Hearth Record

Kindred Hospital Greensboro

A long-term care hospital in Greensboro, North Carolina 27406

2401 Southside Blvd, Greensboro, North Carolina 27406. (336) 271-2800.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 29, 2026: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 31, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Patient Rights: Informed Consent

    The inspectors’ words, 633 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: INFORMED CONSENT CFR(s): 482.13(b)(2) The patient or his or her representative (as allowed under State law) has the right to make informed decisions regarding his or her care. The patient’s rights include being informed of his or her health status, being involved in care planning and treatment, and being able to request or refuse treatment. This right must not be construed as a mechanism to demand the provision of treatment or services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50403 Based on policy review, medical record review and staff interviews, nursing staff failed to ensure patients’ rights as evidenced by failing to obtain an informed blood consent according to policy prior to administering blood for 1 of 5 sampled patients that received blood (#2). The findings include: Review of the “Informed Consent” released 06/2021 revealed...”iv. For both inpatients and outpatients, prior to initiating the first transfusion and each subsequent transfusion, the nurse administering the transfusion must confirm that a current, signed informed consent form is in the chart...vi. For both inpatients and outpatients, confirmation that a current, signed informed consent form is in the chart must be done by the nursing staff as part of the patient identification process prior to the initial and any subsequent treatments.” Medical record review of patient #2 revealed a 60-year-old female admitted on 11/03/2023 for end stage renal disease and respiratory failure post tracheostomy placement in 2020. Chart review revealed the patient had been a previous patient in named facility from 07/23/2020 to 10/28/2023. During the previous admission patient had received some blood transfusions. Further chart review revealed that the patient was readmitted to named facility on 11/03/2023 and Physician order on 10/28/2024 revealed order for 2 units PRBC’s (packed red blood cells) to be given. Review of blood consent form revealed date of 10/31/2021 from prior admission. Further review of the record revealed no evidence the hospital had obtained an informed consent for administration of blood during this current admission. Record review revealed the first unit of blood was started on 10/28/2024 at 0930 and completed at 1040. Second unit given at 10/28/2024 at 1540 and completed at 1905. Numerous other transfusions were found to be in the record without a current informed consent present. Further review of record revealed an informed consent was not obtained according to the hospital’s policy prior to the administration of blood. Interview on 10/31/2024 at 0905 with Dialysis nurse (#2) revealed that “when patient is in dialysis and critical hemoglobin comes back then (dialysis) nurse gets the orders and lets primary nurse know. Primary nurse checks chart for the order and consent then brings the blood to the dialysis unit and together we hang the unit of blood.” The interview revealed that patient information regarding risks and benefits of blood administration should be explained with each administration prior tom obtaining consent and administration. Interview on 10/31/2024 at 0930 with Director of Quality (#4) revealed that consent should be obtained prior to administration of blood and it should be a current consent. “We should have gotten a new consent for this admission but she (patient) had been here so long.” Interview on 10/31/2024 at 0940 with staff nurse (#3) revealed that “ (I) would expect to see current consent for this admission.” Interview revealed consent is good for one admission and “consent was there but didn’t check the date of the consent, (It) didn’t come to mind because she (patient) gets so much blood. I have checked the informed consent form but have never looked at the date on the consent.” The interviews revealed there was no evidence that an informed consent was obtained prior to blood administration and that the nursing staff failed to follow hospital policy for obtaining an informed consent.”

    Rule A0131. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 5 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 29, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 18, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 31, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
May 23, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Feb 22, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 14.08% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (24.09%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.849); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.377); C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.198).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 0.75%; patients successfully weaned from a ventilator, 57.51%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 41.09%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 0.93.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Feb 1, 1994.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 84.87% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Kindred Healthcare Operating LLC owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2011.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Scott Graeser (corporate officer, 0%); Michael L. Moody (corporate officer, 0%); Dana M Rock (corporate officer, 0%); Johnetta M Traylor (corporate officer, 0%); Preston Bryant (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Deanna Schiavone (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Joseph Bean (corporate officer); Richard L Algood (corporate officer); Richard L Algood (other role (CMS gives no detail)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership, the latest on May 1, 1998.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Kindred Healthcare Operating LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Oct 1, 2011
Kentucky Hospital Intermediate LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Kindred Healthcare LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Oct 1, 2011
Kentucky Hospital Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Knight Health Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 23, 2021
Knight Health LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 23, 2021
Knight Intermediate Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 23, 2021
Kentucky Hospital Holdings Jv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 long-term care hospitals CMS lists in Guilford County, 2 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 1 no different than the national rate, 1 worse than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one no different than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDischarged to the community
Select Specialty Hospital-Greensboro8.7

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 8, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.