The Nest School
A child care center in Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104
3904 Old Vineyard Road, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27104. (743) 255-4001.
- administrative action in the last three years
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov.
The short answer
- 52 violations in the last three years
- May 212026 the latest visit on record
- 173 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean5
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Quality rating
- Many states rate child care in a quality rating system that goes past the licensing rules, such as Texas Rising Star or Kentucky All STARS. Taking part is often voluntary, so a program with no rating hasn’t been rated low. Source: Each state’s quality rating system.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
16 DCDEE visits in the last three years, the latest on May 21, 2026.
52 violations cited in the last three years, 52 of them marked corrected.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
When those violations happened
52 violations in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited May 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 3, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each violation, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
May 20, 2026: unannounced5 violations
-
A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children.
“In Space 4, one plastic bin accessible to children on a shelf was observed to be cracked and sharp to the touch. On the playground used by children less than one year of age and by children one year of age, metal grate cover was observed to have holes in greater than three areas and to be sharp to the touch.”
-
All administrators and staff did not complete a professional development plan within one year of employment, that included all the required information.
“The Professional Development Plan for one existing staff member was not observed to include the continuing education, coursework, or training needed to meet the individual’s planned goals.”
-
All equipment and furnishings were not in good repair.
“In Space 3, one wooden toy piece of bread was observed to be splintering at the edges. In Space 4, greater than five faux wood blocks made out of foam were observed to have teeth mark impressions on them.”
-
Food substitution was not of comparable food value or recorded on the menu prior to the meal or snack being served.
“Bananas were listed for breakfast on the menu for today, but blueberries were substituted; this was not recorded on the menu prior to breakfast being served. Mandarin oranges were listed for lunch on the menu for today, but pears were substituted; this was not recorded on the menu prior to lunch being served.”
-
For children under three years of age, materials were not offered in sufficient quantity to allow all children to use them at some time during the day and to allow for a range of choices.
“In Space 3, only one art material was accessible to children.”
Jan 30, 2026: unannounced11 violations
-
A child care operator did not notify the Division of any new child care providers, as defined in G.S.
“110-90.2(a)(2), who were hired or moved into the child care facility within five business days. None of the six new staff members’ CBC qualification letters were observed to be linked to the facility’s ABCMS Facility Profile.”
-
All corrosive agents, pesticides, bleaches, detergents, cleansers, polishes, any product which is under pressure in an aerosol dispenser, and any substance which may be hazardous to a child if ingested, inhaled, or handled were not stored in a locked room or cabinet.
The inspectors’ words, 122 words
“An aerosol can of Febreeze, a spray bottle of Clorox, and a spray bottle of glass cleaner labeled Keep Out of Reach of Young Children were observed in an unlocked cabinet in Space 1; the cabinet has a lock on it, but the lock was not functioning properly and did not lock the cabinet. An aerosol can of Febreeze, a spray bottle of Lysol, and a canister of disinfectant wipes labeled Keep Out of Reach of Young Children were observed greater than five feet from the ground, but in an unlocked cabinet in Space 9. In Space 7, a small keychain with hand sanitizer was observed in a staff bag stored less than five feet from the ground and accessible to children.”
-
All electrical appliances were not used in accordance with the manufacturers instruction.
“Appliances with heating elements, such as bottle warmers, crock pots, curling irons, irons, coffee pots, and/or their cords were accessible to preschool-age children. In Space 7, a portable laminator was observed less than five feet from the ground on a child-sized table; the laminator was plugged in and hot to the touch.”
-
Caregivers did not document compliance with visually checking on sleeping infants aged 12 months or younger and/or the documents were not maintained for a minimum of one month.
“The safe sleep record for one infant enrolled in Space 9 was not completed for 1/28/2026; a staff member stated the child was present and napped that day. The safe sleep record for another infant enrolled in Space 9 was not observed to have been recorded since 11/10/2025; administration stated the child was present in the following days, and the child was present during today’s visit.”
