Hearth Record

Pioneer Specialty Hospital

A long-term care hospital in Pontiac, Michigan 48342

50 North Perry, Pontiac, Michigan 48342. (248) 593-1990.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
Condition-level deficiency
For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Feb 11, 2025: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.

1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Feb 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Feb 11, 2025: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
  • Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 153 words

    “NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 48772 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one individual was designated as the director of nursing services, failed to ensure that registered nurses supervised and evaluated the nursing care for 3 patients (P-1, 6, 9) of 10 patients reviewed, and failed to implement and document interventions in the plan of care for 1 patient (P-1) of 10 patients reviewed, resulting in the potential for negative outcomes to all patients served by the facility, including preventable physical decline. Findings include: See Tags: A0386 - Failure to designate a Director of Nursing. A0395 - Failure of nursing staff to supervise and evaluate nursing care. A0396 - Failure to maintain a nursing care plan.”

    Rule A0385. Condition-level. From a complaint.

  • Organization Of Nursing Services

    The inspectors’ words, 290 words

    “ORGANIZATION OF NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23(a) The hospital must have a well-organized service with a plan of administrative authority and delineation of responsibilities for patient care. The director of the nursing service must be a licensed registered nurse. He or she is responsible for the operation of the service, including determining the types and numbers of nursing personnel and staff necessary to provide nursing care for all areas of the hospital. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 48772 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one individual was clearly designated as the director of nursing services with a plan of administrative authority and delineation of responsibilities for nursing services, resulting in the potential for poor outcomes for all patients served by this facility. Findings include: During the entrance conference on 2/10/25 at 1015, the director of operations (Staff B) stated the Chief Nursing Officer (CNO) position “has been vacant for some time” and they have a nurse manager at the facility that oversees nursing services. Staff B provided an organizational chart dated June 2024 that indicated nurse managers reported to the director of operations. The organizational chart did not list a CNO position or indicate the position as vacant. The CNO job description (no date) states the CNO “actively participates in the oversight and establishment of best practices and standards for hospital clinical services.” The nurse manager job description (dated revised 5/7/21) states the manager reports to the CNO and “leads nursing staff in delivering excellent care.” The nurse manager (Staff C) was queried on her job description and if her role includes CNO duties during an interview on 2/11/25 at 1330. Staff C responded that her role does not include CNO duties.”

    Rule A0386. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 760 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47415 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that registered nurses supervised and evaluated the nursing care for 3 (P-1, P-6, P-9) of 10 patients reviewed, resulting in the lack of assessment and monitoring for P-1, 6, 9 and the potential for poor outcomes. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 1400 record review revealed P-1 was ventilator dependent and paraplegic as a result of a trauma accident. P-1 required total assistance for bed mobility. P-1 was admitted to the facility from a skilled facility with a documented stage 2 pressure injury to the coccyx. The coccyx wound progressed during stay, and a new pressure injury developed on mid back, that also progressed during stay. Review of the nursing flow records revealed that documentation of P-1 being turned and repositioned per wound care protocol every two hours, was inconsistent, including but not limited to the following. 11/25/24 - no documentation of turning and repositioning found between the hours of 1200 -1800. 12/06/24 - no documentation of turning and repositioning found between the hours of 1100 -1800. 12/11/24 - no documentation of turning and repositioning found between the hours of 0800 -1800. 12/15/24 - no documentation of turning and repositioning found between the hours of 0800 -1800. 12/16/24 - no documentation of turning and repositioning found between the hours of 0800 -1300. On 12/16/24 at 1450, a new wound care protocol order to position patient from side to side every 1 hour was entered into record. None of the flow sheets from 12/17/24 - 1/22/25 had turns documented every hour. In addition, review of nursing daily flow records for P-1 revealed wound assessment, (required once a shift) was inconsistently documented, including but not limited to: 12/16/24 - no documentation of wound assessment on 7PM - 7 AM shift. 12/18/24 - no documentation of wound assessment on 7PM - 7 AM shift. 12/24/24 - no documentation of mid back wound found on 7 AM-7PM shift or 7PM shift - 7 AM shift. 12/31/24 - only location of wounds documented (7 AM- 7PM shift) site assessments/treatments not documented, no documentation of wound assessment 7PM - 7 AM shift. 01/03/25 - no documentation of wound assessment on 7PM - 7 AM shift 01/04/25 - no documentation of wound assessment on 7 AM - 7PM shift. 48772 P-6: This 38-year-old female was admitted to the facility on 1/25/25 with diagnoses of necrotizing fasciitis, bilateral polynephritis, and peritonitis. The patient was on a ventilator and expired on 2/8/25 after being placed on comfort care. P-6 had extensive wounds on her gluteal, ischial, and sacral regions as well as on her abdomen and left upper extremity. During record review on 2/11/25, it was noted that the daily nursing assessment flowsheets that indicated documentation of repositioning every two hours was inconsistent, including but not limited to the following: 1/22/25-no documentation of turning and repositioning from 2400 to 0600 1/23/25-no documentation of turning and repositioning for entire day It was also noted that the daily nursing assessment flowsheets that indicated wound documentation two times daily was inconsistent, including but not limited to the following: 1/13/25-(7PM-7AM)-no documentation of wound 1/29/25-(7PM-7AM)-no documentation of wound 1/30/25-(7PM-7AM)-no documentation of wound P-9: This 39-year-old female was admitted to the facility on 10/1/24 with diagnoses of adrenal insufficiency, anoxic encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, and ventilator dependent respiratory failure. P-9 had a stage 3 pressure injury on the left thumb and a stage 4 pressure injury on the sacrum. The patient expired on 11/15/24. During record review on 2/11/25, it was noted that the daily nursing assessment flowsheets that indicated documentation of repositioning every two hours was inconsistent, including but not limited to the following: 11/14/24-no documentation of turning and repositioning from 1000 to 1800 and 0200 to 0600 11/15/24-no documentation of turning and repositioning from 1400 to 0600 It was also noted that the daily nursing assessment flowsheets that indicated wound documentation two times daily was inconsistent, including but not limited to the following: 11/9/24-(7PM-7AM)-no documentation of wound 11/15/24-(7PM-7AM)-no documentation of wound These findings were reviewed and acknowledged by the nursing manager (Staff C) during an interview on 2/11/25 at 1330. Staff C stated nursing staff should be evaluating the wound every shift. *Policy-Management of Pressure Ulcers Overview Flowchart, Ref 2117 (Revised 8/2023). “Pressure ulcer should be evaluated each shift. Evaluate the dressing if present, dressing intact, drainage present. Evaluate the area surrounding the pressure ulcer.””

