Hearth Record

Pam Health Specialty Hospital of Oklahoma City

A long-term care hospital in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103

1407 North Robinson Avenue, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73103. (405) 232-8000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 16, 2026: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Mar 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Mar 16, 2026: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights: Grievances

    The inspectors’ words, 159 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: GRIEVANCES CFR(s): 482.13(a)(2) The hospital must establish a process for prompt resolution of patient grievances and must inform each patient whom to contact to file a grievance. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39648 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure grievance information was correct for all patients and staff. Findings: A Review of “Patient Rights” poster observed in a hospital elevator documented the following: “You may also notify: Oklahoma Department of Health 1000 NE 10th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73117-1299 (405)271-6576” On 08/28/24 at 10:30 AM Staff A was shown the OSDH website which read in part: “Complaints against non-long-term care facilities may be filed... by calling (405) 426-8470... mailed... Oklahoma State Department of Health Medical Facilities 123 Robert S. Kerr Ave., Suite 1702 Oklahoma City, OK 73102-6406” On 03/16/26 at 9:09 am, Staff C stated the information on the poster to make a complaint with OSDH was not correct.”

    Rule A0118. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 118 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39648 Based on observation and interview, the hospital failed to ensure chemicals were stored out of reach of all public visitors of the hospital. Findings: During a tour of the facility 03/16/26 at 9:09 am, surveyors observed a bottle labeled glass and multi-surface cleaner on an overbed table in an unoccupied room. The door to the room was open and accessible to any patients who were ambulatory, to the public, and to staff. On 03/16/26 at 9:09 am, Staff C stated cleaning supplies should not be left in a room.”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Infection Control Program

    The inspectors’ words, 466 words

    “INFECTION CONTROL PROGRAM CFR(s): 482.42(a)(1) The hospital infection prevention and control program, as documented in its policies and procedures, employs methods for preventing and controlling the transmission of infections within the hospital and between the hospital and other institutions and settings; This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39648 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to maintain complete health records for three (Staff D, K, and L) of five clinical staff reviewed and four (Staff G, H, I, and J) of five medical staff reviewed. Findings: Staff G, H, I, and J A review of personnel files showed: 1. No proof of Measles, Mumps, Rubella (MMR) immunity, immunization, or declination. 2. No proof of Varicella immunity, immunization, or declination. 3. Signed attestation of immunity. Staff D A review of personnel files showed: 1. A failed respirator fit test on 09/26/24. 2. Respirator fit test was not completed on 06/09/25 due to “beard.” 3. No follow up testing documented. Staff K A review of personnel files showed: 1. No proof of immunization or declination of influenza documented. 2. A failed respirator fit test on 10/28/25 with a handwritten note that read, “Follow up testing required.” 3. No follow up testing documented. Staff L A review of personnel files showed: 1. No health screening evaluation. 2. No respirator fit test completion. 3. No proof of immunization or declination of influenza documented. Review of a policy titled “Employee Health Program” reviewed 12/29 of unknown year, stated employment health records must contain the following: 1. “Health Screening Evaluation” 2. “Evidence of immunity ... Measles... Mumps, Rubella ... Varicella ... titers ... immunization ... declination.” 3. “Respiratory Fit Testing - Clinical” 4. “Annually ... influenza vaccine ... or declination.” Review of a document titled, “Medical Staff Bylaws” dated 2024, section 2.6.3 showed conditions of continued medical staff membership included in part to “abide by ... all other lawful standards and polices of the Medical Staff and Hospital.” On 03/16/26 from 11:20 AM to 3:35 PM, Staff F stated: 1. Immunization records were usually in the medical staff personnel files. 2. Attestation of immunity did not equal proof of immunity. 3. Providers were credentialed to the hospital and agreed to follow hospital policy and procedures. On 03/16/26 at 11:20 AM, Staff M stated: 1. They did not document proof of MMR vaccination or immunization, but had the medical staff sign an attestation of immunity. On 03/16/26 at 1:00 PM Staff N stated all staff regardless of employment status were to have a completed health record. On 03/16/26 at 4:00 PM, Staff E stated: 1. There was no documentation of immunization, immunity, or signed declinations in Staff L’s personnel file. 2. All documentation available was provided. 3. The employee health records were lacking proper immunization documentation per facility policy.”

