Hearth Record

Back to Everyday clothes

Tommy Hilfiger everyday clothes

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Jun 5, 2012. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Jun 5, 2012the latest report was made
  • Jun 5, 2012the earliest
  • 1with the company’s comments
Brand
Tommy Hilfiger
Maker
Phillips-Van Heusen CorporationMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
Everyday clothesCPSC’s product type: Day Wear (code 1645), in Clothing and Accessories: Clothing

By month

1 report from July 2011 to June 2012; the most in June 2012, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
June 20121

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Hurt, care not known 1 CPSC: Injury, Level of care not known

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Hurt, care not known

    Made Jun 5, 2012, sent to the company Jul 13, 2012, published by CPSC Aug 10, 2012

    The product, in the report: Sweater RN# 66476, CA#20781

    On April 5, 2012, The Tommy Hilfiger sweater I was wearing caught fire when I was near a candle. It was the right sleeve and the flames were coming up my arm and reaching for my hair. The skin on my arm was heated and red by the time I managed to bat the flames out. It scared the hell out of me. On April 10, 2012 I sent an email to the manufacturer telling them what had happened. On April 19 I received a return email from their representative. She said she had no Idea why I was writing and please explain. When I tried to return her email I got a message that the email I was writing to didn’t exist. Since I had clicked on ‘reply’ I couldn’t understand this. By April 25 when I again had no response I resent my original email, and on April29 and May7. L did get a response to this telling me to contact the original retailer for resolution. I asked why I would contact the retailer when it was a product issue I was writing about. Their sweater had caught fire while I was In It. I had offered to send them the sweater so they could examine it. I finally wrote them that I was contacting this office. How uncaring can a company be when their product catches fire while on a body and they tell me to go back to where I bought it for a refund? What do I have to do to get some resolution to the fact that my clothing made by their company caught fire with me In It? I am a single woman almost 66 years old. I live alone. What If I had not been able to put the fire on my sleeve out without causing further Injury to my arm? I am here by filing an official complaint against Tommy Hilfiger. All attempts by me for resolution to this problem have been ignored. They pass me off to a dead end, and when they do respond they ask me why I am writing. What I want is some attention to this Issue. I want some resolution to the fact that I was injured, my sweater ruined and I feared that this was going to result In major Injuries to my body.

    Model
    RN# 66476; CA#20781
    Where
    Kirkland, Washington: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    Unspecified
    As this report names them
    Brand Tommy Hilfiger, made or sold by Phillips-Van Heusen Corporation
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Level of care not known

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Everyday clothes

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.