Nike shoes
16 reports to CPSC, the latest made Apr 14, 2026. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 16reports to CPSC
- Apr 14, 2026the latest report was made
- May 18, 2011the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Nike
- Makers
- NIKE and Hyper Ice, Inc.Makers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- ShoesAll footwearCPSC’s product type: Footwear (code 1615), in Clothing and Accessories: Shoes and other Footwear
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| April 2026 | 1 |
| June 2025 | 1 |
| August 2023 | 1 |
| March 2023 | 1 |
| November 2022 | 1 |
| June 2021 | 1 |
| May 2021 | 3 |
| July 2019 | 1 |
| March 2015 | 1 |
| August 2013 | 1 |
| April 2013 | 1 |
| February 2013 | 1 |
| June 2011 | 1 |
| May 2011 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Hospital admission 2 CPSC: Injury, Hospital Admission
- Emergency room 2 CPSC: Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 5 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
- Hurt, no treatment 1 CPSC: Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
- No one hurt 4 CPSC: Incident, No Injury
- No incident, no one hurt 1 CPSC: No Incident, No Injury
- Not said 1 CPSC: Unspecified
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
No one hurt Made Apr 14, 2026, sent to the company Apr 20, 2026, published by CPSC May 4, 2026
The product, in the report: Tennis shoes
Bought tennis shoes for my 5 year old son. Nike Team hustle D11, the shoe has a [REDACTED] strap that connects to the inside of the shoe, however the strap comes loose as soon you walk or run tripping you and making you fall.
- Model
- Team hustle D11
- UPC
- 1 96604975582
- Serial number
- DV 8994 002
- Bought from
- Las Vegas north
- Bought
- Dec 13, 2025, about then
- Where
- North Las Vegas, Nevada: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Unspecified
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
-
Hospital admission Made Jun 10, 2025, sent to the company Jun 26, 2025, published by CPSC Jul 11, 2025
The product, in the report: Heated Compression sneaker. Reportedly 120-140 degrees. Which is much too hot.
Patient sustained third degree burns from Nike Hyperboot (heated compression boot). Requiring surgery and skin grafting.
Unsure of how much info I can give d/t HIPPA
- Model
- Hyperboot
- Where
- United States: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Unspecified
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by Hyper Ice, Inc.
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Hospital Admission
-
Emergency room Made Aug 30, 2023, sent to the company Sep 1, 2023, published by CPSC Sep 18, 2023
The product, in the report: Nike Vapormax
My son fall and broke his leg (growth plate)
- Model
- Vapormax
- Where
- Mustang, Oklahoma: School
- Who was involved
- Age 11, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
-
No one hurt Made Mar 27, 2023, sent to the company Mar 30, 2023, published by CPSC Apr 20, 2023
The product, in the report: Middle distance track and field running shoe with spike plate.
While wearing Nike Air Zoom Victory teack spikes, the sole began separating after only the third time being worn and collectively less than 15 minutes of use.
- Model
- Air Zoom Victory CD4385-100 size US 9.5
- Bought from
- Nike
- Where
- BREA, California: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Age 18, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
-
Hurt, no treatment Made Nov 30, 2022, sent to the company Dec 2, 2022, published by CPSC Dec 16, 2022
The product, in the report: NIKE WOMENS TANJUN SNEAKER - PINK size 7.5. 812655-605 UPC 00884776919014 date 02/15/18
The sneakers have only been worn several times for walking short distances & the front of the sneakers have torn apart letting my toes hang out of them. I’ve cut & stubbed my toe. This is a dangerous safety hazard.