    Rule A0749. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Transfer Protocols

    The inspectors’ words, 606 words

    “TRANSFER PROTOCOLS CFR(s): Effective July 1, 2025, the hospital must have written policies and procedures for transferring patients under its care (inclusive of inpatient services) to the appropriate level of care (including to another hospital) as needed to meet the needs of the patient. The hospital must also provide annual training to relevant staff regarding the hospital policies and procedures for transferring patients under its care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 53719 Based on record review and interview, the hospital failed to ensure completion of transfer documentation for two (Pt #2 and Pt #5) of five patients reviewed. Findings: Review of the medical records showed patients admitted to the facility and were transferred to a higher level of care, did not show transfer documentation required by facility policy. Review of POLICY NUMBER: NSG 32: Memorandum of Transfer, revised 01/28/25, read in part: “The hospital may not transfer a patient with an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized unless: a. The patient or a legally responsible person acting on the patient’s behalf ...requests transfer to another hospital in writing; b. A physician has signed a certification that includes a summary of the risks and benefits ...the medical benefits ... outweigh the increased risk to the patient.” “The medical record shall contain at a minimum: a. A brief description of the patient’s medical history and physical examination. e. Pertinent x-ray films and reports; and f. Any other pertinent information.” Pt #2 Review of the “Discharge Summary” showed the patient was inpatient at the facility from 11/25/25 until 01/29/26. Review of a physician note dated 01/29/26 with no time noted read in part, “[Pt #2] was noted to have drop in hemoglobin complicated by respiratory distress and failure requiring transferred [sic] to acute on 01/29. Discharge Condition & Disposition: transferred to acute ...Information Provided to the Patient and Family: Done. Discharge Follow Up: Transferred to acute.” Review of the Nursing Shift Assessment - LTCH note dated 01/29/2026 at 1:39 am read in part: “the patient required a higher level of care and was transferred out to acute care facility.” Review of the medical record did not show: 1. a signed physician certification form listing risks and benefits of transfer 2. documentation of medical history, diagnosis, or physical examination of the patient’s condition at the time of transfer 3. family notification of patient requiring transfer On 03/16/26 at 11:59 am, Staff E stated: 1. The patient was transferred to acute care after a change in medical status. 2. The MD ordered to send patient. 3. There was no formal consent on the chart from the patient and the staff only needed the order. Pt #5 Review of the Discharge Summary dated 03/17/26 with no time noted, showed the patient was inpatient at the facility from 02/4/26 until 02/17/26. Review of a physician note dated 02/17/26 with no time noted, read in part, “On 02/17/26, code blue was called. EMS notified. Patient was intubated. EMSA transported patient to [another facility] ...Discharge Condition & Disposition: Transfer to Acute Care One Time Now ... Discharge Follow Up: Follow up at [another facility].” Review of the medical record did not show: 1. a signed physician certification form listing risks and benefits of transfer 2. documentation of medical history, diagnosis, or physical examination of the patient’s condition at the time of transfer 3. code documentation 4. family notification of patient requiring transfer On 03/16/26 at 1:00 pm, Staff D reviewed the patient chart and stated: 1. There was no nursing note showing report was called. 2. There was only an order for transfer and there was no documentation of consent.”

    Rule A0826. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 16, 2026Complaint inspection4 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 10.39% of its patients returned home or to the community: worse than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (22.43%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no comparison (standardized infection ratio 0); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no comparison (standardized infection ratio 0); C. diff infections, no comparison (standardized infection ratio 0).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0.52%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 2.74%; patients successfully weaned from a ventilator, 57.72%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 56.05%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 0.99.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Oct 1, 1993.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by the Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ), whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 33.04% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Curahealth Oklahoma Holdco LLC owns 100% directly since Sep 1, 2016.
  • 5 owners or officers are people: Brittany Misitano (owns 5% or more through other companies, 67.5%); Karick E Stober (corporate officer); Anthony F Misitano (corporate officer); Ryan Keele (managing employee (on the payroll)); Brittany Misitano (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership, the latest on Oct 1, 2016.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Pam Cubed LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Nov 15, 2021
Curahealth Oklahoma Holdco LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Sep 1, 2016
Pam Health Blocker Purchaser Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies41.38%Nov 15, 2021
Curahealth Oklahoma Blocker CorpOwns 5% or more through other companies39.82%Sep 1, 2016
Pam Cubed LLCOther role (CMS gives no detail)0%Aug 6, 2024
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Holds 5% or more security interestJul 23, 2024

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 4 long-term care hospitals CMS lists in Oklahoma County, 4 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 3 no different than the national rate, 1 worse than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one worse than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.