Easytone Reeinspire ll shoes
1 report to CPSC, the latest made Oct 6, 2011. A report isn’t a recall.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CPSC’s own search is on saferproducts.gov.
At a glance
From SaferProducts.gov, released Oct 25, 2026.
- 1report to CPSC
- Oct 6, 2011the latest report was made
- Oct 6, 2011the earliest
- 1with the company’s comments
- Brand
- Easytone Reeinspire ll
- Maker
- adidas GroupMakers, importers or sellers, as the reports name them
- Product
- ShoesAll footwearCPSC’s product type: Footwear (code 1615), in Clothing and Accessories: Shoes and other Footwear
By month
The numbers, as a table
| Month | Reports |
|---|---|
| October 2011 | 1 |
How badly anyone was hurt
- Seen by a doctor or nurse 1 CPSC: Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
As each report says it, in short words; CPSC’s own words are under each.
The reports, as CPSC published them
Reports people made to the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. CPSC publishes each one after sending it to the company named, and doesn’t guarantee they’re accurate. A report isn’t a recall.
Each report is the words of the person who made it, as CPSC published them. The company’s comments, where CPSC published any, are set apart as the company’s own.
CPSC, SaferProducts.gov public database export. Released Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily.
-
Seen by a doctor or nurse Made Oct 6, 2011, sent to the company Oct 17, 2011, published by CPSC Oct 31, 2011
The product, in the report: Reebok Easytone Reeinspire ll women’s shoes size 8 1/2 us with 2 balance pods with moving air creating micro-instability, activating key leg muscles
On 12/14/10 I bought my wife a pair of Reebok EASYTONER shoes which I gave her for Christmas. After a week of use of these EASYTONER shoes she experienced pain in both ankles more noticeably her right ankle and it became increasingly more difficult to use the EASYTONER shoes for any length of time. On 1/12/11 she went to a foot doctor who administered her ankle a cortisone shot to address the pain. This shot had a very limited affect. ($135). We are on a fixed income and she has no medical coverage so we need to exercise restraint in encountering medical expenses.
She had to limit her use of the EASYTONER shoes but the pain in the right ankle became increasingly worse so on 5/23/11 she went back to the foot doctor. He took x-rays of her right ankle. From these x-rays the ankle appeared to have experienced a hairline stress fracture. He fitted her with a cast boot ($405). The boot limited the movement of her ankle and brought some relief. Several weeks later the boot was removed and the pain again began to increase. She stopped using the EASYTONER shoes.
At the end of June, because of the continuing pain, she had to return to the foot doctor. More x-rays were taken and she was given a shoe insert for a regular shoe. (not billed yet) The insert only made the pain worse.
On 7/11/11 she went to her regular doctor. He diagnosed that she had experienced the onset of gout in the right ankle injury which occurred around the end of December and which was shortly after she began using the EASYTONER shoes. Her mother had gout so apparently my wife had a propensity for gout developing in a fracture. She was given pain medication and medication to address the gout. (lab $277; doctor not yet billed). This condition and the pain is expected to be with her for quite some timed. She now has to use a walker to ease the pain enough to get around.
It wasn’t until this Reebok case became public that all the pieces came together chronologically to see the impact of the EASYTONER shoes and the subsequent injury.
- Model
- Easytone
- UPC
- 8 84561 73609 3
- Serial number
- 55029341
- Bought from
- FAMOUS FOOTWARE, California
- Bought
- Dec 14, 2010
- Where
- diamond springs, California: Home/
Apartment/ Condominium - Who was involved
- Age 56, Female
- The reporter’s relation to them
- Self
- As this report names them
- Brand Easytone Reeinspire ll, made or sold by adidas Group
- How badly, in CPSC’s words
- Injury, Seen by Medical Professional
CPSC’s disclaimer
Disclaimer: CPSC does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the contents of the Publicly Available Consumer Product Safety Information Database on SaferProducts.gov, particularly with respect to information submitted by people outside of CPSC.
Word for word, from the disclaimer in CPSC’s export.
Sources
Sources
-
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, SaferProducts.gov public database export.
Released Oct 25, 2026 and checked Oct 25, 2026. Updated daily. Public domain (U.S. Government work). CPSC asks to be credited, and that no endorsement be implied.
Reports of harm are from the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), on SaferProducts.gov. CPSC does not endorse Hearth Record.