Hearth Record

Rivers Health

An acute care hospital in Point Pleasant, West Virginia 25550

2520 Valley Drive, Point Pleasant, West Virginia 25550. (304) 675-4340.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Jun 10, 2026: a complaint inspection.

2 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

2 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Jun 2025. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

2 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Jun 4, 2025: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
  • Rn Supervision Of Nursing Care

    The inspectors’ words, 345 words

    “RN SUPERVISION OF NURSING CARE CFR(s): 482.23(b)(3) A registered nurse must supervise and evaluate the nursing care for each patient. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38282 Based on document review, medical record review, and staff interview, the Director of Nursing failed to supervise the clinical staff by delegating the insertion of a Foley catheter to nursing assistants (NA), which is out of their scope of practice, for two (2) patients (#3 and #4). Findings include: A review of the “Criteria for Determining Scope of Practice for Licensed Nurses and Guidelines for Determining Acts That May Be Delegated or Assigned by Licensed Nurses;” revised: 03/23/23; was reviewed, and stated in part: “Nursing practice assigned to unlicensed assistive personnel is limited to performance of the basic nursing care services, such as taking vital signs, providing personal hygiene, comfort, nutrition, ambulation and environmental safety and protection. Unlicensed workers are PROHIBITED from performing any licensed nursing function that is specifically defined for licensed nurses in the nursing practice acts or rules of the Boards of Nursing, except as specifically provided in West Virginia Code and Rules for AMAPs, School Nurses, Dialysis techs, EMS, etc ...” A review of the medical records for Patient #3 revealed a Foley catheter was inserted on 04/22/25 at 10:50 p.m. in the emergency department (ED) by staff #10, a nursing assistant (NA). A review of the medical records for Patient #4 revealed a Foley catheter was inserted on 05/03/25 at 1:00 a.m. on S1 by staff #21, a NA. An interview was conducted on 06/03/25 at 3:18 p.m. with staff #2, who confirmed that patient #3 and #4 had Foley catheters inserted by NAs. An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 9:00 a.m. with staff #3 regarding NAs and certified nursing assistants (CNA) not being allowed to perform invasive procedures, such as Foley catheters, in the state of West Virginia, as it was outside their scope of practice. Staff #3 stated: “I didn’t know that NAs and CNAs had a scope of practice. They have been inserting catheters here for decades.””

    Rule A0395. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Patient Care Assignments

