Hearth Record

Kindred Hospital St Louis South

A long-term care hospital in Saint Louis, Missouri 63128

10018 Kennerly Rd, 3rd Flr Hyland Bldg B, Saint Louis, Missouri 63128. (314) 525-8100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Nov 19, 2024: a complaint inspection.

3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

3 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Nov 2024. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.

3 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 NovDec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOct

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Nov 19, 2024: complaint inspection3 deficiencies
  • Condition Of Participation: Pharmaceutical Se

    The inspectors’ words, 158 words

    “Condition of Participation: Pharmaceutical Se CFR(s): 482.25 §482.25 Condition of Participation: Pharmaceutical Services. The hospital must have pharmaceutical services that meet the needs of the patients. The institution must have a pharmacy directed by a registered pharmacist or a drug storage area under competent supervision. The medical staff is responsible for developing policies and procedures that minimize drug errors. This function may be delegated to the hospital’s organized pharmaceutical service. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 50151 Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS), review of the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter 797, and policy review, the hospital failed to ensure the required life-saving medication was readily accessible when administering Malignant Hyperthermia triggering medications. Due to the potential risk and harm to all patients this resulted in the non-compliance with §42 CFR 482.25 Condition of Participation: Pharmaceutical Services. Please refer to A-500 for further details 41865”

