Hearth Record

Back to Outerwear

Rothschild outerwear

2 reports to CPSC, the latest made Dec 13, 2012. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 2reports to CPSC
  • Dec 13, 2012the latest report was made
  • Nov 30, 2011the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Rothschild
Maker
ROTHSCHILD AND CO, INC.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
OuterwearCPSC’s product type: Outerwear (code 1646), in Clothing and Accessories: Clothing
Other ways the reports write the brand (1)

“Rothschild Baby-boys Newborn Plush Snowsuit”

By month

1 report from January 2012 to December 2012; the most in December 2012, 1. 1 earlier report, since November 2011, is in the table.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
December 20121
November 20111

How badly anyone was hurt

  • First aid 1 CPSC: Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  • No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. First aid

    Made Dec 13, 2012, sent to the company Jan 4, 2013, published by CPSC Jan 18, 2013

    The product, in the report: Rothschild leopard pram (red puffy snowsuit with leopard trim) size 12 months - Girl’s-Infant

    My stepmother purchased a Rothschild leopard pram online through Kohl’s a couple of months ago for my 8- month-old daughter. I put the snowsuit on my daughter for the first time yesterday (11/28112). Once outside she started really crying and she does not cry often so I thought it was odd and brought her inside. She was very upset so I took the suit off and she fell asleep. I decided to inspect the suit to see if there were any tags or anything that could’ve been bothering her and found a very used rusty pair of shears with some Chinese looking print on side (I searched Google and the closest tool I could find was Chinese leaf shears). I checked my daughter to see if she had been injured and found some cuts on the bottom of her right foot I spoke with her pediatrician and they assured me that her tetanus shots are up to date and told me to wash and treat the area with antibiotic ointment Then I called Kohl’s customer service and emailed them and posted a message to them on their Facebook page and am waiting to hear back. Also, today I contacted Rothschild (via email on their company site), the manufacturer of this product The shears are lightweight and small (about 3-4 inches long) and since her foot did not fit all the way to the bottom I did not feel them before putting the suit on my daughter. It was very scary to find something so dangerous so close to her little baby feet and toes! The cuts on her feet are not deep but I am sick to my stomach thinking about what could have happened. I would hope this would be investigated, for instance why are they using a rusty instrument to process clothing? And how does this get through a clothing inspection?

    Model
    Leopard Pram - Red
    Serial number
    RN#38843 7-26108-87473-1 (on tag)
    Bought from
    Kohl’s - Internet site, Wisconsin
    Bought
    Sep 29, 2012
    Where
    Columbia, Connecticut: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Rothschild, made or sold by ROTHSCHILD AND CO, INC.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, First Aid Received by Non-Medical Professional
  2. No one hurt

    Made Nov 30, 2011, sent to the company Dec 8, 2011, published by CPSC Dec 30, 2011

    The product, in the report: Rothschild Baby-boys Newborn Plush Snowsuit

    I purchased this snow suit for my 9 month old son. I tried it on him and then hung it up. As I put it on the hangar i heard something fall to the floor. The suit has 2 buttons on the upper chest area. The buttons are the banana type that hang from a loop, and are pushed through another loop to fasten. The button, and the loop that attached it to the suit, had fallen off the suit. The loop assembly did not show any signs of stitching or fraying, as if the product had been missewn. The stitching that secures each button sits inside a leather pocket and is not easily inspected. The manufacturer defect in the secure sewing of these buttons on this suit poses a serious choking risk to babies and toddlers. As babys wearing this suit are still of the age range of being secured in a rear facing car seat, and not in the direct sight of a parent, the risk of a child choking to death is even more serious.

    Bought from
    Amazon
    Bought
    Nov 25, 2011
    Where
    Clarksville, Tennessee: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 0, Male
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Rothschild Baby-boys Newborn Plush Snowsuit, made or sold by ROTHSCHILD AND CO, INC.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Incident, No Injury

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Outerwear

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.