- Model
- 812655-605 NIKE WOMENS TANJUN SNEAKER - PINK
- UPC
- 00884776919014
- Serial number
- 108123028
- Where
- New Jersey: Other
- Who was involved
- Age 34, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, No First Aid or Medical Attention Received
-
No incident, no one hurt Made Jun 30, 2021, sent to the company Jul 20, 2021, published by CPSC Aug 3, 2021
The product, in the report: Nike Superfly 6 Elite FG Firm-Ground Soccer Cleat - size 6.5M - Orange and White
Defective Nike soccer cleats could cause serious injury. The glue that holds the heel cleat to the upper is faulty and separates. This could cause anyone using the cleat to severely damage their ankle. Attached are pictures of two pairs of Nike cleats that have the same defective issue (each under a few months old). As you can see, if a child or adult were playing soccer in these and the heel separates, this would cause the ankle to roll and could cause major damage to the user’s ankles and tibia. These cleats are dangerous and Nike should recall or at the very least, stop selling this dangerous product.
- Model
- Superfly 6 Elite FG Firm-Ground Soccer Cleat
- UPC
- NA
- Serial number
- NA
- Bought from
- Nike.com
- Bought
- May 5, 2020
- Where
- Granby, Connecticut: Other
- Who was involved
- Age 17, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- No Incident, No Injury
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made May 12, 2021, sent to the company May 14, 2021, published by CPSC May 28, 2021
The product, in the report: WMNS NIKE AIR VAPOR ADVANTAGE BLUE Model 599364-410 BLUE UPC 00884497557700
Nike has been making defective shows for many years. I fell on the Tennis Court as the Blue NIKE shoes I was wearing style number 599364-410 sole became detached from the shoe.. I have enclose pictures of trying to glue the shoes after the incident as they are over $ 100 each. You can see the glue and you can also see the shoes were hardly worn more than 2-3 times! and this is about the 9th pair that was defective! ( picture attatched) Based on this injury I saw Dr. [REDACTED] in Boca Raton an Orthopedic Doctor on February 23, 2021. The XRAYS determined that i had Hamstring Injury and issues that I needed to go to Physical Therapy. and get more MRI’s. I also saw Dr.[REDACTED] In Delray Beach Florida to address the Pain. I began Physical Therapy ( attatched) on March 10, 2021 until today May 11, 2021. I also saw Dr. [REDACTED] a top Orthopedic Surgeon in Boca Raton about this issue. They have caused me to not only fall on the tennis court but could have caused serious injuries due to they faulty construction. This is not only older shoes but some new shoes..and not heavily worn shoes .Some were only worn once or twice and the rubber sole has come apart from the rest of the shoe. ( I am happy to send pictures of nearly 12 pairs!) Last year in February 2020 I alerted Nike Customer Service department about defective 599364 shoes! At that at time I sent them 2 pairs of shoes that they deemed to not be Nike’s fault. In addition , our representative seemed more than unconcerned about my safety or that of others while performing sports. His name was [REDACTED], [REDACTED]. In fact..I called him several months later and he never returned my phone call. Since contacting your unhelpful representative in February I have had 3 additional pairs of the 599364, 2 of which had only been worn twice, and a pair of your 487996 after only 3 wears. Not only is his extremely dangerous for falls and worse during play..but has now become very very costly! 599364. I now have 9 pairs! Which have fallen apart. 1) 599364- 607 pink worn 3 times…second pair bought 2) 487996-414 blue worn 3 times 3) 599364-410 blue only worn a few times Other pairs of 599364-106,607, 107,410,105 166, 100 fell apart. Sadly I have tried contacting Nike’s Executive office only to be thwarted away and not being able to speak to anyone..EVEN AN EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY! They should clearly be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “blinder’s” when it comes to their products defective construction. Nike has been making defective shows for many years. They have caused me to not only fall on the tennis court but could have caused serious injuries due to they faulty construction. This is not only older shoes but some new shoes..and not heavily worn shoes .Some were only worn once or twice and the rubber sole has come apart from the rest of the shoe. ( I am happy to send pictures of nearly 12 pairs!) Last year in February I alerted your Customer Service department about defective 599364 shoes! At that at time I sent them 2 pairs of shoes that they deemed to not be Nike’s fault. In addition , Nike’s representative seemed more than unconcerned about my safety or that of others while
