Froedtert Community Hospital
An acute care hospital in New Berlin, Wisconsin 53151
4805 S Moorland Rd, New Berlin, Wisconsin 53151. (262) 796-0001.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- Not rated CMS’s overall rating
- 5of 5 patient survey rating
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years
- 16 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean3
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Mar 31, 2026: a complaint inspection.
4 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 4 of them under EMTALA, the law requiring an emergency department to examine and stabilise anyone who comes to it.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
4 deficiencies in 1 month of the last 36. Last cited Oct 2024. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Oct 27, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Nov | Dec | ||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Oct 23, 2024: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
-
Compliance With 489.24
The inspectors’ words, 217 words
“COMPLIANCE WITH 489.24 CFR(s): 489.20(l) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to comply with §489.24. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29972 Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to appropriately transfer patients receiving care in the Emergency Department (ED) as per EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) in 3 of 20 medical records reviewed (Patient (Pt) #1, 2, 8), in a total sample of 20 medical records reviewed; failed to post EMTALA signage in entrances used by patients seeking treatment in the ED in 3 of 4 hospital entrances observed (ED, Urgent Care, Main Entrance), in a total sample of 4 hospital entrances observed; and failed to have written policies and procedures in place addressing on-call physicians in 1 of 1 EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) policy reviewed (EMTALA), in a total sample of 3 policies reviewed. Findings include: The facility staff failed to appropriately transfer a patient receiving care in the Emergency Department (ED) as per EMTALA. See Tag A-2409. The facility staff failed to post EMTALA signage in entrances used by patients seeking treatment in the ED. See Tag A-2402. The facility staff failed to have written policies and procedures in place addressing on-call physicians. See Tag A-2404.”
-
Posting Of Signs
The inspectors’ words, 339 words
“POSTING OF SIGNS CFR(s): 489.20(q) [The provider agrees,] in the case of a hospital as defined in §489.24(b), to post conspicuously in any emergency department or in a place or places likely to be noticed by all individuals entering the emergency department, as well as those individuals waiting for examination and treatment in areas other than traditional emergency departments (that is, entrance, admitting area, waiting room, treatment area) a sign (in a form specified by the Secretary) specifying the rights of individuals under section 1867 of the Act with respect to examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor; and to post conspicuously (in a form specified by the Secretary) information indicating whether or not the hospital or rural primary care hospital (e.g., critical access hospital) participates in the Medicaid program under a State plan approved under Title XIX. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29972 Based on observation, interview, and record review staff failed to post EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) signage in entrances used by patients seeking treatment in the Emergency Department (ED) in 3 of 4 hospital entrances observed (ED, Urgent Care, Main Entrance), in a total sample of 4 hospital entrances observed. Findings Include: Review of policy and procedure #1584 titled, “ED Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act” last reviewed 06/29/2024 revealed: - “Each department that provides emergency services and any main entrance areas shall post sign in places likely to be noticed by all individuals entering the facility...” Per observations on 10/23/2024 beginning at 10:45 AM, while touring the hospital with Administrator B and Quality Coordinator H, there were no EMTALA signs located in the hospital Main entrance, the Urgent Care entrance, and the ED entrance. Per interview with Administrator B on 10/23/2024 at 11:00 AM, Administrator B confirmed there were no EMTALA signs present at the Main entrance, Urgent Care, and ED entrance; Administrator B stated that patients could potentially come through the Main entrance and Urgent Care entrance when seeking treatment in the ED.”
-
On Call Physicians
The inspectors’ words, 333 words
“ON CALL PHYSICIANS CFR(s): 489.20(r)(2) and 489.24(j)(1-2) §489.20(r)(2) [The hospital (including both the transferring and receiving hospitals), must maintain] a list of physicians who are on call for duty after the initial examination to provide further evaluation and/or treatment necessary to stabilize an individual with an emergency medical condition. §489.24(j)(1) Each hospital must maintain an on-call list of physicians on its medical staff in a manner that best meets the needs of the hospital’s patients who are receiving services required under this section in accordance with the resources available to the hospital, including the availability of on-call physicians. §489.24(j)(2)(i) The hospital must have written policies and procedures in place to respond to situations in which a particular specialty is not available or the on-call physician cannot respond because of circumstances beyond the physician’s control. §489.24(j)(2)(ii) The hospital must have written policies and procedures in place to provide that emergency services are available to meet the needs of patients with emergency medical conditions if it elects to permit on-call physicians to schedule elective surgery during the time that they are on call or to permit on-call physicians to have simultaneous on-call duties. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29972 Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to have written policies and procedures in place addressing on-call physicians in 1 of 1 EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act) policy reviewed (EMTALA), in a total sample of 3 policies reviewed. Findings Include: Review of policy and procedure #1584 titled, “ED Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act” reviewed on 06/29/2024 revealed, “The hospital will maintain a list of on-call physicians on its medical staff.” There was no other information in the policy addressing on-call physicians. Per interview with Quality Coordinator H and Administrator B on 10/23/2024 beginning at 3:30 PM, Quality H confirmed that the facility did not have a policy and procedure addressing on-call physicians. Per Administrator B, she was not familiar with any hospital policies addressing on-call physicians.”
