Hearth Record

Atrium Health Navicent Rehabilitation Hospital

An inpatient rehabilitation facility in Macon, Georgia 31210

3351 Northside Drive, Macon, Georgia 31210. (478) 471-6500.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean2
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 23, 2026: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Oct 1, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Discharge Planning Evaluation

    The inspectors’ words, 1,017 words

    “DISCHARGE PLANNING EVALUATION CFR(s): The discharge planning evaluation must be included in the patient’s medical record for use in establishing an appropriate discharge plan and the results of the evaluation must be discussed with the patient (or the patient’s representative). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 47717 Based on a review of patient medical records, facility policies and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide discharge instructions for one patient (P) (P#1) of five patient records reviewed. Findings include: A review of the medical record for P#1 revealed that P#1 was admitted to the facility on 7/29/24 at 8:14 p.m., with a diagnosis of post operative left hip hemiarthroplasty. Continued review of the record revealed that a nursing assessment was completed on admission and every shift for the duration of the hospitalization. The assessment revealed there were no pressure wounds or tears on admission. Orders included pressure ulcer precautions and for the patient to be turned every two hours. P#1 Braden Score was 18 on admission. A review of the physical therapy progress notes revealed P#1 needed 50% assistance with turning. On 8/1/24 at 8:24 a.m. a nursing assessment revealed a wound to the right buttocks area. Wound protocol therapy was initiated. A review of the ‘flowsheets’ revealed that P#1 was not turned every two hours. A physician history and physical note on 7/30/24 at 11:25 a.m. revealed that P#1’s skin color, texture, turgor normal, no rashes or lesions. Further review of the history and physical revealed nursing care will provide close monitoring of vital signs, mental status, pain control, etc. while keeping open communication between the patient, family and care team. A review of the discharge summary written by on 8/2/24 at 5:50 p.m., revealed that P#1 was discharged to home with physical therapy, occupational therapy and DME (Durable Medical Equipment) bedside commode and wheelchair. Wound care treatment was not ordered for home for P#1. A further review of the nursing progress notes failed to revealed discharge documentation to the patient and/or family members. A review of the facility’s policy titled “Patient Rights,” revised 2/5/21, revealed the purpose was to acknowledge patients’ rights and the hospital’s responsibilities associated with those rights. The following areas where patient’s rights were addressed include Access to Treatment, Care Decisions, and Complaints. The organization would assure that patient Investigational Studies, Safety, and Communication and Access to Information. rights are being observed as written in the provision of CMS and National Integrated Accreditation for Healthcare Organizations. A review of the facility’s patient rights brochure that is given to all patient’s on admission revealed a patient has the right to participate in the development and implementation of their plan of care, including their inpatient and/or outpatient treatment/care plan, discharge care plan and pain management plan. A patient, or when appropriate, the patient’s representative, has the right to make informed decisions regarding their care. The patient’s rights include being informed of their health status, being involved in care planning and treatment and being able to request or refuse treatment. Their right must not be considered as a mechanism to demand the provision of treatment, or services deemed medically unnecessary or inappropriate. Making informed decisions include the development of their plan of care, medical and surgical interventions (e.g. deciding whether to sign a surgical consent), pain management, patient care issues and discharge planning. A review of the facility’s policy titled “Discharge Planning Evaluation Procedure (Rehab Hospital),” revision date 08/21/2024, revealed the purpose was to establish a process to complete a discharge planning evaluation in the event it is requested by patients, patient’s representative or a member of the rehabilitation team. Discharge planning evaluation would be done on a timely basis, within two business days of request, to ensure that appropriate arrangements for post-acute care services are made and to prevent unnecessary delays in discharge. Final results and update plan of care would be shared with patient for approval. All information would be documented in the patient record. A review of the facility’s policy titled “Plan of Care/Interdisciplinary Treatment Plan Procedure (Rehab Hospital),” last revised 01/21/2022, revealed the purpose was to implement and maintain an on-going interdisciplinary approach to the assessing of patient’s needs and developing a plan of care that meets the individual needs of each patient within the resources available. The development of an interdisciplinary plan would include initiation of interdisciplinary plan of care by the admitting nurse and at discharge, patient needs which have not been met, and which would require continuing care, would be addressed. These would be documented in the discharge summary. Nurse assigned to the patient would complete discharge portion of care plan. A review of the facility’s policy titled “Discharge Protocol,” revised 1/24/2022, revealed for routine discharges the following would be completed: Complete “Patient Discharge” in electronic medical record, Review Patient Discharge document with patient, For all Patient Education needs, use Mosby to print out education instructions and write in Nursing Notes all pertinent information regarding the discharge including who patient discharge with and how patient transferred into vehicle. During an interview with Nurse Manager (NM) AA on 10/1/2024 at 9:30 a.m. in the education room she revealed she is the nurse manager over Units One and Two. NM AA does not remember P#1 and that it is her understanding that patients should be turned every two hours around the clock. NM AA said the unit has adequate staff to turn the patients every two hours. NM AA makes rounds during the week and talks to patients to try to solve any complaints before they get out of hand. NM AA states discharge instructions should include wound care. An interview was conducted with Case Manager (CM) CC on 10/1/24 at 10:15 a.m. in the education room. CC remembers P#1 and her family member. CM CC revealed P#1 wanted to go home. CM CC further revealed there was not any wound care ordered on the discharge orders. She remembers the family member of P#1 was hard to reach on the phone and does not recall talking to family member regarding wound or wound care.”

    Rule A0808. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 23, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Dec 18, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Oct 1, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited
Apr 25, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • 63.42% of its patients returned home or to the community: worse than the national rate, as CMS compares it (Oct 1, 2023 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Compared by CMS: potentially preventable readmissions within 30 days after discharge, no different than the national rate (8.76%); potentially preventable readmissions during the stay, worse than the national rate (7.34%); catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 1.42); C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark (standardized infection ratio 0.161).
  • As CMS gives them: patients with one or more falls with major injury, 0%; patients with new or worsened pressure ulcers or injuries, 0.96%; patients at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge, 55.18%; Medicare spending per patient (1 is the national median), 0.96.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Is it certified?

  • Medicare-certified inpatient rehabilitation facility since Jun 11, 2007.
  • Ownership: for profit.
  • It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • For profit.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - General Information. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for these facilities.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Who does the caring?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.
  • 96.53% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Navicent Health Inc. owns 100% directly since Sep 29, 2006.
  • Atrium Health Inc. and Advocate Health Inc. run it.
  • 9 owners or officers are people: Adrienne S H Purdue (corporate director); Cynthia Busbee (corporate director); Philip Wheeler (corporate officer); Philip Wheeler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Sanford G Duke (corporate director); Robert G Larrison (corporate officer); Delvecchio S Finley (corporate director); Erin P Snyder (corporate officer); Tracey Ann Blalock (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Navicent Health Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Sep 29, 2006
Ah Georgia Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2019
The Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital AuthorityOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 1, 2019
Atrium Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Oct 9, 2020
Advocate Health Inc.Runs it (operational or managerial control)Dec 2, 2022

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 inpatient rehabilitation facilities CMS lists in Bibb County, 2 have CMS’s comparison of their discharges to the community with the national rate: 1 no different than the national rate, 1 worse than the national rate.
  • CMS rates this one worse than the national rate for returning patients to the community.
Source:

CMS, Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility - Provider Data. Released Sep 23, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceDischarged to the community
Piedmont Macon Rehabilitation Center69.1

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for inpatient rehabilitation facilities or long-term care hospitals, so none are shown.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Many of these facilities are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for these facilities.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the facility

The public record above comes first. Anything the facility adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the facility will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the facility”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.