Hearth Record

Back to Curling irons, curlers and hair clips

TRIM curling irons, curlers and hair clips

1 report to CPSC, the latest made May 18, 2017. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • May 18, 2017the latest report was made
  • May 18, 2017the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
TRIM
Maker
Pacific World CorporationMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Curling irons, curlers and hair clipsCPSC’s product type: Hair Curlers, Curling Irons, Clips & Hairpins (code 1682), in Personal Care: Grooming

By month

1 report from June 2016 to May 2017; the most in May 2017, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
May 20171

How badly anyone was hurt

  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. No one hurt

    Made May 18, 2017, sent to the company May 26, 2017, published by CPSC Jun 19, 2017

    The product, in the report: TRIM eyelash curler, black with white pads.

    On May 1, 2017 I was using a TRIM eye lash curler and the blade of the curler cut through my the pad and cut chunks out of my eyelashes. I didn’t realize what happened until I curled my second eye. I called the company and spoke to a [REDACTED] who in turn put me in touch with [REDACTED]. We spoke twice on the phone, first time she was very nice and asked lots of questions. Second time she had a very bad attitude and tried to deny that the curler was one of their products. I sent lots of pictures of my eyelashes and the curler at her request. She did email back and stated that they did identify the curler was “similar” to theirs from the photos I sent. She asked me to send the curler and pads to them for further investigation. I responded and said I wanted to consult with my attorney for advice as I did not want to send off my curler and have nothing to show causing the injury. Immediately she responded and wanted no further contact with me and said to deal with it through their legal department. I emailed her twice stating I was not retaining an attorney, just wanted to know the best way to cover myself prior to sending off the implement. Still I was faced with NO customer service. This is where I am at this time. Yes it cut chunks out of both eyelashes and thank GOD there was no injury to the skin of my eyelids, but that certainly could have happened. I have had to purchase special hair growth liquid to put on my eyelashes to help grow them out. This just scares me that it could have been much worse and how many other people this could or has happend to. This curler is junk and should be looked at from your department. I am lucky there was no further damage to my eyes, I can only imagine if I had put the curler closer to my eyelid and what could have happened. I have now consulted with my attorney and he suggested I contact your company first to see what my next step should be or what can be done.

    Model
    TRIM
    Bought from
    Target or CVS
    Bought
    Apr 24, 2017, about then
    Where
    Naples, United States: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 61, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Self
    As this report names them
    Brand TRIM, made or sold by Pacific World Corporation
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources

  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Curling irons, curlers and hair clips

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.