Hearth Record

Green Bay Rehabilitation Hospital

An inpatient rehabilitation facility in Green Bay, Wisconsin 54311

1110 Kepler Dr, Green Bay, Wisconsin 54311. (920) 304-9695.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 10, 2025: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Aug 13, 2025: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 149 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 50643 Based on record review and interview staff failed to notify the physician of inadequate fluid intake for 1 of 3 patients (Patient #1) at risk for dehydration; failed to document tube feeding intake for 2 of 4 patients (Patient #6, #9) receiving tube feeding, and failed to review STAT lab results within 4 hours of the order in 1 of 1 patients (Patient #1) in a total of 10 medical records reviewed. Findings include: Staff failed to monitor and notify the physician of inadequate fluid intake per facility protocol and physician orders. See tag A-0395. Staff failed to review STAT lab results within 4 hours per facility policy. See tag A-0395.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,217 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50643 Based on record review and interview staff failed to monitor and notify the physician of inadequate fluid intake for 1 of 3 patients (Patient #1) at risk for dehydration; failed to document tube feeding intake for 2 of 4 patients (Patient #6, #9) receiving tube feeding, and failed to review STAT lab results within 4 hours of the order in 1 of 1 patients (Patient #1) in a total of 10 medical records reviewed. Findings Include: A review of the facility’s policy titled, “Reassessment” effective 03/2023 revealed, “...Patient needs, response to treatments/interventions, and change in condition or diagnosis are reassessed at least every 12 hours and when warranted by a change in the patient’s condition...the RN (registered nurse) will perform reassessment and will direct patient care through a variety of mechanisms including notification of the change to the physician, change to plan of care, and other interventions based on the patient need. An interdisciplinary team throughout the organization assesses and reassesses the patients need for care, treatment and/or intervention...” A review of the facility’s Work Instruction titled, “One More Sip Hydration Program” no date, revealed, “...Age group and medical condition = risk for dehydration...Identify all patients ‘at risk’ on admission and during stay. Review at team conference by dietician. Utilize ‘One More Sip program’...continuous throughout stay...Intake of less than 1000mls (ML milliliters) per day considered [at risk for dehydration]...Interdisciplinary team need to document fluids on the I&O (Intake and Output) record...” A review of the facility’s policy titled, “Critical Tests & Response” effective 03/2023 revealed, “...Critical tests are those tests ordered by the physician as either “now” or “STAT” (immediately). Tests ordered “now” or “STAT” will have results reported within 4 hours of the order...” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed that Patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 4/17/2025 following a stroke. A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Orders” on 4/18/25 revealed, “One More Sip Daily ...All staff Encourage hydration with every pt (patient) interaction.” A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Adult Nutritional Assessment” on 4/18/25 at 12:45 authored by Dietician E revealed, “...Estimated Fluid Needs 1200 - 1500 ML [daily]...” A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Intake Flowsheet” revealed “Fluid Amount Shift Totals” 4/18/25 - 4/26/25: “Total for [9-day] Admission: 2,129 ML (milliliters).” There was no documentation of fluid intake on 4/19/25 Day Shift, 4/20/25 Day Shift, 4/21/25 Day Shift, 4/22/25 Night Shift, 4/23/25 Night Shift, 4/24/25 Night Shift, or 4/25/25 Day Shift. A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Output Flowsheet” revealed that Patient #1 was incontinent, and without a urinary catheter. There was no urination documentation or other fluid output documentation on 4/18/25, 4/19/25, 4/23/25, 4/24/25, or 4/25/25. A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Nursing Reassessments” revealed that RNs assessed Patient #1 each 12-hour shift 4/18/25 - 4/26/25. There was no documented evidence of changes in condition, abnormal vital signs, or signs or symptoms of dehydration noted in nursing assessments or physician notes leading up to the date and time of transfer. Patient #1’s fluid intake was documented as less than 1000 ML daily and there was no evidence that the physician was notified or additional interventions were implemented to address inadequate intake and output. A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Orders” on 4/26/25 at 4:06 PM signed by MD B revealed, “Urinalysis...Comprehensive Metabolic Panel...Complete CBC w/auto diff wbc...STAT” A review of Patient #1’s medical Record “Comprehensive Metabolic Panel” on 4/26/25 at 7:30 PM revealed, “...BUN 104 (normal range 6-20), Creatinine 3.19 (normal range 0.51 - 0.95)...” A review of Patient #1’s medical record “Registered Nurse Note” on 4/26/25 at 10:44 PM authored by RN L revealed, “Between the hours of 1900 (7:00 PM) and 2000 (8:00 PM) tonight, I received a call from the daughter of [Patient #1]. She called inquiring about the [Patient #1]’s most recent lab work. I informed her that [Patient #1]’s labs had not been resulted yet and she agreed to call back around 2100 (9:00 PM). At that time, [Patient #1’s daughter] called back but I could not see [Patient #1]’s lab work. [Patient #1’s daughter] stated that she would look for the labs on MyChart (patient portal) and call back tomorrow with any questions. At approximately 2200 (10:00 PM) as I was performing a dressing change in another patient’s room, I received word from another RN that the paramedics were at the nurse’s station. The RN stated that the paramedics had been called and sent by [Patient #1]’s son, who is a doctor per the family, to be taken to the ER for dehydration. Apparently, [Patient #1’s son] had diagnosed the patient with dehydration based on her lab values. At 2208 (10:08 PM), I called [MD B] to express [Patient #1]’s family’s concerns to her. Once [MD B] looked at the [Patient #1]’s labs, she agreed that [Patient #1] needed to be evaluated emergently based on an elevated BUN and creatinine.” A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed that Patient #1’s STAT lab results were reported to MD B 6 hours and 2 minutes after they were ordered. Patient #1 was transferred to an acute care hospital for a higher level of care on 4/26/25 for dehydration. A review of Patient #6’s medical record revealed that Patient #6 was admitted on 5/3/2025 and discharged on 5/24/2025. A review of Patient #6’s medical record “Orders” on 5/5/2025 revealed, “Jevity 1.5 (tube feeding supplement)...Daily at 1900 (7:00 PM)...Nocturnal Feed...G-Tube (feeding tube)...Rate 84 ml (milliliters)/hr (hour).” A review Patient #6’s medical record revealed no intake documented for 4 days (5/8/2025 - 5/11/2025). A review of Patient #9’s medical record revealed that Patient #9 was admitted on 4/24/2025 and discharged on 5/4/2025. A review of Patient #9’s medical record “Orders” on 4/29/2025 revealed, “275 ml of Jevity 1.5 4 times daily...by gravity over 30 minutes” Review of Patient #9’s medical record revealed no intake documented for 1 day (4/30/2025). An interview was conducted on 8/12/25 at 11:15 AM with DON (Director of Nursing) N. When asked if fluids offered to patients are documented in the patient’s medical record, DON N stated PCTs (Patient Care Technicians) usually document total shift fluid intake in the medical record after meals or at the end of shifts. When asked who reviewed the Intake and Output totals, DON N stated that it was the nurse’s responsibility to review during reassessments, as well as the physician or Nurse Practitioner on daily rounding. An interview was conducted on 8/12/25 at 4:00 PM with MD B. When asked if a creatinine of 3.19 was emergent for Patient #1, MD B stated that it was, as Patient #1’s baseline creatinine was in the normal range. An interview was conducted on 8/12/25 at 4:30 PM with Director of Quality (DOQ) O. DOQ O stated that the facility did not have a policy, procedure, or work direction for monitoring fluid balance or documenting intake and output. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 9:00 AM with DON N. DON N stated that it is the expectation that PCTs and RNs escalate all changes in condition and concerns to the physician or Nurse Practitioner.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Form And Retention Of Records

