Johnston Memorial Hospital
An acute care hospital in Abingdon, Virginia 24211
16000 Johnston Memorial Drive, Abingdon, Virginia 24211. (276) 258-1000.
Watch and the shortlist are kept with a free account, on every device. Your watch list. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare.
The short answer
Record last released by CMS on Oct 20, 2026.
- 3of 5 CMS’s overall rating
- 3of 5 patient survey rating
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years (needs attention)
- 116 beds
Each figure’s source sits beside it, in its section below.
What these words mean4
- Star ratings
- CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System.
- Inspection (survey)
- A visit by state inspectors, often unannounced, who check a place against the rules it must meet. For nursing homes and other places Medicare pays, CMS calls these visits surveys: a standard survey of a nursing home comes at least every 15 months, and a complaint survey whenever a complaint calls for one. Source: CMS; 42 CFR 488.308.
- Deficiency, citation, violation
- What inspectors write up when a place didn’t meet a rule: the rule, what they saw, and when. CMS calls it a deficiency; states may say citation or violation. It is the inspectors’ finding, not a court’s, and the place is usually asked for a plan to correct it. Source: CMS, statement of deficiencies (Form CMS-2567); each state’s licensing agency.
- Condition-level deficiency
- For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual.
What did inspectors find?
The last inspection on record was on Aug 11, 2026: a complaint inspection.
3 deficiencies cited in the last three years, 1 of them at condition level, the most serious.
1 deficiency at condition level, the more serious of CMS’s two levels
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
When those deficiencies happened
3 deficiencies in 2 months of the last 36. Last cited Aug 2026. Most serious: Condition-level. The last 3 years, to Nov 5, 2026.
| Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Dec | |||||||||||
| 2024 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2025 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov | Dec |
| 2026 | Jan | Feb | Mar | Apr | May | Jun | Jul | Aug | Sep | Oct | Nov |
Hover or focus a month to read it.
Hearth Record drew this from the dates and levels in the source’s own records.
Each deficiency, as cited
Rule titles as CMS’s inspectors cite them, set in sentence case.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Aug 11, 2026: complaint inspection1 deficiency
-
Patient Rights: Notice Of Rights
The inspectors’ words, 402 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: NOTICE OF RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13(a)(1) A hospital must inform each patient, or when appropriate, the patient’s representative (as allowed under State law), of the patient’s rights, in advance of furnishing or discontinuing patient care whenever possible. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 19883 Based on medical record review, facility document review, and staff interview, and during the course of a complaint investigation, it was determined that the facility staff failed to notify a patient’s guardian of the application of a restraint for one (1) of nineteen (19) patients included in the survey sample, (Patient #5). The findings include: Review of Patient #5’s medical record revealed that Patient #5, who is “developmentally delayed” and resides in a group home, presented to this hospital’s ED via EMS with complaints of altered mental status. While in the ED, Patient #5 was awake and alert but would not follow commands. Patient #5 was “acting out of impulse” attempting to get out of bed. Patient #5 was not “redirectable.” The ED provider ordered 2-point soft wrist restraints, so Patient #5 could receive care. Review of Patient #5’s demographic sheet indicated that two of Patient #5’s family members were listed as emergency contacts. The family members’ telephone numbers were also listed on the demographic sheet. Review of Patient #5’s “client face sheet” from their group home indicated that one of the same family members whose telephone number was on the hospital’s demographic sheet for Patient #5, was also listed as Patient #5’s “guardian” on the client face sheet from the group home. Review of the restraint monitoring sheet in Patient #5’s medical record showed no evidence that either of Patient #5’s family members, specifically Patient #5’s guardian, were notified or attempts were made to notify them about the use of restraints. Review of this hospital’s policy titled, “Restraint and Seclusion-(name of health entity)” with a revision date of 12/6/24 found in part: “...D. Notification: ...team member attempts to notify the family promptly of the restraint and/or seclusion episode.” And: “...document notification of family or any listed above and any attempts to do so in the patient’s medical record.” Staff Member #1 explained during an interview on 8/11/26 that there should have been documentation in Patient #5’s medical record indicating that either Patient #5’s guardian was notified, or that an attempt at notification to the guardian about Patient #5 been placed in restraints was made.”
