Kindred Hospital - Chicago
A long-term care hospital in Northlake, Illinois 60164
365 E North Ave, Northlake, Illinois 60164. (773) 267-2620.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 14.9% of its patients went home or back to the community No different than the national rate
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 258 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Jul 17, 2026: a complaint inspection.
2 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2025. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Dec 18, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Nursing Services
The inspectors’ words, 94 words
“NURSING SERVICES CFR(s): 482.23 The hospital must have an organized nursing service that provides 24-hour nursing services. The nursing services must be furnished or supervised by a registered nurse. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 34411 Based on document review and interview, the Hospital failed to comply with the Condition of Participation 42 CFR 482.23 Nursing Services. Findings include: 1. The Hospital failed to ensure fall prevention measures were in place; completion of a fall risk assessment post-fall; and that care plans were updated to include post-fall interventions. See deficiency at A-395.”
-
Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care
The inspectors’ words, 1,019 words
“RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 34411 Based on document review and interview, for 13 of 14 (Pt #1, Pt #4, Pt #5, Pt #6, Pt #8, Pt #9, and Pts #13-#17, Pt #18, and Pt #19), clinical records reviewed for fall precautions and falls, the Hospital failed to ensure fall prevention measures were in place; completion of a fall risk assessment post-fall; and that care plans were updated to include post-fall interventions. Findings include: 1. The Hospital’s policy titled, “Fall Prevention” (dated 5/2025) was reviewed and required, “At the time a fall risk screen is completed, appropriate fall intervention precautions are initiated ...Patients are re-screened for fall risk with a change in condition (i.e., change in cognition, after a fall) and/or change in medication(s) that could affect fall risk, and weekly (no more than seven calendar days between screenings) ...Procedure: A score of 6-13 total points=Moderate Fall Risk ...Implement bed and/or chair alarms ...A score of >13 total points=High Fall Risk. The High Fall Risk Interventions may include, but are not limited to: Low Fall Risk and Moderate Fall Risk Interventions: Protective devices such as mats on the floor ...” 2. The “Fall Investigation/Huddle Worksheet” (dated 5/2016), was reviewed and required, “Post Fall Requirements ...Fall Care plan updated ...” 3. The clinical record of Pt. #1 was reviewed on 12/15/2025. Pt. #1 was admitted to the Hospital’s A campus 03/26/2025 at 7:39 PM with a diagnosis of acute respiratory failure. - The initial fall risk assessment, dated 03/28/2025 at 10:58 AM, included a score of 11 (Moderate Fall Risk) [High Fall Risk: > 13; Moderate Risk: 6-13; Low Risk: 0-5]. Subsequent weekly fall risk screenings starting from 04/01/2025-04/29/2025 (last screening documented) included, “Patient is deemed high fall risk due to a diagnosis that places patient at risk. Fall risk level: high.” - Fall safety precautions documented on 04/30/2025 at 10:42 AM included side rails up x3, bed position low, call light within reach. - A Nurse’s Note (E#10) on 04/30/2025, included “Patient showing signs of restlessness building up. [This RN/Registered Nurse] planned to give Ativan, but patient climbed out of bed and fell over pulse oximeter. [This RN] was coming into the room anyways and assessed immediately, patient axo [alert and oriented x2] at baseline. Patient attempting to get out of bed to see if there were ‘snacks in the closet.’ Patient had minor abrasion on elbow from fall. MD [Medical Doctor] notified and assessed patient. Vitals taken, at baseline. Orders placed for follow up, Attending MD and family notified.” - House Physician Note, dated 04/30/2025 at 5:19 PM, included “I was called to examine the patient who was seen by the RN sitting close to the door. Patient states [Pt. #1] got out of the bed to grab the pack of chips from [Pt. #1’s] locker. Patient is alert and verbalizing but is confused. States [Pt. #1] did not hit his head but sustained a minor avulsion [tear] of the skin to the right elbow, dressing applied. Fall precautions are in place but the bed alarm was not on ... there is no bumps and lumps over the head, no bruises except for the minor avulsion of the skin. Movements of all the joints are normal, able to flex and extend the neck ...” - Post fall safety precautions from 04/30/2025 at 8:12 PM to 05/01/2025 at 2:42 PM did not include any additional fall prevention measures put in place to prevent another fall. Additionally, the record lacked a fall re-assessment to indicate history of falls and the plan of care was not updated to reflect the patient’s risk for falls. Subsequently, Pt. #1 had a second unwitnessed fall on 05/01/2025 at 9:25 AM. 4. The clinical records for patients who had falls (Pt #8 and Pt #9), were reviewed on 12/15/2025. Pt #8 fell on 12/6/2025 and Pt #9 fell on 12/10/2025. There were “Fall Investigation/Huddle Worksheets” completed for both patients following the falls. However, their clinical records lacked a re-screening for fall risk post-fall and lacked an updated fall care plan that included fall interventions/new interventions in place. 