His name was [REDACTED], [REDACTED]. In fact..I called him several months later and he never returned my phone call. Since contacting your unhelpful representative in February I have had 3 additional pairs of the 599364, 2 of which had only been worn twice, and a pair of your 487996 after only 3 wears. Not only is his extremely dangerous for falls and worse during play..but has now become very very costly! 599364. I now have 9 pairs! Which have fallen apart. 1) 599364- 607 pink worn 3 times…second pair bought 2) 487996-414 blue worn 3 times 3) 599364-410 blue only worn a few times Other pairs of 599364-106,607, 107,410,105 and 100 fell apart. Sadly I have tried contacting Nike’s Executive office only to be thwarted away and not being able to speak to anyone..EVEN AN EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY! They should clearly be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “blinder’s” when it comes to their products defective construction. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY. They should cleary be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “Blinder’s”when it comes to their product’s defective construction. They completely keep the public away from them. Sadly i even tried contacting Nike through the BBB i their State, and they “[REDACTED]’ no last name said Nike has no RECORD of my email purchasing their products! Nike have over 1000 Legitimate Retailers in the World and US..why would i have not purchased them through a legitiamate outlet!??? They cared nothing and COMPLETELY dodged the issue of the Defective Shoes. Nike seem to have consideration to the SAFETY of the Public and should be SEVERELY FINED for their NEGLIGENCE IN INJURING THE PUBLIC WITH FAULTY DANGEROUS PRODUCT!
- Model
- 599364-410 BLUE
- UPC
- 00884497557700
- Bought from
- Nike Store
- Where
- Boca Raton, Florida: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Age 69, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand NIKE, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made May 11, 2021, sent to the company May 14, 2021, published by CPSC May 28, 2021
The product, in the report: WMNS NIKE AIR VAPOR ADVANTAGE
Nike has been making defective shows for many years. I fell on the Tennis Court as the Orange NIKE shoes I was wearing style number 599364-166 sole became detached from the shoe.. In addition the side became detached from the shoe. I have enclose pictures of trying to glue the shoes after the incident as they are over $ 100 each and this is about the 9th pair that was defective! ( picture attatched) Based on this injury I saw Dr.[REDACTED] in Boca Raton an Orthopedic Doctor on February 23, 2021. The XRAYS determined that i had Hamstring Injury and issues that I needed to go to Physical Therapy. and get more MRI’s. I also saw Dr. [REDACTED] In Delray Beach Florida to address the Pain. I began Physical Therapy ( attatched) on March 10, 2021 until today May 11, 2021. I also saw Dr. [REDACTED] a top Orthopedic Surgeon in Boca Raton about this issue. They have caused me to not only fall on the tennis court but could have caused serious injuries due to they faulty construction. This is not only older shoes but some new shoes..and not heavily worn shoes .Some were only worn once or twice and the rubber sole has come apart from the rest of the shoe. ( I am happy to send pictures of nearly 12 pairs!)
Last year in February 2020 I alerted Nike Customer Service department about defective 599364 shoes! At that at time I sent them 2 pairs of shoes that they deemed to not be Nike’s fault. In addition , our representative seemed more than unconcerned about my safety or that of others while performing sports. His name was [REDACTED], [REDACTED]. In fact..I called him several months later and he never returned my phone call.
Since contacting your unhelpful representative in February I have had 3 additional pairs of the 599364, 2 of which had only been worn twice, and a pair of your 487996 after only 3 wears.
Not only is his extremely dangerous for falls and worse during play..but has now become very very costly! 599364. I now have 9 pairs! Which have fallen apart.
1) 599364- 607 pink worn 3 times…second pair bought 2) 487996-414 blue worn 3 times 3) 599364-410 blue only worn a few times Other pairs of 599364-106,607, 107,410,105 166, 100 fell apart.
Sadly I have tried contacting Nike’s Executive office only to be thwarted away and not being able to speak to anyone..EVEN AN EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY! They should clearly be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “blinder’s” when it comes to their products defective construction. Nike has been making defective shows for many years. They have caused me to not only fall on the tennis court but could have caused serious injuries due to they faulty construction. This is not only older shoes but some new shoes..and not heavily worn shoes .Some were only worn once or twice and the rubber sole has come apart from the rest of the shoe. ( I am happy to send pictures of nearly 12 pairs!)