-
Leftover medicines were not returned to the parent after the course of treatment was completed, after authorization was withdrawn or after authorization had expired and/or medication was not discarded within 72 hours of completion of treatment or withdrawal of authorization.
“In Space 5A, a diaper cream was not returned to a parent after 1/08; the “valid to” date was recorded as 12/05/2025, and the “valid from” date was recorded as 1/08/2025.”
-
Medication authorization, giving the caregiver standing authorization did not meet the specifications in rule.
The inspectors’ words, 183 words
“In Space 9, the name of the topical medication was not observed recorded on the permission to administer topical ointment form for one child enrolled; this name was added to the form during the visit. In Space 2 the permission to administer topical ointment form for one child enrolled did not have a “valid from” date recorded. This date was added to the form during the visit. In Space 9 the permission to administer topical ointment form for one child enrolled did not have a “valid to” and “valid from” date recorded; these dates were added to the form during the visit. In Space 4, the date the topical medication authorization form was signed by a parent was not observed for one child enrolled; this date was recorded during the visit by administration. The diaper creams for two children enrolled in Space 2 and one child enrolled in Space 4 did not have permission to administer forms on file for review. The medication authorization form for one child enrolled in Space 2 with an emergency medication was not observed on file for review.”
-
Non-mobile children were enrolled and the center did not have a crib or other approved device to safely evacuate the children in an emergency.
“Evacuation cribs were not observed in Space 9, a room designated for infants ages nine months to twelve months in age with seven infants currently enrolled.”
-
Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age.
“In Space 6, a classroom designated for children one year of age, a piece of wrapped peppermint candy, greater than three small screws, and other items small enough to be potential choking hazards for children were observed inside an unlatched drawer less than five feet from the ground.”
-
Prior to the expiration date of the qualification letter, the child care provider did not complete and submit required forms to complete a criminal background check (a qualification letter is valid for a maximum of five years for the date of issuance).
“The Criminal Background Check Qualification Letter for one new staff member expired on 1/19/2026.”
-
Shelter-in-place or lockdown drills were not practiced every three months and/or drill record was incomplete.
“A lockdown/ shelter-in-place drill was not observed to be recorded between 7/02/2025 and 1/09/2026.”
-
The center’s safe sleep policy was not posted in a prominent place in the infant room where parents and caregivers were able to view daily.
“A safe sleep policy was not observed posted in Space 9.”
Jun 9, 2025: unannounced8 violations
-
A child care operator did not notify the Division of any new child care providers, as defined in G.S.
“110-90.2(a)(2), who were hired or moved into the child care facility within five business days. A facility profile for Criminal Background Checks had not been created; hence, staff CBCs were also not yet linked to this profile.”
-
A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children.
“In Space 4, a toy shelf was observed to be cracked and chipped on the top right edge and was sharp to the touch. Also in Space 4, a plastic electrical switch plate was observed to be cracked and sharp to the touch. On the playground designated for children of preschool age, one plastic sand table was observed to be cracked and sharp to the touch in greater than three places.”
-
A violation was found for which there is no item number.
“Child Care Sanitation Rule 15A NCAC 18A .2820 (g) STORAGE states purses and other personal effects belonging to child care center employees shall be kept inaccessible to children and shall be stored in accordance with this Rule, as applicable. The purse belonging to one staff member in Space 8 was observed on the floor of the classroom, accessible to children.”
-
Application for enrollment did not include all required information.
“The file for one child enrolled did not contain emergency medical information.”
-
For children under three years of age, materials were not offered in sufficient quantity to allow all children to use them at some time during the day and to allow for a range of choices.
“In Space 6, a classroom designated for children one year of age, greater than four learning centers did not contain sufficient materials accessible for the children’s play.”
-
Leftover medicines were not returned to the parent after the course of treatment was completed, after authorization was withdrawn or after authorization had expired and/or medication was not discarded within 72 hours of completion of treatment or withdrawal of authorization.