    Rule A0489. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,545 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 49489 Based on observation, record review, interview and policy review, the hospital failed to: - Verify two patient identifiers for medication administration for four patients (#9, #20, #23 and #53) of 11 reviewed; - Provide appropriate bathing and repositioning for five patients, (#8, #9, #14, #15, and #23) out of 12 reviewed; - Perform appropriate glove changes and hand hygiene when administering care to six patients (#6, #20, #23, #25, #34 and #35) of 22 reviewed; and - Perform an appropriate dressing change for one patient (#23) of 8 reviewed. These failures had the potential to lead to poor outcomes, increased risk of infection, impaired skin integrity, and overall increased risk of health status deterioration for every patient admitted to the hospital. Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Two Patient Identifiers,” dated 06/2022, showed Kindred hospitals and staff will utilize a standardized patient identification process to include the use of at least two patient identifiers to verify patient identity prior to administering medications, collecting blood samples and other specimens, clinical testing, providing treatments or procedures and at any other time as needed. A patient room number and/or location shall not be used as an identifier. Hospital specific identifiers recommended include the patient’s full name and date of birth. The patient identification bracelet shall be utilized for patient identification. Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Routine Bathing,” dated 06/2023, showed the patient’s mental status, mobility, level of cooperation, physical health, and bathing preferences are to be considered when preparing a patient for bathing. Standard precautions (also known as universal precautions, avoiding contact with patients’ bodily fluids by means of wearing gloves, goggles and face shields) are to be followed during bathing unless the patient is on isolation. Pre-moistened disposable cloths that contain a no-rinse surfactant are used for daily bathing. The frequency of bathing is dependent on the patient’s hemodynamic status, therapy schedule, preference, incontinence (inability to control urination or bowel movements) needs, and body odor. Review of the hospital’s policy titled, “Indwelling Urinary Catheter (a small flexible tube inserted into the bladder to provide continuous urinary drainage) Standards and Practice,” dated 06/2022, showed hand hygiene should be done immediately before and after any manipulation of the catheter site or apparatus. The staff should maintain a sterile, continuously closed drainage system. Change gloves and practice good hand hygiene when emptying each patient’s drainage system. Catheter care includes gently cleaning of the perineal area with soap and water or general bathing cloth at least once a shift. Review of the hospital’s policy titled “Clinical Guidelines for Pressure Injury,” dated 06/2022, showed the following guidelines to prevent and treat pressure injuries (injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony area): - The skin and wound assessment is conducted per the RN on admission and each shift, including the day of discharge. - All patients are considered at risk for pressure injuries. Therefore, patients are routinely screened to determine their Braden Scale (an assessment tool for predicting the risk of bed sores or pressure ulcers) risk level on admission and daily. - Standard interventions for all patients can include, but are not limited to, a support surface, skin and wound assessments, repositioning orders (minimum turns every two hours), wound and nutritional consults, decrease or elimination of friction and shear (injury to the skin caused by friction) forces and incontinence management. - Standard interventions also include the consideration of turning the patient every hour if the patient is unable to reposition themselves, has poor nutrition, multiple wounds, a recent change of condition (acute decline in hemodynamics), poor cognition, their skin is moist or at high risk for friction/shear injury. - Based on the Braden Scale risk score and individual subscales, additional interventions may be required. Additional interventions for may include repositioning devices, active therapy support surfaces, preventative dressings, and heel offloading (relieve from pressure) devices. All devices are to be removed each shift to inspect the skin. - The frequency of wound dressing changes depends upon various clinical indicators including, but not limited to, physician orders, dressing integrity, skin integrity (refers to skin health, to be free of wounds or irritation) and incontinence. Observation on 11/13/24 at 2:38 PM, showed Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), contaminated Patient #6’s drawer handle with a used glove during a wound dressing change. Observation with concurrent interview on 11/13/24 at 9:10 AM, showed Patient #8’s room had suction tubing, which was previously connected to the patient’s external urinary draining device, lying on the floor. The tubing was connected to a suction canister that contained urine. She reported that she had only been bathed twice since she was admitted on 10/15/24. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 9:50 AM, Patient #9 stated that: - She was bathed that morning, but it had been four days since her last bath. - Urinary catheter care was only completed when she was bathed. - When she was bathed that morning, the towel used to clean between her legs looked like it was covered in mud. - When medications were administered, the nurses did not verify her identity or verify that she received the correct medications. Observation on 11/13/24 at 11:00 AM, showed Patient #9’s bathroom contained heavily soiled towels that were used to bathe her. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 11:15, Staff L, CNA, stated that Patient #9 was dirty and soiled before she bathed her. Review of Patient #14’s medical record dated 03/19/24 through 03/25/24, showed a bed bath and linen change were only completed twice, on 03/19/24 and 03/21/24, during her six-day hospitalization. Review of Patient #15’s medical record showed he was not repositioned every two hours as required by hospital policy. He acquired multiple pressure injury wounds during his admission. Observation on 11/13/24 at 8:40 AM, showed Staff N, RN, enter Patient #20’s room for a medication pass. The patient was given medications via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG, a tube inserted through a person’s abdomen directly into the stomach to provide a means of feeding when oral intake is not possible) tube, one intravenous (IV, in the vein) medication, eye drops, and prescription powder to the patient’s peri-area. Staff N failed to verify two patient identifiers. She did not change her gloves at any time and she did not pull a curtain, or close the door, to protect the patient’s privacy when her peri-area was exposed. Observation on 11/13/24 at 10:15 AM, showed Staff N, RN, enter Patient #23’s room for medication administration. The patient was on contact precautions (precautions used to minimize the risk of infection spreading through touching an infected person or contaminated object). He was given four medications via PEG tube. Staff N did not change gloves in between documenting on the computer and administering the medications. She spoke to the patient by name, however, she did not verify his birth date or look at his ID bracelet. The patient’s foley catheter drainage line popped loose from the catheter. She replaced the foley line and drainage bag, placing the old line and drainage bag containing urine in the trash can. Observation on 11/13/24 at 3:44 PM, showed Staff N, RN, and Staff S, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), performed a dressing change on Patient #23’s right upper leg and buttocks area. The wound was cleansed and wet gauze was applied to the wound. Staff N placed three padded dressings over the gauze. She dropped the second padded dressing onto a pile of soiled dressings on the bed, picked it back up and placed it on the wound. No glove changes were observed between removing the soiled dressing and applying new dressings. The patient had a foul body odor although hygiene had been documented. Observation on 11/13/24 at 11:08 AM, showed Staff Q, RN, prepared for a procedure on a dirty bedside table for Patient #25. She placed a glucometer (used to measure the amount of glucose [sugar] in blood at patient bedside) on the patient’s bedside table that had pooled and dried spills on the surface, without cleaning the surface. She touched multiple surfaces with gloves used during the procedure, she did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene. Observation on 11/13/24, at 9:55AM, Staff Y, Wound Care RN, performed hand hygiene, applied gloves, and then proceeded to touch multiple surfaces in the patient’s room such as the bed and bedding, tray side table, IV poles and assisted the patient to change positions. Staff Y did not change gloves or perform hand hygiene prior to performing wound care on Patient #34. Observation on 11/13/24 at 10:22 AM, showed Staff JJ, RN, failed to perform hand hygiene prior to applying and after removing gloves when she provided care to Patient #35. During an interview on 11/13/24 at 2:41 PM, Patient #53 stated that she didn’t understand why Staff P, RN, was verifying her name and date of birth for her medication administration while observed by a surveyor. She stated that the staff never did that and wondered why it was happening that day. She also questioned why her room was being mopped that day when that rarely happened. 41474 50151 51264”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Delivery Of Drugs