Apr 11, 2024: complaint inspection2 deficiencies
-
Patient Rights
The inspectors’ words, 111 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS CFR(s): 482.13 A hospital must protect and promote each patient’s rights. This Condition is not met as evidenced by: 33906 Based on interviews, observations, document review and investigation of a complaint, it was determined the hospital failed to meet the Condition of Participation 482.13 Patient Rights. The hospital failed to protect patients from abuse while conducting their investigation of allegations of abuse or neglect or harassment. The hospital failed to assure that any incidents of abuse, neglect or harassment are reported, analyzed, acted on and the appropriate corrective, remedial or disciplinary action occurs, in accordance with applicable local, State, or Federal law. Please refer to A-0145 for further information.”
-
Patient Rights: Free From Abuse/Harassment
The inspectors’ words, 921 words
“PATIENT RIGHTS: FREE FROM ABUSE/HARASSMENT CFR(s): 482.13(c)(3) The patient has the right to be free from all forms of abuse or harassment. This Standard is not met as evidenced by: 33906 Based on interview, clinical record review, document review and the investigation of a complaint, the hospital failed to a) protect patients from abuse during internal investigation of an allegation of abuse, and b) failed to assure that incidents of abuse, were immediately reported, analyzed, acted on and the appropriate corrective actions occurred, in accordance with hospital policy. The findings include: Review of hospital policy “Adult Abuse and Neglect: Protection and Reporting”, PC-600-396-BH , dated October 12/2023 indicated under the heading “Procedure” that allegation, observation or suspected patient abuse by a hospital staff member should be always immediately reported to a facility Supervisor and to the attending physician or designee. The Supervisor will notify the Risk Manager. The staff accused of abuse will immediately be suspended pending the outcome of the abuse allegation. An internal investigation will occur with notification of corrective action taken (if any) to appropriate state agencies. Further, the hospital policy section titled “Reporting” indicated that anyone having reason to suspect elderly or incapacitated adult abuse has occurred must report concerns immediately to the Department of Social Services or contact the Adult Protective Services Hotline number. This policy is applicable at all times and doesn’t contain exception for weekend or night shift. Review of hospital documents, interviews and the clinical record of Patient #3 indicated the following: On November 18, 2023, and November 19, 2023, during the 7 AM- 7 PM shift, Staff #12 was the senior in-house decision-maker for the hospital. Review of the hospital’s event documentation revealed that on November 18, 2023, at 3:00 PM the nursing instructor notified Staff #12 that a student nurse observed and reported to them physical and verbal abuse of Patient #3 by Staff #10 on two separate occasions during the same shift. Staff #10 was observed verbally abusing Patient #3 and to hold/push them into the bed while forcefully applying restraints. Staff #10 verbally threatened Patient #3 and jerked their thumb up while preparing to administer i.v. medication. The alleged abuse was witnessed by the nursing student and Staff #13. Staff #12 informed Staff #11, nursing administration of the reported allegation of abuse in a phone conversation on November 18, 2023 around 3:00 PM and Staff #11 requested more information before making any decisions related to the allegation of abuse. Review of Patient #3’s medical record failed to contain evidence that the attending physician or family were notified of this event at any point. The hospital documentation related to this event evidenced that on November 19, 2023 at 4:26 PM Staff #12 emailed Staff #11 and Staff #8, members of nursing administration a notification of the alleged abuse of Patient #3 by Staff #10. The hospital documentation revealed that on November 21, 2023 at 7:19 PM, Staff #8 notified Staff #4 (Risk Manager) via email of the patient abuse allegation. The documentation revealed that Staff #4 informed (via email) Staff #1 and Staff #5 about the allegation of patient abuse allegation on November 21, 2023 at 7:39 PM. Review of the “as worked” staffing schedules revealed Staff #10 was allowed to continue to work unrestricted for the remainder of shift on November 18, 2023, caring for 5 patients, including Patient #3, and also a 12 hour shift (7 AM-7 PM) on November 19, 2023, caring for 7 patients, including Patient #3. Staff #10 was not scheduled to work on November 20 and 21, 2023. Staff #10 was suspended on November 22, 2023 at 6:34 AM, pending the outcome of the investigation. Review of hospital documentation related to the investigation of this event revealed that Staff #10 was terminated on December 1, 2023 for violation of the above noted hospital policy PC-600-396-BH and the hospital notified by email the Virginia Department of Health Professions (VDHP) of the patient abuse on December 11, 2023. Review of personnel files for Staff #11 and Staff #12 indicated that Staff #12 worked part-time and Staff #11 was in their position for less than a year. Both staff received training related to Patient Rights and Abuse and Neglect prior to the incident and were expected to follow the hospital policy and State law (Code of Virginia Section 63.2-1606). Review of the job description for “Nursing House Supervisor” on 4/10/23 evidenced in part, “On nights and weekends this position functions as the senior in-house decision-maker for the hospital.” In interviews on April 9, 2024 Staff #1, Staff #4 and Staff #5 indicated that they failed to follow the hospital “Adult Abuse and Neglect: Protection and Reporting” policy, and after receiving notification of an allegation of patient abuse, Staff #12 failing to immediately contact the Risk Manager and notify the attending physician. The hospital also failed to immediately suspended Staff #10 pending an investigation of the allegation of abuse. The hospital staff interviewed were not aware of their obligation to immediately report the patient abuse to other state agencies in addition to VDHP as outlined in the same hospital policy. At the time of survey exit, on April 11, 2024, the hospital hasn’t reported the abuse to the Department of Social Services. In addition, the hospital documentation evidenced that the attending physician was not notified as required by the above noted hospital policy. The findings above indicate a systemic failure to adhere to hospital policy related to the mandated reporting of abuse and protection of patients from abuse/harm.”
