Hearth Record

Whittier Rehabilitation Hospital

A long-term care hospital in Westborough, Massachusetts 01581

150 Flanders Road, Westborough, Massachusetts 01581. (508) 871-2063.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Sep 23, 2025: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Sep 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Sep 23, 2025: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Supervision Of Contract Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 1,232 words

    “SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 45980 Based on interviews and records reviewed, the Hospital failed to ensure a new wound was measured by nursing staff and was staged (a classification system used to identify the severity of tissue damage caused by a pressure injury) by a Certified Wound Specialist (CWS) or designee in accordance with Hospital policies and procedures for 1 Patient (#1) out of a total sample of 10 patients. Findings include: Review of the Hospital ’ s Skin Integrity Standard of Care Policy, revised 10/2022, indicated that the: I. Purpose is to accurately identify patients at risk for skin breakdown and development of pressure ulcers and to provide an environment which promotes to maintenance of intact skin or allows for the restoration of tissue integrity. II. The policy further indicates that skin will be inspected every shift and documented in the electronic medical record (EMR). In addition, any areas of altered skin integrity will be documented in the shift assessment and/or the wound assessment. A plan of care will be developed which promotes restoration of maintenance of skin integrity. Reassessment of wounds will be performed at every dressing change with a minimum of once a week with accurate measurements. IV. Standards of Clinical Practice indicates that: 2. Skin impairments will be identified by location, a description of the area and if indicated by measurement in centimeters. 5. pressure injures will be classified by depth (never back stage): Definitions: a. Partial Thickness Ulcer: Involving loss of epidermis and dermis. b. Full Thickness Ulcer: Involving loss of Epidermis, Dermis, and deeper layers. *Only CWS or designee will stage wounds as appropriate. 6. All wounds will be reevaluated a minimum of weekly by CWS. VIII. Responsibilities indicates that: 1. Rehabilitation Physican will be responsible for initial and ongoing assessment and evaluation in collaboration with the Clinical Wound Specialist Nurse and for ordering appropriate treatments. Review of Patient #1’s medical records, indicated that he/she presented to the Hospital on 7/17/25 for rehabilitation after experiencing increased weakness and paresthesia (tingling and numbness) after an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (a surgical procedure to alleviate pressure on the spinal cord or nerve roots). Review of Patient #1’s History and Physical dated 7/17/25 indicated Patient #1 was experiencing numbness and tingling in both hands and both feet. On 7/17/25 the Provider ordered a wound nurse consult. Review of Patient #1’s medical record indicated that on 7/18/25, the Nurse Practitioner (NP#1) discontinued the order placed by the Physician for a wound nurse consult for Patient #1. Further review of Patient #1 ’ s medical record failed to indicate Patient #1 was seen by the CWS during his/her hospitalization. Review of the Rehabilitation Physician’s daily progress notes throughout Patient #1’s admission indicated skin intact with the plan for follow up by NP #1 for the management of medical issues and for medical care. Review of Patient #1’s Nursing Shift Assessments indicated: 7/24/25 at 3:04 A.M., Patient #1’s coccyx was red, intact, and non-blanchable (an area that doesn ’ t turn white or fade when pressed which could indicate bleeding under the skin or a lack of blood flow to the area). 7/25/25 at 4:10 P.M.: Patient #1’s bilateral buttocks were poorly blanchable, and a new left upper buttock superficial opening was identified. Further review failed to indicate the new open area was measured by nursing staff and was staged by a CWS or designee. 7/29/25 at 9:45 P.M., Patient #1’s sacral area documented as being red. Further review failed to provide a description of the area by nursing staff. During an interview on 9/19/25 at 12:22 P.M., NP #1 said Patient #1 had a small open area to the buttocks and he believes it was a stage 1 or 2 pressure injury. NP #1 said he thought Patient #1 had a wound care consult and the wound nurse was seeing the Patient. NP #1 said he is wound certified and generally will visualize wounds weekly at a minimum. NP #1 said a treatment had been implemented for Patient #1 ‘s buttock wound. NP #1 said that he will see wounds after the wound nurse performs an assessment. He further said that a wound care consult will be ordered when a new wound is identified. NP #1 was unable to say the last time he saw Patient #1’s wound. Review of the medical record failed to indicate a wound care consult was performed or documented for Patient #1. During an Interview on 9/19/25 at 1:41 P.M., the CWS said she didn’t work with Patient #1. She said she was on vacation when Patient #1 was admitted and doesn’t remember ever being consulted as she would have written a note. She said NP #1 has his own wound certification and will look at surgical wounds and rarely consults her. She said patients with pressure injuries are followed by the wound nurse. During an interview on 9/23/25 at 9:10 A.M., and throughout the survey, the Director of Nurses (DON) said he had investigated a complaint from Patient #1’s family member regarding concerns about a wound on Patient #1’s bottom. The DON said when Patient #1 was admitted his/her coccyx was red, and he was unclear if it progressed to an open area. He said NP #1 will sometimes discontinue wound consults as he has wound care certification and that he had started a protective dressing to the area. The DON said the expectation is that nurses will describe wounds in the skin assessments as an open area with partial thickness or full thickness. The DON said the NP or the wound nurse would do staging, and that certain nursing supervisors are cross trained and can also document staging. He said he is unsure if staging ever occurred. He said the nurses should measure and describe any new open areas once identified, and notify the provider. He said nursing would document every shift in the skin assessment and if there is an open wound it is measured weekly. The DON said a more comprehensive assessment will be completed by the wound care nurse or NP. He said there is no evidence in the medical record indicating that Patient #1’s wounds were staged by the CWS or NP. Review of the Wound Ostomy Note from the receiving Outside Hospital (OSH), dated 7/30/25 at 3:04 P.M., indicated that Patient #1 was admitted from an Outside Facility (OSF) today. Upon initial assessment, the patient was noted to have Mepilex border (foam dressing) to the sacrum. The note further indicates the Coccyx area as having red, denuded (a condition where the outer layer of the skin (epidermis) is lost or stripped away, exposing the underlying layers (dermis and subcutaneous tissue) open area with unattached but distinct edges. A follow-up wound consult note dated 8/1/25 at 1:29 P.M., indicated Stage 2 pressure injuries to left and right buttocks previously assessed prior to the patient being taken to the operating room (OR) on 7/31/25.”

