Madelaine Cuello
A family day home in Fredericksburg, Virginia 22407
5522 Elder St., Fredericksburg, Virginia 22407. (540) 628-5676.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 14 deficiencies in the last three years
- Aug 132026 the latest visit on record
- 12 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
18 inspections on record, the latest on Aug 13, 2026.
14 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
14 deficiencies in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 2, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Aug 13, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Annually, the provider shall review with the parent the emergency contact information required in 8VAC20-800-60 B 2 to ensure the information is correct, and obtain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the review.
“The emergency contact information in the record of Child #2 was last reviewed 21 months ago; the emergency contact information in the record of Child #4 was last reviewed thirteen months ago; and the emergency contact information in the record of Child #5 was last reviewed over two years ago.”
Feb 18, 2026: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
A tuberculosis (TB) screening is required every two years from the last screening.
“An updated TB screening for Caregiver #2 was not completed and was overdue by five months.”
-
The provider shall review the emergency plan at least annually and update the plan as needed. The provider shall document in writing each review and update to the emergency plan.
“The home’s emergency plan was last reviewed in August 2025.”
Jul 21, 2025: subsidy health and safety inspection2 deficiencies
-
The vendor shall maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“The record of daily attendance for 07/21/25, and several weeks prior did not document the arrival and departure of each child in care each week. Five children were observed in care on 07/21/25.”
-
A written care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy, to include instructions from a physician regarding the food to which the child is allergic and the steps to be taken in the event of a suspected or confirmed allergic reaction.
“The record of Child #3 indicated the child has a diagnosed food allergy, but a written care plan is not on file. Child #3 was in attendance during the inspection.”
Jul 21, 2025: inspection2 deficiencies
-
(Repeat Violation) A child’s record shall contain the required information.
“Child #2, enrolled for over four months, did not contain the address for the two emergency contacts listed or the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the receipt of the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan.”
-
The emergency evacuation procedures shall be practiced monthly with all caregivers and children in care during all shifts that children are in care.
“The emergency evacuation procedures have not been practiced since January 7, 2025.”
Jan 29, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
(Repeat Violation) A child’s record shall contain the required information.
“Child #1, enrolled for 22 days, Child #2, enrolled for more than one month, and Child #3, enrolled for more than two months, did not contain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the receipt of the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan.”
Aug 29, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on a review of documentation and interviews, the vendor did not maintain a written hard copy record of daily attendance that documents the arrival and departure of each child in care as it occurs.
“Evidence: 1. The record of daily attendance for the week of August 26, 2024, was reviewed on 08/29/24. The record of daily attendance did not document the arrival and departure of each child in care that week. The record of daily attendance for 08/29/24 did not document the arrival of each child in care that day. The inspector observed four children in care. 2. During interviews, Caregiver #1 acknowledged the arrival and departure of each child in care has not been documented.”
Aug 29, 2024: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on a review of five children’s records and interviews, the provider did not ensure four children’s records contained the required information.
The inspectors’ words, 138 words
“Evidence: 1. The record of Child #1, date of attendance 02/13/23, did not contain documentation of the annual review of the child’s emergency contact information. 2. The record of Child #2, date of attendance 08/15/22, did not contain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the receipt of the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan. 3. The record of Child #4, date of attendance 09/12/22, did not contain documentation of the annual review of the child’s emergency contact information. The last review was completed on 06/13/23. 4. The record of Child #5, date of attendance 08/12/24, did not contain the parent’s signed acknowledgment of the receipt of the provisions of the family day home’s emergency preparedness and response plan. 5. During interview, Caregiver #1 acknowledged the information was missing and would be obtained on 08/29/24.”
Mar 27, 2024: inspection4 deficiencies
-
Repeat Violation
“Based on observation and interview, the provider did not post the most recent inspection of the family day home. Evidence: The findings of the most recent inspection of the family day home was not posted; the documentation of the last inspection was stored in a folder.”
-
Based on a review of 5 files and an interview, it was determined that one child’s file did not have a physical within 30 days of attendance.
“Evidence: The record for Child #5, with a start date of 02/14/22, had a physical dated 01/10/23.”
-
Based on observation and interview it was determined that children were not always diapered on a nonabsorbent surface that can be cleaned and sanitized.
“Evidence: The diaper changing pad had a small tear which makes the pad no longer nonabsorbent.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the provider did not ensure a thermometer was present to monitor the temperature in the refrigerator or the freezer.