“In Space 4, the medication authorization form for lip balm for one child enrolled expired on 2/05/25.”
-
Parent’s medication authorization did not include required information.
“In Space 9, the medication authorization for one child enrolled did not contain the name of the medication. In Space 2, the medication authorization forms for two children enrolled did not contain valid to and from dates.”
-
The written feeding plan did not include the child’s name, parent signature, and/or was not dated when received by the center.
“The infant feeding plan for one child enrolled in Space 9 was not signed by a parent.”
May 21, 2025: announced4 violations
-
A child was handled in a rough way, including shaking, pushing, shoving, pinching, slapping, biting, kicking, or spanking.
“On 5/14/25, a staff member moved a 4-year-old child on their nap cot in a rough and inappropriate manner, as a result, the child sustained a bruise on their elbow.”
-
Each child was not attended to in a nurturing and appropriate manner, or in keeping with the child’s developmental needs.
“On 5/14/25, a staff member spoke to multiple children with a harsh and inappropriate tone of voice, when telling the children to lay down on their nap cots.”
-
Incident reports were not completed each time a child was injured, it did not include all the information required in rule, it was not signed by the parent and/or it was not maintained in the child’s file.
“On 5/14/25, staff members failed to complete an incident report when a child was injured. On 5/15/25, staff members said they completed an incident report after a child sustained an injury; however, a copy of the incident report was not on file for review.”
-
There was a substantiation of child maltreatment.
“The Division confirmed child maltreatment based on the physical needs of a child.”
Jan 3, 2025: unannounced6 violations
-
All corrosive agents, pesticides, bleaches, detergents, cleansers, polishes, any product which is under pressure in an aerosol dispenser, and any substance which may be hazardous to a child if ingested, inhaled, or handled were not stored in a locked room or cabinet.
The inspectors’ words, 98 words
“In Space 1, an aerosol canister of room spray was observed in unlocked storage. In Space 4, one bottle of disinfectant spray labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children with additional warnings was observed stored greater than five feet from the ground, but in unlocked storage. Also in Space 4, the emergency medication for one child enrolled was observed to be stored less than five feet from the ground, accessible to children. Greater than ten individual packets of disinfectant wipes labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children with additional warnings were observed in unlocked storage in Space 8.”
-
Leftover medicines were not returned to the parent after the course of treatment was completed, after authorization was withdrawn or after authorization had expired and/or medication was not discarded within 72 hours of completion of treatment or withdrawal of authorization.
“In Space 1 and Space 9, the diaper cream forms for one child enrolled in each classroom were observed to have the recorded length of time the authorization was valid to be expired (each was recorded as valid through 11/2024). In Space 5, two sunscreens were observed for the length of time the authorization was valid to be expired (each was recorded as valid through 11/2024).”
-
Parent’s medication authorization did not include required information.
“In Space 5, one sunscreen was observed without a medication authorization form. Additionally in Space 5, the name of the diaper cream for one child enrolled was not included on the medication authorization form.”
-
Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age.
“In Space 2, a space designated for infants, a cabinet was observed to be unlatched and contain greater than two plastic bags and diaper wrappers, presenting a potential choking hazard. On the playground used by children two years old, plastic weed block was observed emerging from a gardening box, presenting a potential choking hazard.”
-
The center did not complete an EPR Plan within four months of completing the EPR in Child Care training and/or the Plan was not completed on a template provided by the Division.
“A physical copy of the EPR plan was not on file for review, and it had not been updated since 11/142023.”
-
The EPR Plan did not include the location of the Ready to Go File and or the required information.
“The Ready to Go file was observed to be missing five children’s applications and the contact information for nine staff members.”
Jul 11, 2024: unannounced18 violations
-
A copy of the safe sleep policy was not given to and/or explained to the parent of each child on or before the first day the infant attended the center.
“The safe sleep policy for one child enrolled was not signed by a parent.”
-
A current activity plan was not posted for each group of children for reference.
