First Adventure Day Care Center
A child care center in Fayetteville, North Carolina 28304
1727 Roxie Avenue, Fayetteville, North Carolina 28304. (910) 615-6656.
- administrative action in the last three years
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov.
The short answer
- 19 violations in the last three years
- Jul 152026 the latest visit on record
- 465 children, its licensed capacity
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean5
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Quality rating
- Many states rate child care in a quality rating system that goes past the licensing rules, such as Texas Rising Star or Kentucky All STARS. Taking part is often voluntary, so a program with no rating hasn’t been rated low. Source: Each state’s quality rating system.
- Licence status
- Whether the state’s licence lets the place operate now, in the state’s own words: licensed, on probation (allowed to keep operating on conditions, after problems), provisional, pending or expired. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
- Capacity
- The most people the licence or certification lets the place care for at once: residents, children, beds or apartments, as the state counts them. It isn’t how many are there now. Source: Each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
19 DCDEE visits in the last three years, the latest on Jul 15, 2026.
19 violations cited in the last three years, 19 of them marked corrected.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
When those violations happened
19 violations in 6 months of the last 36. Last cited Jul 2026. The last 3 years, to Nov 3, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each violation, in its source’s words
Grouped by visit, newest first, with the level its source gave it.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Jul 7, 2026: unannounced1 violation
-
Children were not adequately supervised at all times.
“On June 17, 2026, a one year old child was left alone in a classroom for eight (8) minutes. On June 24, 2026, a four year old child was left alone in a classroom for six (6) minutes. Staff were not aware of their location and activities, nor could they hear or see the children. During today’s visit, adequate supervision was provided. This was corrected during the visit.”
Nov 25, 2025: unannounced3 violations
-
Child care providers and uncompensated providers who are not substitute providers or volunteers, including the director did not have a medical report on file prior to employment that was signed by a health care professional and/ or the medical report was older than 12 months.
“A medical report for eleven (11) staff members was not on file for review. The violation was corrected when documentation of staff’s medical reports were placed on site at the facility by the company’s employee health department.”
-
Children were not adequately supervised at all times.
“Based on staff interviews and video footage monitored, a child was left unsupervised for approximately 30 seconds in space #3 on November 7, 2025. The violation was corrected when a staff member returned 30 seconds later to space #3 to remove the child from the classroom.”
-
On or before the first day of work, all staff, including the director and individuals who volunteer more than once per week did not provide results indicating that they were free of active TB and/or TB test or screening was older than 12 months.
“Documentation of TB test or screening results were not on file or available for review for eleven (11) staff members. The violation was corrected when documentation of TB test or screening results were placed on site at the facility by the company’s employee health department.”
Jul 17, 2025: unannounced1 violation
-
When screen time was provided to school-aged children, it was not offered as a free-choice activity; not used to meet a developmental goal; was not limited to 30 minutes per day and no more than a total of two and a half hours per week, per child; and/or was not documented on a cumulative log or the activity plan that is available for review.
“In space #4, I observed two children playing age-appropriate games individually on desktop computers. Documentation of screen time cumulative log was not available for review and screen time was not documented on the current activity plan. The violation was corrected with a screen time log was placed in near the computers used for children.”
Jan 6, 2025: unannounced1 violation
-
Human milk, formula and other bottled beverages including sippy cups, sent from child’s home were not fully prepared, dated, and labeled for the appropriate child.
“In spaces #8 and #11, infant bottles and sippy cups for two (2) children were labeled with names and no dates were included. The violation was corrected when the administrator added the date on each bottle and sippy cup.”
Oct 1, 2024: unannounced10 violations
-
A safe indoor and outdoor environment was not provided for the children.
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, staff members failed to provide a safe environment for two-year-old children. A staff member routinely handled children roughly and used inappropriate discipline techniques, placing the children at risk of injury and/or harm. Staff members who observed this maltreatment failed to intervene to protect the children, also placing them at risk of injury and/or harm.”
-
Child was handled roughly.
The inspectors’ words, 139 words
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, staff members in the classroom for two-year-old children handled multiple children roughly. A staff member routinely pulled and pushed children on various parts of their body including their heads, sat children down roughly, slid children across the floor with her foot, dragged a child across the floor while seated by pulling the child’s leg, poked a child in the face, kicked at children and used her feet to knock children to the ground, roughly removed toys from their hands, held children roughly by one arm, made a child fall when the child ran into the staff member’s outstretched arm, and shook a child. Though the majority of the incidents involved one staff member, two additional staff members had at least one incident during this timeframe where they handled a child roughly.”
-
Children were not adequately supervised at all times.
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024 there were multiple instances in the classroom for two-year-old children where staff members failed to provide adequate supervision. Staff members spent a large amount of time on their phones and stood in the hallway outside of the classroom. During a lapse of supervision, children fought over a toy without any intervention from staff.”
-
Discipline was not appropriate for the child’s age and development.
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, staff members disciplined two-year-old children in an inappropriate way. Two-year-old children were seated in time-out for longer than developmentally acceptable. During one incident, a two-year-old child was in time-out for twenty-six minutes. Two-year-old children were routinely required to be in time-out for longer than two minutes.”
-
Each child was not attended to in a nurturing and appropriate manner, or in keeping with the child’s developmental needs.
The inspectors’ words, 104 words
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, staff members in the classroom for two-year-old children failed to treat children in a nurturing and appropriate manner. There were multiple instances of a staff member lifting their hand as if to hit a child and yelling at and speaking harshly to children. In one instance a staff member threw toy blocks at a two-year-old child, one of which hit the child on the head. A staff member removed food from children that were actively eating. Additionally, the majority of the interactions between staff and children were disciplinary and there was little to no positive engagement.”
