 09/18/2018.”
-
Based on observation and provider interview, the provider did not provide all required daily age-appropriate activities.
“Evidence: The provider is not providing the children with opportunities for vigorous outdoor play daily. The provider stated she has not been taking the children outside during the day, as the area she typically uses, the backyard of the home, is not available due to the space being utilized for storage.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review annually with the parent the emergency contact information required to ensure the information is correct, and obtain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the review for 2 children.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent documented review of the emergency contact information for Child #1 was dated 12/20/2021. 2. The most recent documented review of the emergency contact information for Child #2 was dated 11/18/2020.”
-
Based on record review, emergency evacuation procedures were not practiced monthly.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent evacuation drill was dated 07/06/2023.”
-
Based on record review, shelter in place procedures were not practiced a minimum of twice per year.
“Evidence: The most recent shelter in place drill was completed on 11/12/2022.”
Jun 1, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and provider interview, the provider did not provide all required daily age-appropriate activities.
“Evidence: The provider is not providing the children with opportunities for vigorous outdoor play daily. The provider stated she has not been taking the children outside during the day, as the area she typically uses, the backyard of the home, is not available due to the space being utilized for storage.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review annually with the parent the emergency contact information required to ensure the information is correct, and obtain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the review for 3 children.
“Evidence: 1. The most recent documented review of the emergency contact information for Child #1 was dated 1/3/2022. 2. The most recent documented review of the emergency contact information for Child #2 was dated 11/18/2020. 3. The most recent documented review of the emergency contact information for Child #3 was dated 5/03/2019,”
-
Based on observation, children were allowed to drink while walking and lying down.
“Evidence: 1. Provider was observed giving the children milk prior to naptime. Child #1 was observed walking while drinking milk. Child #2 was observed lying on the couch while drinking.”
May 23, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-800-50-A
“8Based on review of the written attendance record, the provider did not ensure all children were included on the written attendance record. Evidence: 1) The written attendance record showed 5 children in care, however there were 6 children present in the family day home.”
May 4, 2023: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain the parents’ written acknowledgement of the receipt of all required information for 2 of 2 children’s records reviewed.
The inspectors’ words, 276 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for child #1 was missing written acknowledgement of receipt of the following required information: -Operating information including the hours and days of operation, holidays or other times closed, and the telephone number where a message can be left for a caregiver; -Schedule of fees and payment plans; - Check in and check out procedures; -Requirement for the family day home to notify the parent when the child becomes ill and for the parent to arrange to have the child picked up as soon as possible if so requested by the home; -Requirement for the parent to inform the family day home within 24hours or the next business day after his child or any member of the immediate household has developed any reportable communicable disease - Requirement for the child to be adequately immunized -Requirement for paid caregivers to report suspected child abuse or neglect -Custodial parent’s right to be admitted to the family day home any time the child is in care -General daily schedule that is appropriate for the age of the enrolling child; -Policies for the provision of food; -Presence of a pet or animal in the home; -Discipline policies including acceptable and unacceptable discipline measures; -Amount of time per week that an adult assistant or substitute provider instead of the provider is scheduled to care for the child and the name of the adult assistant or substitute provider; -Provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan; -Policies for termination of care 2. The record for Child #2 was missing written acknowledgement of receipt of the Provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan.”
Nov 30, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection3 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the provider did not maintain a written record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child as it occurs.
“Evidence: 1. Upon arrival at the home, there were seven children in care. The attendance sheet indicated only 5 children were present at that time.”
-
Based on record review and provider interview, 1 of 2 caregivers did not complete the Virginia Preservice Training for Child Care Staff sponsored by the Department of Education within the first 90 days of employment.
“Evidence: 1.There was no documentation in the record for Caregiver #1 of the completed training. 2.The provider confirmed Caregiver #1 has not yet completed the training.”
-
Based on record review, 1 of 2 caregivers did not complete department’s health and safety update Course as required.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Caregiver #2 did not contain documentation of the health and safety update course.”
Nov 30, 2022: inspection12 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain the results of a fingerprint-based criminal history record check for 1 caregiver, prior to the first date of employment.
“Evidence: 1. The fingerprint-based criminal history record check results in the record for Caregiver #1 (employment date 1/11/2022) was dated 1/25/2022.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain a Sworn Statement or Affirmation for 1 Caregiver prior to the first date of employment.
“Evidence: 1.The record for Caregiver #1 (employment date 1/11/2022) did not contain documentation of a sworn statement.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain the results of Central Registry search by the end of 30th day of employment.
“Evidence: 1.The Central Registry check results in the record for Caregiver #1 were dated 8/15/2022.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain documentation of a physical examination within 30 days of the first day of attendance for one child.
“Evidence: 1. The provider stated Child #1 began attending the family day home in ?March or April? of 2022. 2. The physical in the record for Child #1 was dated 07/1/2022.”
-
Based on record review, 1 caregiver record did not contain all required information.
“Evidence: 1.The provider stated Caregiver #1 began employment on 1/11/2022. 2.The record for Caregiver #1 did not contain the following: -Address; -Verification of age; -Job title; -Date of employment or volunteering; -Name address and telephone number of a person to be notified in an emergency; -documentation that two or more references as to character and reputation as well as competency were checked before employment.”
-
Based on record review, 1 Caregiver record did not contain documentation that the provider provided orientation training to the assistant by the end of their first week of assuming job responsibilities.
“Evidence: 1.The provider stated Caregiver #1 began employment on 1/11/2022. 2.There was no documentation of orientation in the record for Caregiver #1.”
-
Based on record review, 1 of 2 children’s records did not contain all required information.
