Cutie Pie Baby everyday clothes
1 report to CPSC, the latest made May 19, 2016. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- May 19, 2016the latest report was made
- May 19, 2016the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Cutie Pie Baby
- Maker
- Cutie Pie Baby, Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- Everyday clothesCPSC’s product type: Day Wear (code 1645), in Clothing and Accessories: Clothing
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| May 2016 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- No one hurt 1 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made May 19, 2016, sent to the company May 27, 2016, published by CPSC Jun 20, 2016
The product, in the report: Infant socks, three-pack, white, grey, and pink colors with rattles in the shape of bear, cat, and bunny heads
Infant was wearing rattle socks which have a rattle in the shape of a bunny stitched onto the socks. She was wearing them while in the back seat of the car on the way to daycare. When we arrived I noticed she had removed one of the socks, so I put it back on without looking closely at it. Just as I was leaving her, I noticed something white in her mouth. On closer examination, she had pulled off the ear of the bunny - about the size of a dime - and had it in her mouth. She must have had it in her mouth for at least 5-10 minutes, and it was large enough to block her airway if she’d tried to swallow it. I took off her socks to examine them and saw that the stitches holding the ear to the bunny head had ripped, which were also the stitches keeping the stuffing and rattle disk inside. The stuffing was now coming out, and if she had continued chewing on the sock while in the back seat, she easily could have swallowed the stuffing and the rattle disk (slightly larger than a dime) as well. None of the stitching on the socks is very solid - the stitching of ears to animal head, the stitching holding in the stuffing and rattle disk, and the stitching holding the rattle to the sock - and an infant could easily pull off/pull apart the different components and choke. Had my child tried to swallow the ear instead of just chewing on it, or if I had not happened to notice the bit of white in her mouth as I was leaving, she easily could have choked.
- Bought from
- Gift
- Bought
- Jul 1, 2015, about then
- Where
- Cincinnati, Ohio: Street or Highway
- Who was involved
- Age 1, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Cutie Pie Baby, made or sold by Cutie Pie Baby, Inc.
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.