All 7 inspections in the last three years
| Date | Visit | What the record says |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2026 | Complaint inspection | 1 deficiency cited |
| Jun 3, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Jan 14, 2026 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Dec 17, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Aug 6, 2024 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
| Apr 11, 2024 | Complaint inspection | 2 deficiencies cited |
| Dec 19, 2023 | Complaint inspection | No deficiencies cited |
How do patients fare?
- CMS’s overall CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System. for it is 3 of 5.
- Of the measures behind its CMS rates some kinds of place from 1 to 5 stars, more stars meaning better on CMS’s own measures for that kind: for a nursing home, its health inspections, staffing and quality measures. A rating is CMS’s summary of those measures; it doesn’t promise good care. Source: CMS, Care Compare and the Five-Star Quality Rating System., CMS counts against the national value: mortality, 0 better and 1 worse of 7; safety of care, 1 better and 0 worse of 6; readmission, 1 better and 1 worse of 9.
- Patients rate it 3 of 5 in CMS’s patient survey (792 surveys completed, Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): 68% rated it 9 or 10 out of 10, and 66% would definitely recommend it.
- Infections, compared by CMS with the national benchmark (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025): central line bloodstream infections (CLABSI), no different than national benchmark; catheter urinary tract infections (CAUTI), no different than national benchmark; surgical site infections after colon surgery, no different than national benchmark; MRSA bloodstream infections, no different than national benchmark; C. diff infections, better than the national benchmark.
- CMS’s patient safety composite for serious complications, PSI 90, Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2024: no different than the national value.
- Deaths within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2022 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 12.4%, heart failure 12.1%, pneumonia 19.2%, COPD 8%, stroke 12.6%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- Readmissions within 30 days, as CMS gives them (Jul 1, 2023 to Jun 30, 2025): heart attack 14%, heart failure 22.5%, pneumonia 17.8%, COPD 20.1%, hip or knee replacement 6.3%. CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for them in this release.
- After outpatient care, compared by CMS: unplanned hospital visits after a colonoscopy, no different than the national rate; hospital admissions after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; emergency visits after outpatient chemotherapy, no different than the national rate; unplanned hospital visits after outpatient surgery, no different than expected.
- Emergency department patients spent a median of 192 minutes there before leaving (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025), and 1% left before being seen.
- 80% of patients with severe sepsis or septic shock got the care CMS measures, SEP-1 (Oct 1, 2024 to Sep 30, 2025).
- Medicare’s spending per patient here is 1 times the national median (Jan 1, 2024 to Dec 31, 2024).
CMS, Hospital General Information, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital and Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Complications and Deaths - Hospital and Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital. Released Sep 30, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Measure | Rating |
|---|---|
| Overall ratingCMS’s overall hospital quality star rating, 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
| Patient survey ratingCMS star rating from its survey of the hospital’s patients (HCAHPS), 1 to 5 | 3 of 5 |
Is it certified, and in good standing?
- Medicare-certified acute care hospital since Jul 1, 1966.
- Ownership: voluntary non-profit - private.
- It is accredited by The Joint Commission, whose surveys stand in for the state’s routine inspections.
- Cited at For hospices, home health agencies, hospitals and dialysis facilities, CMS writes deficiencies at two levels. Standard is the usual one; condition-level is the more serious, when a problem is serious enough that the provider doesn’t meet a whole condition of taking part in Medicare. Source: CMS, State Operations Manual. in the last three years: it didn’t meet a whole condition of Medicare’s rules for hospitals.
