Hearth Record

Rehabilitation Hospital of Southern New Mexico,inc

An inpatient rehabilitation facility in Las Cruces, New Mexico 88011

4441 E Lohman Ave, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88011. (575) 521-6400.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jan 15, 2026: a complaint inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jan 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jan 15, 2026: complaint inspection5 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 100 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 53401 Based on record review and interview the facility failed to meet the Condition of Participation to ensure that nursing services were provided per facility procedure. This deficient practice can lead to compromised patient safety, inconsistent delivery of care, increased risk for patient harm, and non-compliance with federal regulatory requirements. The findings are: A. Refer to Tag A-0398 B. Refer to Tag A-0405”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Grievances

    The inspectors’ words, 275 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: GRIEVANCES CFR(s): 482.13(a)(2) The hospital must establish a process for prompt resolution of patient grievances and must inform each patient whom to contact to file a grievance. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 53401 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure patients feel comfortable filing a complaint for 1(P[patient] P3) out of 4 (P1, P3, P6, P7) patients interviewed. This deficient practice could possibly lead to patients receiving care without adequate knowledge and understanding of their right to file a complaint or grievance, placing the facility out of compliance with patient rights regulations. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s document titled “Patients’ Rights” dated 02/2025 stated in the third paragraph “ ...patients and families are provided information on admission regarding the facility’s complaints/grievance process, including who to contact within the facility to file a complaint/grievance.” B. During an interview on 01/15/26 with S(Staff)4, Clinical, when asked how she would handle a patient complaint, S4 verbalized appropriate steps to resolve a complaint and escalating if not promptly resolved. However, no mention was made that the nurse would provide the patient with additional information on how the patient can file a grievance and no reassurance to the patient to make them feel comfortable filing a grievance. C. During an interview on 01/14/26 at 3:10 pm with P3 stated he did not know who to contact if he decided to file a complaint as he felt his concerns about his diabetes were still not adequately addressed. However, P3 stated he was hesitant to file a complaint as he did not want to be treated differently by staff.”

    Rule A0118. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Grievance Procedures

    The inspectors’ words, 211 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES CFR(s): 482.13(a)(2)(i) [At a minimum:] The hospital must establish a clearly explained procedure for the submission of a patient’s written or verbal grievance to the hospital. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 53401 Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure patients are informed about the procedure of filing a complaint or grievance for 1(P[patient] P3) out of 4 (P1, P3, P6, and P7) patients interviewed. The patient interviewed reported not knowing how to file a complaint. This deficient practice could possibly lead to patients receiving care without adequate understanding of the procedure to file a complaint or grievance, placing the facility out of compliance with patient rights regulations. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s document titled “Patient’s Rights” dated 02/25, stated in the third paragraph that “ ...patients and families are provided information on admission regarding the facility’s complaints/grievance process, including who to contact within the facility to file a complaint/grievance” B. During an interview on 01/14/2026 at 3:10 pm with P3 stated he did not know who to contact if he decided to file a grievance. Furthermore, P3 stated he was hesitant to file a grievance as he did not want to be treated differently by staff.”

    Rule A0121. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Supervision Of Contract Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 415 words

    “SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 53401 Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication reconciliation was completed by the facility as per policy for 1(P[patient]3) out of 1(P3) patient reviewed for medication reconciliation. This deficient practice has the potential to affect patient safety and lead to preventable patient harm. The findings are: A. Record review of P3’s medical record for admission date of 01/12/26, with admitting diagnosis of SCI (Spinal Cord Injury) incomplete. Past medical history of Type 1 Diabetes with use of insulin pump. Document dated 1/15/26, titled, “order listing report” no physician’s orders are present for capillary glucose checks or insulin for day of admission of 1/12/2026. B. Record review of P3’s medical record for admission date of 01/12/26, titled, “Scheduled: Medication/ History” dated 01/15/26 Insulin is not listed for 01/12/26. C. Record review of P3’s medical record for admission date of 01/12/26, document dated 1/12/26, titled “Notes- Consultation Note (General)” under Impression/Plan section of the consultation note, written by a physician, it reads, “type 1 diabetes mellitus patient on insulin pump at home ...I will monitor blood sugars and adjust insulin accordingly.” D. Record review of the facility’s policy titled “Medication reconciliation” dated 02/2023, stated under section II (1). “At the time of admission, a complete list of medications that the patient was taking at home prior to hospitalization and at the time of transfer is obtained and documented ... The most complete and accurate list is created utilizing a variety sources that may include, but not be limited to the patient, family ...” E. During an interview on 01/15/26 at 1:05 pm with S1(staff) confirmed an order for capillary glucose checks should have been obtained upon the patient’s admission. F. During an interview on 01/14/26 at 3:10 pm with P3 stated he explained to his nurse he is a type one diabetic and management for his diabetes is different. P3 also stated he asked his nurse multiple times about checking his blood sugars, but the nurse replied, they didn’t have an order.”