-
Enhanced staff/child ratios and group sizes were not met.
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, there were multiple instances in the classroom for two-year-old children where staff/child ratios were not in compliance.”
-
For children under three years of age, an open area that allows freedom of movement was not available, both indoors or outdoors.
“Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, staff members in the classroom for two-year-old children required the children to spend a large amount of time in a very small area of the classroom. Whenever children attempted to exit and play with toys, they were directed back to the small area and the toys were removed from them.”
-
Rule violated (DCDEE’s description below)
The inspectors’ words, 93 words
“Corporal punishment was used. [Omit item 0903 for religious sponsored centers operating under GS 110-106 with an exemption on file with the Division.] Between September 3, 2024 and September 17, 2024, a staff member in the classroom for two-year-old children used corporal punishment on multiple children. The staff member hit children with her hand as well as with different items, including a folder, a basket, a pointer the size of a pencil, and a plastic bin. The children were hit on various parts of their body including their bottoms, heads, legs, and backs.”
-
The center did not report a suspected case of child maltreatment as required by the mandatory duty prescribed in GS 110-105.4(a).
“Staff members that observed the maltreatment of children failed to immediately report the incidents to administration or investigating authorities.”
-
There was a substantiation of child maltreatment.
“Pursuant to its investigation, the Division has confirmed sufficient information to determine child maltreatment.”
Jan 11, 2024: unannounced3 violations
-
All staff, including the director, did not have an annual health questionnaire on file following the initial medical statement.
“A current health questionnaire was not available for A.R. The staff member A.R. completed an annual health questionnaire during the visit.”
-
Child care providers, including the director, uncompensated providers, substitute providers, and volunteers did not have the required Emergency Information Form on file on or before the first day of work, which included all the required information and/or the information on the form was not updated as changes occur and at least annually.
“Emergency information was not available for staff member A.R. The staff member A.R. completed an emergency information form during the visit.”
-
Each employee’s personnel file did not contain an annual staff evaluation and a staff development plan.
“The annual staff evaluation for administrator D.G. was not current. It expired on 12/2023.”
All 19 visits on record
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jul 7, 2026 | Unannounced visit | 1 violation cited |
| Mar 13, 2026 | Announced visit | No violations cited |
| Jan 9, 2026 | Announced visit | No violations cited |
| Dec 8, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Nov 25, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 3 violations cited |
| Aug 26, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jul 17, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 1 violation cited |
| Jul 15, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jun 10, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jun 3, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Apr 30, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Feb 24, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jan 30, 2025 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jan 6, 2025 | Unannounced visit | 1 violation cited |
| Dec 3, 2024 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Oct 1, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 10 violations cited |
| Jul 30, 2024 | Unannounced visit | No violations cited |
| Jan 11, 2024 | Unannounced visit | 3 violations cited |
Is it licensed?
- Child Care Center, holding a Four Star Center License since Apr 22, 2026.
- Licensed for 465 children, ages 0 through 12.
- Enrolled in North Carolina’s subsidized child care program.
- North Carolina’s licence number: 2655292.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Has North Carolina acted against it?
- DCDEE says it has issued one or more administrative actions for this facility in the past three years; North Carolina’s page doesn’t say what they were, and shows one only after its 30-day appeal period.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
Who does the caring?
- North Carolina’s page gives a staff-to-child ratio policy as the provider reports it, unverified by DCDEE, so it isn’t shown.
Who owns it?
- Owner, as North Carolina lists it: Cumberland County Hosptial System, Inc..
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How is it rated?
- Star Rated License: 4 stars of five.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
How does it compare nearby?
- Among 260 child care providers in Cumberland County, the middle value for violations cited in the last three years was 9; this one had 19.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations. Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily.
| Place | Violations cited in the last three years |
|---|---|
| First Adventure Day Care Center This child care provider | 19 |
| Lil’ Angels Day Care | 1 |
| The Pillar of Faith Christian Home Day Care | 3 |
| The New Dimension Child Care | 28 |
| Fran’s Child Care | 8 |
| Carpenter’s Child Care | 0 |
| Loyd Auman Prime Time | 1 |
| William H. Owen Prime Time | 0 |
| The Sunshine Child Care | 1 |
| Birds Nest Montessori School | 11 |
| Happy Kidz | 24 |
| Loyd Auman Elementary | 6 |
| Alpha Omega Day Academy, Inc. | 10 |
What the record doesn’t say
- North Carolina doesn’t show a visit summary tied to an open child maltreatment investigation while the case is active, and shows an administrative action only after its 30-day appeal period, without saying what it was.
- DCDEE’s descriptions of violations are shown in its own words; a description that names or may name a person isn’t shown. Visit summaries, the consultants’ full reports, aren’t read.
- North Carolina’s page lists the provider’s own features (transport, ratios) as furnished by the provider and unverified by DCDEE, so they aren’t shown.
Sources
-
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE), Child Care Facility Search (ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov): licences, DCDEE visits and violations.
Checked Oct 21, 2026. Updated daily. nc.gov terms: copying and distribution for non-commercial use, without alteration, citing the source. Shown free and never sold; DCDEE’s own words are quoted.
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Division of Child Development and Early Education (DCDEE). North Carolina’s own record is on ncchildcare.ncdhhs.gov. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 3, 2026.
From the provider
The public record above comes first. Anything the provider adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the provider will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the provider”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.