Faith Church of God
A religious exempt child day center in Hampton, Virginia 23666
1115 Todds Lane, Hampton, Virginia 23666. (757) 827-0732.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov.
The short answer
- 8 deficiencies in the last three years
- Oct 152025 the latest visit on record
- 63 children, its capacity in the state’s list
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
9 inspections on record, the latest on Oct 15, 2025.
8 violations cited in the last three years.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
When those deficiencies happened
8 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2025. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Oct 15, 2025: subsidy health and safety inspection1 deficiency
-
Staff shall be evaluated by a health professional and be issued a statement that the individual is determined to be free of communicable tuberculosis (TB). Documentation of the screening shall be submitted at the time of employment and prior to coming into contact with children.
“Staff#2 did not have documentation of tuberculosis (TB) screening and was working with children during the inspection.”
Oct 15, 2025: inspection1 deficiency
-
Each person in a supervisory position has been certified by a practicing physician or physician assistance to be free from any disability which would prevent from caring for children under his supervision.
“Staff#3 did not have documentation of a staff health report and was supervising children in care during the inspection.”
Aug 22, 2024: subsidy health and safety inspection6 deficiencies
-
Based on review of staff records and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain all background checks every five years thereafter.
“Evidence: 1. In Staff#1’s record, the last dated central registry search was 12/06/18. 2. In Staff#3’s record the last dated criminal was 04/12/19. 3. Interview with staff confirmed the updated background checks were not available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on review of staff record and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain a copy of the results of a search of the central registry.
“Evidence: In Staff#2’s record (date of hire: 03/2024) there was no documentation of a search of the central registry found. Interview with staff confirmed the documentation of a search was not available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on review of staff record and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain documentation of a tuberculosis screening prior to staff coming into contact with children.
“Evidence: In Staff#2’s record (date of hire: 03/20240 there was no documentation of a tuberculosis screening found. Interview with staff confirmed the documentation was not available during the inspection.”
-
Based on review of children’s record and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain documentation of immunization before the child can attend the center.
“Evidence: In Child#4’s record, there was no documentation of immunizations found. Interview with staff confirmed the documentation of immunization was not available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on observations, the center did not ensure staff counted in staff to children ratios is directly supervision children.
“Evidence: In the school age group, the staff assigned to the group was observed twice in separate areas leaving the children in care without direct supervision by a staff.”
-
Based on observations, the center did not ensure all children’s hands are washed with soap and running water before and after eating meals or snacks.
“Evidence: The twos/threes group were observed transitioning indoor from outdoor activity and the children sat at the table eating their snack without handwashing.”
Aug 29, 2023: subsidy health and safety inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on review of children’s record and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain a written allergy care plan for each child with a diagnosed food allergy
“Evidence: In Child #4’s record, there was no written allergy plan found for known allergy. Interview with staff confirmed the allergy plan wasn’t available for review.”
-
Based on interview, the center did not ensure to obtain a fingerprint based national criminal background check for all staff.
“Evidence: Interview with staff confirmed that Staff#3 working in a classroom during the inspection did not have background check available for review.”
-
Based on interview, the center did not ensure obtain Virginia Child Protective Services Central Registry check for all staff.
“Evidence: Interview with staff confirmed there was no Virginia Child Protective Services Central Registry check for Staff#3 working in the classroom for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on interview, the center did not ensure to obtain a sworn statement or affirmation for all staff.
“Evidence: Interview with staff confirmed there was no sworn statement for Staff#3 working in a classroom during the inspection.”
-
Based on review of children’s record and interview, the center did not ensure to obtain documentation for each child immunizations.
“Evidence: In Child #2’s, Child#3’s, and Child#4’s records, there were no immunization documentation available for review. Interview with staff confirmed the documentation was not available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on interview, the provider did not ensure to have one working, battery-operated radio.
“Evidence: During the inspection on September 8, 2023, interview with staff confirmed there was no working, battery-operated radio available for review”
-
Based on interview, the center did not ensure to maintain a record of the dates of the practice drills.
“Evidence: Interview with staff confirmed the practiced drills were not available for review during the inspection.”
Sep 7, 2022: subsidy health and safety inspection7 deficiencies
-
Based on review of children’s record and interview, the provider did not obtain in 2 of 3 records all information for each enrolled child.
“Evidence: 1.In Child#1’s (start date 8/29/22) and Child#3’s records (start date 08/29/22), there was no documentation for the address of at least one emergency contact and no proof of child’s identity and age found for review. 2. In Child’s1’s record (start date 8/29/22) there was no documentation of written agreements. 3. Interview with staff confirmed this information for all children’s records were not obtained at this time.”
-
Based of review of staff records and interview, the provider did not ensure in 2 of 2 staff records to obtain documentation of training required.
