Hearth Record

Select Medical Rehabilitation Hospital at Lutheran

An inpatient rehabilitation facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804

7970 W Jefferson Blvd, Fort Wayne, Indiana 46804. (260) 435-6100.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 4 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 29, 2026: a complaint inspection.

4 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

4 deficiencies in 3 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

4 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 29, 2026: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 297 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47186 Based on document review and interview, nursing services failed to assess patient transfer needs with patient reported weakness and failed to document patient education, rationale, or alternative plan when patient declined to use a walker during a transfer in one of 10 medical records reviewed (Patient 1). 1. Review of policy titled: Fall And Injury Prevention, Policy Number: RH-CL-114, last revised 1/01/26 , indicated under: Policy B. Patients have the right to refuse interventions identified as necessary for safety. However, staff are responsible to identify the basis for the refusal, present rationale about why the interventions are important, offer an alternative plan as appropriated, and document the actions taken. 2. Review of P1’s MR lacked documentation of interdisciplinary staff communication when patient’s increased need for assistance with mobility was observed during an OT (Occupational Therapy) session on 3/01/26. 3. Review of P1’s MR lacked documentation of patient’s mobility assessment prior to a transfer on 3/01/26 at 4:00 pm when patient reported weakness to N2 (RN). 4. In a telephone interview on 4/29/26 at approximately 2:02 pm to 2:18 pm, N2 patient had been minimal assist/mostly independent with toileting in the morning, patient’s mobility status as a 1-nurse assist had not been changed, and they were not notified of patient’s weakened condition with transferring prior to patient’s fall on 3/01/26. N2 indicated patient refused to use the walker and they assisted patient to feet with the gait belt, patient then fell onto them as they could not regain balance. N2 did not indicate patient education was provided prior to patient’s fall regarding the use of patient’s walker for transfer.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Delivery Of Services

    The inspectors’ words, 300 words

    “DELIVERY OF SERVICES CFR(s): 482.56(b)(2) The provision of care and the personnel qualifications must be in accordance with national acceptable standards of practice and must also meet the requirements of §409.17 of this chapter. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47186 Based on document review and interview, Occupational Therapy (OT) services failed to update the plan of care and did not inform nursing of change in patient mobility in 1 of 10 medical records reviewed (Patient 1). 1. Review of policy titled: Fall And Injury Prevention, Policy Number: RH-CL-114, last revised 1/01/26, indicated under: Procedure: A. Admission, Assessment and Patient Family Education. 8. b. All appropriate information will be updated whenever the patient’s status changes. The level of independent patient activity recommended by the interdisciplinary team will be regularly communicated/updated with the patient during therapy sessions and during nursing care activities. 2. Review of P1’s MR at 2:19 pm on 3/01/26, indicated OT treatment session where patient reported lower extremity weakness and completed multiple task/stand transfers with moderate to maximum aid to boost to stand from sitting position, and with all transfers during the session. MR indicated session was limited by patient’s decreased lower extremity strength and difficulty completing sit to stand transfers and patient’s summary plan of care remained unchanged. 3. Review of P1’s MR lacked documentation of interdisciplinary staff communication when patient’s increased need for assistance with mobility was observed during an OT (Occupational Therapy) session on 3/01/26. 4. In a telephone interview on 4/29/26 at approximately 2:02 pm to 2:18 pm, N2 (RN) patient had been minimal assist/mostly independent with toileting in the morning, patient’s mobility status as a 1-nurse assist had not been changed, and they were not notified by OT staff of patient’s weakened condition with transferring prior to patient’s fall on 3/01/26.”

