Hearth Record

Lewisgale Hospital Montgomery

An acute care hospital in Blacksburg, Virginia 24060

3700 South Main Street, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060. (540) 951-1111.

CMS’s own record, on Care Compare

Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.

The short answer

Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.

The last 24 months 5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. Every month

Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.

What these words mean3
Star ratings
CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
Inspection (survey)
A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
Deficiency, citation, violation
What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.

What did inspectors find?

The last inspection on record was on Apr 30, 2026: a complaint inspection.

5 deficiencies cited in the last three years.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

When those deficiencies happened

5 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Apr 2026. Most serious: Standard-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.

5 deficiencies by month over the last 3 years. Each cell is one month.
JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2023 Dec
2024 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2025 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
2026 JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNov

Hover or focus a month to read it.

No visit on record Visited, nothing cited A stronger orange is more serious, on its source’s own levels, read onto four bands: from the least serious it publishes to the most
Source:

Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.

Each deficiency, as cited

Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.

Source:

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Apr 30, 2026: complaint inspection4 deficiencies
  • Patient Rights: Restraint Or Seclusion

    The inspectors’ words, 287 words

    “PATIENT RIGHTS: RESTRAINT OR SECLUSION CFR(s): 482.13(e)(4)(i) The use of restraint or seclusion must be-- (i) in accordance with a written modification to the patient’s plan of care. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interviews, medical record review and facility document review, the facility failed to modify the patient’s plan of care for three (3) of three (3) sampled medical records reviewed. The findings include: A review of the facility’s policy “Patient Restraint/Seclusion Policy”, effective 6/2024, indicated in part: “...1. Care of the Patient/Plan of Care14. a. The plan of care will clearly reflect a loop of assessment, intervention, and evaluation for restraint, seclusion and medications...1. Documentation requirements17. The medical record contains documentation of...n. Modifications of the plan of care...”. On April 28, 2026, the surveyors reviewed medical records of Patient’s #7, #8, and #9. Patient #7’s record indicated that they were placed in restraints on April 10, 2026, at 5:13 AM. The patient’s plan of care was not modified to reflect that the patient was placed in restraints. Patient #8’s record indicated that they were placed in restraints on April 24, 2026, at 11:59 AM. The patient’s plan of care was not modified to reflect that the patient was placed in restraints. Patient #9’s record indicated that they were placed in restraints on April 18, 2026, at 5:26 PM. The patient’s plan of care was not modified to reflect that the patient was placed in restraints. An interview was conducted with Staff Member #2 on April 28, 2026. Staff Member #2 stated that the facility’s Electronic Medical Record (EMR) was updated in March 2026 and there was no option for the nurse to add restraints to the patient’s Plan of Care.”

    Rule A0166. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Supervision Of Contract Staff