“Evidence: In Staff #1’s record (date of hire12/12/07) and Staff#2’s record (date of hire 03/11/19) all documentation of completion of required trainings were not found. Interview with staff confirmed information not being available for review during the inspection.”
-
Based on review of staff records and interview, the provider did not ensure to obtain in 2 of 2 staff records, documentation for tuberculosis completed prior to coming into contact with children or within last 30 calendar days of the date of employment.
“Evidence: In Staff#1’s (date of hire 12/12/07) and Staff#2’s (date of hire 03/11/19), there was no documentation of tuberculosis available for review during the inspection. Interview with staff confirmed the documentation was not obtain from all staff at this time.”
-
Based on review of children’s record and interview, the provider did not ensure 2 of 3 records obtained documentation for immunizations required before the child can attend the center.
“Evidence: In Child#1’s record (start date: 08/29/22) and Child#3’s record (start date: 08/29/220, there was no immunization documentation found for review during the inspection. Interview with staff provider confirmed the documentation was not received at this time.”
-
Based on observation, the provider did not ensure all hazardous substances were kept in a locked place using a safe locking method that prevents access by children.
“Evidence: 1. In the Twos classroom, there was a bottle of hand sanitizer on counter top and a can of air spray on the top of a shelf observed unlocked with the labels “keep out of reach of children” and “warnings”. 2. There were two tubes of diapering creams unlocked and accessible to children with the labels, “keep out of reach of children’’ and ‘warnings” observed under the diapering station in the bathroom.”
-
Based on interview, the provider did not have one working, battery-operated flashlight.
“Evidence: During the inspection on September 7, 2022, interview with staff revealed a working, battery-operated flashlight was not available at the program.”
-
Based on interview, the provider did not ensure to have one working, battery-operated radio.
“Evidence: During the inspection on September 7, 2022, interview with staff confirmed there was no working, battery-operated radio available for review.”
Aug 8, 2022: inspection1 deficiency
-
Based on review of documentation and interview, the provider did not ensure all written statements were provided to the parents or guardians of the children in the center.
“Evidence: During the inspection on 08/09/22, there was no written documentation found for public liability insurance. Interview with provider confirm this written documentation was not available for review during the inspection.”
All 9 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2025 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Oct 15, 2025 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Aug 22, 2024 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 6 violations cited |
| Aug 22, 2024 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Aug 29, 2023 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Aug 29, 2023 | Inspection | No violations cited |
| Sep 7, 2022 | Subsidy health and safety inspection | 7 violations cited |
| Aug 8, 2022 | Inspection | 1 violation cited |
| Jun 15, 2022 | Complaint inspection | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Religious Exempt Child Day Center: Exempt from licensure, expires Jan 15, 2027.
- A current subsidy provider.
- Ages: 2 years - 12 years 11 months.
- Capacity: 63 children.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Has Virginia acted against it?
- 1 complaint inspection on record.
- No complaint allegations published with findings.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations and Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
Who does the caring?
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels for individual providers. State rules set staff-to-child ratios by age.
Who owns it?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t list owners.
How is it rated?
- Virginia’s search doesn’t show a quality rating.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 75 child care providers in the City of Hampton, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 12; this one had 8.
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations. Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| Ms. Phyllis Noel | 35 |
| Faith Church of God This child care provider | 8 |
| Childtime Learning Centers 1012 | 21 |
| New Mount Olive Baptist Church | 23 |
| Ms. Tammy Barker | 6 |
| Betty Bembury | 2 |
| Hampton Christian Academy | 5 |
| HRCAP Mallory | 16 |
| Bethel Temple Church, Inc. | 20 |
| Alston’s Village Learning Center LLC | 36 |
| Tiffany Booker | 5 |
| Pure at Heart Childcare Center, Phase 2 | 47 |
What the record doesn’t say
- Virginia doesn’t grade how serious a violation is, so no severity is shown.
- Virginia publishes a complaint’s allegations and findings only when its inspection found a violation and the records are linked.
- Virginia doesn’t publish staffing levels or owners for individual providers.
- A plan of correction sent late, or not at all, isn’t online: Virginia says to ask the inspector.
- Virginia’s pages show about the last five years of inspections; for older ones, Virginia says to contact the licensing inspector.
- Virginia says this information may not be accurate, up to date or complete, and shouldn’t be the only source in choosing care.
Sources
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each facility’s page.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each inspection’s page, with its violations.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
-
Virginia Department of Education, Search for Child Day Care: each complaint’s page, with its allegations and findings.
Checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated weekly. No open licence; Virginia allows non-commercial use, so Care Ledger shows it free.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: Virginia Department of Education. Virginia’s own record is on legacy.dss.virginia.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.