Hearth Record

Upland Hills Health

A critical access hospital in Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53533

800 Compassion Way, Dodgeville, Wisconsin 53533. (608) 930-8000.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Dec 4, 2023: a complaint inspection.

1 deficiency cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

1 deficiency in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Dec 2023. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

1 deficiency by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Dec 4, 2023: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Records System

    The inspectors’ words, 2,183 words

    “RECORDS SYSTEM CFR(s): All orders of doctors of medicine or osteopathy or other practitioners, reports of treatments and medications, nursing notes and documentation of complications, and other pertinent information necessary to monitor the patient’s progress, such as temperature graphics, progress notes describing the patient’s response to treatment; and This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29972 Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to document Emergency Department (ED) nursing assessments, monitoring, and evaluations addressing patient care needs and response to treatments in 10 of 10 ED medical records reviewed (Patient (Pt) #1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10), in a total sample of 10 ED records reviewed. Findings Include: Review of “Pain Care Management Protocols” origination date October 15, 2001 revealed the following: -“All patients are assessed on admission for the presence of pain.” -“Pain is assessed using a tool appropriate to the patient’s age and ability and documented in the medical record...Cognitive adults...are asked to rate their pain using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (Numbers 0-10).” -“Assess the patient’s pain by using a pain assessment tool or scale or by asking key questions and noting the patients’ response to pain.” -“Acute...patients who are receiving pharmacological pain therapy are reassessed within one hour of each intervention.” -“Evaluate your patient’s response to pain management. If the patient is still in pain, reassess...and alter care plan as appropriate.” -“Pain assessment, reassessment and the pain scale used is documented in the patient’s medical record...Documentation should include the administration of medication and any other interventions...” Review of the facility’s Emergency Secondary Assessment guidelines from “Elsevier Clinical Skills” copyright 2023 revealed the following: - “Full Set of Vital Signs...Obtain and trend readings for blood pressure (BP), pulse, respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (Sp02) and temperature at regular intervals.” -“Continue ongoing monitoring and evaluation of the patient. Reevaluation should include the primary survey (complaint), vital signs, level of pain, and any injuries identified.” -“Perform a focused assessment of any injuries or abnormalities found.” -“Evaluate the patient’s evolving condition by monitoring these indicators and intervene as needed...Neurological status, Vital Signs...Assess, treat, and reassess pain...” -“Documentation: Vital signs...Injuries and conditions found in the secondary assessment...mechanism of injury or history of present illness...Interventions performed...Patient’s response to interventions...Education.” Review of policy and procedure #ER 5.2 titled, “Discharge and Instructions” last date reviewed 07/2008 revealed the following: -Vital signs are obtained immediately prior to decision to discharge for patient with high risk clinical presentations (i.e. any patient that presented with abnormal vital signs, trauma, chest pain, and new onset headaches)...Abnormal vitals are defined as: 8 years or older...Heart Rate >100...RR >20...Sp02 <92%. -“Pre-discharge re-evaluations include clinically pertinent assessment of the presenting complaint.” Pt #1: Review of Pt #1’s medical record revealed Pt #1 arrived to the ED on 07/10/2023 at 5:57 AM with an Arrival Complaint revealing, “Reported headache, neck and back pain with chills, vomiting in triage, thinks had fever, started out with ear ache yesterday then developed headache.” Pt #1 was discharged home from the ED on 07/10/2023 at 10:45 AM. Review of Pt #1’s ED Physician G’s Provider Notes dated 07/10/2023 at 7:24 AM revealed, “(Pt #1)...is a 59 year old...presented to the emergency department with a headache that has been present for the past 2 days. No recent falls, accidents, or injuries...Nausea with several episodes of vomiting but (Pt #1) denies abdominal pain or diarrhea...No neurological changes or deficits, no changes in vision or speech...