    The inspectors’ words, 802 words

    “SUPERVISION OF CONTRACT STAFF CFR(s): 482.23(b)(6) All licensed nurses who provide services in the hospital must adhere to the policies and procedures of the hospital. The director of nursing service must provide for the adequate supervision and evaluation of all nursing personnel which occur within the responsibility of the nursing service, regardless of the mechanism through which those personnel are providing services (that is, hospital employee, contract, lease, other agreement, or volunteer). This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interviews, document review, and review of medical records, it was determined that the hospital failed to ensure nursing staff on Medical Surgery unit assessed and monitored an outpatient post-operative patient in their care according to the established policies and procedures for patients in Ambulatory Surgery Center (ASC) settings. The findings include: Policy and Procedures A review of the facility’s policy “Post-Operative Care”, last revised 12/2025, indicated in part: “...Admission of patient from PACU a. Assess 1. Vital signs (Temperature, BP, P, R, SpO2) will be assessed on return, 15 minutes after return for 1 hour, every 30 minutes for 1 hour, every hour for 4 hours and then every 4 hours if stable for 24 hours. 2. Level of consciousness. 3. Skin Color, Temperature, turgor. 4. Lung and bowel sounds...8. Pain status...10. Specific assessments as may relate to type of surgery...”. A review of the facility’s policy “ACS Assessment/Reassessment”, last revised 3/2021, indicated in part: “...III. Procedure Admission to ACS 1. Surgical/Endoscopy/Invasive procedures patients will be assessed upon arrival to the unit according to ASPAN Standards...Reassessment 1. Reassessment will occur by an RN upon return to the unit following procedure and be repeated at 15 minutes following procedure and for any changes in assessment findings...”. A review of the facility’s policy “Pain Assessment and Management”, last revised 4/2024, indicated in part: “...Expectations of the Nurse in the Assessment & Management of Pain. The nurse is expected to...Document assessments and reassessments accurately and completely, using a numeric value based on the appropriate scale for the patient as well as narrative documentation whenever needed to document a complete pain assessment...”. Medical Record Patient #5 came to this facility’s ASC on March 19, 2026 for a planned surgical intervention, and after successful surgery received care in the facility’s PACU (Post Anesthesia Care Unit). Patient #5 was transferred to the hospital’s Medical Surgery floor on March 19, 2026, at 7:26 PM for recovery and observation with a plan to discharge to home. Review of Patient #5’s medical record revealed that pain assessment and initial nursing assessment were first documented on this unit at 9:45 PM and the first set of partial vital signs (pulse and pulse oximetry) at 10:21 PM. Interviews On April 29, 2026, at 9:20 AM, Staff Member #9 revealed in an interview that the standard care for post operative patients when they arrive to the Medical Surgery unit was for the nursing staff to take report from the PACU Registered Nurse, obtain vital signs and assess the patient. On April 29, 2026, at 12:45 PM, Staff Member #13 explained in an interview that after surgery, outpatients recover in the PACU first and then are transferred to ASC until they are determined ready for discharge. The standard of care when a patient arrived at ASC was to monitor their vital signs every 15 minutes for one hour, every 30 minutes for the next hour and then hourly afterwards until the patient was stable for discharge. Staff Member #13 stated that the assigned nurse would complete a head-to-toe assessment and assess the patient’s pain level and give medications as needed. On April 29, 2026, at 1:00 PM, Staff Member #1 revealed in the interview that the nurses on the Medical Surgery unit are expected to follow the above noted policies for monitoring of post-surgical patients from ASC while recovering in their unit. Staff Member #1 stated that there were no separate policies for inpatient or outpatient post-surgical care. Medical Surgical nurses should be completing the vital signs, pain assessments and initial assessments as ASC. On April 29, 2026, at 1:30 PM, Staff Member #8 explained in an interview that they were in the room when Patient #5 arrived at the Medical Surgical unit and received the report from the PACU nurse and assessed the patient’s pain. Staff Member #8 believed that they documented the pain assessment in the medical record. Staff Member #8 reported that post-operative patients from ASC should have vital signs monitored every 15 minutes for an hour and their pain assessed. SM8 stated that this was the first “outpatient” post-operative patient that they cared for on the Medical Surgical floor since they started working there and did not recall receiving any specific training regarding assessment and care for an outpatient post-operative patients vs to an inpatient post-operative patients. 2”

    Rule A0398. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Form And Retention Of Records

    The inspectors’ words, 230 words

    “FORM AND RETENTION OF RECORDS CFR(s): 482.24(b) The hospital must maintain a medical record for each inpatient and outpatient. Medical records must be accurately written, promptly completed, properly filed and retained, and accessible. The hospital must use a system of author identification and record maintenance that ensures the integrity of the authentication and protects the security of all record entries. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on medical record documentation review the facility failed to maintain an accurately written medical record for one (1) of 12 patient records reviewed.(Patient #5) The findings include: On April 28, 2026, the surveyor reviewed Patient #5’s medical record. Patient #5’s History and Physical documented by the Hospitalist on March 19, 2026, at 9:57 PM, indicated “...After procedure pt was moved to the 4th floor for further observation and to receive postop pain medication. However, due to delay in pain medication administration, patient’s pain became uncontrolled requiring IV pain medication. Due to uncontrollable pain hospitalist Service asked to admit for observation to assist with pain control. After receiving IV fentanyl pt states (their) pain somewhat improved however on evaluation (their) pain was starting to come back...”. Review of Patient #5’s medication administration record report revealed that the Hospitalist ordered IV (intravenous) fentanyl for breakthrough pain on March 19, 2026, at 10:57 PM, however, this medication was never administered to Patient #5.”