    Rule A1134. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jul 23, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 398 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32952 Based on document review and interview, the nursing staff failed to ensure a patient’s urinary output amount was documented per physician order for 1 of 12 medical records reviewed. (Patient #1); and nursing staff failed to notify physician of urine output that was outside of the parameters per physician orders and/or facility policy for 1 of 12 medical records reviewed. (Patient #1) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled “Guidelines and Protocols: Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals” Policy Number: RH-NU-114 with issue date of 10/1/23 indicated the following: “POLICY: A. To ensure quality patient care, certain standards of care must be upheld. D. A specific physician order will supersede the minimum frequencies noted below. PROCEDURE: Nutrition and Fluids, Routines/Guidelines: Intake and output (I & O) totaled. Minimum Frequency: Per MD order, total each shift.” 2. Review of patient #1’s medical record indicated the following: The patient was admitted on 5/18/24 at 11:49 a.m. (A.) A physician order dated 5/18/24 at 11:59 a.m. and discontinued on 5/22/24 at 12:30 a.m. indicated to notify the physician of urine output less than 100 milliliters in 4 hours. (B.) A review of nursing flowsheets for Patient #1 indicated the following urine output: and estimated urine amount: On 5/19/24 at 4:26 p.m. - urinary occurrence of continent and estimated urine output amount was small. On 5/19/24 at 6:23 p.m. - urinary occurrence of continent and estimated urine output amount was small. On 5/19/24 at 7:30 p.m. - urinary occurrence of continent and estimated urine output amount was medium. On 5/19/24 at 9:55 p.m. - urinary occurrence of continent and estimated urine output amount was medium. (C.) The medical record lacked documentation of measured urine output in milliliters for Patient #1, therefore was unable to determine if the patient had a urine output of greater than and/or lesser than 100 milliliters with each urinary occurrence. 3. During an interview with A1 (Director of Quality Management ) on 7/19/24 at approximately 2:00 p.m., he/she verified the medical record information for patient #1. 4. During a phone interview with N1 on 7/23/24 at 3:32 p.m., N1 verified that they toileted Patient #1 prior to going on break on 5/19/24 at approximately 9:45 p.m. and did not measure Patient #1’s urine.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Jan 23, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 1,114 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 32952 Based on document review and interview, the Registered Nurse failed to supervise the care of providing patient incontinence care, ensure a patient was assisted with repositioning/turning every two hours, pain level assessments/reassessments were completed per physician orders and/or facility policy for 1 of 10 medical records reviewed. (Patient #1) Findings include: 1. Facility policy titled “Pain Management” last reviewed/revised on 10/1/23 indicated the following: “POLICY: Pain assessment and pain management is an essential part of rehabilitation care of patients and is a priority in the hospital setting. PROCEDURE: 8. Re-assessment after initiating treatment: a. Pain will be assessed prior to pain interventions. b. Pain will be re-assessed approximately 30-60 minutes following a pharmacologic pain intervention, including the patient’s perception of relief, improved functional status, etc. 2. Facility policy titled “Pressure Injury Prevention” last reviewed/revised 4/1/23 indicated the following: “Prevention: All patients admitted will be considered at risk for the development of pressure injuries. Mobility deficit: Patients that are bed bound or with limited activity should be repositioned at least every two hours. Moisture/Incontinence: All patients will be cleaned as soon as possible after soiling.” 3. Facility policy titled “Guidelines and Protocols: Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals” last reviewed/revised 10/1/23 indicated the following: “Purpose: To outline clinical routines, guidelines and protocols of patient care. Policy...outlines basic tasks and designates the minimum frequency with which these tasks must be performed to maintain quality care. Hygiene: Bed linen changed, every other day and PRN (as needed). Draw sheets, incontinent pads, gown changed, daily and PRN. Peri-care every 12 hours and PRN. 4. Review of patient #1’s medical record indicated the following: The patient was admitted on 11/30/23 at 6:36 p.m. and discharged on 12/18/23 at 11:45 a.m. The patient had diagnoses that included but were not limited to cerebral infarction due to thrombosis of unspecified middle cerebral artery and displaced bimalleolar fracture of left lower leg. (A.) A physician order dated 11/30/23 at 6:40 p.m. indicated to cleanse the patient with bath wipes after incontinence and/or as needed for soiling/saturation with a start date of 11/30/23 at 6:40 p.m. and end date of 12/18/23 at 2:05 p.m. A physician order dated 11/30/23 at 6:40 p.m. indicated to assess the patient’s pain every four hours with a start date of 11/30/23 at 8:00 p.m. and an end date of 12/18/23 at 2:05 p.m. A physician order dated 11/30/23 at 6:40 p.m. indicated to turn the patient every two hours to start on 11/30/23 at 8:00 p.m. and was discontinued on 12/18/23 at 2:05 p.m. (B.) A review of intake and output flowsheets indicated Patient #1 had episodes of urine incontinence on 12/3/23 at 7:00 p.m., 12/4/23 at 12:48 a.m. and 3:03 a.m., 12/9/23 at 7:00 a.m. and 12/10/23 at 10:00 a.m. The medical record lacked documentation of linen changes, incontinence care being provided to the patient and/or patient refusal of linen changes/incontinence care. (C.) The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level assessment on the following dates and times: On 12/1/23 at 1:03 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. On 12/2/23 at 1:26 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. On 12/3/23 at 5:37 p.m. On 12/4/23 at 3:00 a.m., 7:00 a.m. and 4:03 p.m. On 12/5/23 at 4:25 a.m. and 6:25 p.m., On 12/6/23 at 6:47 p.m. On 12/7/23 at 1:00 a.m., 1:43 p.m. and 5:43 p.m. On 12/8/23 at 6:31 a.m. On 12/9/23 at 12:34 a.m., 4:34 a.m., 8:34 a.m. and 12:34 p.m. On 12/10/23 at 1:00 a.m., 9:26 a.m., 1:26 p.m. and 7:13 p.m. On 12/11/23 at 1:02 p.m. and 6:43 p.m. On 12/12/23 at 12:10 a.m. On 12/13/23 at 9:14 a.m. and 7:01 p.m. On 12/14/23 at 1:17 a.m., 9:38 a.m. and 6:36 p.m. On 12/15/23 at 8:52 a.m. On 12/16/23 at 6:08 p.m. On 12/17/23 at 1:17 p.m. (D.) A review of Patient #1’s Medication Administration Record indicated medications were administered that included but were not limited to the following: On 12/1/23 at 5:24 a.m., Tylenol 650 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level reassessment 60 minutes after a pain intervention at 6:24 p.m. On 12/1/23 at 9:26 p.m., Tylenol 1300 milligrams by mouth. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level reassessment 60 minutes after a pain intervention at 10:26 p.m. On 12/8/23 at 9:03 a.m., Norco 5/325 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level reassessment 60 minutes after a pain intervention at 10:03 a.m. On 12/11/23 at 2:43 p.m., Norco 5/325 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level reassessment 60 minutes after a pain intervention at 3:43 p.m. On 12/12/23 at 9:28 a.m., Norco 5/325 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level reassessment 60 minutes after a pain intervention at 10:28 a.m. On 12/13/23 at 11:05 a.m., Norco 5/325 milligrams 1 tablet by mouth. The medical record lacked documentation of a pain level reassessment 60 minutes after a pain intervention at 12:05 p.m. (E.) The medical record lacked documentation of patient repositioning/turning every two hours and/or patient refusing repositioning/turning every two hours for the following dates and times: On 11/30/23 at 10:00 p.m., 12/1/23 at 8:00 p.m., 9:00 p.m., 10:00 p.m., 11:00 p.m., 12/2/23 at 2:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m. The patient was documented as being in the supine position on 12/1/23 at 12:00 a.m., 1:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 6:00 a.m., 7:00 a.m., 12/2/23 at 12:00 a.m., 1:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 6:00 p.m., 7:00 p.m., 8:00 p.m., 9:00 p.m., 10:00 p.m., 11:00 p.m., 12/5/23 at 6:00 a.m., 7:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m., 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. The patient was documented as being in the sitting position on 12/2/23 at 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a.m., 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. The patient was documented as being in the semi-fowler’s position on 12/3/23 at 10:00 p.m., 11:00 p.m., 12/4/23 at 12:00 a.m., 1:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m., 4:00 a.m., 4:59 a.m., 12/5/23 at 12:00 a.m., 1:00 a.m., 2:00 a.m., 3:00 a.m. and 4:00 a.m. (F.) A review of a physical therapy evaluation note dated 12/2/23 at 8:30 a.m., indicated that Patient #1 required total assistance/dependent and moderate verbal cues related to bed mobility. A review of physical therapy weekly progress note dated 12/5/23 at 6:39 a.m., indicated that Patient #1 was a moderate assist for bed mobility. 5. During an interview with A3 (Chief Nursing Officer) on 1/23/24 at approximately 4:45 p.m., he/she verified the medical record information for patient #1.”