    The inspectors’ words, 259 words

    “FORM AND RETENTION OF RECORDS CFR(s): 482.24(b) The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentication and protects the security of all record entries. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50643 Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure discharge summaries were completed and retained in the medical record within 30 days of discharge for 4 of 8 discharged patients (Patient #1, #6, #7, and #9) in a total sample of 10 medical records reviewed. Findings Include: A review of Patient #1’s medical record revealed Patient #1 was admitted to the facility on 04/17/2025 and discharged 04/26/2025. There was no discharge summary found within the closed medical record. A review of Patient #6’s medical record, Patient #6 was admitted on 5/3/25 and discharged on 5/24/25. There was no discharge summary found within the closed medical record. A review of Patient #7’s medical record, Patient #7 was admitted on 4/14/25 and discharged on 5/4/25. There was no discharge summary found within the closed medical record. A review of Patient #9’s medical record, Patient #9 was admitted on 4/24/25 and discharged on 5/4/25. There was no discharge summary found within the closed medical record. An interview was conducted on 8/13/25 at 10:40 AM with MD (medical doctor) B. MD B stated that discharge summaries should be completed within 30 days.”

    Rule A0438. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 10, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Sep 2, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 13, 2025Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 68.03% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (9.03%); potentially preventable readmissions during the stay, no different than the national rate (5.24%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.406); C. diff infections, no comparison (standardized infection ratio 0).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0.18%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 1.23%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 81.61%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 1.32.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified inpatient rehabilitation facility since May 5, 2023.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 89.95% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Ernest Health Holdings LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 4, 2018.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jacob S Socha (corporate officer); Michael S Roffelsen (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Eudora Cannon (corporate officer); Eudora Cannon (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Caleb Reed (corporate officer); Denise A Kann (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Epoch Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Epoch Parent Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Ernest Health Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 4, 2018
Epoch Midco Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Truist BankHolds 5% or more security interest100%Nov 1, 2025
Epoch Acquisition Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
One Equity Partners VII LPOwns 5% or more through other companies58%Oct 4, 2018
One Equity Partners VII-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies29.7%Oct 4, 2018
One Equity Partners VII-B LPOwns 5% or more through other companies12.4%Oct 4, 2018
Ernest Health, Inc.Other role (CMS gives no detail)0%Oct 4, 2018

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 inpatient rehabilitation facilities CMS lists in Brown County, 3 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 3 no different than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one no different than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

3 compared
PlaceDischarged to the community
Bellin Memorial Hospital65.7
St Vincent Hospital70.9
Aurora Baycare Medical CenterNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.