Last year in February I alerted your Customer Service department about defective 599364 shoes! At that at time I sent them 2 pairs of shoes that they deemed to not be Nike’s fault. In addition , our representative seemed more than unconcerned about my safety or that of others while performing sports. His name was[REDACTED], [REDACTED]. In fact..I called him several months later and he never returned my phone call.
Since contacting your unhelpful representative in February I have had 3 additional pairs of the 599364, 2 of which had only been worn twice, and a pair of your 487996 after only 3 wears.
Not only is his extremely dangerous for falls and worse during play..but has now become very very costly! 599364. I now have 9 pairs! Which have fallen apart.
1) 599364- 607 pink worn 3 times…second pair bought 2) 487996-414 blue worn 3 times 3) 599364-410 blue only worn a few times Other pairs of 599364-106,607, 107,410,105 and 100 fell apart.
Sadly I have tried contacting Nike’s Executive office only to be thwarted away and not being able to speak to anyone..EVEN AN EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY! They should clearly be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “blinder’s” when it comes to their products defective construction. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY. They should cleary be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “Blinder’s”when it comes to their product’s defective construction. They completely keep the public away from them. Sadly i even tried contacting Nike through the BBB i their State, and they “[REDACTED]no last name said Nike has no RECORD of my email purchasing their products! Nike have over 1000 Legitimate Retailers in the World and US..why would i have not purchased them through a legitiamate outlet!???They cared nothing and COMPLETELY dodged the issue of the Defective Shoes. Nike seem to have consideration to the SAFETY of the Public and should be SEVERELY FINED for their NEGLIGENCE IN INJURING THE PUBLIC WITH FAULTY DANGEROUS PRODUCT!
- Model
- 599364-166 ORANGE
- UPC
- 00883212612052
- Bought from
- Dick Sporting Goods
- Where
- Boca Raton, Florida: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Age 69, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand NIKE, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
No one hurt Made May 10, 2021, sent to the company May 13, 2021, published by CPSC May 27, 2021
The product, in the report: NIKE WOMEN’s TENNIS SHOE AIR VAPOR ADVANTAGE Model 599364107 UPC 00884497553580
Nike has been making defective shows for many years. They have caused me to not only fall on the tennis court but could have caused serious injuries due to they faulty construction. This is not only older shoes but some new shoes..and not heavily worn shoes .Some were only worn once or twice and the rubber sole has come apart from the rest of the shoe. ( I am happy to send pictures of nearly 12 pairs!)
Last year in February I alerted your Customer Service department about defective 599364 shoes! At that at time I sent them 2 pairs of shoes that they deemed to not be Nike’s fault. In addition , our representative seemed more than unconcerned about my safety or that of others while performing sports. His name was [REDACTED], Elite Services. In fact..I called him several months later and he never returned my phone call.
Since contacting your unhelpful representative in February I have had 3 additional pairs of the 599364, 2 of which had only been worn twice, and a pair of your 487996 after only 3 wears.
Not only is his extremely dangerous for falls and worse during play..but has now become very very costly! 599364. I now have 9 pairs! Which have fallen apart.
1) 599364- 607 pink worn 3 times…second pair bought 2) 487996-414 blue worn 3 times 3) 599364-410 blue only worn a few times Other pairs of 599364-106,607, 107,410,105 and 100 fell apart.
Sadly I have tried contacting Nike’s Executive office only to be thwarted away and not being able to speak to anyone..EVEN AN EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT. Nike seems to be not at all concerned with Customer Service or SAFETY! They should clearly be penalized for not only causing injuries, but for wearing “blinder’s” when it comes to their products defective construction. It is no coincidence that this has happened again and again!