-
Appropriate Transfer
The inspectors’ words, 2,026 words
“APPROPRIATE TRANSFER CFR(s): 489.24(e)(1)-(2) (1) General If an individual at a hospital has an emergency medical condition that has not been stabilized (as defined in paragraph (b) of this section), the hospital may not transfer the individual unless - (i) The transfer is an appropriate transfer (within the meaning of paragraph (e)(2) of this section); and (ii)(A) The individual (or a legally responsible person acting on the individual’s behalf) requests the transfer, after being informed of the hospital’s obligations under this section and of the risk of transfer. The request must be in writing and indicate the reasons for the request as well as indicate that he or she is aware of the risks and benefits of the transfer. (B) A physician (within the meaning of section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) has signed a certification that, based upon the information available at the time of transfer, the medical benefits reasonably expected from the provision of appropriate medical treatment at another medical facility outweigh the increased risks to the individual or, in the case of a woman in labor, to the woman or the unborn child, from being transferred. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based; or (C) If a physician is not physically present in the emergency department at the time an individual is transferred, a qualified medical person (as determined by the hospital in its bylaws or rules and regulations) has signed a certification described in paragraph (e)(1)(ii)(B) of this section after a physician (as defined in section 1861(r)(1) of the Act) in consultation with the qualified medical person, agrees with the certification and subsequently countersigns the certification. The certification must contain a summary of the risks and benefits upon which it is based. (2) A transfer to another medical facility will be appropriate only in those cases in which - (i) The transferring hospital provides medical treatment within its capacity that minimizes the risks to the individual’s health and, in the case of a woman in labor, the health of the unborn child; (ii) The receiving facility (A) Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and (B) Has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provide appropriate medical treatment. (iii) The transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility all medical records (or copies thereof) related to the emergency condition which the individual has presented that are available at the time of the transfer, including available history, records related to the individual’s emergency medical condition, observations of signs or symptoms, preliminary diagnosis, results of diagnostic studies or telephone reports of the studies, treatment provided, results of any tests and the informed written consent or certification (or copy thereof) required under paragraph (e)(1)(ii) of this section, and the name and address of any on-call physician (described in paragraph (g) of this section) who has refused or failed to appear within a reasonable time to provide necessary stabilizing treatment. Other records (e.g., test results not yet available or historical records not readily available from the hospital’s files) must be sent as soon as practicable after transfer; and (iv) The transfer is effected through qualified personnel and transportation equipment, as required, including the use of necessary and medically appropriate life support measures during the transfer. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 29972 Based on record review and interview the facility staff failed to appropriately transfer patients receiving care in the Emergency Department (ED) as per EMTALA (Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act) policy in 3 of 20 medical records reviewed (Patient (Pt) #1, 2, 8), in a total sample of 20 medical records reviewed. Findings Include: Review of policy and procedure #1645 titled, “Nursing Services Management of Patient Transfers...” last reviewed 02/27/2023 revealed, - “An appropriate transfer to a medical facility is a transfer: 1. In which the transferring hospital provides the medical treatment within its capacity which minimizes the risk to the individual’s health...2. In which the receiving facility: a. Has available space and qualified personnel for the treatment of the individual; and has agreed to accept transfer of the individual and to provider appropriate medical treatment. 3. In which the transferring hospital sends to the receiving facility, a. All medical record copies related to the emergency condition...b. Completed Physician’s Certificate of Transfer form...” - “The attending physician is responsible to make the determination of appropriateness of transfer and initiate arrangements with a physician at the receiving hospital.” - “After assessing the patient’s condition and determining the appropriateness and necessity for transfer...the treating physician will discuss transfer risks and benefits with the patient/family to obtain patient/family consent.” - “A physician must sign a certification that based upon information available at the time of transfer, stating that the medical benefits expected from treatment at another facility outweigh the risks of transfer of the individual.” - “After securing an accepting physician and accepting facility for transfer, when assigned bed is available, the transferring registered nurse (RN) and physician must call report to the receiving facility...”