MJMOTO (as shown on Temu product page) clothing accessories
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jul 13, 2025. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Jul 13, 2025the latest report was made
- Jul 13, 2025the earliest
- 0with the company’s comments
- Brand
- MJMOTO (as shown on Temu product page)
- Maker
- MJMOTOMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Clothing accessoriesCPSC’s product type: Clothing Accessories (code 1647), in Clothing and Accessories: Other
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| July 2025 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Emergency room 1 CPSC: Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Emergency room Made Jul 13, 2025, sent to the company Jul 16, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 30, 2025
The product, in the report: A pair of full-finger motorcycle gloves purchased through Temu. Color: Black/Brown. Labeled as summer breathable motorcycle gloves with touchscreen-compatible fingertips. The gloves were marketed as unisex protective riding gear for motorcycles and bicycles. No adequate padding was provided in the palm area, which led to injury during use.
I purchased MJMOTO full-finger motorcycle gloves via Temu on March 30, 2025. During a certified long-distance motorcycle ride on April 18, 2025, I developed a painful blister on my right palm due to the gloves inadequate padding and poor construction. The gloves were marketed as protective motorcycle gear and were used exactly as intended worn during a long-distance ride on a [REDACTED]. However, they appeared to be inappropriately manufactured and not designed in line with common safety and durability standards expected of motorcycle gear. Injury: The low-quality palm material led to repeated friction and pressure during regular use, resulting in a painful blister that required medical attention. I incurred out-of-pocket medical expenses (CA$62.16) and wage loss from three missed workdays (CA$666.00). I contacted the seller (Temu) and submitted all requested evidence, but no meaningful resolution has been provided.
- Model
- MJMOTO Cycling Gloves Summer Breathable Full Finge
- UPC
- Not listed
- Serial number
- Not provided
- Bought from
- https:/
/ www.temu.com - Bought
- Mar 30, 2025
- Where
- Canada: Other
- Who was involved
- Age 65, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand MJMOTO (as shown on Temu product page), made or sold by MJMOTO
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.