(Pt #1) denies a history of headaches but admits she has been in the ER (emergency room) many times for headaches...The light is bothering her eyes due to the headache...” Review of Pt #1’s Physician G’s Physical Exam dated 07/10/2023 revealed that Pt #1 was “Ill-appearing” and was “uncomfortable but able to answer most questions appropriately.” Per ED G’s physical exam, Pt #1 was “...alert and oriented to person, place, and time. (Pt #1) is not disoriented”; “Patient is cooperative despite discomfort throughout ED visit.” Review of Pt #1’s ED timeline of care on 07/10/2023 revealed the following: -6:19 AM: Given Toradol (treatment for Migraines). -6:20 AM: Given Benadryl (treatment for Migraines). -6:25 AM: Given Reglan (treatment for vomiting). -6:23 AM: Given Dexamethasone (treatment for Migraines). -7:00 AM: Registered Nurse (RN) C documented, “Patient stated no relief, MD (medical doctor) made aware.” -7:11 AM: Given Droperidol (treatment for Migraines). -7:35 AM: RN C documented, “(Pt #1) Stated no change with pain, MD updated.” -8:05 AM: Given Ativan (anti-anxiety medication). -8:13 AM: Patient hyperventilating and rolling in bed, sheets and pillow with call light on floor. MD made aware.” -8:18 AM, Radiologist’s Head CT (computed tomography) findings revealed, “The ventricles are of normal size, shape, and contour for the patient’s age. The brainstem, cerebellum, and cerebral hemispheres have a normal morphology and CT attenuation. There is no evidence of midline displacement. No hemorrhage, mass effect, mass lesions, or edema is evident.” -9:03 AM: RN C documented, “Tried calling mother for patient for ride home.” -9:47 AM: RN C documented, “...patient refusing to get off the floor, rolling around, refusing discharge instructions and to leave the ER” -10:45 AM: Patient discharged to home. Review of Pt #1’s ED Triage/Nursing Notes from 07/10/2023 at 5:57 AM to 10:55 AM revealed there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment/evaluation (i.e. Neurological and Gastrointestinal) addressing Pt #1’s complaints of a headache, nausea/vomiting. Review of the nurses notes revealed there was no documentation of a nursing re-evaluation of Pt #1’s response to treatment (Reglan at 6:25 AM), addressing Pt #1’s nausea and vomiting. Review of Pt #1’s ED Triage/Nursing notes from 07/10/2023 at 5:57 AM to 10:55 AM revealed there was no documentation of nursing staff completing pain assessments and re-assessments using a Numerical Rating Scale as per policy. Review of Pt #1’s ED Triage/Nursing notes from 07/10/2023 at 8:05 AM to 10:55 AM (after giving Ativan) revealed there was no documentation of a nursing re-evaluation of Pt #1’s response to treatment, addressing Pt #1 hyperventilating and rolling around on the floor. Pt #1 was discharged home at 10:45 AM. Review of Pt #1’s Vital signs (VSs) log dated 07/10/2023 at 6:04 AM revealed Pt #1’s temperature was 95.7 (98.6 normal) and the RR was 32 (>20 abnormal as per policy); Pt #1’s RR was re-checked at 7:17 AM and was 30. Review of Pt #1’s VSs log from 7:19 AM through 10:45 AM (3 hours 26 minutes later) revealed there was no documentation of staff rechecking Pt #1’s abnormal temperature and RR, and obtaining a full set of vital signs (BP, pulse, RR, temperature, Sp02) prior to Pt #1’s discharge (10:45 AM) as per policy. Pt #2: Review of Pt #2’s ED medical record revealed Pt #2 arrived in the ED on 07/28/2023 at 11:06 PM with a chief complaint of abdominal pain. Review of Pt #2’s ED medical record revealed there was no documentation of a BP, a pain assessment, and a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Gastrointestinal & Genitourinary) addressing Pt #2’s complaint of abdominal pain. Pt #3: Review of Pt #3’s ED medical record revealed Pt #3 arrived in the ED on 07/17/2023 at 10:22 AM with a chief complaint of right side pain. Per review of Pt #3’s ED record, VSs were taken at 10:24 AM and not again prior to discharge at 1:55 PM (3 hours and 31 minutes later) as per policy. Review of Pt #3’s ED Medical record revealed there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Gastrointestinal & Genitourinary) addressing Pt #3’s complaint of right sided pain. Per Pt #3’s ED medical record there was no documentation of a pain assessment; Pt #3 received an IV injection of Dilaudid (Pain medication) on 07/17/2023 at 11:45 AM, and there was no documentation of a pain re-assessment. Pt #4: Review of Pt #4’s ED medical record revealed Pt #4 arrived in the ED on 09/09/2023 at 5:41 PM with a chief complaint of abdominal pain and vomiting. Review of Pt #4’s ED record revealed there was no documentation of a BP until 6:31 PM; 50 minutes after arrival to the ED. Pt #4 was discharged at 8:19 PM (2 hours and 38 minutes) and no vital signs were taken prior to discharge. Review of Pt #4’s ED medical record revealed there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Gastrointestinal & Genitourinary) addressing Pt #4’s complaint of abdominal pain. Pt #4 received Toradol for pain on 09/09/2023 at 6:17 PM, and there was no documentation of a pain re-assessment. Pt #4 received Zofran for vomiting at 6:26 PM and there was no documentation of a nursing evaluation of Pt #4’s response to treatment. Pt #5: Review of Pt #5’s ED medical record revealed Pt #5 arrived in the ED on 07/10/2023 at 2:16 PM with a chief complaint of chest pain; Pt #5 was discharged at 5:16 PM. Pt #5’s VSs were last checked at 2:20 PM (2 hours and 56 minutes) and were not re-checked prior to discharge. Per medical record review, there was no documentation of staff checking Pt #5’s temperature. Review of Pt #5’s ED medical record revealed there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Cardiac & Respiratory) addressing Pt #5’s complaint of chest pain, and there was no documentation of a pain assessment. Pt #6: Review of Pt #6’s ED medical record revealed Pt #6 arrived in the ED on 11/17/2023 at 12:35 PM with a chief complaint of vaginal bleeding and cramping. Per review, there was no documentation of a focused nursing (i.e. Genitourinary) assessment addressing Pt #6’s complaints. Pt #7: Review of Pt #7’s ED medical record revealed Pt #7 arrived in the ED on 08/25/2023 at 2:06 PM with a chief complaint of vomiting and sweating; Pt #7 was discharged home at 7:54 PM (5 hours and 