This is the third shoe complaint i have entered..even though i have an additional 10 pairs of Defective Nike Shoes I am happy to send pictures of. I had mentioned that I did contact the BBB about Nike and they responded that they had no record of me purchasing their shoes.That was a dreadful excuse as I did not in fact purchase them from Nike.com..but from their many Legitimate Worldwide retailers! They NEVER EVEN addressed the DEFECTS of their shoes!! Nike is not only stealing our money..but endangering our lifes with their defective products. It is no COINCIDENCE that over 12 pairs of their shoes have come apart making me fall and barely avoid serious injuries.
- Model
- 599364107
- UPC
- 00884497553580
- Where
- Boca Raton, Florida: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Age 0, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Jul 5, 2019, sent to the company Jul 31, 2019, published by CPSC Aug 14, 2019
The product, in the report: Nike Epic React Flyknit (GS)
Submitter says that material of the shoe is not good material and left bruises on her foot. Submitter went to an amusement park and when she left she had marks on the top of her foot caused by the shoes. She says that they are her correct size and fit properly.
Submitter contacted an advice nurse and they informed her to keep the foot elevated and to soak her foot to help with the swelling.
Submitter contacted the firm and they informed her that the shoes are not supposed to be worn to an amusement part because they are foam fitting. Caller indicated that the firm was rude when speaking with her about the situation.
- Model
- 94331103
- Serial number
- 9188456765
- Bought from
- Nike, California
- Bought
- Jan 1, 2019
- Where
- Hercules, California: Place of Recreation or Sports
- Who was involved
- Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
No one hurt Made Mar 11, 2015, sent to the company Mar 26, 2015, published by CPSC Apr 9, 2015
The product, in the report: Nike Flex Trainer 4 Wide Cross-Trainers
My boyfriend purchased a pair of Nike Shoes for me for my birthday on Dec 15, 2015. On March 6th, 2015 I contacted Nike Corporate to inform them of a defect on the bottom of the shoe. The shoe has little triangular designs on the bottom and the adhesive that held them on was coming off and they were rolling under causing me to trip. I wore these shoe strictly in my office, never exercised in them or did anything to cause them to come apart. “[REDACTED]” from corporate treated me very unfair. He stated I needed to ship the product to Nike and cover the cost of shipping, then Nike would determine whether it was MY fault or a product defect. I asked “[REDACTED]” if there was a consumer email address that I could email photos to since I myself, and everyone I spoke to knew it was a product defect and he stated they didn’t have that technology , a multi-million/billion dollar company doesn’t have that technology? I tripped several times from the triangles rolling under. Luckily, I’m in fairly young with decent balance and wasn’t running in the shoes. If someone was running or using these shoes for exercise (i.e. on the treadmill) and had the same defect it could cause them a lot of harm and or injury. I think Nike Corporate should have taken initiative to resolve my issue before it came to this but someone could seriously get injured. The product # is 643088-001, Nike Flex Trainer Wide Cross Trainers (size 8.5) . These are made for exercising. Someone could get seriously hurt with these defects!
- Model
- Nike Flex Trainer 4 Wide Cross-Trainer Item # 643088-001
- Bought from
- Famous Footwear, Florida
- Bought
- Dec 15, 2014
- Where
- Lake Worth, Florida: Other Public Property/
Office - Who was involved
- Unknown
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Incident, No Injury
-
Not said Made Aug 12, 2013, sent to the company Sep 6, 2013, published by CPSC Sep 20, 2013
The product, in the report: rubber soles shower sandals with smooth insole
(08/12/2013)The consumer stated that he was walking away from his car across his lawn. The lawn was wet with dew. As soon as the insole of the shoe got wet, there was no friction. The consumer stated that the shoe slipped out from under his foot causing his ankle to twist. The consumer had to take off his shoes in able to walk. He did not fall.
(-8/12/20130 The consumer contacted the company. He does not know who he spoke with. They are sending him a follow up email to confirm the conversation.
- Model
- 307812-01800
- Bought from
- Gift
- Where
- Newport News, Virginia: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Unspecified
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Unspecified
-
Hospital admission Made Apr 3, 2013, sent to the company Apr 11, 2013, published by CPSC Apr 25, 2013
The product, in the report: Full Length Nike Air Running Shoe. The arch underneath the shoe is made of a hard plastic.