    Rule A0438. Standard-level. From a complaint.

  • Content Of Record: Orders,Notes,Reports

    The inspectors’ words, 304 words

    “CONTENT OF RECORD: ORDERS,NOTES,REPORTS CFR(s): 482.24(c)(4)(vi) [All records must document the following, as appropriate:] All practitioner’s orders, nursing notes, reports of treatment, medication records, radiology and laboratory reports, and vital signs and other information necessary to monitor the patient’s condition. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interviews, medical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to document nursing notes for one (1) of 13 medical records reviewed. (Patient #5) The findings include: A review of the facility’s policy “Pain Assessment and Management”, last revised 4/2024, indicated in part: “...Expectations of the Nurse in the Assessment & Management of Pain. The nurse is expected to...Document assessments and reassessments accurately and completely, using a numeric value based on the appropriate scale for the patient as well as narrative documentation whenever needed to document a complete pain assessment...”. Patient #5’s medical record was reviewed on April 28, 2026, and indicated that Patient #5 arrived at the facility’s Ambulatory Surgery Center for outpatient surgery. After recovery in the facility’s PACU, Patient #5 was transferred as an outpatient to the facility’s Medical Surgery floor to recover prior to discharge. The medical record indicated that Patient #5 arrived at the Medical Surgery floor at 7:26 PM on March 19, 2026. There was no nursing documentation that Staff Member #8 (the assigned nurse) completed an assessment on Patient #5 when they arrived at the floor. On April 29, 2026, at 1:30 PM, an interview was conducted with Staff Member #8. Staff Member #8 stated that they were present in the room with Patient #5 when Patient #5 arrived from PACU. Staff Member #8 stated that they took report from the PACU nurse and assessed the patient’s pain. Staff Member #8 stated that they thought they documented the pain assessment in the patient’s chart.”

    Rule A0467. Standard-level. From a complaint.

Aug 6, 2024: complaint inspection1 deficiency
  • Medical Record Services

    The inspectors’ words, 252 words

    “MEDICAL RECORD SERVICES CFR(s): 482.24(c)(1) All patient medical record entries must be legible, complete, dated, timed, and authenticated in written or electronic form by the person responsible for providing or evaluating the service provided, consistent with hospital policies and procedures. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 46466 Based on interviews, facility document and medical record reviews, the facility failed to interpret the results of performed test and/or procedure per facility policy. The findings include: On August 5, 2024 a review of Patient #1’s medical record was conducted with Staff Member #2. The facility received an order for Patient #1 dated October 25, 2023 for an electrocardiogram (EKG), and other tests. The EKG was performed on October 31, 2023 at 10:16 AM and the result was electronically signed by a physician on November 7, 2023 at 7:42 AM. The facility received an order for Patient #1 with a handwritten date of July 3, 2024 for another EKG. The EKG was performed on July 8, 2024 at 9:32 AM and the result was electronically signed by a physician on July 13, 2024 at 9:44 PM. A review of the facility’s policy “Cardiology Procedure Timeliness Policy”, effective 3/2022, revealed in part “...Routine Tests...Any routine diagnostic test ordered. This includes but is not limited to...EKGs...Goal: Interpretation and dictation of routine test results will occur within 48 hours of test completion...”. The findings were discussed with Staff Members #1, #2, #7, #8 and #9 at the exit conference on August 6, 2024 at 9:15 AM.”

    Rule A0450. Standard-level. From a complaint.

All 4 inspections in the last three years
Inspections on record
DateVisitWhat the record says
Apr 30, 2026Complaint inspection4 deficiencies cited
Jul 1, 2025Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Nov 21, 2024Complaint inspectionNo deficiencies cited
Aug 6, 2024Complaint inspection1 deficiency cited

How do patients fare?