“Evidence: The refrigerator and freezer being used to store food for the children in care did not contain a thermometer to monitor the temperature.”
Aug 22, 2023: inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on observation and interview, the provider did not post the most recent inspection of the family day home.
“Evidence: The findings of the most recent inspection of the family day home was not posted; the documentation of the last inspection was stored in a folder.”
-
Based on observation and interview, the provider did not ensure that the home, built prior to 2015, was equipped with a carbon monoxide detector.
“Evidence: An interview revealed that the provider thought the smoke detector, located in the day care area of the home, was a carbon monoxide detector.”
-
Based on observation, potentially poisonous substances such as disinfectants, were not stored in areas inaccessible to children.
“Evidence: There was a container of disinfectant wipes and an air freshener spray located on top of a toy shelf, accessible to children.”
-
Based on observation the provider did not ensure small electrical appliances were unplugged when not in use.
“Evidence: In the kitchen a toaster and coffee machine were plugged in and not in use.”
-
Based on observation and measurement the provider did not ensure that stationary playground equipment was placed at least six feet from the perimeter of other play structures.
“Evidence: A slide exit attached to the stationary playground structure was 46 inches away from the trampoline.”
-
Based on observation and interview the provider did not ensure that trampolines were not used during the hours children are in care.
“Evidence: An interview with the provider revealed, the trampoline was used by children in her care, ages six to eight-years-old. The standard requires that trampolines are not used during the hours children are in care.”
-
Based on interview, the provider did not have a written emergency preparedness and response plan.
“Evidence: The provider stated that the emergency preparedness plan has not been completed yet but it is being worked on.”
May 3, 2023: inspection3 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on a review of documentation, the provider did not ensure that all of the children’s records contained the required information. Evidence: Child A and B’s records were missing child’s full name, nickname (if any), sex, address, and birth date; emergency contact information; first and last dates of attendance; proof of the child’s age and identity. Child C’s record was missing the insurance policy number and information for parents.”
-
8VAC20-800-830-A
“Based on a review of documentation, the provider did not ensure that an emergency evacuation practice drill was conducted on a monthly basis. Evidence: The provider did not have any documentation of monthly practice drills being conducted.”
-
8VAC20-800-830-B
“Based on a review of documentation, the provider did not ensure that shelter-in-place procedures were conducted twice a year. Evidence: The provider did not have documentation of a shelter-in-place drills being conducted.”
Dec 19, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
8VAC20-790-430-A-3
“Based on a review of documentation, the provider did not conducted an annual lock down drill.”
Dec 19, 2022: inspection2 deficiencies
-
8VAC20-800-60-B
“Based on a review of documentation, the provider did not ensure that all of the children’s records contained the required information. Evidence: Child A and child B’s records were missing the medical insurance name and policy number. Child C’s record was missing the parent’s work place information and one emergency contact.”
-
8VAC20-800-830-A
“Based on a review of documentation, the provider did not ensure that an emergency evacuation drill was conducted on a monthly basis. Evidence: There was no emergency practice drill documented for November 2022.”
All 18 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Feb 18, 2026 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 21, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jul 21, 2025 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Jan 29, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Jan 29, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 29, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 29, 2024 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 27, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 27, 2024 | Inspection | 4 violations cited |
| Aug 22, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 22, 2023 | Inspection | 7 violations cited |
| May 3, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| May 3, 2023 | Inspection | 3 violations cited |
| Dec 19, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 19, 2022 | Inspection | 2 violations cited |
| Mar 8, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | No violations cited |
| Mar 8, 2022 | Inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Family Day Home: Two Year license, expires Sep 7, 2028.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 2 months - 12 years 11 months.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 0 complaint inspections on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 66 child care providers in Spotsylvania County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 7.5; this one had 14.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| The Merit School at The Castle (#9) | 25 |
| Learning Paths Academy at Leavells (#8) | 13 |
| Salem Village Academy | 5 |
| Rappahannock Area Young Men’s Christian Association-Smith Statio | 17 |
| Children of America Salem Church, LLC | 4 |
| Ms. Tamara Gilchrist | 12 |
| Madelaine Cuello This child care provider | 14 |
| Creative Childcare Center | 17 |
| Resurrection Lutheran Church | 0 |
| The Merit School of Southpoint (#45) | 14 |
| Tiny Toes Creative Learning Center | 46 |
| Ms. Lisa Ernest | 0 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 2, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 2, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.