    The inspectors’ words, 1,269 words

    “PATIENT CARE ASSIGNMENTS CFR(s): 482.23(b)(5) A registered nurse must assign the nursing care of each patient to other nursing personnel in accordance with the patient’s needs and the specialized qualifications and competence of the nursing staff available. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 38282 Based on document review, medical record review, and staff interview, the hospital failed to comply with 482.23(b)(5), as Registered Nurses (RN) were delegating the insertion of Foley catheters to nursing assistants (NA), including for two (2) patients (#3 and #4); and allowing NAs and certified nursing assistants (CNA) to be trained, and oversee staff, in the insertion of Foley catheters, which is out of their scope of practice. Findings include: A review of the “Criteria for Determining Scope of Practice for Licensed Nurses and Guidelines for Determining Acts That May Be Delegated or Assigned by Licensed Nurses;” revised: 03/23/23; was reviewed, and stated in part: “Nursing practice assigned to unlicensed assistive personnel is limited to performance of the basic nursing care services, such as taking vital signs, providing personal hygiene, comfort, nutrition, ambulation and environmental safety and protection. Unlicensed workers are PROHIBITED from performing any licensed nursing function that is specifically defined for licensed nurses in the nursing practice acts or rules of the Boards of Nursing, except as specifically provided in West Virginia Code and Rules for AMAPs, School Nurses, Dialysis techs, EMS, etc ...” A review of the Rivers Health Admission Packet was completed, and stated in part: “Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: ...To prevent urinary tract infections, doctors and nurses take the following actions ...Only properly trained persons insert catheters using sterile (“clean”) technique ...” A review of the medical records for Patient #3 revealed a Foley catheter was inserted on 04/22/25 at 10:50 p.m. in the emergency department (ED) by staff #10, a nursing assistant (NA). A review of the medical records for Patient #4 revealed a Foley catheter was inserted on 05/03/25 at 1:00 a.m. on S1 by staff #21, a NA. A total of eleven (11) personnel files were reviewed - eight (8) NA and three (3) CNA. The orientation and annual trainings were reviewed, and revealed the Foley catheter trainings had been completed, but the observation check off sheets could not be located for staff #7, #14. #16, #17, #18, or #19 - all with dates of hire between 2019 and 2023. Further review of the July 2024 skills fair revealed that staff #18 had signed off the Foley catheter training for staff #7 and #10; but had no documented training for (himself/herself) for 2024. An interview was conducted on 06/03/25 at 3:18 p.m. with staff #2, who confirmed that patient #3 and #4 had Foley catheters inserted by NAs. An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 9:00 a.m. with staff #3 regarding NAs and certified nursing assistants (CNA) not being allowed to perform invasive procedures, such as Foley catheters, in the state of West Virginia, as it was outside their scope of practice. Staff #3 stated: “I didn’t know that NAs and CNAs had a scope of practice. They have been inserting catheters here for decades.” An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 8:49 a.m. with staff #4, who stated: “NAs have been inserting Foley catheters for years, at least since I started working here thirty-three (33) years ago. We start the Foley catheter training in orientation, and continue it annually within the skills fairs. An interview was conducted on 06/03/25 at 10:50 a.m. with staff #5 regarding the skills fairs. Staff #5 stated: “I assigned [staff #18] to run the Foley catheter trainings at the skills fair in July of 2024. [He/she] is a NA preceptor, and I went over the training with [him/her] again just prior to the fair. I guess I should have had an RN do it, but there were none available.” Regarding staff #18 having no documented Foley catheter skills fair training in 2024, staff #5 stated: “That was my oversight for not documenting the training.” Staff #5 denied knowledge that NAs and CNAs were not allowed to insert Foley catheters in the state of West Virginia. An interview was conducted on 06/04/25 at 9:00 a.m. with staff #6 who confirmed that when a patient is ordered to have a Foley catheter inserted, the NA assigned to the patient is responsible for inserting the catheter; and that it is up to the NA to inform the staff if they need their observation check off sheet completed or not. Staff #6 then confirmed that the Foley catheter observation check off sheets could not be located for staff #7, #14. #16, #17, #18, or #19. An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 1:54 p.m. with staff #7, who confirmed that they had worked at the hospital for three (3) years as a NA. Staff #7 stated: “I got training on inserting Foley catheters when I was hired. I had to be observed and signed off three (3) times before I could do them alone. I have probably put in about ten (10) to twelve (12) by myself. I will ask for help if I have a patient that cannot hold still or if they are heavy and need to be held back. If we cannot get the catheter in because they are swollen or something, we will get the RN to come and do it. Usually I just do it myself. I feel very comfortable.” An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 2:05 p.m. with staff #8, who confirmed they had worked at the hospital for thirty-eight (38) years as a NA. Staff #8 stated: “Over the years since I worked here, we have been trained and allowed to insert Foley catheters off and on. We have been doing them for years now, since way before Covid. I worked briefly at the nursing home, and we were not allowed to do it over there. We get trained on it every year. We get male and female dummies to practice on, then a RN signs us off. They watch us do a male, a female, and a straight cath. I have watched other techs and signed them off before, but it has been awhile.” An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 2:15 p.m. with staff #9, who stated: “I am a new CNA. I got the Foley catheter training in orientation. I was trained on a male and female dummy. I will be watched and signed off for three (3). The nurse educator or an RN will sign me off, then I can do it alone. I have never inserted one on a real person yet, but I watched another NA do a couple. We got a lot of training in orientation. I am seasoned, or it would have been overwhelming. I have worked at [another facility], and we were not allowed to insert Foley catheters there.” An interview was conducted on 06/02/25 at 2:35 p.m. with staff #10 who stated: “I work in the emergency department (ED) as a NA. I have worked here two (2) years, and six (6) years previously. This is the only place I’ve worked that we are allowed to put in Foley catheters. The training starts with a video, then we practice on dummies. [Staff #5] or another RN will watch us three (3) or four (4) times and we get signed off. After that we are good to go. We get a skills lab every year. I have inserted lots of catheters, probably hundreds, either Foley or straight caths. I have even done several in one (1) day in the eight (8) years I have been here.””

    Rule A0397. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 2 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Jun 10, 2026Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Jun 4, 2025Complaint inspection2 deficiencies cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 1 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 4; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 0 better and 2 worse of 6.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (129 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 67% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 62% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 11.1%, pneumonia 16.3%, COPD 8.3%, stroke 12.2%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 21.1%, pneumonia 16.8%, COPD 20.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 104 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
  • 45% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 51 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • It has an inpatient rehabilitation unit of 6 beds, which CMS lists apart as a rehabilitation facility.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 2 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
  • 94% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Marshall Health Network Inc. owns 100% directly since Oct 1, 2023.
  • 11 owners or officers are people: Edgar Stanton Lanham (corporate director, 0%); Leigh Ann Shepard (corporate director, 0%); Rocky Sturgeon (corporate director, 0%); Claire E Cottrill (corporate director, 0%); Robert Tayengco (corporate director, 0%); Cofer Kayser (corporate director, 0%); Russell Henchey (corporate officer); Michael Sellards (corporate director, 0%); Shawn Edward Bastin (corporate officer); Shawn Edward Bastin (managing employee (on the payroll)); Angela Zimmerman (corporate director, 0%).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 3 changes of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
Marshall Health Network Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%Oct 1, 2023

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Mason County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.