  • CMS’s overall for it is 3 of 5.
  • Of the measures behind its , CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; safety of care, 0 better and 0 worse of 7; readmission, 1 better and 2 worse of 8.
  • Patients rate it 4 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (562 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 74% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 75% would definitely recommend it.
  • Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
  • CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
  • Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 11.7%, heart failure 12.4%, pneumonia 14%, COPD 9.3%, stroke 12.5%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 13.3%, heart failure 21.3%, pneumonia 17.6%, COPD 19.8%, hip or knee replacement 5.8%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
  • After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
  • Emergency department patients spent a median of 124 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 0% left before being seen.
  • 63% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
  • Medicare’s spending per patient here is 0.93 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
Ratings and measures, as published
MeasureRating
Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 53 of 5
Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 54 of 5

Is it certified, and in good standing?

  • Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Aug 29, 1971.
  • Ownership: proprietary.
  • It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
  • No deficiency on record in the last three years.
  • Proprietary.
Source:

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

Has it been penalized?

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
  • Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
  • 5 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
Source:

CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.

What do patients say about their care?

  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 5 of 5.
  • 51% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
Source:

CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Who owns it?

  • Hti Hospital Holdings Inc. owns 100% directly since May 31, 2007.
  • 34 owners or officers are people: Michael Mcalevey (corporate officer); Jaime L Derensis (corporate officer); John M Franck (corporate director); Douglas L Downey (corporate officer); Eric D Smith (managing employee (under contract)); Henry Todd Maxwell (corporate officer); Christopher F Wyatt (corporate director); John I Starling (corporate officer); Shirley E Scharf-Cheatham (corporate director); John M Hackett (corporate officer); William Wilburn Lunn (corporate officer); Samuel N Hazen (corporate director); Rachael Stanton (corporate officer); Rachael Stanton (managing employee (on the payroll)); Ronald Lee Grubbs (corporate director); Monica Cintado (corporate officer); Jon Foster (corporate officer); Michael D Ehrat (corporate officer); Michael D Ehrat (managing employee (on the payroll)); Dustin J Fosness (corporate officer); Seth A Killingbeck (corporate officer); Timothy Scott Noonan (corporate officer); Natalie H Cline (corporate officer); Michael T Bray (corporate director); Matthew R Favicchio (corporate officer); Peter J Rossell (corporate officer); Timothy M Mcmanus (corporate officer); Michael A Marks (corporate officer); Edwin W Robinson (corporate officer); Brad Ej Spicer (corporate officer); Kevin A Ball (corporate officer); Jeffery Mcinturff (corporate officer); Deborah H Mullin (corporate director); Russell Young (corporate officer).
  • CMS’s Provider of Services file records 1 change of ownership.
  • No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
  • No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
Source:

CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.

CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.

Organisations CMS lists
OrganisationRoleShareSince
HCA Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 26, 2011
HCA Healthcare Inc.Owns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 25, 2011
Healthtrust Inc. - the Hospital CompanyOwns 5% or more through other companies100%Jan 25, 2011
Hti Hospital Holdings Inc.Owns 5% or more directly100%May 31, 2007
Frisco Holding IIOwns 5% or more through other companies16.3%Feb 6, 2026
Hercules Holding IIOwns 5% or more through other companies14.4%Sep 23, 2016

How does it compare nearby?

  • Of the 2 hospitals CMS lists in Montgomery County, 2 have an overall star rating from CMS: 1 rated 4 of 5, 1 rated 3 of 5.
  • CMS rates this one 3 of 5.
Source:

CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.

1 compared
PlaceOverall star rating
Carilion New River Valley Medical Center4

What the record doesn’t say

  • CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
  • Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
  • Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
  • QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
  • CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
  • In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.

Sources

If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.

Source:

This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.

From the hospital

The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.

Replies

None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.

Paid listing

None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.

How to read a record

Four things every record does, shown on an example record made up for this guide.

An example record, made up for this guide

An example nursing home

Made up for this guide: no real place is shown

Not fully inspected in over two years (CMS flag)

11 health citations at the latest inspection cycle

The state average is 14.3.

Source:

CMS, State and US Averages and Health Deficiencies. Released Oct 28, 2026. Updated monthly.

From the homeNone yet. Replies and paid listings aren’t open, and when they open they will sit here, below the record.

1 of 4

Every fact names its source.

Who published it, when, and how often it changes sit beside each fact, with a link to the agency’s own file.

Sign in

A free account keeps your watch list, shortlists, comparisons and saved searches on every device, and can email you when something you watch changes. Browsing never needs one.