- Voluntary non-profit - Private.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
Has it been penalized?
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals.
- Not among the hospitals whose Medicare payments CMS cut under the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program for fiscal year 2026.
- 3 deficiencies cited in the last three years came from inspections that included a complaint investigation.
CMS, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated yearly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
CMS, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies. Released Oct 20, 2026. Updated monthly.
What do patients say about their care?
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In CMS’s patient survey, patients rate how well its nurses communicated 3 of 5.
- 95% of its health care workers got a flu shot (Oct 1, 2024 to Mar 31, 2025).
CMS, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital and Timely and Effective Care - Hospital. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
Who owns it?
- Mountain States Health Alliance owns 100% directly since Nov 10, 2021.
- 12 owners or officers are people: Shane Hilton (corporate officer, 0%); Shane Hilton (corporate director, 0%); Gregory Wilgocki (corporate director, 0%); Gregory Wilgocki (managing employee (on the payroll), 0%); Marvin Eichorn (corporate officer, 0%); Marvin Eichorn (corporate director, 0%); Buford Deaton (corporate officer, 0%); Buford Deaton (corporate director, 0%); Alan Levine (corporate officer, 0%); Alan Levine (corporate director, 0%); Julie Bennett (corporate officer, 0%); Julie Bennett (corporate director, 0%).
- CMS’s Provider of Services file records 4 changes of ownership.
- No private-equity firm among the owners CMS lists.
- No real-estate investment trust among the owners CMS lists.
CMS, Hospital All Owners and Hospital Enrollments. Released Sep 29, 2026. Updated monthly.
CMS, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities. Released Oct 14, 2026. Updated quarterly.
| Organisation | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballad Health | Owns 5% or more through other companies | 100% | Feb 1, 2018 |
| Mountain States Health Alliance | Owns 5% or more directly | 100% | Nov 10, 2021 |
How does it compare nearby?
- No other hospital CMS lists is in Washington County.
CMS, Hospital General Information. Released Aug 13, 2026. Updated quarterly.
What the record doesn’t say
- CMS doesn’t publish fines or other penalties for hospitals, so none are shown. The one payment cut CMS publishes for each hospital, under its Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program, is shown where it applies.
- Only complaints that led to a citation appear; complaints that didn’t aren’t published.
- Most hospitals are accredited by a private organisation (The Joint Commission, DNV and others) whose routine inspections stand in for the state’s; those reports aren’t public, and QCOR holds only the state’s surveys: no inspection on record here doesn’t mean none took place.
- QCOR says its hospital inspection data are complete only through September 17, 2026, while it moves to a new system.
- CMS doesn’t publish staffing levels for hospitals.
- In its September 2026 release CMS gives no comparison with the national rate for death and readmission rates, though it gives the rates.
Sources
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital General Information (xubh-q36u).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Patient survey (HCAHPS) - Hospital.
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Healthcare Associated Infections - Hospital (77hc-ibv8).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Complications and Deaths - Hospital (ynj2-r877).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Unplanned Hospital Visits - Hospital (632h-zaca).
Released Sep 30, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Timely and Effective Care - Hospital (yv7e-xc69).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary - Hospital (rrqw-56er).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program (yq43-i98g).
Released Aug 13, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated yearly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Provider of Services File - Hospital & Non-Hospital Facilities (Hospital_and_other.DATA.Q3_2026.csv).
Released Oct 14, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated quarterly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, QCOR Hospital 2567 statements of deficiencies (Hospital_2567s_2010_to_2026YTD.xlsx).
Released Oct 20, 2026 and checked Oct 27, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital All Owners (Hospital_All_Owners_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
-
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Hospital Enrollments (Hospital_Enrollments_2026.09.29.csv).
Released Sep 29, 2026 and checked Nov 5, 2026. Updated monthly. Public domain (U.S. Government work).
If you believe something here is wrong, a correction starts with the agency whose record this copies: CMS. CMS’s own record is on Care Compare. If Hearth Record copied something wrongly, it will fix it and log the correction publicly, with its date: how corrections work.
This copy of the record was made on Nov 5, 2026.
From the hospital
The public record above comes first. Anything the hospital adds will appear here, below it, and say who wrote it.
Replies
None. Replies aren’t open yet. When they open, the hospital will be able to answer any finding for free, and the reply will show beside that finding, unedited and dated.
Paid listing
None. Paid listings aren’t open yet. When they open, anything paid for will say “Paid by the hospital”, and paying will never change a finding, a rating or the order of results.