    The inspectors’ words, 580 words

    “DELIVERY OF DRUGS CFR(s): 482.25(b) §482.25(b) Standard: Delivery of Services In order to provide patient safety, drugs and biologicals must be controlled and distributed in accordance with applicable standards of practice, consistent with Federal and State law. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 50151 Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Malignant Hyperthermia Association of the United States (MHAUS) guidelines and policy review, the hospital failed to ensure the required life-saving antidote medication and additional emergency supplies per MHAUS guidelines were readily available and accessible to staff when succinylcholine (a muscle relaxant/paralytic used with anesthesia during intubation [a process where a healthcare provider inserts a tube through a person’s mouth or nose down into their windpipe when a person is not breathing on their own], mechanical ventilation, and surgery) was administered during a bedside tracheostomy (an opening created in the neck in order to place a tube into a person’s windpipe that allows air to enter the lungs) placement for one current patient (Patient #19). This failure had the likelihood of potential negative outcome resulting is serious harm or death due to the unavailability of the antidote and recommended supplies. Findings included: Review of the hospital’s policy “Neuromuscular Blocking Agents (NMBA),” dated 06/2022, showed, when NMBA were available to be administered, the hospital must be aware of and be prepared to treat MH. Review of, “MHAUS guidelines,” dated 2016, showed to ensure that malignant hyperthermia (MH) deaths become a “never event,” an adequate supply of dantrolene (a muscle relaxant used to treat malignant hyperthermia) should be available when an NMBA, such as succinylcholine, are administered. The minimum dantrolene dose of 10mg per kilogram (kg) of patient weight should be immediately available (within 10 minutes). There is a direct correlation between the length of time it takes to administer dantrolene and subsequent patient outcomes related to MH. Review of the hospital’s online procedure, “MH,” dated 06/2022, showed there must be an internal communication plan for response to MH. A MH crisis box (containing medications, supplies, cooling equipment, monitoring equipment and laboratory testing supplies) must be appropriately stocked and readily available. Review of the hospital’s document, “Drug Usage Report for Succinylcholine,” dated 08/01/23 through 11/22/24, showed succinylcholine was administered once. On 10/23/24 at 6:30 AM, Patient #19 received succinylcholine 80 mg intravenous (IV, in the vein). Observation with concurrent interview on 11/19/24 at 8:50 AM, in the High Acuity Unit (HAU) with Staff QQ, Pharmacist, showed there was no dantrolene available to be administered if MH occurred after the use of succinylcholine. Staff QQ stated that succinylcholine was rarely used at the hospital and only used in small doses. Therefore, dantrolene was not needed and was not stocked. A patient would be transferred to an acute care hospital after succinylcholine was used for intubation. During an interview on 11/12/24 at 3:20 PM, Staff E, House Supervisor, stated the hospital has had to use succinylcholine during intubation, in the past. She had not received any education on rapid sequence intubation (RSI, an airway management technique where administering anesthesia medications induces immediate unresponsiveness and muscle relaxation for the purpose of controlling an emergency airway) for the treatment of MH and was not aware of any education provided to the nursing staff. The nurses were required to complete Advance Cardiac Life Support (ACLS, specific life saving measures taken by certified health professionals when a patient’s heartbeat or breathing stops). The hospital does not perform surgery or employ any anesthesia staff. 41865”

    Rule A0500. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Nov 19, 2024Complaint inspection3 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 11.8% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (21.22%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.46); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.097); C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.255).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0.23%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 0.27%; patients successfully weaned from a ventilator, 53.81%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 56.86%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 1.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Aug 30, 1991.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 78.98% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Kindred Healthcare Operating LLC owns 100% directly since Feb 26, 1998.
  • 7 owners or officers are people: Scott Graeser (corporate officer, 0%); Michael L. Moody (corporate officer, 0%); Dana M Rock (corporate officer, 0%); Johnetta M Traylor (corporate officer, 0%); Kevin Shrake (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Deanna Schiavone (corporate officer, 0%); Michael Joseph Bean (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Kindred Healthcare Operating LLCOwns 5% or more directly100%Feb 26, 1998
Kentucky Hospital Intermediate LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Kindred Healthcare LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Mar 27, 1998
Kentucky Hospital Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018
Knight Health Holdings LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 23, 2021
Knight Health LLCOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Dec 23, 2021
Kentucky Hospital Holdings Jv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 2, 2018

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other long-term care hospital CMS lists is in St. Louis County.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.