On November 29, 2012, I slipped off my side porch, dislocated and broke my right ankle in three places. It is a very serious injury, and I am just now (April 3rd) driving and walking slowly with a small walking cast. Needless to say, it was a pretty rough holiday and winter season. I couldn’t, at first, figure out what happened, as it was not wet or icy and I never rush when leaving the house. I thought I would never really know what caused me to fall, until I started questioning myself again. When I remembered back to the day I fell, I thought maybe the arch of my foot may have been too far over the porch step...that’s the only thing that made sense to me, so I started looking at the porch (which was safe) and the shoe. What I found totally shocked me. The arch under the running shoe is made of a hard plastic, unlike the rest of the bottom, which is rubber and has traction. This plastic is hard and slippery. I went over to the porch step and, basically, took a careful step to reenact the fall. My foot went flying off the step, and I am certain this is what caused me to fall. This running shoe is extremely dangerous. Imagine what could happen if a person fell down a long flight of stairs. I am not looking for anything, except to have Nike remake their shoes without this very dangerous plastic arch under it. Sincerely, [REDACTED]
- Model
- Full Length Nike Air Running Shoe
- UPC
- 00091206925730
- Serial number
- 344104-161 ?
- Bought
- Aug 1, 2011
- Where
- Bellingham, Massachusetts: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 60, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Hospital Admission
-
Emergency room Made Feb 27, 2013, sent to the company Mar 7, 2013, published by CPSC Mar 21, 2013
The product, in the report: nike lebron IX, miami vice size 4c. The color is wolf grey and teal
One evening I took my 5 month old son to a game. I decided to put on his brand new nike lebron sneakers that I had just purchased. I put his socks and shoes on and we went to the game. I carried him the whole evening because he was unable to walk. Later that night I noticed a severe blister on the bottom of his great toe and bruise marks on his heels and across the top of his foot where the elastic had been rubbing. I immediately rushed him to the ER and he was checked out. The doctor prescribed him with antibiotics for the blisters.
- Model
- nike lebron IX
- Bought from
- finishline.com
- Bought
- Jun 2, 2012
- Where
- missouri city, Texas: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 0, Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Child
- As this report names them
- Brand nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Emergency Department Treatment Received
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Jun 28, 2011, sent to the company Oct 6, 2011, published by CPSC Oct 21, 2011
The product, in the report: footwear
Latex or Spandex?
In: Bras Women’s Underwear Shirts Dress Pants Dresses Workout Shoes Workout Clothes Flip-Flops (even Nike’s) Children’s Ware Mattresses
I have had the Pylori bacteria the doctor finally cleared up. The swelling in my body continued with a rash breakout on my neck and head and private areas. When she finally asked me if I wore undergarments with Spandex, I had no this was causing such havoc in my recovery. I always was hot and sweaty this last 6 years.
Just 3 days after I bought [REDACTED] undergarment and stopped wearing my Nike’ flip flops I have had such relief.
I have suffered for the past 6 year; please this product needs to be removed from our daily wear.
Thank you [REDACTED] for your time.
[REDACTED]
- Where
- Tampa, Florida: Unspecified
- Who was involved
- Age 64, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Nike, made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made May 18, 2011, published by CPSC Jun 10, 2011
The product, in the report: Flip flops
I had chronic hives for 13 months before finding that it was caused from my [REDACTED] memory foam mattress. I was then sold a [REDACTED] spring mattress, which also caused hives. After talking to [REDACTED] on the phone, it was determined that the common product was visco elastic, which is the memory foam. The spring mattress also contained a layer of memory foam, or visco elastic. I feel like it is the visco elastic, and not the fire retardent material, because I was just given some Nike flip flops, which also contains 8mm of memory foam in them. I broke out from them also, and I would guess that they don’t contain a fire retardant product, although that is just a guess.
- Model
- Nike
- Where
- Bowling Breen, Kentucky: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 55, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- made or sold by NIKE
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.