- “Ensure transfer of all patient records...” Review of policy and procedure #1584 titled, “ED Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act” last reviewed 06/29/2024 revealed: - “Staff that suspect an inappropriate transfer or EMTALA violation has occurred must promptly (same day) report the incident to the Manager/Director/Administrative Supervisor.” - “Staff will complete an Incident Report.” Review of Pt #1’s Emergency Department (ED) Patient Care Timeline, revealed that Pt #1 arrived in the ED on 09/08/2024 at 4:59 PM with the arrival complaint of “Hallucinations.” Pt #1 left the ED in police custody on 09/08/2024 at 9:43 PM. Review of RN I’s “ED Triage Note” dated 09/08/2024 at 5:55 PM revealed, “Pt presents to ER (emergency room) with mother reporting hearing voices that are telling him to kill himself, hurt his mom and ‘do other awful things.’ Pt states he feels that someone is trying to take over his brain and put it into theirs. He states that he has a plan of how to hurt himself, specifically putting a toaster into a bath...” Review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D’s ED “Patient Safety Observation” dated 09/08/2024 at 6:00 PM, revealed that Pt #1 was on “Continuous Observation (1:1).” Review of RN C’s “ED Notes” dated 09/08/2024 at 9:15 PM revealed, “(Pt #1) pacing and not following directions. OCPD (Oak Creek Police Department) called...” Review of RN C’s “ED Notes” dated 09/08/2024 at 9:32 PM revealed, “OCPD handcuffed (Pt #1) and walked out from the department without notified [sic] MD (medical doctor) and RN. Writer walked out in the parking lot and spoke to OCPD and officer came in and stated, ’(Pt #1) is chaptered (Chapter 51--involuntary psychiatric hospital admission) and going to (psychiatric hospital).’ After asking (police officer) provided report. MD notified.” Review of MD G’s “ED Provider Notes” signed on 09/09/2024 at 1:28 AM revealed, “Spoke with mom she doesn’t feel it is safe for patient to go home with them...Spoke with patient he is denying SI (suicidal ideations), HI (homicidal ideations). (Pt #1) admits to auditory hallucinations...Notified police to come see him...Pt is no [sic] voluntary...medically cleared...Police is at bedside evaluated (Pt #1)...Police chaptered patient, and removed him from ER. (Pt #1) was taken to a mental health facility. Police didn’t tell ER staff where patient was going. I didn’t have a chance to do a doc to doc (doctor to doctor conversation with receiving hospital).” Review of nursing progress notes from the receiving hospital (hospital #2) dated 09/08/2024 at 10:31 PM revealed, “It appears that the patient was transferred from (transferring hospital) without a doc to doc or nurse to nurse. Writer contacted (transferring hospital) and spoke to (RN J). (RN J) reports the patient was conveyed to the ED voluntarily with his mother...but then the patient began to request to leave and was pacing so the ED staff contacted police...police arrived and apparently handcuffed the patient and began walking (Pt #1) outside the hospital. The nurse went outside to ask the police where they were taking the patient and the police reported the patient is chaptered and they are coming to (receiving hospital) which is why the doc to doc and nurse to nurse was not completed...” Per interview with CNA D on 10/23/2024 beginning at 3:15 PM, CNA D stated that CNA D was the Sitter in the room with Pt #1 on 09/08/2024 while Pt #1 was in the ED (transferring hospital). CNA D stated that she observed the Police Officer enter Pt #1’s room and tell him to get dressed and that Pt #1 “will have to come with us.” CNA D stated that she observed the Police Officer handcuff Pt #1 and escort him out of the ED. CNA D stated that the ED physician and the nurse assigned to Pt #1 were not aware the Police Officer was taking the patient out of the ED. CNA D stated that she found RN C and informed RN C that the Police Officer left the ED with Pt #1. Per interview with RN C on 10/23/2024 beginning at 4:50 PM, RN C stated that he was informed by staff that the Police Officer was leaving with Pt #1, so RN C ran outside to confront the Police Officer. RN C stated that the Police Officer said he arrested Pt #1 and was taking Pt #1 to a (psychiatric hospital). RN C stated that he and the ED physician informed the Police Officer that he could not take the patient yet, but the officer to did not listen. RN C stated that the Police Officer filled out the Chapter 51 paper work and then left with Pt #1. RN C stated that Pt #1 was medically cleared at the time, but there had not been a Mental Health Team evaluation, no doc to doc, and no RN to RN discussion with the receiving hospital. RN C stated that he did not call the receiving hospital after the Police left with Pt #1. Per interview with Hospital Administrator B while reviewing Pt #1’s ED medical record on 10/23/2024 beginning at 1:05 PM, Administrator B stated that there