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Nursing Care Plan

    The inspectors’ words, 338 words

    “NURSING CARE PLAN CFR(s): 482.23(b)(4) The hospital must ensure that the nursing staff develops, and keeps current, a nursing care plan for each patient that reflects the patient’s goals and the nursing care to be provided to meet the patient’s needs. The nursing care plan may be part of an interdisciplinary care plan. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47415 Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the hospital failed to ensure that nursing staff completely and accurately established nursing treatment protocols to prevent avoidable decline and initiated appropriate actions to facilitate a nursing response to address skin breakdown in 1 (P-1) of 3 sampled patients with pressure ulcers. This resulted in nursing care plans that lacked the necessary therapeutic intervention detail to limit reasonable preventable tissue breakdown and to facilitate healing. Findings include: Review of form titled, 24 Hour Patient Record and Plan on Care for P- 1 revealed the following: 11/24/25 and 1/08/24, section titled “Wound Documentation, Interventions” had no documentation (Blank) On 12/16/24 turning and repositioning for P-1 was ordered to be increased to every 1 hour. Daily care plans reviewed for 12/17/24, 12/18/24 12/20/24, and 1/8/25 did not reflect the increase for changing P-1’s position. On 2/11/25 at 1150, interview with Staff RN revealed the wound care section of the form on the 24-Hour Care Record and Plan of Care monitors patient progress toward goals, all applicable sections should be completed daily. Record review of policy titled, “Assessment Daily Flowsheet”, revised 8/2024, revealed, “The Nursing Flow Sheet provides data to support the nursing diagnosis and process. It utilizes a systemic approach to identifying patient problems. It is legal document that supports and guides nursing action within 24-hour period ...Proper documentation is essential to patient care.” Review of policy titled, “Interdisciplinary Plan of Care”, dated last reviewed 8/24, revealed, “Care, treatment and services are planned to ensure that they are individualized to the patient’s needs ... All staff should be responsible for interdisciplinary collaboration to establish goals and appropriate interventions”.”

    Rule A0396. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Feb 11, 2025Complaint inspection4 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 13.46% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (23.98%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.777); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.568); C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.172).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 2.13%; patients successfully weaned from a ventilator, 59.23%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 55.32%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 1.07.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Oct 20, 2014.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • Cited at in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 84.36% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 2 owners or officers are people: Fahim Uddin (owns 5% or more directly, 100%); Fahim Uddin (managing employee (on the payroll), 100%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other long-term care hospital CMS lists is in Oakland County.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.