“An activity plan was not posted in Space 7.”
-
A First Aid information sheet was not posted in a place for referral and/or the information sheet did not include all the required information.
“The content included in on the First Aid poster posted in each classroom did not include First Aid guidance for scalds, head injuries, poisons, skin wounds, stings, and bites.”
-
A summary of the NC Child Care Law was not given to a parent of every child enrolled in the center.
“A signed receipt of the Summary of NC Child Care Law was not observed on file for one child enrolled.”
-
All corrosive agents, pesticides, bleaches, detergents, cleansers, polishes, any product which is under pressure in an aerosol dispenser, and any substance which may be hazardous to a child if ingested, inhaled, or handled were not stored in a locked room or cabinet.
“One bottle of coconut oil skin treatment labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children with additional warnings was observed greater than five feet up, but in unlocked storage in Space 1. One bottle of hydrogen peroxide labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children with additional warnings was observed greater than five feet up, but in unlocked storage in Space 3. One bottle of sunscreen labeled Keep Out of Reach of Children with additional warnings was observed hanging inside a bag, less than five feet from the ground in Space 8.”
-
Child care providers, including the director, uncompensated providers, substitute providers, and volunteers did not have the required Emergency Information Form on file on or before the first day of work, which included all the required information and/or the information on the form was not updated as changes occur and at least annually.
“An Emergency Information form was not observed on file for review for one substitute.”
-
Emergency information did not name childs health care professional.
“The application for one child enrolled did not contain a responsible party’s choice of health care professional.”
-
For children under three years of age, materials were not offered in sufficient quantity to allow all children to use them at some time during the day and to allow for a range of choices.
“In Spaces 3, 5A, 5B, and 9, the art centers were completely inaccessible to children. In Space 4, the home living center did not contain sufficient materials for three children to use the space at the same time.”
-
Leftover medicines were not returned to the parent after the course of treatment was completed, after authorization was withdrawn or after authorization had expired and/or medication was not discarded within 72 hours of completion of treatment or withdrawal of authorization.
“The prescription diaper cream for one child enrolled was not returned to the parent within 72 hours of the completion of treatment.”
-
Medication authorization, giving the caregiver standing authorization did not meet the specifications in rule.
The inspectors’ words, 195 words
“The diaper cream medication authorization form for one child enrolled in Space 5A was observed without a name of the medication. A diaper cream medication authorization form for one child enrolled in Space 5A was observed without the criteria of when to administer the cream. The sunscreen medication authorization forms for two children enrolled in Space 5A did not contain a parent’s signature. The topical medication authorization forms for two children enrolled in Space 7 were missing criteria for administration and the name of the medication, respectively. The topical medication authorization form for one child enrolled with bug spray wipes was not on file for review. The topical medication authorization forms for three children enrolled in Space 8 were not observed on file for review during the visit (one bug spray, one sunscreen, and one Chapstick). The topical medication authorization forms for five children enrolled in Space 8 did not contain a name of the medication. The diaper cream medication authorization form for one child in Space 9 did not contain a parent’s signature; the same form for another child enrolled in Space 9 did not contain the criteria for how much cream to administer.”
-
Plastic bags, materials that could be torn apart and toy parts small enough to be swallowed were accessible to children under three years of age.
“In Space 9, a classroom for children one year of age, two plastic garbage bags were observed in an unlatched drawer located less than five feet from the ground, accessible to children. On the playground designated for children two years of age, two planters were observed to be lined with plastic liner which was observed to be shredding and could present a potential choking hazard.”
-
Shelter-in-place or lockdown drills were not practiced every three months and/or drill record was incomplete.
“A lockdown/ shelter-in-place drill was not observed to be documented from August 2023 through February, 2024.”
-
Special diet or food allergy information was not posted where they can be seen in food preparation and eating areas.
“An Allergy List was not posted in Space 2.”
-
Substitutes and volunteers counted in ratio were not informed of the center’s EPR Plan and its location.
