Hearth Record

Select Specialty Hospital Springfield, Inc.

A long-term care hospital in Springfield, Missouri 65804

1630 East Primrose, Springfield, Missouri 65804. (417) 881-1657.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Mar 10, 2026: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 23, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights

    The inspectors’ words, 167 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 39840 Based on observation, interview and policy review, the hospital failed to ensure three patients (#1, #18, and #36) were provided with a call system that was in reach and appropriate for their special needs, and two of two emergency airway carts were checked daily. These failures had the potential to adversely affect the quality of care and safety of all patients in the hospital. The severity and cumulative effect of this practice had the potential to place all patients at risk for their health and safety, also known as Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). As of 10/23/24, the hospital provided an immediate action plan sufficient to remove the IJ when the hospital implemented corrective actions that included educating all current and oncoming nursing staff on call light appropriateness and availability. All remaining staff were educated prior to the start of their next shift. Please refer to A-0144.”

    Rule A0115. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Rights: Care In Safe Setting

    The inspectors’ words, 496 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: CARE IN SAFE SETTING CFR(s): 482.13(c)(2) The patient has the right to receive care in a safe setting. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39840 Based on observation, interview and policy review, the hospital failed to ensure three patients (#1, #18, and #36) were provided with a call system that was in reach and appropriate for their special needs, and two of two emergency airway carts were checked daily. Findings included: 1. Although requested, the hospital failed to provide a policy that addressed the use of call lights for special needs. Observation on 10/22/24 at 10:25 AM, showed Patient #1 with a mitten (restrictive mitt that hinders picking and tube pulling) restraint (any manual method, physical or mechanical device that limits the ability of free movement of arms, legs, body, or head) on her left hand and a standard call light within reach. Patient #1 was unable to use her right hand. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 10:30 AM, Staff E, Nurse Manager, stated that she would expect a soft touch call light for a patient with mittens on. Observation on 10/22/24 at 10:50 AM, showed Patient #18 was paralyzed with a ventilator (a machine that supports breathing) in place and a soft touch call light that laid on the ventilator machine, out of reach of the patient. Observation on 10/22/24 at 2:45 PM, showed Patient #18 was paralyzed with a ventilator in place and a soft touch call light laid on the patients’ abdomen, out of reach of the patient. Observation on 10/23/24 at 9:45 AM showed Patient #36 was a left arm amputee (removal of an injured or diseased body part) on a ventilator and in a soft limb restraint on her right arm and the call light was on the floor out of reach of the patient. During an interview on 10/23/24 at 9:43 AM, Staff B, Chief Nursing Officer (CNO), stated that she expected call lights be accessible and appropriate for the patients. 2. Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Emergency Equipment Checking Procedure,” dated 10/01/23, directed staff to check the emergency airway cart every shift. Review of the airway cart check lists showed the emergency airway cart on the acute nursing unit was checked on 08/28/24, 09/03/24, and 09/28/24. The emergency airway cart on the rehabilitation (the action of restoring someone to health or normal life through training and therapy) unit was checked on 08/01/24 and last checked on 08/26/24. Observation on 10/21/24 at 1:20 PM, showed an emergency airway cart last checked 09/28/24 and was located on the acute nursing unit. Observation on 10/22/24 at 2:15 PM, showed an emergency airway cart with no current check list. During an interview on 10/21/24 at 1:20 PM, Staff I, Respiratory Therapist, stated that the emergency airway cart was check when it was opened. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 2:00 PM, Staff Q, Respiratory Therapy Manager, stated that the emergency airway carts were checked every month. 49404”

    Rule A0144. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Administration Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 469 words

    “ADMINISTRATION OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.23(c)(1), (c)(1)(i) & (c)(2) (1) Drugs and biologicals must be prepared and administered in accordance with Federal and State laws, the orders of the practitioner or practitioners responsible for the patient’s care as specified under §482.12(c), and accepted standards of practice. (i) Drugs and biologicals may be prepared and administered on the orders of other practitioners not specified under §482.12(c) only if such practitioners are acting in accordance with State law, including scope of practice laws, hospital policies, and medical staff bylaws, rules, and regulations. (2) All drugs and biologicals must be administered by, or under supervision of, nursing or other personnel in accordance with Federal and State laws and regulations, including applicable licensing requirements, and in accordance with the approved medical staff policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 39840 Based on observation, interview and policy review, the hospital failed to ensure proper medication administration for six patients (#1, #11, #15, #16, #17, and #18) of six patients observed whose medications were administered through a feeding tube. Findings included: Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Medication Administration: Feeding Tubes,” dated 07/01/24, showed each medication should be placed in a sealed plastic sleeve and crushed one at a time. After each medication is given, the feeding tube should be flushed with 20 milliliters (ml) of water. Observation on 10/22/24 at 10:25 AM, showed Staff O, Registered Nurse (RN), placed four medications in one plastic sleeve, crushed them and administered to Patient #1 through the feeding tube. Observation on 10/22/24 at 9:50 AM, showed Staff M, RN, placed five medications in one plastic sleeve, crushed them and administered to Patient #11 through the feeding tube. Observation on 10/22/24 at 9:10 AM, showed Staff N, RN, placed seven medications in one plastic sleeve, crushed them and administered to Patient #15 through the feeding tube. Observation on 10/22/24 at 9:30 AM, showed Staff N, RN, placed five medications in one plastic sleeve, crushed them and administered to Patient #16 through the feeding tube. Observation on 10/22/24 at 9:45 AM, showed Staff O, RN, placed seven medications in one plastic sleeve, crushed them and administered to Patient #17 through the feeding tube. She then crushed one pain medication and mixed it with a liquid antibiotic prior to administering through the feeding tube. Observation on 10/22/24 at 10:50 AM, showed Staff O, RN, placed three medications in one plastic sleeve, crushed them and administered to Patient #18 through the feeding tube. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 9:10 AM, Staff N, RN, stated that she flushed the feeding tube with 20 ml of water before and after she administered medications. During an interview on 10/22/24 at 12:47 PM, Staff C, Pharmacy Director, stated that he would expect nursing staff to follow the medication administration policy. 49404”

    Rule A0405. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 3 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Mar 10, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 27, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 23, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 14.02% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (22.79%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.381); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.593); C. diff infections, no comparison (standardized infection ratio 0).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 0%; patients successfully weaned from a ventilator, 65.95%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 39.22%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 0.98.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Nov 1, 2008.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 67.97% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Select Specialty Hospital Springfield Inc. owns 100% directly since Jan 1, 2008.
  • 10 owners or officers are people: Ashleigh Goris (corporate officer); Ashleigh Goris (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ashleigh Goris (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Thomas Mullin (corporate officer); John Saich (corporate officer); Robert Breighner (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Malatesta (corporate officer); Robert Kido (corporate officer); John Duggan (corporate officer); John Duggan (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Select Medical CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2008
Select Specialty Hospitals Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2008
Select Specialty Hospital Springfield Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Jan 1, 2008

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other long-term care hospital CMS lists is in Greene County.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.