Muck Boot Company shoes
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Mar 11, 2014. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Mar 11, 2014the latest report was made
- Mar 11, 2014the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Muck Boot Company
- Maker
- HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERSMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- ShoesAll footwearCPSC’s product type: Footwear (code 1615), in Clothing and Accessories: Shoes and other Footwear
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| March 2014 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Hurt, care not known 1 CPSC: Injury, Level of care not known
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Hurt, care not known Made Mar 11, 2014, sent to the company Mar 20, 2014, published by CPSC Apr 3, 2014
The product, in the report: Muck Boot Company Item No. MUHSM13-Hoser Mid Boot 13M/14W
I purchased these boots for my husband for Christmas 2013 but he did not wear them outside until we had several inches of snow in late January 2014. He wore the boots for one to two hours and noticed that they had worn the skin off an area on both of his legs. The damage to the left leg was worse than the right. I am attaching a copy of a photo of the injured area. I contacted the company where the boots were purchased and asked if they could be exchanged for another style. The company representative stated that they felt this was not a defect so they would not accept a return. I submitted a review for the MuckBoots.com website but it was not posted and the boot in question has been removed from the website. I have given up on trying to exchange the product or get any kind of satisfaction from the company. We feel that this product needs to come with a prominent warning that some sort of thick clothing should be worn on the legs under these boots. Otherwise other consumers may end up with injured legs. The Muck Boot Company does not seem to be concerned.
- Model
- Hoser Mid Boot
- Bought from
- MuckandStuff.com, Arkansas
- Bought
- Nov 27, 2013
- Where
- Lumberton, North Carolina: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Male
- The reporter’s relation to them
- My Spouse
- As this report names them
- Brand Muck Boot Company, made or sold by HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Level of care not known
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.