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 29, 2026Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited
Aug 16, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jul 23, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Jan 23, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • 65.15% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (10.51%); potentially preventable readmissions during the stay, no different than the national rate (5.4%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.086); C. diff infections, no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.394).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 0.8%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 70.08%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 0.91.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified inpatient rehabilitation facility since Nov 22, 1993.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 60.27% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Intensiva Healthcare Corporation owns 70% directly since Sep 1, 2023; Lutheran Health Network of Indiana LLC owns 30% directly since Jul 1, 2022.
  • Select Medical Corporation runs it.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Robert A Ortenzio (owns 5% or more through other companies, 12.75%); Thomas Mullin (corporate officer); Gregory Parrett (corporate officer); Gregory Parrett (managing employee (on the payroll)); Gregory Parrett (runs it (operational or managerial control)); John Saich (corporate officer); Robert Breighner (managing employee (on the payroll)); Michael Malatesta (corporate officer); Robert Kido (corporate officer); John Duggan (corporate officer); John Duggan (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 2 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Select Medical CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Sep 1, 2023
Select Medical CorporationRuns it (operational or managerial control)100%Sep 1, 2023
Select Medical Holdings CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jul 1, 2026
Intensiva Healthcare CorporationOwns 5% or more directly70%Sep 1, 2023
Stallion Intermediate CorporationOwns 5% or more through other companies67.79%Jul 1, 2026
Stallion Group Parent LPOwns 5% or more through other companies67.79%Jul 1, 2026
Lutheran Health Network of Indiana LLCOwns 5% or more directly30%Jul 1, 2022
Wcas Xiv LPOwns 5% or more through other companies28.24%Jul 1, 2026
Cas Stallion Co Investments LPOwns 5% or more through other companies9.55%Jul 1, 2026

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 inpatient rehabilitation facilities CMS lists in Allen County, 2 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 2 no different than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one no different than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDischarged to the community
Parkview Hospital63.1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.