    Rule A0398. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Administration Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 586 words

    “ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 53401 Based on record reviews, observation and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications, specifically insulin (a medication that is essential for type 1 diabetics because their pancreas does not produce it) were ordered in a timely fashion as per the facility’s medication reconciliation policy for 1(P[patient]3) out of 1(P3) patient reviewed for medication reconciliation. This deficient practice has the potential to lead to delays in obtaining medication orders and places patients at risk for poor outcomes. The findings are: A. Record review of the facility’s policy titled “Medication reconciliation” dated 02/2023 stated under section II (1). “At the time of admission, a complete list of medications that the patient was taking at home prior to hospitalization and at the time of transfer is obtained and documented ... The most complete and accurate list is created utilizing a variety sources that may include, but not be limited to the patient, family ...” B. Record review of P3’s medical record for admission date of 01/12/26, document dated 01/12/26, titled “Notes- Consultation Note (General)” under Impression/Plan section of note it reads, “type 1 diabetes mellitus patient on insulin pump at home ...I will monitor blood sugars and adjust insulin accordingly.” C. Record review of P3’s medical record for admission date of 01/12/26, under document titled “Physician’s Order” Insulin orders are first documented on 01/13/26. The insulin order with date of 01/13/26, reads,”Insulin regular 1 unit/ 0.01ml (HumuLin R/ NovoLin R) Inject 16 unit (0.16 mL) subcutaneously Before Meals.” Insulin order for 01/13/26, reads, “Insulin Glargine-Yfgn 1 unit/0.01mL (Semglee) Inject 15 unit (0.15 mL) subcutaneously Every Evening.” Insulin order for 01/13/26 reads, “Insulin Glargine-Yfgn 1 unit/0.01mL (Semglee) Inject35 unit (0.35 mL) subcutaneously Every Morning.” D. Record review of P3’s medical record for admission date of 01/12/26, Medication Administration document dated 01/12/26, lists all medications administered to P3 on 01/12/26. No evidence that insulin was administered on 01/12/26, to P3 is present. E. During an observation on 01/14/26 at 3:10 pm the patient is placing his own insulin pump after stating he is tired of not being managed well for his type 1 diabetes. F. During an interview with S (staff)1 on 01/15/26 at 1:05 pm when asked if the expectation to have physicians write orders for diabetic management on admission and she replied yes. Additionally, when S1 was asked if the expectation from nurses is to request orders for diabetic management when the patient does not have any and she replied, yes. Lastly, when S1 was asked if the facility had specific policy or standards of practice for diabetic management she replied, no, just the Lippincott (an online resource that provides facilities with evidence-based practice content and virtual learning solutions) references.”

    Rule A0405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jan 15, 2026Complaint inspection5 deficiencies cited
Mar 19, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 76.31% of its patients returned home or to the community: better than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (8.98%); potentially preventable readmissions during the stay, no different than the national rate (4.06%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.413); C. diff infections, no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.448).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0.29%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 1.22%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 80.56%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 1.01.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified inpatient rehabilitation facility since Mar 25, 2005.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 84.15% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Ernest Health, Inc. owns 100% directly since Feb 29, 2012.
  • 6 owners or officers are people: Jacob S Socha (corporate officer); Eudora Cannon (corporate officer); Eudora Cannon (other role (CMS gives no detail)); Christina Salazar (managing employee (on the payroll)); Caleb Reed (corporate officer); Denise A Kann (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • A private-equity firm is among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Ernest Health, Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Feb 29, 2012
Epoch Parent Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Epoch Parent Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Ernest Health Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Feb 29, 2012
Epoch Midco, Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Epoch Acquisition Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 4, 2018
Mpt of Las Cruces LLCHolds 5% or more security interest84.5%Dec 31, 2020
One Equity Partners VII LPOwns 5% or more through other companies58%Oct 4, 2018
One Equity Partners VII-A LPOwns 5% or more through other companies29.7%Oct 4, 2018
Truist BankHolds 5% or more security interest15.5%Nov 1, 2025
One Equity Partners VII-B LPOwns 5% or more through other companies12.4%Oct 4, 2018
Ernest Health, Inc.Other role (CMS gives no detail)Oct 4, 2018

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 inpatient rehabilitation facilities CMS lists in Dona Ana County, 1 has CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 1 better than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one better than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDischarged to the community
Mountain View Regional Medical CenterNot given

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.