“Documentation of this notice was not maintained on file or in a file designated for emergency preparedness and response plan documents. A signed notice of the EPR plan location was not observed on file for review for one substitute.”
-
The EPR Plan did not include the location of the Ready to Go File and or the required information.
“The Ready to Go file did not contain applications for children enrolled, emergency contact information for 102 of the 125 children enrolled, staff contact information, medication authorizations and medical action plans, and copies of blank incident reports.”
-
The Prevention of Shaken Baby Syndrome and Abusive Head Trauma policy was not reviewed with new staff prior to providing care with children and/or a signed acknowledgement with all the required information was not maintained in the staff person’s file.
“The signed Shaken Baby and Abusive Head Trauma Policy for one new employee was not observed on file for review.”
-
The written feeding plan did not include the child’s name, parent signature, and/or was not dated when received by the center.
“The infant feeding plans for two children enrolled (one in Space 1 and one in Space 9) were not signed by a parent or dated upon center receipt.”
-
When three year old children and older were in care, the materials and equipment in the activity area was not in sufficient quantity to allow at least three children to use the area regardless of whether the children choose the same or different activities.
“In Space 8, the art center did not contain sufficient materials for three children to use the space at the same time.”
All 16 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| May 20, 2026 | Unannounced visit | 5 violations cited |
| Jan 30, 2026 | Unannounced visit | 11 violations cited |
| Oct 17, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Sep 18, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Aug 7, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jun 12, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jun 9, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 8 violations cited |
| Jun 5, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| May 21, 2025 | Announced visit | 4 violations cited |
| Jan 3, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 6 violations cited |
| Jul 24, 2024 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jul 12, 2024 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jul 11, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 18 violations cited |
| Mar 25, 2024 | Announced visit | No violations cited |
| Dec 20, 2023 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Care Center, holding a Four Star Center License since Oct 23, 2025.
- Licensed for 173 children, ages 0 through 12.
- Not enrolled in North Carolina’s subsidized child care program.
- North Carolina’s licence number: 34001399.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Has North Carolina acted against it?
- DCDEE says it has issued one or more administrative actions for this facility in the past three years; North Carolina’s page doesn’t say what they were, and shows one only after its 30-day appeal period.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Who does the caring?
- North Carolina’s page gives a staff-to-child ratio policy as the provider reports it, unverified by DCDEE, so it isn’t shown.
Who owns it?
- Owner, as North Carolina lists it: The Nest Schools, Inc..
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How is it rated?
- Star Rated License: 4 stars of five.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 149 child care providers in Forsyth County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 13; this one had 52.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| The Sunshine House, Inc. | 97 |
| The Bunny Stop Pre-School Inc. | 52 |
| The Nest School This child care provider | 52 |
| The Goddard School of Winston-Salem | 0 |
| La Petite Academy, Inc. | 57 |
| La Petite Academy, Inc. | 64 |
| A Child’s World Learning Center Downtown | 3 |
| Ctrs for Exceptional Children: Spec Children’s Sch | 15 |
| Sunshine House | 46 |
| Epiphany Early Childhood Center | 11 |
| Waughtown Kids R Us Child Care Center | 30 |
| Happy Days Child Care | 27 |
What the record doesn’t say
- North Carolina doesn’t show a visit summary tied to an open child maltreatment investigation while the case is active, and shows an administrative action only after its 30-day appeal period, without saying what it was.
- DCDEE’s descriptions of violations are shown in its own words; a description that names or may name a person isn’t shown. Visit summaries, the consultants’ full reports, aren’t read.
- North Carolina’s page lists the provider’s own features (transport, ratios) as furnished by the provider and unverified by DCDEE, so they aren’t shown.
Sources
-
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations.
Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily. nc.gov terms: copying and distribution for non-commercial use, without alteration, citing the source. Shown free and never sold; DCDEE’s own words are quoted.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE). North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 3, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.