    Rule A0398. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Sep 23, 2025Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • 23.64% of its patients returned home or to the community: better than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (20.27%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no comparison (standardized infection ratio 0); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.556); C. diff infections, no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.417).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 5.04%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 47.94%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 0.84.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Oct 1, 2005.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 71.72% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Whittier Healthcare Holdings II Inc. owns 100% directly since Dec 31, 2010.
  • Greenleaf VI II Inc. runs it.
  • 12 owners or officers are people: Alfred J Arcidi (owns 5% or more through other companies, 50%); Alfred J Arcidi (corporate officer, 50%); Alfred J Arcidi (corporate director, 50%); Philip M Arcidi (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33.3%); Michael P Arcidi (owns 5% or more through other companies, 33.3%); Alfred R. Arcidi (corporate director); Philip M Arcidi (corporate officer); Philip M Arcidi (corporate director); Michael P Arcidi (corporate officer); Michael P Arcidi (corporate director); Deborah D’apolito (managing employee (on the payroll)); Rebecca Roman (managing employee (on the payroll)).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Whittier Healthcare Holdings II Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Dec 31, 2010
Greenleaf VI II Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)100%Jan 1, 2013
Whittier Healthcare TrustOwns 5% or more through other companies66.6%Dec 31, 2012

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 long-term care hospitals CMS lists in Worcester County, 2 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 1 better than the national rate, 1 no different than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one better than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDischarged to the community
Vibra Hospital of Western Mass - Central Campus14.7

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.