5. Seven open clinical records for patients on census on the 3 East Medical/Surgical/Telemetry Unit (Campus B) (Pt #4, Pt #5, and Pts #13-17), were reviewed on 12/15/2025. The most recent fall risk assessments indicated that these patients were all scored as High Fall Risk. 6. On 12/15/2025 at 10:50 AM, an observational tour of 3 East Medical/Surgical/Telemetry Unit (Campus B) was conducted. During the tour, it was noted that 8 patients were on High Fall Risk precautions. In 7 out of the 8 (Pt #4, Pt #5, Pt #13-#17) patient rooms of patients on the High Fall Risk precautions, there were no fall mats in place, and the bed alarms were not activated (patients were in their beds during the tour), as required for high fall risk precautions. 7. On 12/17/2025 at 10:40 AM, an observational tour of 1 East Medical/Surgical/Telemetry Unit (Campus A) was conducted. Three patients (Pt #6, Pt #18, and Pt #19) were on moderate fall risk precautions based on fall risk assessments completed in theier clinical records. During the tour, the patients were observed to be in bed with no fall mats in place, and bed alarms were not activated. 8. On 12/15/2025 at 11:05 AM, an interview was conducted with a RN (E #6). E #6 stated that fall precautions include non-skid socks; bed and chair alarms; low bed; fall mats; and door signage. E #6 stated that fall risk assessments are done on admission, weekly, and post-fall. 9. On 12/17/2025 at 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Chief Nursing Executive (E #2). E #2 stated that a re-assessment should be done following a fall incident. E #2 stated that in addition, the care plan should be updated with new interventions following the fall. E #2 stated that fall mats and bed alarms should be activated if the patient is on Moderate or High Fall Risk precautions.”
All 3 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 18, 2025 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Oct 10, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- 14.89% of its patients returned home or to the community: no different than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (25.63%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.12); central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), worse than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.987); C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.552).
- As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 3.39%; patients successfully weaned from a ventilator, 53.87%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 70.75%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 1.02.
CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Is it certified?
- Medicare-certified long-term care hospital since Feb 1, 1992.
- Ownership: for profit.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- For profit.
CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
- 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Who does the caring?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
- 86.96% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Kindred Healthcare Operating LLC owns 100% directly since Dec 16, 2020.
- 8 owners or officers are people: Scott Graeser (corporate officer, 0%); Dana M Rock (corporate officer, 0%); Johnetta M Traylor (corporate officer, 0%); Darla Beranek (corporate officer); Nancie Trueman (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Deanna Schiavone (corporate officer); Michael Joseph Bean (corporate officer); Linn Billingsley (corporate officer).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 5 changes of ownership, the latest on Dec 16, 2020.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kindred Healthcare Operating LLC | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Dec 16, 2020 |
| Kentucky Hospital Intermediate LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 16, 2020 |
| Kindred Healthcare LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 16, 2020 |
| Kentucky Hospital Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 16, 2020 |
| Knight Health Holdings LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 23, 2021 |
| Knight Health LLC | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 23, 2021 |
| Kentucky Hospital Holdings Jv LP | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Dec 16, 2020 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 4 long-term care hospitals CMS lists in Cook County, 4 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 3 no different than the national rate, 1 worse than the national rate.
- CMS rates this one no different than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
CMS, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Discharged to the community |
|---|---|
| Rml Health Providers Limited Partnership | 11.7 |
| Holy Family Medical Center | 10.5 |
| Rush Specialty Hospital, LLC | 12.4 |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Long-Term Care Hospital - General Information (azum-44iv).
Released Sep 23, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Long-Term Care Hospital - Provider Data (fp6g-2gsn).
Released Sep 23, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the facility
The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.