Hearth Record

Back to Shoes

Sprry Pier View Core shoes

1 report to CPSC, the latest made Aug 31, 2016. A report isn’t a recall.

Watch it to hear when CPSC publishes new reports about it. CPSC’s own search, on saferproducts.gov

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.

At a glance

From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.

  • 1report to CPSC
  • Aug 31, 2016the latest report was made
  • Aug 31, 2016the earliest
  • 0with the company’s comments
Brand
Sprry Pier View Core
Maker
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
Product
ShoesAll footwearCPSC’s product type: Footwear (code 1615), in Clothing and Accessories: Shoes and other Footwear

By month

1 report from September 2015 to August 2016; the most in August 2016, 1.
The numbers, as a table
Reports to CPSC by the month each was made, newest first
MonthReports
August 20161

How badly anyone was hurt

  • Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.

The reports, as CPSC published them

Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.

Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.

Source:

CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.

  1. Seen by a doctor or nurse

    Made Aug 31, 2016, sent to the company Oct 13, 2016, published by CPSC Oct 27, 2016

    The product, in the report: women’s shoes, with memory foam, black in color, size-9 Medium

    The consumer purchased the shoes and kept them for about a week. The consumer’s 19 year old daughter wore the shoes to work for approximately 4 hours and suffered an allergic reaction. The daughter wore the shoes without socks and did not come into contact with anything else during that time. The allergic reaction was to both feet, but her left foot was worse than the right foot. The rash extended from the area just above the toes to where the shoe stopped.

    8/27/2016: Daughter was taken to Edward Urgent Care Hospital, Oswego, IL, and she was diagnosed with a dermititus reaction. A steroid cream was prescribed for the rash and she has to apply it twice a day. Since that time the daughter has not been able to wear closed shoes; She has only been able to wear flip flops.

    8/28/2016: The consumer contact the manufacturer by email and she received a response the following day, 8/29/2016. A manufacturer’s rep. indicated that they try to test their materials, but noted that some individuals may have a reaction to the materials used in their shoes. The email indicated that the mfr. would like the shoes back and the consumer could pick out another pair or get store credit. The consumer was also provided with a FedEx label to return the shoes. However, the consumer does not want another pair of their shoes. The consumer said that she incurred medical cost and their email did not mention that they would provide any compensation or assistance with the cost.

    The consumer is not sure if she will return the shoes and she may have them tested by an independent authority.

    The consumer said that she saw approximately 3 to 4 other reports on CPSC’s site and one person included pictures. The consumer said that she also found that the firm has had 2 prior lawsuits against them for this issue. Therefore, she questions why the firm has not addressed the matter.

    Model
    SKU; STS95730
    Bought from
    DSW, Illinois
    Bought
    Aug 20, 2016, about then
    Where
    Oswego, Illinois: Home/Apartment/Condominium
    Who was involved
    Age 19, Female
    The reporter’s relation to them
    My Child
    As this report names them
    Brand Sprry Pier View Core, made or sold by WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE, INC.
    How badly, in CPSC’s words
    Injury, Seen by Medical Professional

CPSC’s disclaimer

Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.

Source:

Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.

Sources

Sources
  • U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.

    Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.

Source:

Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.

Back to Shoes

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.