48 minutes). Per medical record review, there was no documentation of nursing assessments and evaluations (i.e. Gastrointestinal & Genitourinary) addressing Pt #7’s complaints of nausea and vomiting throughout Pt #7’s ED visit; and there was no documentation of a pain assessment. Review of Pt #7’s VSs revealed Sp02 was 88% (normal >92%) and RR was 22 (normal <20) at 2:09 PM; there was no documentation of VSs being rechecked until 7:08 PM; 5 hours later. Pt #8: Review of Pt #8’s ED medical record revealed Pt #8 arrived in the ED on 11/14/2023 at 1:01 PM with a chief complaint of urinary frequency, flank pain, and pregnancy; Pt #8 was discharged at 4:57 PM. Pt #8’s VSs were last checked at 1:05 PM (3 hours and 48 minutes) and were not re-checked prior to discharge as per policy. Per Pt #8’s ED medical record review, there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Gastrointestinal & Genitourinary) addressing Pt #8’s complaints of flank pain, urinary frequency, and pregnancy. Pt #9: Review of Pt #9’s ED medical record revealed Pt #9 arrived in the ED on 10/27/2023 at 11:45 AM with a chief complaint of cough, congestion, and shortness of breath. Per review, there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Cardiac & Respiratory) addressing Pt #9’s complaints of cough and shortness of breath. Pt #10: Review of Pt #10’s ED medical record revealed Pt #10 arrived in the ED on 07/31/2023 at 2:30 PM with a chief complaint of asthma and shortness of breath; Pt #10 was discharged home at 4:44 PM. Review of Pt #10’s VSs checked at 2:33 PM revealed a RR of 24 (normal <20) and a BP of 175/101 (normal 120/80). Pt #10 last VSs were checked at 2:33 PM (2 hours and 1 minute) and VSs were not re-checked prior to discharge. Review of Pt #10’s ED medical record revealed there was no documentation of a focused nursing assessment (i.e. Cardiac & Respiratory) addressing Pt #9’s complaints of shortness of breath. Pt #10 was administered an albuteral nebulizer treatment and a prednisone tablet (steroids to treat shortness of breath) on 07/31/2023 at 3:19 PM; there was no documentation of a nursing evaluation of Pt #10’s response to treatment. Per interview with ED Director D, while reviewing medical records on 12/04/2023 between 2:00 PM and 5:00 PM , Director D confirmed the above findings. Director D stated that ED nurses should be completing a focused assessment on all ED patients based on the chief complaint and conducting a pain assessment and re-assessment using an appropriate pain scale. Director D stated that a nursing assessment/evaluation of symptoms (pain, nausea/vomiting) should be completed within an hour of providing an intervention. Director D stated that staff should check a full set of VSs on admission and within a hour of discharge. Director D stated that if VSs are abnormal, VSs should be repeated at least every hour. Per interview with Vice President (VP) of Nursing Services E on 12/04/2023 at 4:00 PM, when asked for a policy guiding ED Nursing Assessments,VP E stated that the facility does not have a policy specific to ED nursing assessments, but nursing staff should be following the assessment guidelines set forth in “Elsevier Clinical Skills” copyright 2023.”

    Rule C1116. Standard-level. From a complaint.

The one inspection in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Dec 4, 2023Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 4 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 3; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 4.
  • Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (204 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 88% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 85% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, no different than national benchmark.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 12.1%, pneumonia 16.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 20.6%, pneumonia 16.9%, COPD 19.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 113 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 76% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 54 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 55 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified critical access hospital since Jan 1, 2005.
  • Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Voluntary non-profit - Private.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • CMS’s HAC Reduction Program file has no result for it: the program covers general acute care hospitals Medicare pays under its inpatient prospective payment system.
  • 1 deficiency cited in the last three years came from an inspection that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
  • 91% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • 12 owners or officers are people: Jean M Mlsna (corporate director, 0%); Danielle Moyer (corporate director, 0%); Danielle Moyer (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Lisa A Schnedler (corporate director); Lisa A Schnedler (managing employee (on the payroll)); Bradley D Laufenberg (corporate officer); Sandra Fischer (corporate director, 0%); John G Thronson (corporate director); Margo Francisco (corporate director, 0%); David Engels (corporate director, 0%); Theodore Jon Greenheck (corporate officer); James M Massey (corporate director).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

How does it compare nearby?

  • No other hospital CMS lists is in Iowa County.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.