was no Physician’s Certificate of Transfer form completed as per policy and the ED physician and RN assigned to Pt #1’s care on 09/08/2024 (transferring hospital) did not contact the receiving hospital to discuss transfer before or after the Police Officer removed Pt #1 from the ED. Administrator B confirmed that staff did not complete an Incident Report after the incident as per policy. Administrator B stated that the root cause of this incident was that the Police Officer left with Pt #1 without notifying staff and ensuring the transfer process had been completed as per policy. Administrator B stated that the hospital Director of Security will be meeting with the Police Department to discuss the incident and develop an action plan, but this has not happened yet. Administrator B was unable to provide evidence of an action plan developed and implemented to address the actions of the Police Department and the staff’s response to this incident. Pt #2: Review of Pt #2 ED medical record revealed Pt #2 was a 16 year old who arrived in the ED on 09/26/2024 at 6:47 AM with a chief complaint of Suicidal Thoughts; Pt #2 was transferred to psychiatric hospital on 09/27/2024 at 12:49 AM. Per interview with Administrator B on 10/23/2024 beginning at 2:10 PM, while reviewing Pt #2’s ED medical records (09/26 and 09/27), Administrator B stated that she was unable to find evidence of staff completing the Physician’s Certificate of Transfer form as per policy. Pt #8: Review of Pt #8 ED medical record revealed Pt #8 was a 17 year old who arrived in the ED on 05/07/2024 at 8:46 PM with complaints of Suicidal Thoughts; Pt #8 was transferred to psychiatric hospital on 05/08/2024 at 6:41 AM. Per interview with Administrator B on 10/23/2024 beginning at 2:55 PM, while reviewing Pt #8’s ED medical records (05/07 and 05/08), Administrator B stated that she was unable to find evidence of staff completing the Physician’s Certificate of Transfer form as per policy.”
All 4 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 17, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jun 2, 2025 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Oct 23, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 4 deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS gives no overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.: “There are too few measures or measure groups reported to calculate a star rating or measure group score.”
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 2; readmission, 1 better and 0 worse of 2.
- Patients rate it 5 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (160 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 84% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 86% would definitely recommend it.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): pneumonia 11.9%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart failure 19.9%, pneumonia 16.4%, COPD 20.1%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 125 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 59% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.71 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | Not rated |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 5 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Dec 22, 2020.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by DNV, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- No For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. deficiency on record in the last three years.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 4 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
- 85% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Froedtert Thedacare Health, Inc. owns 100% directly since Sep 24, 2019.
- 9 owners or officers are people: Matthew R Partridge (corporate officer); Kara Waggoner (corporate director); Bryce Gartland (corporate director); Michael Degere (corporate director); Caryn Beth Esten (corporate director); Allen Ericson (corporate director); Allen Ericson (managing employee (on the payroll)); Allen Ericson (runs it (operational or managerial control)); Amanda Gonring (corporate director).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records no change of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Jul 15, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Froedtert Thedacare Health, Inc. | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Sep 24, 2019 |
How does it compare nearby?
- Of the 8 hospitals CMS lists in Waukesha County, 4 have an overall star rating from CMS: 2 rated 5 of 5, 2 rated 4 of 5.
- CMS gives this hospital no overall star rating to compare.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Place | Overall star rating |
|---|---|
| Waukesha Memorial Hospital | 4 |
| Oconomowoc Memorial Hospital | 5 |
| Community Memorial Hospital | 4 |
| Aurora Medical Center - Summit | 5 |
| Ascension Wisconsin Hosp Menomonee Falls Campus | Not given |
| Rogers Memorial Hospital | Not given |
| Waukesha County Mental Health Ctr | Not given |
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q2_2026.csv).
Released Jul 15, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Oct 27, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.