“Evidence: 1.The record for Child #1 did not contain the first date of attendance. 2. The record for Child #1 did not contain written authorization for emergency medical care should an emergency occur and the parent cannot be located immediately.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain the parents’ written acknowledgement of the receipt of all required information for 2 of 2 children’s records reviewed.
The inspectors’ words, 254 words
“Evidence: 1. The records for child #1 and Child #2 were missing written acknowledgement of receipt of the following required information: -Operating information including the hours and days of operation, holidays or other times closed, and the telephone number where a message can be left for a caregiver; -Schedule of fees and payment plans; - Check in and check out procedures; -Requirement for the family day home to notify the parent when the child becomes ill and for the parent to arrange to have the child picked up as soon as possible if so requested by the home; -Requirement for the parent to inform the family day home within 24hours or the next business day after his child or any member of the immediate household has developed any reportable communicable disease - Requirement for the child to be adequately immunized -Requirement for paid caregivers to report suspected child abuse or neglect -Custodial parent’s right to be admitted to the family day home any time the child is in care -General daily schedule that is appropriate for the age of the enrolling child; -Policies for the provision of food; -Presence of a pet or animal in the home; -Discipline policies including acceptable and unacceptable discipline measures; -Amount of time per week that an adult assistant or substitute provider instead of the provider is scheduled to care for the child and the name of the adult assistant or substitute provider; -Provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan; -Policies for termination of care”
-
Based on observation and provider interview, required telephone numbers were not posted in a visible area.
“Evidence: 1. The following required information was not posted in the Family Day Home: -A 911 or local dial number for police, fire, and emergency medical responders; -The responsible person for emergency backup care -The regional poison control center.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain from the parent, within seven business days of the child’s first day of attendance, verification of the identity and age of the child for 2 children.
“Evidence: 1.Provider stated Child #1 began attending the family day home in ?March or April? of 2022. The documentation in the record for Child #1 does not contain the signature of the provider or the date the proof of identification was reviewed. 2. Child #2 began attending the family day home on 4/11/2022. The documentation in the record for Child #2 does not contain the signature of the provider or the date the proof of identification was reviewed.”
-
Based on record review and provider interview, the family day home did not have a written emergency preparedness and response plan.
“Evidence: 1. Documentation of the emergency preparedness and response plan was not available for review during the inspection. 2.The provider stated she didn’t know where the plan was.”
-
Based on record review, 1 of 2 children’s records reviewed did not contain documentation that a child has been adequately immunized before the child began attending the family day home.
“Evidence: 1.The provider stated Child #1 began attending the family day home in ?March or April? of 2022. 2. The immunizations in the record for Child #1 were dated 07/1/2022.”
Dec 2, 2021: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain documentation of a physical examination by or under the direction of a physician within 30 days after the first day of attendance.
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child #1 (start date 4/8/2021) did not contain documentation of a physical examination.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain for each adult household member a current Report of Tuberculosis Screening form every two years from the date of the first screening.
“Evidence: The most recent tuberculosis screening in the record for Household Member #1 was dated 5/8/2019.”
-
Based on record review, 2 of 2 children’s records did not contain all required information.
The inspectors’ words, 99 words
“Evidence: 1. The record for Child #1 did not contain the address of each custodial parent’s place of employment. 2. The record for Child #1 did not contain the address and telephone number of one of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached. 3. The record for Child #2 did not contain the name of one of two designated persons to contact in case of an emergency if the parent cannot be reached. 4. The record for Child #1 did not contain the policy number of the child’s medical insurance.”
-
Based on record review, parents were not provided in writing the information required in 8VAC20-800-70A before the child’s first day of attendance.
“Evidence: 1. The written acknowledgement of the information required by 8VAC20-800-70A4-5, and A16 in the record for Child #1 (start date 4/8/2021)were dated 12/01/2021, after the child’s first date of attendance. 2. The record for Child #1 did not contain written acknowledgement of the information required in 8VAC20-800-70A1-3, 6-15, and 17-19.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not review with the parent the emergency contact information required in 8VAC20-800-60B to ensure the information is correct and obtain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the review annually for 1 child.
“Evidence: The emergency contact information in the record for Child #2 was last reviewed in 2019.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain from the parent verification of the identity and age of the child within seven business days.
“Evidence: 1. The proof of identification for Child #1 (start date 5/10/2021) was dated 12/01/2021.”
-
Based on record review, the provider did not obtain documentation that the child has been adequately immunized before a child may attend the family day home.
“Evidence: The record for Child #1 (start date 4/8/2021) did not contain documentation of immunizations.”
All 18 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 5 violations cited |
| May 8, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 3, 2025 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Apr 22, 2025 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Oct 9, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| May 13, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| May 13, 2024 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Nov 28, 2023 | Inspection | 5 violations cited |
| Jun 1, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| May 23, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| May 4, 2023 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Nov 30, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Nov 30, 2022 | Inspection | 12 violations cited |
| Dec 2, 2021 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Dec 2, 2021 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: Two Year license, expires Jun 6, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 1 month - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 1353 child care providers in Fairfax County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7; this one had 35.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Childtime Learning Center - Huntington | 30 |
| Lucia Martinez This child care provider | 35 |
| Friba Nezami | 5 |
| MARIA VASQUEZ DE LOZANO | 1 |
| Sandi Yesmina Rivas De Lemus | 21 |
| Marzia Amin | 3 |
| Burgundy Farm Country Day School | 40 |
| The Brooksfield School | 3 |
| Tysons Corner Children’s Center -Spring Hill | 9 |
| Common Ground Child Care | 41 |
| Teddy Bear Day Care of University Mall | 24 |
| Grasshopper Green and Kenwood School | 7 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.